Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Bracebridge's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 14 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Bracebridge's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 67 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Bracebridge spent $5.3M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $11.1M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 1 of 67 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Bracebridge had $10.6M saved at the end of 2024, down from $14.8M in 2019. That is 37% of one year's spending. Only 2 of 67 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
$6,118,091in reserves at the end of 2025, down from $10,551,322 a year earlier
Reserves are savings that council sets aside for named purposes, such as replacing roads or buildings. The Town's 2025 audited statements list them in Note 12. Added up, they were $10,551,322 at the end of 2024 and $6,118,091 at the end of 2025, a fall of $4,433,231 (worked out by us). Three reserves went to nothing: recreation, parks and trails (from $664,893), library and other facilities (from $90,613) and cemeteries (from $26,361). Public works fell from $3,093,970 to $1,613,121. The 2025 budget planned to take $7,209,010 out of reserves and put $3,663,840 in. A Town release about the 2026 budget talks about "reducing our reliance on reserves".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$8,900,609net financial debt at the end of 2025, after having $8,049,368 net financial assets at the start of 2024
"Net financial debt" is what the Town owes minus the money and other financial assets it holds. At the start of 2024 the Town held $8,049,368 more than it owed. By the end of 2024 it was $9,476,911 in net debt, and at the end of 2025 it was $8,900,609. In 2024 the Town spent $29,280,382 in cash on buildings, roads and equipment (tangible capital assets). Its cash and temporary investments fell from $31,163,175 at the start of 2024 to $16,011,400 at the end of 2025. The statements record these assets at $165,760,858, so the spending bought something; the question is how the Town plans to pay back what it borrowed to do it.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$38,885,989of interest still to be paid on $52,197,139 of loans, as the Town's own table shows
The Town owed $52,197,139 on four loans from the District Municipality of Muskoka (called debentures: a loan paid back on a set schedule) at the end of 2025. Two run to 2052 and 2053 and carry 4.30% and 4.69% interest. The Town paid $2,330,290 interest in 2025. Its own table says $38,885,989 of interest is still to be paid over the life of the loans. Payments in 2026 are $3,731,941 ($1,458,295 of principal and $2,273,646 of interest). The Town also has a $5,000,000 bank line it had not used. The statements say the payments are within the provincial limit on how much of its income a town can commit to debt.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$10,000,000committed to the local share of two new hospitals by July 2037
Note 13 of the 2025 statements says the Town has committed to give up to $10,000,000 by July 2037 toward the local share of two new hospitals in Muskoka, in money, land or goods and services. A Town release on the 2026 budget says the plan includes continued contributions to reserves for this. The reserves note (Note 12) lists reserves by purpose and none is named for the hospitals. Total reserves were $6,118,091 at the end of 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$7.0 milliona year: the Town's own estimate of the gap between what it saves and what replacing its assets needs
Under provincial rules the Town keeps an asset management plan. The 2025 plan values the Town's roads, buildings, bridges, pipes and other assets at $420.4 million to replace. It says the Town needs $12.8 million a year to keep up with replacement, but about $5.8 million a year is available, so it is paying 45% of what is needed and is short about $7.0 million a year. The plan says closing the gap over 20 years would take a yearly tax increase of 1.4% on current property tax revenue of about $21.5 million. A Town release says the 2026 budget includes a 4.9% tax rate increase.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$1,807,098more spent on materials than budgeted in 2025 (worked out by us)
The 2025 audited statements compare actual spending with the budget. Materials cost $11,382,874 against a budget of $9,575,776, which is $1,807,098 more (worked out by us). Recreation and culture cost $15,049,777 against $13,473,901, which is $1,575,876 more (worked out by us). Amortization (the yearly share of what buildings and equipment cost, spread over their lives) was $7,341,549 against $6,500,000, and rose from $5,352,707 in 2024. Salaries came in under budget: $14,424,396 against $14,786,064. In total expenses were $37,776,492 against $35,685,050. The Town still ended the year with an annual surplus of $1,468,607 against a planned deficit of $1,856,420.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Bracebridge spent $5.1M on roads and snow in 2019 and $7.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 11 of 67 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$862,930owed by Theatre Muskoka, with $646,000 set aside against it
