Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Admaston-Bromley's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Admaston-Bromley's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 28 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Admaston-Bromley had $867K saved at the end of 2025, up from $643K in 2019. That is 22% of one year's spending. Only 1 of 28 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$60,452.50"Growth / (In Year Adj.)" that brings the 2026 levy increase to 0.00%
The levy is the part of the budget that property taxes must pay. The 2026 budget booklet says the Township needs $3,733,333, up $60,453 from 2025, and then subtracts an "in year adjustment" of the same amount to reach "0.00%" levy increase. The booklet also shows the costs rising by $563,824.75 (15.10 percent of the levy), and says new debt of $705,000 and a transfer from reserves of $534,359.16 cover most of that. The adjustment of $60,452.50 is exactly the gap left once those are counted: $563,824.75 less $503,372.25 (worked out by us). The booklet's slides do not say what it is.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$3,000,000fire hall expansion loan shown for 2030 in the "Future Consideration Analysis"
Ontario gives each municipality a yearly limit on how much of its income can go to loan payments. The Township's 2026 budget booklet has two tables on this. The first, built on loans it has taken or plans to take for 2026, leaves room under the limit in every year to 2036 (for example $194,845.91 in 2030). The second, called "Future Consideration Analysis", adds later loans for public works and fire vehicles and a $3,000,000 fire hall expansion loan in 2030. It shows the room under the limit going below zero in 2030, at (43,243.23), and to (295,639.14) in 2031, shaded red.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$102,501.06estimated working fund at the end of 2026, against a target limit of $500,000
A reserve is money a council sets aside for a purpose. The working fund is the general-purpose one, kept for cash needs and surprises. The 2026 budget booklet estimates it at $210,993.27 at the end of 2025, takes out $126,852.21 in 2026 and adds $18,360, leaving $102,501.06. The booklet's own target for it is $500,000. Every other reserve is also far under its target: the roads reserve is planned to reach $185,171.96 against a target of $3,600,000. The audited statements show total reserves rose in 2025, from $598,303 to $866,802.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$1,075,329cash at the end of 2025, against $1,223,480 of reserves and restricted funds (worked out by us)
At the end of 2025 the Township had $1,075,329 in cash, down from $1,354,610. It also reports reserves of $866,802, restricted grant money of $336,828 (grants it must spend on set projects) and general deferred revenue of $19,850. Together those come to $1,223,480, which is $148,151 more than its cash (worked out by us). It also owed $526,834 to suppliers. Money owed to the Township, mostly taxes and bills, was $771,477 (worked out by us: $373,381 plus $398,096).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Admaston-Bromley spent $424K on running the town office in 2019 and $819K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 4 of 28 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$1,346,313amortization in 2025 that the budget column leaves out
Side by side, the audited statements show the Township spending $1,135,788 more than its 2025 budget (worked out by us). Most of that is one accounting item. Amortization is the yearly cost of roads, buildings and vehicles wearing out. The budget column has nothing in it for amortization, and the actual column has $1,346,313. Without it, actual spending was $3,915,389 (the segmented schedule prints this total), which is $210,525 below the budget (worked out by us). The same is true of roads: transportation spending reads $2,804,199 against a budget of $1,647,332, but $1,244,390 of the actual is amortization. The planned surplus of $1,438,837 and the actual $415,084 are not on the same footing either.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$156,000building cost not yet financed at the end of 2025, with a loan arranged after year end
The accumulated surplus note shows "Unfinanced building" of (156,000), a negative amount, at the end of 2025. A note says that after year end the Township got a loan of $156,000 from Infrastructure Ontario "to finance the building", due in 2041, paid in half-yearly instalments of $5,200 plus interest at 4.21 percent. The statements do not say which building. The 2026 budget booklet's debt table has a loan of 156,000 for the "Stone Rd Sand/Salt Shed", with a bylaw number not yet filled in ("2026-XX"). Buildings were the second-largest purchase of 2025: $508,564.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$139,602user charges in 2025, against a budget of $70,124
User charges are fees paid by people who use a Township service. The 2025 budget expected $70,124. The statements show $139,602, almost exactly double, and close to the $133,596 of 2024. The line "Fees, service charges, donations and miscellaneous" is also well above its budget: $124,126 against $65,296. Total revenue came in $112,035 above budget (worked out by us). Spending before amortization came in under its budget too (see the first question about amortization).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Admaston-Bromley had $867K saved at the end of 2025, up from $643K in 2019. That is 22% of one year's spending. Only 1 of 28 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Admaston-Bromley have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$1.0M
$867K
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$643K
2020
$792K
2021
$819K
2022
$878K
2023
$810K
2024
$598K
2025
$867K
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$60,452.50"Growth / (In Year Adj.)" that brings the 2026 levy increase to 0.00%
The levy is the part of the budget that property taxes must pay. The 2026 budget booklet says the Township needs $3,733,333, up $60,453 from 2025, and then subtracts an "in year adjustment" of the same amount to reach "0.00%" levy increase. The booklet also shows the costs rising by $563,824.75 (15.10 percent of the levy), and says new debt of $705,000 and a transfer from reserves of $534,359.16 cover most of that. The adjustment of $60,452.50 is exactly the gap left once those are counted: $563,824.75 less $503,372.25 (worked out by us). The booklet's slides do not say what it is.
Why it matters
The booklet shows how it reaches a tax increase of zero. But a levy held flat with borrowing and savings leaves a question for next year: do the same savings and the same adjustment exist again, or does the levy have to catch up?
It could be because…
The row is labelled "Growth", so it may be extra property tax income from new buildings and supplementary taxes, which does not raise anyone's rate.
Some of the reserve money was set aside for exactly this kind of use, which is what reserves are for.
The new debt is for vehicles, which councils often finance over their working life.
Questions you could ask
What is the "Growth / (In Year Adj.)" of $60,452.50: new assessment, supplementary taxes, or a one-time item?
How much of the 2026 transfer from reserves of $534,359.16 is a one-time use of savings, and what does the Township plan for the 2027 levy if it is not available again?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Budget comparison: "TOTAL MUNICIPAL LEVY REQUIREMENTS" 2025 3,672,881, 2026 3,733,333, change 60,453. Below it: "60,453 2026 Budget Increase", "(60,453) Plus in year adjustment", "(0) Amount req'd from taxation 2026", "0.00% Levy Increase".
2026 Budget Booklet - FINAL (February 19, 2026) · Slide 15, Budget Comparison, PDF page 15 (read from the rendered slide, twice; the 2026 column adds up: operating 4,641,111 + capital 1,998,300 less revenue 2,906,078 = 3,733,333)
Contributing Factors, part 1: "Total Operating Expenditures" 320,398.75 (8.58%); "Capital Expenditures" 243,426.00 (6.52%); "Sub-Total" 563,824.75 (15.10%). "New Contributions to Reserves" 67,165.00 (1.80%).
Contributing Factors, part 2: "Debt" 705,000.00 (18.88%), comment "new debt for new Tandem & Fire Truck". "Transfers f/ Reserves" (534,359.16) (-14.31%). "Total Other Revenue Sources" 503,372.25 (13.48%). "Less: Growth /(In Year Adj.)" 60,452.50 (1.62%). "Total Amount To Raise through Tax Levy" "-" (0.00%).
$3,000,000fire hall expansion loan shown for 2030 in the "Future Consideration Analysis"
Ontario gives each municipality a yearly limit on how much of its income can go to loan payments. The Township's 2026 budget booklet has two tables on this. The first, built on loans it has taken or plans to take for 2026, leaves room under the limit in every year to 2036 (for example $194,845.91 in 2030). The second, called "Future Consideration Analysis", adds later loans for public works and fire vehicles and a $3,000,000 fire hall expansion loan in 2030. It shows the room under the limit going below zero in 2030, at (43,243.23), and to (295,639.14) in 2031, shaded red.
Why it matters
A township cannot borrow past the limit. If the fire hall and the vehicles are all needed, something has to give: grants, saved reserves, a different schedule or a request to the Province. Residents who vote this fall are choosing a council that will make those decisions. The booklet shows the problem, but not how Council plans to meet it.
It could be because…
The second table is labelled a "future consideration", not a plan. Nothing in it has been approved.
The limit is worked out again each year from the Township's income, which may be higher by 2030. The booklet already uses an updated limit of $576,675, against $438,368 from the Province's 2025 calculation.
Grants, reserves or a longer or shorter loan could cover part of the cost.
The Township's statements say its debt payments are within the limit today.
Questions you could ask
Has Council decided how it will pay for the fire hall expansion, and does the plan stay under the debt limit?
Does Council plan to buy the later vehicles on loans, or from reserves and grants?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
10-year Debt Future Consideration: "Est. Payment - Fire Hall Expansion 2030 - 30 yr" loan amount 3,000,000, payment 236,543.07 in 2031. "Estimated Future Debt Repayments" 2030 619,918.23, 2031 872,314.14. "ESTIMATED Debt Repayment Limit Remaining based on updated ARL" 2029 82,306.86, 2030 (43,243.23), 2031 (295,639.14), 2032 (300,185.49).
2026 Budget Booklet - FINAL (February 19, 2026) · Slide 25, 10-year Debt Future Consideration, PDF page 25 (read from the rendered slide, twice; 2030 column: 381,829.09 plus the six 2030 loan payments listed gives 619,918.23, and 194,845.91 less the 238,089.14 added is (43,243.23))
Note 5: "The annual principal and interest payments required to service these liabilities are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing."
$102,501.06estimated working fund at the end of 2026, against a target limit of $500,000
A reserve is money a council sets aside for a purpose. The working fund is the general-purpose one, kept for cash needs and surprises. The 2026 budget booklet estimates it at $210,993.27 at the end of 2025, takes out $126,852.21 in 2026 and adds $18,360, leaving $102,501.06. The booklet's own target for it is $500,000. Every other reserve is also far under its target: the roads reserve is planned to reach $185,171.96 against a target of $3,600,000. The audited statements show total reserves rose in 2025, from $598,303 to $866,802.
Why it matters
A working fund is what stands between a bad winter or a late grant and a tax increase. The Township keeps a bank line of $300,000, which is unused, but it costs interest if it is drawn. Residents may want to know what a safe level is, and how the Township plans to get there.
It could be because…
The column is headed "Target Limits", which may be a long-term goal, not a minimum.
The working fund may be topped up from future surpluses, and the 2025 balance is itself an estimate.
A fund of this kind is meant to be used when it is needed.
Questions you could ask
What is the working fund for, and what balance does Council think is the minimum?
Does the plan to draw $126,852.21 in 2026 include a plan to rebuild it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Estimated Discretionary Reserve Balances 2026: "Working Fund" estimated balance as of 12/31/2025 210,993.27; additions 18,360.00; withdrawals (126,852.21); estimated balance as of 12/31/2026 102,501.06; target limit 500,000.00. "Reserve - Paved / Gravel Roads" 155,171.96 to 185,171.96, target limit 3,600,000.00. "TOTAL DISCRETIONARY RESERVES" 869,955.83 to 905,268.62, target limits 8,149,667.00.
2026 Budget Booklet - FINAL (February 19, 2026) · Slide 39, Estimated Discretionary Reserve Balances 2026, PDF page 39 (read from the rendered slide, twice; 869,955.83 + 218,165.00 - 182,852.21 = 905,268.62)
Note 8, Accumulated surplus: "Internally restricted reserves" 866,802 (2024 598,303). "Unrestricted surplus" General 413,042 (2024 341,148). Note 9: the operating line of credit "has a limit of $300,000" and "a balance of $NIL" at year end.
$1,075,329cash at the end of 2025, against $1,223,480 of reserves and restricted funds (worked out by us)
At the end of 2025 the Township had $1,075,329 in cash, down from $1,354,610. It also reports reserves of $866,802, restricted grant money of $336,828 (grants it must spend on set projects) and general deferred revenue of $19,850. Together those come to $1,223,480, which is $148,151 more than its cash (worked out by us). It also owed $526,834 to suppliers. Money owed to the Township, mostly taxes and bills, was $771,477 (worked out by us: $373,381 plus $398,096).
Why it matters
A reserve is a promise to set money aside. If the cash is not there, the promise is made on paper only, and the Township has to borrow or collect what it is owed before it can spend a reserve. Residents want to know the savings exist as money.
It could be because…
Reserves are an earmark, not a separate bank account, and many councils hold them partly as money owed to them. The Township is owed $771,477.
The Township has a $300,000 line of credit that is unused.
Cash moves a lot through the year. December 31 is the day after most tax instalments are spent or before they come in.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $866,802 in reserves is held as cash or investments, and how much is money owed to the Township?
Does the Township have a policy on keeping reserve money in a separate account?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Admaston-Bromley spent $424K on running the town office in 2019 and $819K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 4 of 28 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 93% in 6 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+93%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+23%
+1%
2021
+32%
+4%
2022
+62%
+11%
2023
+72%
+16%
2024
+81%
+18%
2025
+93%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $394K a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $334K to $680K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $424K, 2020 $520K, 2021 $559K, 2022 $689K, 2023 $731K, 2024 $769K, 2025 $819K.
$1,346,313amortization in 2025 that the budget column leaves out
Side by side, the audited statements show the Township spending $1,135,788 more than its 2025 budget (worked out by us). Most of that is one accounting item. Amortization is the yearly cost of roads, buildings and vehicles wearing out. The budget column has nothing in it for amortization, and the actual column has $1,346,313. Without it, actual spending was $3,915,389 (the segmented schedule prints this total), which is $210,525 below the budget (worked out by us). The same is true of roads: transportation spending reads $2,804,199 against a budget of $1,647,332, but $1,244,390 of the actual is amortization. The planned surplus of $1,438,837 and the actual $415,084 are not on the same footing either.
Why it matters
A reader who compares the two columns will think the Township overspent its roads budget by 70 percent. The documents show it did not, but only to a reader who finds the note. A budget column that leaves out a cost the statements include invites the wrong question.
It could be because…
Councils in Ontario usually set the tax levy on a cash basis, which does not include amortization, and the statements then show the budget the same way. The statements' own budget column is described as the operating and capital budgets Council approved, so it follows the budget Council voted on.
Capital spending was close to plan: the Township bought $1,476,834 of capital assets against a budgeted $1,484,500.
Questions you could ask
Would Council consider printing the budget with amortization included, or adding a note beside the statement that says why it is left out?
Does the Township publish a budget-against-actual report during the year on the same basis as the budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: expenses, budget 2025 4,125,914, actual 2025 5,261,702 (2024 4,994,594). "Transportation services" budget 1,647,332, actual 2,804,199 (2024 2,724,780). "Excess of revenue over expenses" budget 1,438,837, actual 415,084 (2024 (274,410)). The columns add up: 838,811 + 1,124,707 + 2,804,199 + 334,079 + 102,285 + 57,621 = 5,261,702.
Schedule 2, segmented disclosure: "Transportation Services" expenses before amortization 1,559,808 and "Amortization expense" 1,244,390. Total expenses before amortization 3,915,389; total amortization 1,346,313; net revenue 415,084.
$156,000building cost not yet financed at the end of 2025, with a loan arranged after year end
The accumulated surplus note shows "Unfinanced building" of (156,000), a negative amount, at the end of 2025. A note says that after year end the Township got a loan of $156,000 from Infrastructure Ontario "to finance the building", due in 2041, paid in half-yearly instalments of $5,200 plus interest at 4.21 percent. The statements do not say which building. The 2026 budget booklet's debt table has a loan of 156,000 for the "Stone Rd Sand/Salt Shed", with a bylaw number not yet filled in ("2026-XX"). Buildings were the second-largest purchase of 2025: $508,564.
Why it matters
Spending first and borrowing after is common, and the statements show it plainly. The open point is only what was bought, how it was paid for in the meantime, and when Council approved the loan.
It could be because…
A loan from Infrastructure Ontario may be arranged only after a project is built, in which case the Township would have paid from cash or reserves in the meantime.
The "building" in the statement may be the Stone Road shed in the booklet. The statements do not say, and we did not confirm it.
Questions you could ask
Which building is the "unfinanced building", and how was it paid for before the loan?
When did Council approve the Infrastructure Ontario loan, and under what bylaw?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8: "Unfinanced building" (156,000) (2024 "-"). "Subsequent to year end, the Township obtained a debenture from Infrastructure Ontario for $156,000 to finance the building. This debenture is due in 2041 and payable in semi-annual installments of $5,200 plus interest at 4.21% per annum."
Debt table: "EST PW - 15 Year Loan IO (Stone Rd Sand/Salt Shed By-law# 2026-XX)" loan amount 156,000, with payments of 8,348.51 in 2026 and 16,432.61 in 2027.
$139,602user charges in 2025, against a budget of $70,124
User charges are fees paid by people who use a Township service. The 2025 budget expected $70,124. The statements show $139,602, almost exactly double, and close to the $133,596 of 2024. The line "Fees, service charges, donations and miscellaneous" is also well above its budget: $124,126 against $65,296. Total revenue came in $112,035 above budget (worked out by us). Spending before amortization came in under its budget too (see the first question about amortization).
Why it matters
A budget that is lower than last year's actual for the same line is easy to beat. It can make the year look better than planned. Residents may want the budget to say what it expects.
It could be because…
The Township may have expected fees to fall, for example if a fee was due to change or a service was due to end.
Fees may depend on things the Township does not control, such as how many permits are issued in a year.
Questions you could ask
What explains user charges of $139,602 against a budget of $70,124?
Did the 2026 budget set user charges using the 2025 actual?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, revenue: "User charges" budget 70,124, actual 2025 139,602 (2024 133,596). "Fees, service charges, donations and miscellaneous" budget 65,296, actual 124,126 (2024 83,860). "Penalties and interest" budget 27,300, actual 45,926. Total revenue budget 5,564,751, actual 5,676,786.
Admaston-Bromley spent about $433 per home on snow ploughing in 2025. The typical similar town spent $150. Only 2 of 28 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Admaston-Bromley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Snow ploughing per home: Admaston-Bromley $433; typical similar town $150; ranked 3rd highest of 29.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy