Council BooksBrudenell, Lyndoch and RaglanOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 9 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 4 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Is the Township replacing its roads and equipment as fast as they wear out?

$463,943spent on new assets in 2025, against $1,324,463 of wear (amortization)

Amortization is the yearly cost of an asset wearing out. In 2025 it was $1,324,463, but the Township bought only $463,943 of new assets. The net value of its assets fell by $897,104 (worked out by us) in one year. The 2025 budget had planned $794,850 of purchases.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingMoney health

What did the $275,000 loan taken in 2025 pay for, and why borrow while cash rose?

$490,375net long-term liabilities at the end of 2025, up from $275,400

The Township took a $275,000 loan from Ontario Infrastructure in 2025. Its long-term debt went from $275,400 to $490,375. Cash in the bank rose over the same year, from $1,556,023 to $1,978,239.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the fire department spend $370,957 in 2025 when the budget was $281,925?

$370,957fire department spending in 2025, against a budget of $281,925

Fire department spending came in $89,032 (31.6 per cent; both worked out by us) above budget in 2025, and the 2026 budget is $377,578. Fire revenue was also above budget, at $80,894 against $15,000, which covers part of the gap.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 58% in 6 years?

+58%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan spent $293K on running the town office in 2019 and $463K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 47% in 6 years?

+47%roads and snow, 2019 to 2025

Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan spent $784K on roads and snow in 2019 and $1.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowSpending level

Why is the 2026 budget for Members of Council $34,500 when 2025 cost $26,959?

$34,5002026 budget for Members of Council, against $26,959 spent in 2025

The budget line for Members of Council was $27,000 in 2025 and is $34,500 in 2026, an increase of $7,541 on last year's actual, or 28 per cent (worked out by us). The line has stayed between about $26,000 and $29,000 in earlier years.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowMoney health

How will the landfill closing costs be paid for?

$257,000estimated landfill closure and post-closure cost, with no reserve set aside for it

The Township counts $257,000 as the cost to close and monitor its landfills. It says no reserves are set aside for that, and about 17 years of capacity remain. The statements show the amount as an unfunded debt against the surplus.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowRising costs

Why is the 2026 budget for policing $373,918, up from $332,692 spent in 2025?

$373,9182026 budget for policing services, against $332,692 spent in 2025

Policing is budgeted $41,226 (12.4 per cent; both worked out by us) above the 2025 actual. The statements say the Township has no contract with the Ontario Provincial Police and is billed yearly, with the bill settled against real costs the following year.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowOpenness

Where can residents read the 2026 budget on the accounting basis used in the audited statements?

$3,718,599total 2026 budgeted expenditures in the cash-basis budget, with no amortization

Council adopted the 2026 budget by by-law on March 4, 2026. That budget is cash-basis, and says so. On May 6, 2026 council approved what the minutes call the "2026 PSAB Budget", which is the accounting basis of the audited statements, with wear on assets counted. We found the first on the Administration page but not the second.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Each question in full

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Is the Township replacing its roads and equipment as fast as they wear out?

$463,943spent on new assets in 2025, against $1,324,463 of wear (amortization)

Amortization is the yearly cost of an asset wearing out. In 2025 it was $1,324,463, but the Township bought only $463,943 of new assets. The net value of its assets fell by $897,104 (worked out by us) in one year. The 2025 budget had planned $794,850 of purchases.

Why it matters

Most of what a township owns is roads. If wear keeps running ahead of spending, repairs and replacement costs get pushed to later years, and later councils and taxpayers pay them.

It could be because…

  • Road projects often cost less or take longer than planned, so spending slips into the next year. The statements say capital budgets are project-based and may not match one year's actual spending.
  • Amortization is an accounting figure based on old costs. Replacing a road today usually costs more than the figure on the books.
  • A small township may use grant money (such as the provincial infrastructure fund) as it arrives, which makes the amounts uneven year to year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the Township's plan, by year, for replacing roads and equipment, and how much of the wear does it expect to fund?
  2. Which 2025 projects planned at $794,850 were not finished, and when will they be?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets prints amortization of tangible capital assets of 1,324,463 for 2025 actual and 1,264,342 for 2024, and acquisition of tangible capital assets of (794,850) budget, (463,943) actual in 2025 and (991,499) in 2024.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 8, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets

  2. The Statement of Financial Position prints tangible capital assets (net) of $ 19,874,478 for 2025 and $ 20,771,582 for 2024.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 6, Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

What did the $275,000 loan taken in 2025 pay for, and why borrow while cash rose?

$490,375net long-term liabilities at the end of 2025, up from $275,400

The Township took a $275,000 loan from Ontario Infrastructure in 2025. Its long-term debt went from $275,400 to $490,375. Cash in the bank rose over the same year, from $1,556,023 to $1,978,239.

Why it matters

Debt has to be paid back with interest from the yearly budget. Scheduled payments on this debt are $97,869 in 2026.

It could be because…

  • Low-rate provincial loans can be a sensible way to spread the cost of a long-lived asset such as a truck or a road.
  • Cash on hand at year end may already be promised to grants, reserves or bills, so a higher balance does not mean the money is free.

Questions you could ask

  1. What asset or project was the debenture taken for, and by what resolution of council?
  2. What interest rate and term does it carry?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Statement of Cash Flows prints "Proceeds from Ontario Infrastructure debenture" of $ 275,000 for 2025 and cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year of $ 1,978,239 against 1,556,023 at the beginning.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 9, Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  2. Note 3 says the balance of net long term liabilities is $ 490,375 (2024 - $ 275,400), and shows 2026 principal and interest payments of $ 80,650 and $ 17,219, a total of $ 97,869.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 13, Note 3 Net Long Term Liabilities

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the fire department spend $370,957 in 2025 when the budget was $281,925?

$370,957fire department spending in 2025, against a budget of $281,925

Fire department spending came in $89,032 (31.6 per cent; both worked out by us) above budget in 2025, and the 2026 budget is $377,578. Fire revenue was also above budget, at $80,894 against $15,000, which covers part of the gap.

Why it matters

A fire service is one of the bigger things a small township pays for itself. When the budget is far from the result, council is not seeing the real cost when it sets the tax rate.

It could be because…

  • Grant-funded purchases show up on both sides of the budget. The budget lists a fire protection grant under revenue and under expenses, so some of the extra spending was paid by someone else.
  • Some of the extra revenue may be fees for calls or one-time reimbursements, which would explain the higher spending.
  • These are cash-basis figures with no amortization in either column, so the gap is not wear on assets.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were the main items behind the 2025 fire department result, and how much was paid by grants or other outside money?
  2. Is the 2026 budget of $377,578 built on those real costs?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The fire department total expense line prints 243,139 (2024 actual), 281,925 (2025 budget), 370,957 (2025 actual) and 377,578 (2026 budget).

    2026 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2026-15 · PDF page 7, Total Fire Department Services Expense

  2. The revenue line "Fire Dept./Services" prints 22,704 (2024 actual), 15,000 (2025 budget), 80,894 (2025 actual) and 25,000 (2026 budget).

    2026 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2026-15 · PDF page 3, Fees, Services Charges & Other

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 58% in 6 years?

+58%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan spent $293K on running the town office in 2019 and $463K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 58% in 6 years?
+58%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+28%+1%
2021+105%+4%
2022+53%+11%
2023+39%+16%
2024+57%+18%
2025+58%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $170K a year pay for?
  2. Why did senior management go from $272K to $436K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $293K, 2020 $376K, 2021 $602K, 2022 $448K, 2023 $407K, 2024 $460K, 2025 $463K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Senior management, from $272K to $436K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 47% in 6 years?

+47%roads and snow, 2019 to 2025

Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan spent $784K on roads and snow in 2019 and $1.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 47% in 6 years?
+47%
Show as a table
YearRoads and snowPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−4%+1%
2021−3%+4%
2022+18%+11%
2023+27%+16%
2024+49%+18%
2025+47%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $371K a year pay for?
  2. Why did snow ploughing go from $325K to $508K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Roads and snow: 2019 $784K, 2020 $755K, 2021 $762K, 2022 $927K, 2023 $992K, 2024 $1.2M, 2025 $1.2M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Snow ploughing, from $325K to $508K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why is the 2026 budget for Members of Council $34,500 when 2025 cost $26,959?

$34,5002026 budget for Members of Council, against $26,959 spent in 2025

The budget line for Members of Council was $27,000 in 2025 and is $34,500 in 2026, an increase of $7,541 on last year's actual, or 28 per cent (worked out by us). The line has stayed between about $26,000 and $29,000 in earlier years.

Why it matters

It is the cost of the whole council as a group, set in an election year. We do not compare members with each other.

It could be because…

  • A pay review for council could have been adopted. The budget shows a separate "Pay Study" line, but we could not tell from it whether the study covers council.
  • The line may include training, mileage or election-year costs, or the cost of a new council taking office.
  • Part of the increase may simply catch up with years of flat pay.

Questions you could ask

  1. What decision of council set the amount, and what does the line cover?
  2. Is the council pay by-law posted?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The line "Members of Council" prints 26,577 (2024 actual), 27,000 (2025 budget), 26,959 (2025 actual) and 34,500 (2026 budget).

    2026 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2026-15 · PDF page 5, General Government expenditures

  2. The same line in the 2025 budget prints 28,784, 25,800, 26,577 and 27,000 in its four columns.

    2025 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2025-19 · General Government expenditures, Members of Council (PDF page 5; 2023 actual is the first column)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How will the landfill closing costs be paid for?

$257,000estimated landfill closure and post-closure cost, with no reserve set aside for it

The Township counts $257,000 as the cost to close and monitor its landfills. It says no reserves are set aside for that, and about 17 years of capacity remain. The statements show the amount as an unfunded debt against the surplus.

Why it matters

Landfill closing is required by law. Saving a little each year costs less each year than finding the whole amount at the end.

It could be because…

  • The Township keeps a general solid waste disposal reserve and contributes to it in its budget, which may be what it intends to use.
  • Closure may be many years away, and the estimate can change.

Questions you could ask

  1. Is the solid waste disposal reserve meant to cover landfill closure, and is there a written plan?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 6 says "There are currently no reserves set aside for either closure or post closure activities." It gives a remaining useful life of 17 years and approximately $ 257,000 of undiscounted expenses over the 10 year post closure period.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 14, Note 6 Asset Retirement Obligations - Landfills

  2. The Schedule of Reserves and Reserve Funds prints a "Solid waste disposal" reserve of 248,831 at the end of 2025.

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 20, Schedule of Reserves and Reserve Funds

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why is the 2026 budget for policing $373,918, up from $332,692 spent in 2025?

$373,9182026 budget for policing services, against $332,692 spent in 2025

Policing is budgeted $41,226 (12.4 per cent; both worked out by us) above the 2025 actual. The statements say the Township has no contract with the Ontario Provincial Police and is billed yearly, with the bill settled against real costs the following year.

Why it matters

Policing is one of the largest single bills a small township pays, and the Township does not set the price.

It could be because…

  • The yearly OPP bill is set by the province and the Township must pay what it is billed.
  • A later reconciliation of the previous year's actual costs can add to or lower the bill.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the OPP's 2026 billing statement say, and what part of the increase comes from the reconciliation of earlier years?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Policing Services line prints 319,256 (2024 actual), 335,061 (2025 budget), 332,692 (2025 actual) and 373,918 (2026 budget).

    2026 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2026-15 · PDF page 1, summary of expenditures

  2. Note 11 says the Township has not negotiated a contract with the Ontario Provincial Police, that annual charges are reconciled to actual costs in the following year, and that the contract for 2025 was $ 331,880 (2024 - $ 319,255).

    Financial Statements, year ended 31 December 2025 · PDF page 16, Note 11 Contractual Obligations

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Where can residents read the 2026 budget on the accounting basis used in the audited statements?

$3,718,599total 2026 budgeted expenditures in the cash-basis budget, with no amortization

Council adopted the 2026 budget by by-law on March 4, 2026. That budget is cash-basis, and says so. On May 6, 2026 council approved what the minutes call the "2026 PSAB Budget", which is the accounting basis of the audited statements, with wear on assets counted. We found the first on the Administration page but not the second.

Why it matters

The audited statements compare actual results with a budget that includes about $1.3 million of wear on assets, while the posted budget leaves it out. Without the second budget a resident cannot line the two up.

It could be because…

  • The accounting-basis budget may be posted somewhere we did not look, such as in a meeting package.
  • It is a provincial reporting requirement that is often kept as a staff report and not a public document.

Questions you could ask

  1. Is the 2026 PSAB budget public, and where?
  2. Can the Township post it next to the by-law budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The budget says: "Actual expenses are based on Trial Balance which is prepared using Cash Basis accounting methods. The Financial Statements are prepared according to PSAB accounting standards." Total Expenditures are printed as 3,718,599 for the 2026 budget.

    2026 Budget, Schedule A to By-Law 2026-15 · PDF page 15 (note), PDF page 1 (totals)

  2. The minutes record resolution 2026-05-06-12: "approve the 2026 PSAB Budget as per Ontario Regulation 284/09."

    Minutes, Regular Meeting May 6, 2026 · PDF page 6, item 12.1 Approval of 2026 PSAB Budget

↑ All questions