Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Calvin's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 13 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Calvin's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 42 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Calvin spent $320K on running the town office in 2019 and $834K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 1 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Calvin spent $354K on roads and snow in 2019 and $611K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$655,125landfill closure and post-closure accrual at December 31, 2024, counted under the old rule the auditors say is withdrawn
An audit opinion is the auditors' verdict on whether the statements are fair. For 2024 the auditors said the statements are fair only "except for" one problem. The Municipality had not finished working out what it would owe to clean up or close certain assets, including its landfill, as a new accounting rule requires. The auditors said they cannot measure how much this changes the results, for both 2024 and 2023.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$1,624,005recorded at December 31, 2024 for the Cassellholme redevelopment commitment, up from $1,089,781
Cassellholme is the long-term care home that several nearby municipalities own together, and it is being rebuilt. The Municipality now records $1,624,005 as the present value of what it expects to pay for its share, up from $1,089,781 a year earlier. In 2024 it booked a $534,224 expense for the increase. That one item is most of the Municipality's long-term debt, and the Municipality also signed a guarantee on the home's loan.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$3,809,500agreed in principle in 2016 to be paid jointly over 25 years, split not yet decided
In 2016 Calvin and three other municipalities agreed in principle to give $3,809,500 over 25 years toward rebuilding the Algonquin Nursing Home. The statements say the payment terms, including how the cost is split, have not been decided. Calvin keeps a reserve of $160,616 for the Algonquin Nursing Home.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$1,817,838net financial liabilities at December 31, 2024, up from $828,772
Net financial liabilities are what the Municipality owes minus its cash and other financial assets. They grew from $828,772 to $1,817,838 in 2024 (more than double, worked out by us). Cash fell from $1,196,628 to $803,805. The roads reserve fell from $167,752 to $26,263 and total reserves from $875,090 to $746,351. The statements show the main causes: a $534,224 Cassellholme expense and $896,320 of new capital assets bought.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
July 30, 2024the date Council adopted the 2024 budget, according to the audited statements
The statements say Council adopted the 2024 budget on July 30, 2024, about seven months into the year (worked out by us). The budget presentation says Council held two special open meetings in June and July and a public meeting on July 25, 2024.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
In 2024, Calvin collected $179K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 12% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 6 of 42 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 10% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 2.5%.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 4 sources
$500,000estimated cost of the June 21, 2025 flood response, with a provincial assistance application planned
The 2024 statements report that a severe storm on June 21, 2025 flooded the Municipality, knocked down trees and washed out roads, and led to a state of emergency. Costs were estimated at about $500,000. The Municipality planned to apply to the provincial disaster assistance program to recover eligible costs. At the end of 2024 its cash was $803,805 and its roads reserve $26,263.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$200,000accrued liabilities at December 31, 2024, with no explanation in the notes
Accounts payable (money owed to suppliers and others) was $267,169 at the end of 2024, up from $179,558. The notes split it into trade payables of $19,592, accrued payroll of $47,577 and a new line, "Accrued liabilities", of $200,000. In 2023 that line was blank and trade payables were $163,959. The notes do not say what the $200,000 is for.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$836,852spent on general government in 2024, against a budget of $649,559
In 2024 general government cost $836,852 against a budget of $649,559, and protection to persons and property cost $304,397 against $161,780. Transportation cost $782,855 against $686,961. Government transfers, a revenue, came in at $711,945 against a budget of $367,396. The statements say the budget was not built the same way as the actual results.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
In 2019, Calvin had $23,556 more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$1.8M. About 36% of that change ($655K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 1 of 42 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Calvin spent $320K on running the town office in 2019 and $834K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 1 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 160% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%+150%+200%
+160%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−15%
+1%
2021
+11%
+4%
2022
+54%
+11%
2023
+65%
+16%
2024
+160%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $513K a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $83,389 to $781K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $320K, 2020 $273K, 2021 $356K, 2022 $492K, 2023 $528K, 2024 $834K.
Calvin spent $354K on roads and snow in 2019 and $611K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 72% in 5 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+72%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−1%
+1%
2021
−1%
+4%
2022
+42%
+11%
2023
+45%
+16%
2024
+72%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $256K a year pay for?
Why did gravel roads go from $85,341 to $579K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Calvin spent about $6,205 per home on long-term debt in 2024. The typical similar town spent $464. Only 1 of 42 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: Calvin $6,205; typical similar town $464; ranked 2nd highest of 43.
$655,125landfill closure and post-closure accrual at December 31, 2024, counted under the old rule the auditors say is withdrawn
An audit opinion is the auditors' verdict on whether the statements are fair. For 2024 the auditors said the statements are fair only "except for" one problem. The Municipality had not finished working out what it would owe to clean up or close certain assets, including its landfill, as a new accounting rule requires. The auditors said they cannot measure how much this changes the results, for both 2024 and 2023.
Why it matters
A qualified opinion means a reader cannot be sure the debts and assets shown are complete. The landfill clean-up promise is one of the largest items the Municipality owes.
It could be because…
A small municipality with a small office can find the new asset retirement rule slow work, and management told the auditors it had not finished its review of assets.
The Municipality may be waiting on an engineer or consultant to value its buildings and equipment.
The 2025 statements may fix it. We did not use the draft, so we cannot say.
Questions you could ask
When will the review of assets that may carry a retirement obligation be finished?
What does the Municipality expect the change to do to its accumulated surplus?
Has the landfill reserve of $185,557 been set against the $243,839 still to be recognized?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The auditor's report says: "In our opinion, except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report, the accompanying financial statements present fairly". The basis section says management "has not been able to complete its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential retirement obligations" and that it is not possible to quantify the effect on the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Note 8 says the reported landfill liability at year end was $655,125 (2023 - $657,958), and that the total discounted estimated future expenditures for closure and post-closure care are $898,965, "leaving an amount to be recognized of $243,839". Municipal reserves for the landfill site total $185,557 (2023 - $165,557).
$1,624,005recorded at December 31, 2024 for the Cassellholme redevelopment commitment, up from $1,089,781
Cassellholme is the long-term care home that several nearby municipalities own together, and it is being rebuilt. The Municipality now records $1,624,005 as the present value of what it expects to pay for its share, up from $1,089,781 a year earlier. In 2024 it booked a $534,224 expense for the increase. That one item is most of the Municipality's long-term debt, and the Municipality also signed a guarantee on the home's loan.
Why it matters
A small township has little room to absorb a bigger bill. The payments are meant to start in 2026, and the amount depends on estimates of cost, interest rates and the finishing date.
It could be because…
Large building projects often cost more than first planned, and every owner's share moves together.
The number is a present value (today's worth of payments due over many years), so it also moves when the borrowing rate used changes.
The Municipality is following the rule that makes each owner record its share now, even though most of the payments come later.
Questions you could ask
What is the latest total cost Cassellholme has given its owners, and what yearly payment does Calvin expect once the rebuild is done?
Where do those payments appear in the Municipality's long-range plan, and how will they be covered?
Will future budget presentations show the Cassellholme commitment alongside the other debt?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 7 lists "Cassellholme redevelopment commitment (ii)" at $1,624,005 for 2024 against $1,089,781 for 2023, out of long-term debt of $1,855,299. It says that, based on a municipal borrowing rate of 4.53% for a 30-year period plus anticipated construction completion in 2028, the present value of the expected payments commencing in 2026 is $1,624,005.
The Statement of Operations shows a Cassellholme redevelopment commitment line of (534,224) for 2024 and (45,128) for 2023, and an annual deficit of (328,106) for 2024.
Note 7 also says the Municipality is a joint guarantor of Cassellholme's financing agreement with the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, and "the Municipality's maximum liability is $830,816".
The 2024 budget presentation to the public says "The municipality has minimal debt" and mentions a fire truck loan and a $250,000 dump truck loan. It does not mention Cassellholme.
$3,809,500agreed in principle in 2016 to be paid jointly over 25 years, split not yet decided
In 2016 Calvin and three other municipalities agreed in principle to give $3,809,500 over 25 years toward rebuilding the Algonquin Nursing Home. The statements say the payment terms, including how the cost is split, have not been decided. Calvin keeps a reserve of $160,616 for the Algonquin Nursing Home.
Why it matters
Until the split is set, no one can say from the statements how much of this is Calvin's.
It could be because…
The share may be small if the split follows population or assessment, and the notes may simply be waiting on the other three municipalities.
Some of the work may already have been paid for under the reserve.
Questions you could ask
What share of the $3,809,500 is Calvin expected to pay, and when would it start?
Is the $160,616 reserve meant for this, and has it been added to since 2023?
Has the agreement been updated since 2016, and is it public?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 11, Commitments, says in 2016 the Municipality, with the Town of Mattawa and the Townships of Papineau-Cameron and Mattawan, agreed in principle to jointly contribute $3,809,500 over the next 25 years toward the Algonquin Nursing Home, and that the payment terms, including the distribution of the cost among the municipalities, "have not yet been determined".
$1,817,838net financial liabilities at December 31, 2024, up from $828,772
Net financial liabilities are what the Municipality owes minus its cash and other financial assets. They grew from $828,772 to $1,817,838 in 2024 (more than double, worked out by us). Cash fell from $1,196,628 to $803,805. The roads reserve fell from $167,752 to $26,263 and total reserves from $875,090 to $746,351. The statements show the main causes: a $534,224 Cassellholme expense and $896,320 of new capital assets bought.
Why it matters
Cash and reserves are what a township uses when something unplanned happens. Lower reserves leave less room, and a flood cost estimated at $500,000 arrived in 2025.
It could be because…
The Municipality bought a dump truck (a new loan of $221,294) and other equipment and spent provincial funding it had been holding for roads, which is what that funding is for.
Much of the rise is the Cassellholme booking, which is an estimate of future payments, not cash spent.
The 2024 budget presentation estimated $630,666 left in reserves, so reserves ended above the estimate.
Questions you could ask
What level of reserves does Council want to hold, and what is the plan to rebuild the roads reserve?
How much of the 2024 rise was cash spent and how much was the Cassellholme estimate?
How many months of normal spending does the Municipality's cash cover?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Statement of Financial Position shows net financial liabilities of (1,817,838) in 2024 and (828,772) in 2023, and cash and cash equivalents of $803,805 against $1,196,628.
Note 10 shows reserves and reserve funds of $746,351 in 2024 against $875,090 in 2023. The roads reserve is 26,263 against 167,752, and the fire department reserve 159,517 against 181,767.
The Statement of Changes in Net Financial Liabilities shows the acquisition of tangible capital assets at (896,320) and an increase in net financial liabilities of (989,066) for 2024.
The 2024 budget presentation says "The municipality is in a good position and is estimated to have $630,666 left in reserves and $227,584 left in Deferred Revenue."
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus (Budget 2024, Actual 2024, Actual 2023): "Cassellholme redevelopment commitment (Note 7)" - (534,224) (45,128).
Note 15, Subsequent Events: "On June 21, 2025, a severe weather event caused significant flooding ... resulted in estimated costs of approximately $500,000."
July 30, 2024the date Council adopted the 2024 budget, according to the audited statements
The statements say Council adopted the 2024 budget on July 30, 2024, about seven months into the year (worked out by us). The budget presentation says Council held two special open meetings in June and July and a public meeting on July 25, 2024.
Why it matters
Spending is easier to control when the plan exists before the year begins. A budget that passes in July means the first half of the year runs without a final plan.
It could be because…
The Municipality's interim tax bill is set at half of last year's bill, so the early months run on that, and the Municipality may wait for the provincial grant notice and updated assessment before finalizing.
A small township with a small office can find budget work slow, especially in a year with a new loan and a big project.
The 2024 budget may simply have been done at this time every year.
Questions you could ask
On what dates were the 2025 and 2026 budgets adopted?
Is there a plan to adopt the budget before the year starts?
What does the Municipality spend between January 1 and the day the budget passes, and who approves it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 12, Budget, says "The Budget By-law adopted by Council on July 30, 2024 was not prepared on a basis consistent with that used to report actual results."
The 2024 budget presentation is headed "Public Meeting July 25th 2024" and says Council had two Special Council Meetings open to the public on June 20th and July 10th to discuss the 2024 Budget.
The Treasury page's tax payment questions say the interim tax bill is 50% of last year's tax bill and that both the interim and final bills must be paid on time.
Treasury page · Payment Options, section on interim and final tax bills
In 2024, Calvin collected $179K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 12% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 6 of 42 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 10% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 2.5%.
Why did Calvin's property tax go up 12% in 2024?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M
$1.7M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$1.3M
2020
$1.3M
2021
$1.4M
2022
$1.4M
2023
$1.6M
2024
$1.7M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $599 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2024 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $1,553,450 in 2023, $1,732,647 in 2024.
$500,000estimated cost of the June 21, 2025 flood response, with a provincial assistance application planned
The 2024 statements report that a severe storm on June 21, 2025 flooded the Municipality, knocked down trees and washed out roads, and led to a state of emergency. Costs were estimated at about $500,000. The Municipality planned to apply to the provincial disaster assistance program to recover eligible costs. At the end of 2024 its cash was $803,805 and its roads reserve $26,263.
Why it matters
If the Province repays only part, or pays late, the Municipality must cover the gap from cash and reserves that were already lower in 2024.
It could be because…
Provincial disaster assistance can repay a large share of eligible costs, so the net cost may be much lower.
The estimate was made months before the work was finished and may have changed.
Work may be paid out of roads funding the Municipality was already holding.
Questions you could ask
What did the flood response finally cost, and how much has the Province approved so far?
Which funds paid for the work while waiting for the Province?
Did the flood delay any planned road work?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 15, Subsequent Events, says on June 21, 2025 a severe weather event caused significant flooding, fallen trees and road washouts and prompted a state of emergency, with estimated costs of "approximately $500,000", and that the Municipality will apply to the Municipal Disaster Recovery Assistance Program.
$200,000accrued liabilities at December 31, 2024, with no explanation in the notes
Accounts payable (money owed to suppliers and others) was $267,169 at the end of 2024, up from $179,558. The notes split it into trade payables of $19,592, accrued payroll of $47,577 and a new line, "Accrued liabilities", of $200,000. In 2023 that line was blank and trade payables were $163,959. The notes do not say what the $200,000 is for.
Why it matters
A round $200,000 owed at year end is about 8% of the year's $2,475,655 of expenses (worked out by us), and the statements do not explain it.
It could be because…
It could be an estimate for work done before year end but not yet billed, which is normal accounting.
It could be a round estimate for a cost the Municipality could not yet measure.
Part of it may relate to a project or contract that was still open at year end.
Questions you could ask
What does the $200,000 of accrued liabilities cover, and was it paid in 2025?
Why did trade payables fall by about $144,000 (worked out by us) in the same year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6, Accounts Payable, lists trade payables of $19,592 (2023 - $163,959), accrued liabilities of 200,000 (2023 - none) and accrued payroll liabilities of 47,577 (2023 - 15,599), totalling $267,169 against $179,558.
Note 14, Contingent Liabilities, gives only a general statement that the Municipality is subject to various claims arising in the normal course of its operations and does not name any amount.
$836,852spent on general government in 2024, against a budget of $649,559
In 2024 general government cost $836,852 against a budget of $649,559, and protection to persons and property cost $304,397 against $161,780. Transportation cost $782,855 against $686,961. Government transfers, a revenue, came in at $711,945 against a budget of $367,396. The statements say the budget was not built the same way as the actual results.
Why it matters
Gaps between plan and result show how reliable the budget is. Here the statements themselves say the two are on different bases, so the gaps are not a clean measure of overspending.
It could be because…
The budget counted purchases of equipment as expenses, while the results spread them over time, so the two are not directly comparable.
The budget presentation said budgets rose for insurance and "extraordinary legal expenses", and actual costs may have moved with them.
Provincial grants that arrived above the budgeted amount may have paid for work that cost more.
Questions you could ask
Does the Municipality publish a budget-to-actual report during the year?
Can the 2025 statements show the budget and results on the same basis?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Statement of Operations lists 2024 budget and actual: General government 649,559 and 836,852; Protection to persons and property 161,780 and 304,397; Transportation 686,961 and 782,855; Government transfers 367,396 and 711,945.
Note 12 says the budget was prepared on a modified accrual basis while the standards require a full accrual basis, and "the budget expensed all tangible capital expenses rather than including amortization expense".
The budget presentation lists under Expenses "Increase in salaries and benefits", "Increase in insurance premiums as well as extraordinary legal expenses" and "Increase in Board levies and outside agency costs".
In 2019, Calvin had $23,556 more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$1.8M. About 36% of that change ($655K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 1 of 42 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Calvin went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$2.0M−$1.5M−$1.0M−$500K$0$500K
−$1.8M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$23,556
2020
$146K
2021
$222K
2022
$277K
2023
−$829K
2024
−$1.8M
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Calvin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy