Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Chisholm's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 9 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Chisholm's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 40 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Chisholm had $650K saved at the end of 2024, up from $446K in 2019. That is 26% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 40 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$1,256,283recorded at December 31, 2025 for the Cassellholme rebuild, up from $1,240,731 a year earlier
Cassellholme is the long-term care home that several nearby municipalities own together, and it is being rebuilt. Chisholm records $1,256,283 as the present value of what it expects to pay for its share, which is about 70% of its long-term debt (worked out by us from the $1,806,063 total). It has also promised, as one of the joint guarantors of the home's loan, to stand behind up to $942,169.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Qualifiedauditor's opinion on the 2025 statements, dated July 30, 2026, same as 2024
A qualified opinion means the auditor says the statements are fair except for one stated problem. For both 2024 and 2025, the auditor says the Township has not finished working out what it will owe to close or take apart some of its assets, so the effect on the statements cannot be measured.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$534,457cash at December 31, 2025, against $1,318,669 at the start of 2024
Cash at the end of 2025 was $534,457, down from $709,594 a year earlier and $1,318,669 at the start of 2024. Reserves (money set aside for specific purposes) fell from $649,808 to $534,176 in 2025. The Township must repay $276,383 of long-term debt in 2026.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$1,543,922transportation expenses in 2025 statements, against a budget column of $1,135,502
On the statements, 2025 transportation (roads) expenses are well over the budget column. Most of the gap looks like a difference in how the two are counted: the budget includes capital spending and leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of roads and equipment), which the statements include.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$945,855government transfers and grants in 2025, against a budget of $714,790
In 2025 the Township took in $945,855 in government transfers and grants, well above its $714,790 budget, and about 30% of its $3,133,431 total revenue (worked out by us). Property tax brought in $2,019,583.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
June 12, 2025date council adopted the 2025 budget by-law, according to the audited statements
The Township's Budget and Finance page lists a 2025 budget as its newest, and the file has no readable text. We did not find a 2026 budget there. Council's May 26, 2026 meeting received a budget report, but we could not find the adopted 2026 budget itself.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
June 9, 2026date on the 2025 council remuneration memo, which says it is due by March 31
The 2025 council pay and expenses memo is dated June 9, 2026. The memo itself says the statement is due on or before March 31st. The 2024 memo is dated January 23, 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
August 30, 2024date of the newest Integrity Commissioner report we found
The Integrity Commissioner's August 30, 2024 report says it continues to recommend a review and update of the Code of Conduct and complaint procedures for the Township's website. We did not find a later report or an updated procedure.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Chisholm had $650K saved at the end of 2024, up from $446K in 2019. That is 26% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 40 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Chisholm have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K
$650K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$446K
2020
$515K
2021
$606K
2022
$677K
2023
$567K
2024
$650K
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2024?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$1,256,283recorded at December 31, 2025 for the Cassellholme rebuild, up from $1,240,731 a year earlier
Cassellholme is the long-term care home that several nearby municipalities own together, and it is being rebuilt. Chisholm records $1,256,283 as the present value of what it expects to pay for its share, which is about 70% of its long-term debt (worked out by us from the $1,806,063 total). It has also promised, as one of the joint guarantors of the home's loan, to stand behind up to $942,169.
Why it matters
A small township with about $534,457 in cash has little room to absorb a surprise. If the project costs more or the payments start earlier, the yearly cost lands on local taxes.
It could be because…
The amount is a present value (today's worth of payments due over 30 years), so it moves up each year as the start date gets closer, even if nothing else changes.
The guarantee is a maximum, and a guarantee is only called on if the home cannot pay its own loan.
Several municipalities share this cost, and the provincial long-term care law sets how it is divided.
Questions you could ask
What is the latest total project cost Cassellholme has given its owners, and has the Township's share changed?
What yearly payment does the Township expect once the home is finished, and where will it appear in the budget?
Is the Township setting money aside for those payments, and how much?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8, Long-term Debt, lists "Cassellholme redevelopment commitment (ii) 1,256,283" for 2025 against 1,240,731 for 2024, out of total long-term debt of $1,806,063. The note says the present value of the expected payments commencing in 2027 is $1,256,283, based on a borrowing rate of 4.76% over 30 years and construction completion anticipated in 2028.
The same note says the Township is named as a joint guarantor of the home's financing agreement with Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, and that the Township's maximum liability is $942,169 (2024 - $900,051).
The Statement of Operations shows a line "Cassellholme redevelopment commitment (Note 8)" of (15,552) for 2025 and (60,136) for 2024, with a budget of nil.
Qualifiedauditor's opinion on the 2025 statements, dated July 30, 2026, same as 2024
A qualified opinion means the auditor says the statements are fair except for one stated problem. For both 2024 and 2025, the auditor says the Township has not finished working out what it will owe to close or take apart some of its assets, so the effect on the statements cannot be measured.
Why it matters
A qualified opinion means residents cannot be sure how large the Township's real long-term obligations are. The landfill is one example: its estimated liability is larger than the reserve held for it.
It could be because…
The new accounting standard for asset retirement obligations is large and technical, and many small municipalities have been slow to complete it.
The work needs an asset-by-asset review that a small staff may not have had time for.
The Township may already have a plan to finish this in a coming year.
Questions you could ask
When does the Township expect to finish its asset retirement obligation review, and who is doing it?
Does the Township expect the auditor's opinion to be clean for 2026?
How will the landfill liability be paid for beyond the reserve?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Independent Auditor's Report gives a qualified opinion and says under Basis for Qualified Opinion: "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential retirement obligations." It says the effect on 2025 and 2024 expenses, assets and accumulated surplus cannot be quantified. The report is dated July 30, 2026.
Note 9 says the landfill closure and post-closure liability at year end was $237,155 (2024 - $248,279), that total estimated future spending is $407,869, and that Township reserves for the landfill site total $140,064 (2024 - $129,664).
$534,457cash at December 31, 2025, against $1,318,669 at the start of 2024
Cash at the end of 2025 was $534,457, down from $709,594 a year earlier and $1,318,669 at the start of 2024. Reserves (money set aside for specific purposes) fell from $649,808 to $534,176 in 2025. The Township must repay $276,383 of long-term debt in 2026.
Why it matters
Cash and reserves are what a township uses to cover surprises, like a washed-out road. They are shrinking while loan payments and the Cassellholme share are coming due.
It could be because…
Council may have chosen to spend reserves and cash on road and equipment purchases on purpose; the Township bought $691,121 of capital assets in 2025.
Government grant money is received and spent in different years, so cash can move around.
The Township has an unused $400,000 line of credit for short-term needs.
Questions you could ask
What level of cash and reserves does council consider the minimum, and when does it expect to get back to it?
Does the 2026 budget plan to add to reserves, and by how much?
Why are two equipment loans at 6.37%, and could they be refinanced?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Statement of Cash Flows shows "Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year" of 709,594 for 2025 and 1,318,669 for 2024, and "Cash and cash equivalents, end of year" of $534,457 for 2025. It shows acquisition of tangible capital assets of (691,121) in 2025 and repayment of long-term debt of (151,867).
Note 6, Credit Facilities, says the Township has a line of credit with a maximum credit limit of $400,000, and that the balance used at year end was $Nil.
$1,543,922transportation expenses in 2025 statements, against a budget column of $1,135,502
On the statements, 2025 transportation (roads) expenses are well over the budget column. Most of the gap looks like a difference in how the two are counted: the budget includes capital spending and leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of roads and equipment), which the statements include.
Why it matters
A reader comparing the two columns could think roads cost far more than planned. The Township explains in a note that the columns are not on the same basis.
It could be because…
Amortization in the transportation segment was $586,179, a cost that is not cash and that the budget leaves out.
The budget includes capital expenses of $344,900 that the statements count as assets instead.
Because of this, the gap is mostly timing and counting, not overspending.
Questions you could ask
Does the Township publish a budget-to-actual report on the same basis as its budget, so the roads line can be compared fairly?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Statement of Operations shows Transportation services (Note 8): budget 1,135,502, 2025 actual 1,543,922, 2024 actual 1,594,761.
Note 15 says the budget "expensed all tangible capital expenses rather than including amortization expense" and lists capital expenses of 344,900 and debt repayment of 168,047 as adjustments.
$945,855government transfers and grants in 2025, against a budget of $714,790
In 2025 the Township took in $945,855 in government transfers and grants, well above its $714,790 budget, and about 30% of its $3,133,431 total revenue (worked out by us). Property tax brought in $2,019,583.
Why it matters
Grants can change with a provincial decision. A township this size leans on them to keep roads up.
It could be because…
Capital grants are often recognized when the spending happens, so they can run above or below the budget in a given year.
Receiving more than budgeted is good news, and 2024 was similar at $952,046.
Questions you could ask
Which grants make up the 2025 total, and which are one-time?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The Statement of Operations shows Government transfers and grants: budget 714,790, 2025 actual 945,855, 2024 actual 952,046; Taxation 2,019,583; total revenues 3,133,431.
June 12, 2025date council adopted the 2025 budget by-law, according to the audited statements
The Township's Budget and Finance page lists a 2025 budget as its newest, and the file has no readable text. We did not find a 2026 budget there. Council's May 26, 2026 meeting received a budget report, but we could not find the adopted 2026 budget itself.
Why it matters
The budget is the plan for the taxes residents pay. It is hardest to check when the file is pictures of pages or is not posted.
It could be because…
The 2026 budget may simply not have been uploaded yet.
The 2026 budget may be posted somewhere we did not look, such as with a meeting package.
Questions you could ask
Will the Township post the adopted 2026 budget, and the 2025 budget in readable form?
What does the Budget Report received on May 26, 2026 show, and is it posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 15 says the Budget By-law was adopted by Council on June 12, 2025 (2024 - May 28, 2024).
Resolution 2026-86 says: be it resolved that the Budget Report printed May 8, 2026, be received. The report itself is described only as "(Encl.)" in the agenda.
June 9, 2026date on the 2025 council remuneration memo, which says it is due by March 31
The 2025 council pay and expenses memo is dated June 9, 2026. The memo itself says the statement is due on or before March 31st. The 2024 memo is dated January 23, 2025.
Why it matters
Residents rely on this yearly statement to see what council members are paid. The memo itself gives March 31st as the due date.
It could be because…
The memo may have been prepared earlier and only dated or posted on June 9.
The statement may have been given to council in another form earlier.
Questions you could ask
When was the 2025 statement first given to council and posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The memo is dated June 9, 2026 and says the Treasurer is required to submit, "on or before March 31st, an itemized statement of the remuneration and expenses paid to each member of Council" for the previous year.
August 30, 2024date of the newest Integrity Commissioner report we found
The Integrity Commissioner's August 30, 2024 report says it continues to recommend a review and update of the Code of Conduct and complaint procedures for the Township's website. We did not find a later report or an updated procedure.
Why it matters
Clear complaint rules are how residents know what to do if they think a council member broke the rules.
It could be because…
The update may have happened and simply not be posted on the page we read.
A later report may exist that we did not find.
Questions you could ask
Has council reviewed the Code of Conduct since August 2024, and are complaint procedures posted?
Is there an Integrity Commissioner report for 2024 to 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chisholm?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The letter dated August 30, 2024 says: "I continue to recommend a review and update of the Township's Code of Conduct" and procedures for posting on the Township's website, and that none of the inquiries it received resulted in an investigation.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy