Council BooksAshfield-Colborne-WawanoshOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 8 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 73 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 53% in 5 years?

+53%roads and snow, 2019 to 2024

Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh spent $1.9M on roads and snow in 2019 and $2.9M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 7 of 73 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingRising costs

Why did snowplowing cost nearly twice as much in 2025 as in 2024?

$767,468spent on snowplowing in 2025, against $394,722 in 2024 and a 2025 budget of $616,500

The Township's budget books show snowplowing spending of $394,722 in 2024 and $767,468 in 2025. The 2025 figure was $150,968 over what council budgeted for that year, and the 2026 budget is $760,000, so the higher level has been built into the new budget. Sanding and salting rose the same way, from $118,658 to $227,780. Most of the rise is in hired equipment and in wages. Both differences are worked out by us.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why are legal costs in roads administration and planning running above their old levels?

$67,709spent on planning legal fees in 2025, against a budget of $40,000

In the budget books, the Legal line under Roads Administration was $5,332 in 2024 and $36,654 in 2025, against a $25,000 budget. The 2026 budget raises it to $40,000. The Legal line under Development & Planning Administration was $8,027 in 2024 and $67,709 in 2025, against a $40,000 budget, and the 2026 budget is $50,000. We did not find a published explanation.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why does the 2026 budget need $670,889 from the general surplus reserve?

$670,889to be taken from the general surplus reserve to balance the 2026 budget

A reserve is money set aside in earlier years. The 2026 budget covers its gap after a 5% levy increase by taking $670,889 from the general surplus reserve. The 2025 budget planned a $463,500 draw from the same reserve, but the 2026 budget book shows nothing was taken in 2025. Across the whole 2026 budget, $3,613,389 (22%) of the money comes from transfers out of reserves.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingSpending level

What will the Port Albert servicing project cost the Township in the end?

$2,845,765shown as actual for Phase 1A, against a $2,690,000 budget

The roads capital budget carries Port Albert servicing work in three phases. Phase 1A (Wellington Street) was budgeted at $2,690,000 for 2025 and shows $2,845,765 actual, which is $155,765 more (worked out by us). Phase 1B was budgeted at $1,060,000 and shows $912,707. Phase 1C was budgeted at $1,480,000 and shows $883,652, with $283,428 and $416,572 more in 2026. The budget book does not give a total cost for the project or say how much each phase was expected to cost at the start.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingMoney health

How much of the Township's budget depends on the K2 Community Benefits Fund?

$750,700from the K2 Community Benefits Fund in the 2026 general revenues

The Township's general revenues include $750,700 a year from the K2 Community Benefits Fund in the 2026 budget. The fund is also named in the roads capital budget ($700,000 for Market and Sydenham, $217,500 more) and the 2026 changes list a $469,000 transfer from a K2 reserve fund. We could not read the K2 agreement, because the copy on the Township's site is a scanned image with no readable text, so we do not know how long the payments last.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

How will the $5,635,908 of unfunded capital projects at the end of 2024 be paid for?

$5,635,908of unfunded capital projects in process at the end of 2024, against $2,986,505 a year earlier

The 2024 audited statements show an "Unfunded" amount for capital projects in process of $5,635,908, up from $2,986,505 a year earlier. It is a negative part of the accumulated surplus: the Township had spent that much on projects that were not yet matched by money in hand. In the same year, cash that was free to spend (unrestricted) fell from $5,350,919 to $3,848,904.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowOpenness

Why does the 2024 statement of operations show transportation spending 36% over budget?

$4,271,988actual transportation spending in 2024, against a budget column figure of $3,147,026

In the audited 2024 statement of operations, transportation services were budgeted at $3,147,026 and came in at $4,271,988. The same statement, and the statement of changes in net financial assets, show no budget at all for amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of roads, buildings and equipment), while actual amortization was $1,743,097. So most of the gap looks like a difference in how the budget column is built rather than overspending, but the statements do not say so. The 36% is worked out by us.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 53% in 5 years?

+53%roads and snow, 2019 to 2024

Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh spent $1.9M on roads and snow in 2019 and $2.9M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 7 of 73 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 53% in 5 years?
+53%
Show as a table
YearRoads and snowPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−1%+1%
2021+6%+4%
2022+36%+11%
2023+34%+16%
2024+53%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $1.0M a year pay for?
  2. Why did gravel roads go from $1.0M to $1.7M?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Roads and snow: 2019 $1.9M, 2020 $1.9M, 2021 $2.0M, 2022 $2.6M, 2023 $2.6M, 2024 $2.9M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Gravel roads, from $1.0M to $1.7M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 28%. Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh ranks 8th of 74.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2024, 73 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did snowplowing cost nearly twice as much in 2025 as in 2024?

$767,468spent on snowplowing in 2025, against $394,722 in 2024 and a 2025 budget of $616,500

The Township's budget books show snowplowing spending of $394,722 in 2024 and $767,468 in 2025. The 2025 figure was $150,968 over what council budgeted for that year, and the 2026 budget is $760,000, so the higher level has been built into the new budget. Sanding and salting rose the same way, from $118,658 to $227,780. Most of the rise is in hired equipment and in wages. Both differences are worked out by us.

Why it matters

Public works is the largest department in the Township budget. A cost that doubles in a year and is then budgeted at that new level is paying for something lasting, or it is a bad winter that has been treated as normal.

It could be because…

  • A snowier winter in 2025 than in 2024, with more plow runs and more hired equipment.
  • The 2024 winter was unusually mild, so 2024 is the odd year rather than 2025.
  • More roads or more passes per storm were added, or contract rates went up.
  • Costs moved between lines, for example from general road work into winter control.

Questions you could ask

  1. What caused snowplowing to cost $767,468 in 2025 when 2024 cost $394,722: more storms, more roads, or higher rates?
  2. Why is the 2026 budget set at $760,000 instead of an average of several winters?
  3. How much of the 2025 hired-equipment cost went to outside contractors and how were they chosen?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The 2025 budget book shows Snowplowing: Total Expense of 497,000 budgeted for 2024, 394,722 actual for 2024, and 616,500 budgeted for 2025. Sanding & Salting: Total Expense 135,300 budgeted for 2024, 118,658 actual for 2024, and 159,000 budgeted for 2025.

    2025 Township Budget · page 12, Snowplowing and Sanding & Salting

  2. The 2026 budget book shows Snowplowing: Total Expense of 616,500 budgeted for 2025, 767,468 actual for 2025, and 760,000 budgeted for 2026. The Equipment Rentals line is 270,000 budgeted, 403,301 actual and 400,000 for 2026. Sanding & Salting: Total Expense 159,000 budgeted, 227,780 actual, 243,600 for 2026.

    2026 Township Budget · page 13, Snowplowing and Sanding & Salting

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why does the 2026 budget need $670,889 from the general surplus reserve?

$670,889to be taken from the general surplus reserve to balance the 2026 budget

A reserve is money set aside in earlier years. The 2026 budget covers its gap after a 5% levy increase by taking $670,889 from the general surplus reserve. The 2025 budget planned a $463,500 draw from the same reserve, but the 2026 budget book shows nothing was taken in 2025. Across the whole 2026 budget, $3,613,389 (22%) of the money comes from transfers out of reserves.

Why it matters

Paying yearly costs from savings works for a year or two, but it cannot repeat forever. A bigger draw each year means a bigger tax increase later unless costs fall or other money arrives.

It could be because…

  • A deliberate choice by council to smooth the tax rate rather than raise it more in one year.
  • The Township ended 2025 with a surplus, so it may again spend less than budgeted and not need the draw.
  • Much of the $3,613,389 is reserve money set aside for specific capital projects, which is what reserves are for.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the balance of the general surplus reserve now, and how many years of draws like $670,889 can it support?
  2. Why was nothing taken from the reserve in 2025, and is the 2026 draw likely to be needed?
  3. What is the plan to bring yearly costs and yearly revenue back into balance without the draw?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The 2026 budget highlights say: "Council directed that the remaining budget shortfall after applying a 5% levy increase be funded by transfer of $670,889 from the general surplus reserve." They also say council agreed to a 3.8% tax rate increase over the 2025 tax rate, raising an additional $345,667 for Township purposes.

    2026 Budget Highlights (March 2026) · page 3, Changes to the 2026 Draft Budget

  2. The 2026 budget highlights list where 2026 revenue comes from, including Transfers from Reserves $3,613,389 and Tax Revenue $7,301,336, and show Transfer from Reserve at 22% of revenue.

    2026 Budget Highlights (March 2026) · page 5, Budget Summary, 2026 Budget - Revenue

  3. The 2026 budget book, General Revenues, shows Transfer from General Surplus Reserve: (463,500) budgeted for 2025, a dash (nothing) for 2025 actual, and (670,889) budgeted for 2026. The book's last page shows Total (Surplus)/Deficit for 2025 actual of (148,149).

    2026 Township Budget · page 1, General Revenues; page 41, Total (Surplus)/Deficit

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

What will the Port Albert servicing project cost the Township in the end?

$2,845,765shown as actual for Phase 1A, against a $2,690,000 budget

The roads capital budget carries Port Albert servicing work in three phases. Phase 1A (Wellington Street) was budgeted at $2,690,000 for 2025 and shows $2,845,765 actual, which is $155,765 more (worked out by us). Phase 1B was budgeted at $1,060,000 and shows $912,707. Phase 1C was budgeted at $1,480,000 and shows $883,652, with $283,428 and $416,572 more in 2026. The budget book does not give a total cost for the project or say how much each phase was expected to cost at the start.

Why it matters

This is the largest single capital project in the budget book. Residents are asked to pay part of it through local improvement charges, so they have a reason to know the total and who pays what.

It could be because…

  • Phase 1A carried costs from earlier years, so its budget and actual do not cover the same period.
  • Phase 1C work moved into 2026, which is why its actual is below budget and 2026 shows the rest.
  • Part of the cost is paid by residents through local improvement charges and by the K2 Community Benefits Fund, so the Township's own share is smaller than the headline cost.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the total expected cost of all phases of Port Albert servicing, and how does it compare with the first estimate?
  2. How much will be paid by residents, by the K2 Community Benefits Fund, by grants and by the Township's own reserves?
  3. Why did Phase 1A come in at $2,845,765 against a $2,690,000 budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The 2026 budget book, Roads Capital expenses under Port Albert Servicing, shows: Phase 1A - Wellington Street, Victoria St Drain (2023-2024) 2,690,000 budgeted for 2025 and 2,845,765 actual; Phase 1B - Ashfield Street (2024-2025) 1,060,000 and 912,707; Phase 1C - Market and Sydenham Street Construction - Carryforward 2025 1,480,000 and 883,652, then 283,428 for 2026; and Phase 1C (ACW Share of 2025 Work) 416,572 for 2026.

    2026 Township Budget · page 19, Roads Capital, Port Albert Servicing

  2. The same book's Roads Capital revenue shows: PHASE 1C - Est. Resident Share of Costs (By-Law 46-2025) (481,000) budgeted and (467,080) actual for 2025; and K2 Community Benefits Fund - Wellington Street (1,652,500) budgeted and (1,652,500) actual for 2025.

    2026 Township Budget · page 18, Roads Capital revenue

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

How much of the Township's budget depends on the K2 Community Benefits Fund?

$750,700from the K2 Community Benefits Fund in the 2026 general revenues

The Township's general revenues include $750,700 a year from the K2 Community Benefits Fund in the 2026 budget. The fund is also named in the roads capital budget ($700,000 for Market and Sydenham, $217,500 more) and the 2026 changes list a $469,000 transfer from a K2 reserve fund. We could not read the K2 agreement, because the copy on the Township's site is a scanned image with no readable text, so we do not know how long the payments last.

Why it matters

Money that arrives each year pays for ordinary services and for big projects. If it ended or fell, the Township would have to raise taxes, cut services or borrow to replace it.

It could be because…

  • The payments are fixed by a long agreement and are reliable for many years.
  • The Township plans for K2 money to cover specific projects only and treats the general revenue amount as a known, steady payment.
  • The reserve transfer is money already received in earlier years and set aside.

Questions you could ask

  1. For how many more years will the K2 Community Benefits Fund pay the Township, and are the amounts fixed?
  2. What share of the total 2026 budget is paid for by K2 money, counting both yearly payments and reserve transfers?
  3. What would the Township do if the payments stopped or fell?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The 2026 budget book, General Revenues, shows K2 Community Benefits Fund: (746,850) budgeted for 2025, (746,849) actual for 2025, and (750,700) budgeted for 2026.

    2026 Township Budget · page 1, General Revenues

  2. The 2026 budget book, Roads Capital revenue, shows K2 Community Benefits Fund - Market and Sydenham (700,000) for 2026, and K2 Community Benefits Fund (217,500) for 2026.

    2026 Township Budget · page 18, Roads Capital revenue

  3. The 2026 budget highlights list changes made in budget talks, including "Transfer from K2 Community Benefits Reserve Fund - $469,000".

    2026 Budget Highlights (March 2026) · page 3, Changes to the 2026 Draft Budget

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

How will the $5,635,908 of unfunded capital projects at the end of 2024 be paid for?

$5,635,908of unfunded capital projects in process at the end of 2024, against $2,986,505 a year earlier

The 2024 audited statements show an "Unfunded" amount for capital projects in process of $5,635,908, up from $2,986,505 a year earlier. It is a negative part of the accumulated surplus: the Township had spent that much on projects that were not yet matched by money in hand. In the same year, cash that was free to spend (unrestricted) fell from $5,350,919 to $3,848,904.

Why it matters

Spending first and being paid back later is normal when a grant, a loan or a resident charge has been promised, but if the money does not arrive the Township would have to cover the gap itself.

It could be because…

  • The projects (for example Port Albert servicing) are waiting for resident local improvement charges, K2 payments or grants that have been committed.
  • Water expansion work was paid up front and will be repaid from developer contributions as new connections are made.
  • A timing difference that closes once the work is finished and the funding arrives.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which projects make up the $5,635,908 and what funding is expected for each?
  2. How much of it has been paid back since the end of 2024?
  3. If any expected funding does not arrive, which reserve would cover it?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 11, Schedule of accumulated surplus, shows: Unfunded - Capital projects in process (5,635,908) for 2024 and (2,986,505) for 2023; Asset retirement obligations (1,849,515) and (1,852,055); Reserves 13,123,315 and 10,801,045.

    Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · page 13, Note 11 Schedule of accumulated surplus

  2. Note 4, Cash, shows Unrestricted 3,848,904 for 2024 and 5,350,919 for 2023, and Restricted 4,570,535 and 3,229,996.

    Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · page 12, Note 4 Cash

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why does the 2024 statement of operations show transportation spending 36% over budget?

$4,271,988actual transportation spending in 2024, against a budget column figure of $3,147,026

In the audited 2024 statement of operations, transportation services were budgeted at $3,147,026 and came in at $4,271,988. The same statement, and the statement of changes in net financial assets, show no budget at all for amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of roads, buildings and equipment), while actual amortization was $1,743,097. So most of the gap looks like a difference in how the budget column is built rather than overspending, but the statements do not say so. The 36% is worked out by us.

Why it matters

The gap looks alarming and is probably not. Saying so in the statements would spare residents the worry.

It could be because…

  • The budget column leaves out amortization, which is a book entry and not cash, while the actual column includes it.
  • The statements follow the usual practice of showing the council budget adjusted to the accounting basis; Note 12 describes the adjustments.

Questions you could ask

  1. Could future statements add a line that explains the gap between the budget column and actual spending, such as amortization not budgeted?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The statement of operations shows Transportation services: 3,147,026 budget, 4,271,988 actual for 2024, 3,830,495 for 2023. Total expenses: 8,582,497 budget, 9,619,418 actual for 2024.

    Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · page 7, Consolidated Statement of Operations

  2. The statement of change in net financial assets shows Amortization of tangible capital assets: a dash (nothing) in the 2024 budget column, 1,743,097 in the 2024 actual column, and 1,606,391 for 2023.

    Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · page 6, Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets

↑ All questions