Two items in the 2025 statements are about how the Town holds its money. First, temporary investments were $9,099,740 at the end of 2025. During the year the Town sold its holdings in one investment program and put the money into 12 pooled funds run by Royal Trust Pooled Funds Group, all but one of them equity (stock) funds by name. The Town's own note says a 10% change in their market value would change the remeasurement gains and losses for 2025 by $909,974. Investment income was $2,556,281 against a budget of $918,000. Second, the Town is owed $862,930 by Theatre Muskoka for part of the cost of the theatre in the community recreation complex. There are no fixed repayment dates, no interest, and the Town has set aside $646,000 (up from $607,000) in case part of it is never repaid.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
In 2019, Bracebridge had $36.7M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$9.5M. About 0% of that change ($143K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 3 of 67 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Bracebridge spent $5.3M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $11.1M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 1 of 67 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 109% in 5 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%+150%
+109%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−18%
+1%
2021
−10%
+4%
2022
+19%
+11%
2023
+42%
+16%
2024
+109%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $5.8M a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $2.5M to $6.9M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Bracebridge had $10.6M saved at the end of 2024, down from $14.8M in 2019. That is 37% of one year's spending. Only 2 of 67 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Bracebridge have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$5.0M$10M$15M$20M$25M
$10.6M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$14.8M
2020
$14.7M
2021
$11.3M
2022
$16.9M
2023
$21M
2024
$10.6M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2024?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Bracebridge spent about $5,786 per home on long-term debt in 2024. The typical similar town spent $1,131. Only 1 of 67 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: Bracebridge $5,786; typical similar town $1,131; ranked 2nd highest of 68.
$6,118,091in reserves at the end of 2025, down from $10,551,322 a year earlier
Reserves are savings that council sets aside for named purposes, such as replacing roads or buildings. The Town's 2025 audited statements list them in Note 12. Added up, they were $10,551,322 at the end of 2024 and $6,118,091 at the end of 2025, a fall of $4,433,231 (worked out by us). Three reserves went to nothing: recreation, parks and trails (from $664,893), library and other facilities (from $90,613) and cemeteries (from $26,361). Public works fell from $3,093,970 to $1,613,121. The 2025 budget planned to take $7,209,010 out of reserves and put $3,663,840 in. A Town release about the 2026 budget talks about "reducing our reliance on reserves".
Why it matters
Reserves are what the Town can use for repairs and surprises without raising taxes or borrowing. When they run down, the next big cost has to come from taxes or loans. Residents will want to know whether the fall was planned, and what the reserves were spent on.
It could be because…
Council planned it. The 2025 budget took more out of reserves ($7,209,010) than it put in ($3,663,840), to pay for capital projects.
Reserves may have paid for part of a large building project, which is what they are for.
Amounts "self-financed from reserves" are shown as a minus ($425,655), so some of the shortfall may be shown as money owed back to reserves rather than gone.
A staff member quoted in the Town's release describes cutting back on reserves as a choice to strengthen finances, not a sign of trouble.
Questions you could ask
Which projects were paid for from the reserves that fell in 2025, and was each one in the approved budget?
What does the Town consider a safe level for its reserves, and when does it expect to reach it?
Why are the recreation, parks and trails and the library and other facilities reserves at nothing?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The Town's release on the 2026 budget quotes a staff member: "By reducing our reliance on reserves, maintaining strong contributions to future commitments like the new hospital, and making strategic capital investments, we are strengthening the Town's financial position."
$8,900,609net financial debt at the end of 2025, after having $8,049,368 net financial assets at the start of 2024
"Net financial debt" is what the Town owes minus the money and other financial assets it holds. At the start of 2024 the Town held $8,049,368 more than it owed. By the end of 2024 it was $9,476,911 in net debt, and at the end of 2025 it was $8,900,609. In 2024 the Town spent $29,280,382 in cash on buildings, roads and equipment (tangible capital assets). Its cash and temporary investments fell from $31,163,175 at the start of 2024 to $16,011,400 at the end of 2025. The statements record these assets at $165,760,858, so the spending bought something; the question is how the Town plans to pay back what it borrowed to do it.
Why it matters
Spending on buildings and roads builds things residents use for decades, and borrowing for them is normal. But net debt means future surpluses must first close the gap, and it limits what the Town can do in an emergency.
It could be because…
The Town built a very large asset. A Town release says the budget includes "the full operational integration of the Muskoka Lumber Community Centre, the largest municipal asset in the Town's history".
The Mayor is quoted saying the Town has made "a generational investment of nearly $100 million", so the move into net debt may have been planned.
In 2025 the Town had an annual surplus of $1,468,607 and the statements show net financial assets rising by $576,302, so the trend may already be turning.
Questions you could ask
What is the Town's plan, with years, to return to net financial assets?
How much of the $29,280,382 spent in 2024 went to the Muskoka Lumber Community Centre, and how was it paid for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Changes in Net Debt: "Increase (decrease) in net financial assets" 576,302 (2025) and (17,526,279) (2024). "(Net debt) net financial assets, beginning of year" 8,049,368 (2024 column). "Net financial debt, end of year" $ (8,900,609) (2025) and $ (9,476,911) (2024).
Statement of Cash Flows: "Cash used to acquire tangible capital assets" (8,050,258) in 2025 and (29,280,382) in 2024. "Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year" 18,304,978 (2025) and 31,163,175 (2024). "Cash and cash equivalents, end of year" $ 16,011,400 (2025) and $ 18,304,978 (2024).
The Town's release on the 2026 budget says it includes "the full operational integration of the Muskoka Lumber Community Centre, the largest municipal asset in the Town's history", and quotes the Mayor, Rick Maloney: "During this term of Council, the Town has made a generational investment of nearly $100 million".
$38,885,989of interest still to be paid on $52,197,139 of loans, as the Town's own table shows
The Town owed $52,197,139 on four loans from the District Municipality of Muskoka (called debentures: a loan paid back on a set schedule) at the end of 2025. Two run to 2052 and 2053 and carry 4.30% and 4.69% interest. The Town paid $2,330,290 interest in 2025. Its own table says $38,885,989 of interest is still to be paid over the life of the loans. Payments in 2026 are $3,731,941 ($1,458,295 of principal and $2,273,646 of interest). The Town also has a $5,000,000 bank line it had not used. The statements say the payments are within the provincial limit on how much of its income a town can commit to debt.
Why it matters
Interest is money that buys no road or building. A 30-year loan with interest above 4% costs much more than the amount borrowed. Residents pay through taxes, so they will want to know how much more the Town plans to borrow.
It could be because…
Long-lived buildings are normally paid for over the same decades they are used, so borrowing is a fair way to share the cost between today's and tomorrow's residents.
Interest on debt fell from $2,993,795 in 2024 to $2,330,290 in 2025, so the burden is shrinking, not growing, in the years we can see.
The Town says its payments are within the debt repayment limit set by Ontario Regulation 403/02.
The Town's loans come through the District Municipality of Muskoka, which may offer lower rates than the Town could get alone.
Questions you could ask
What new borrowing, if any, is planned for 2027 and later, and for what?
What would interest cost over the full life of any new loan, as it is shown for the existing ones?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 10, Long-Term Liabilities: total $52,197,139 (2024 $53,976,692), made of debentures from the District Municipality of Muskoka: "payable $739,292 semi-annually including interest at 4.30%, due June 2052" $23,249,294 and "payable $787,065 semi-annually including interest at 4.69%, due July 2053" $24,398,444.
Note 10 payment table: 2026 Gross $3,731,941, Interest $2,273,646, Principal $1,458,295. Totals: Gross $91,083,128, Interest $38,885,989, Principal $52,197,139. The note says the payments "are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by Ontario Regulation 403/02".
Note 8, Temporary Borrowings: an operating demand facility with Scotiabank of $5,000,000 at prime less 0.75%. The Town "had not drawn on this facility" at December 31, 2025 and 2024.
$10,000,000committed to the local share of two new hospitals by July 2037
Note 13 of the 2025 statements says the Town has committed to give up to $10,000,000 by July 2037 toward the local share of two new hospitals in Muskoka, in money, land or goods and services. A Town release on the 2026 budget says the plan includes continued contributions to reserves for this. The reserves note (Note 12) lists reserves by purpose and none is named for the hospitals. Total reserves were $6,118,091 at the end of 2025.
Why it matters
This is a promise of a large amount, and the statements do not show how much is already saved for it. Residents will want to know whether meeting it will mean higher taxes or more loans.
It could be because…
The commitment can be met with land or services, not only cash, so the full amount need not come out of reserves.
The money may be held in a reserve whose name does not say "hospital", such as "Other" ($1,094,654) or "Major infrastructure" ($708,653). The statements do not say.
There are about 11 years to go, so smaller yearly savings could meet the amount.
Questions you could ask
How much has been set aside so far for the hospital commitment, and in which reserve is it held?
What yearly amount does the Town plan to set aside to reach $10,000,000 by July 2037?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 13, Contingencies and Commitments: "The Municipality has made a commitment to directly contribute up to $10,000,000 by July 2037, consisting in combined value of funds, land or in-kind goods or services towards the local share cost of developing two new hospitals in Muskoka."
Note 12 lists these reserves: "Major infrastructure" $708,653, "Other" $1,094,654, "Tax rate stabilization" $287,906, total $6,118,091. None is named for the hospitals.
The Town's release lists as a 2026 budget highlight: "Continued contributions to reserves to help the Town meets its local share commitment towards the future construction of a new hospital".
$7.0 milliona year: the Town's own estimate of the gap between what it saves and what replacing its assets needs
Under provincial rules the Town keeps an asset management plan. The 2025 plan values the Town's roads, buildings, bridges, pipes and other assets at $420.4 million to replace. It says the Town needs $12.8 million a year to keep up with replacement, but about $5.8 million a year is available, so it is paying 45% of what is needed and is short about $7.0 million a year. The plan says closing the gap over 20 years would take a yearly tax increase of 1.4% on current property tax revenue of about $21.5 million. A Town release says the 2026 budget includes a 4.9% tax rate increase.
Why it matters
Roads and buildings wear out. If a town does not save enough, repairs get put off and bills pile up for later councils. The Town is open about the gap, which is to its credit, and residents can ask how the 2026 budget and later ones deal with it.
It could be because…
Many Ontario municipalities have a gap like this. The plan itself says "many municipalities, including Bracebridge" face one.
The plan says more than 90% of the Town's assets are in fair or better condition, so the need may not be urgent.
The 2026 budget's 4.9% tax rate increase may include money for this gap. The release does not say.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2026 tax increase is set aside for replacing assets, and how does that compare with the $7.0 million gap?
Which projects were put off because the money for replacements was short?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Executive Summary: the seven asset categories "have a total replacement cost of $420.4 million". "On average, the Town requires $12.8 million per year". "Approximately $5.8 million in average annual funding is available". The Town "is addressing 45% of its annual capital requirements, corresponding to an actual reinvestment rate of 1.4% and an estimated annual funding shortfall of $7.0 million".
"Based on the Town's current property tax revenue of approximately $21.5 million, closing the annual infrastructure funding gap over a 20-year period would require a dedicated annual tax increase of 1.4%." The plan gives 1.9% over 15 years and 2.9% over 10 years.
The Town's release says: "This year's budget includes a 4.9% tax rate increase" and that since COVID-19 the Town has kept an average annual tax rate increase of 3.7%.
$1,807,098more spent on materials than budgeted in 2025 (worked out by us)
The 2025 audited statements compare actual spending with the budget. Materials cost $11,382,874 against a budget of $9,575,776, which is $1,807,098 more (worked out by us). Recreation and culture cost $15,049,777 against $13,473,901, which is $1,575,876 more (worked out by us). Amortization (the yearly share of what buildings and equipment cost, spread over their lives) was $7,341,549 against $6,500,000, and rose from $5,352,707 in 2024. Salaries came in under budget: $14,424,396 against $14,786,064. In total expenses were $37,776,492 against $35,685,050. The Town still ended the year with an annual surplus of $1,468,607 against a planned deficit of $1,856,420.
Why it matters
A budget is a promise about how tax money will be used. A few lines far over budget can mean the plan understated costs. The statements show revenue also came in higher, which may have covered it, but residents will want to see the lines.
It could be because…
The Muskoka Lumber Community Centre was in its first full year. Recreation and culture amortization rose from $1,735,396 in 2024 to $3,539,108 in 2025, which is a bookkeeping cost, not cash.
The budget is built a different way from the statements. Note 14 says the budget "expensed all tangible capital expenses rather than including amortization expense", so the two are not like for like.
Revenue was higher than budget too ($39,245,099 against $33,828,630), including a $1,144,160 contribution of roads that cost the Town nothing, so overspending may have been matched by extra income.
Questions you could ask
Which materials costs ran over budget in 2025, and what was bought?
How much of the recreation and culture overspending was the Muskoka Lumber Community Centre's first full year, and was that planned in the budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 18, Expenses by Object: "Materials" budget 9,575,776, actual 2025 11,382,874. "Salaries, wages and employee benefits" budget 14,786,064, actual 14,424,396. "Amortization" budget 6,500,000, actual 7,341,549 (2024 5,352,707). Total budget 35,685,050, actual 37,776,492.
Statement of Operations: "Recreation and culture" budget 13,473,901, actual 2025 15,049,777, actual 2024 12,962,994. "Annual surplus" budget (1,856,420), actual 1,468,607 (2024 5,921,620). Revenue total budget 33,828,630, actual 39,245,099.
Note 21, Segmented Information, Recreation and Culture: amortization of tangible capital assets 3,539,108 in 2025 (1,735,396 in 2024 on the next page); annual deficit (2,115,994).
Note 14, Budget: "In addition, the budget expensed all tangible capital expenses rather than including amortization expense." "Budget deficit per statement of operations" $ (1,856,420).
Bracebridge spent $5.1M on roads and snow in 2019 and $7.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 11 of 67 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 44% in 5 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+44%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−2%
+1%
2021
+29%
+4%
2022
+11%
+11%
2023
+22%
+16%
2024
+44%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $2.2M a year pay for?
Why did roadsides and signs go from $488K to $1.2M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Bracebridge spent $2.2M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $3.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 47% in 5 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+47%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−17%
+1%
2021
−8%
+4%
2022
−0%
+11%
2023
+22%
+16%
2024
+47%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.0M a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $1.0M to $1.7M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $2.2M, 2020 $1.8M, 2021 $2.0M, 2022 $2.2M, 2023 $2.7M, 2024 $3.3M.
$862,930owed by Theatre Muskoka, with $646,000 set aside against it
Two items in the 2025 statements are about how the Town holds its money. First, temporary investments were $9,099,740 at the end of 2025. During the year the Town sold its holdings in one investment program and put the money into 12 pooled funds run by Royal Trust Pooled Funds Group, all but one of them equity (stock) funds by name. The Town's own note says a 10% change in their market value would change the remeasurement gains and losses for 2025 by $909,974. Investment income was $2,556,281 against a budget of $918,000. Second, the Town is owed $862,930 by Theatre Muskoka for part of the cost of the theatre in the community recreation complex. There are no fixed repayment dates, no interest, and the Town has set aside $646,000 (up from $607,000) in case part of it is never repaid.
Why it matters
Public money held in stock funds can go down as well as up. And a loan with no end date is one residents may wish to follow. Both are normal for a town that has thought them through, and both are worth knowing about.
It could be because…
The funds are quoted on an active market, and the Town says it manages the risk by holding "a diverse investment portfolio".
The Town's note says the investments are held "for the purpose of meeting long-term capital obligations", which suits a long-term fund.
The Town says Theatre Muskoka has agreed to repay from capital fundraising, a ticket surcharge and theatre revenue, and the allowance shows the Town has already allowed for part of it not coming back.
Investment income may have been higher than budgeted because of how much cash and savings the Town held during the year ($16,011,400 at year end).
Questions you could ask
What are the Town's rules for where its savings may be invested, and who approved the move to stock-market funds?
How much has Theatre Muskoka repaid each year, and when does the Town expect the rest?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 3, Temporary Investments: total $9,099,740 at market value, $9,052,503 at cost. "During the year, the Municipality redeemed its investments held with One Investment and reinvested the proceeds in One Investment pooled funds managed by Royal Trust Pooled Funds Group." "Temporary investments are held for the purpose of meeting long-term capital obligations."
Note 1, Other price risk: "The impact of a 10% change in the market value of investments is estimated to increase the remeasurement gains and losses for 2025 by $909,974."
Note 5, Long-Term Receivables: Theatre Muskoka $862,930, valuation allowance (646,000) (2024 (607,000)), net 216,930. "There are no fixed terms of repayment and the balance is non-interest bearing." "The Theatre Muskoka has agreed to repay the outstanding balance from capital fundraising proceeds, a ticket surcharge and net revenues of the theatre operations."
In 2019, Bracebridge had $36.7M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$9.5M. About 0% of that change ($143K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 3 of 67 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Bracebridge went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$20M$0$20M$40M$60M
−$9.5M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$36.7M
2020
$38.8M
2021
$40.1M
2022
$23.5M
2023
$8.0M
2024
−$9.5M
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Bracebridge spent about $408 per home on snow ploughing in 2024. The typical similar town spent $75. None of the 67 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Bracebridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Snow ploughing per home: Bracebridge $408; typical similar town $75; ranked 1st highest of 68.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy