Council BooksCobaltOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Cobalt's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 12 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Cobalt's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 31 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did Cobalt's property tax go up 133% in 2025?

+133%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, Cobalt collected $1.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 133% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. None of the 31 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Needs an answerMoney health

Does Cobalt have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$18,075in savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Cobalt had $18,075 saved at the end of 2025, down from $259K in 2019. That is 1% of one year's spending. None of the 31 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Needs an answerMoney health

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$309Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $309K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 16% of everything billed. Only 7 of 31 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $299K.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Why did Cobalt end 2025 with a deficit of $595,737 when its budget planned for $327,197?

$595,737annual deficit in 2025, against a budgeted $327,197

The audited statements show an annual deficit (spending above income) of $595,737 for 2025, against a budget deficit of $327,197 and a 2024 deficit of $655,576. The gap to budget, $268,540 (worked out by us), is $170,894 of extra spending and $97,646 of missing income. Most of the extra spending is in three areas: environmental services (water, sewer and garbage) $1,380,502 against $1,282,013 budgeted, general government $776,986 against $711,350, and recreation and culture $247,268 against $210,350. The Town's own note explains that these statements count amortization (the yearly wearing-out of buildings, roads and equipment, $666,088) which is not cash. On the Town's own budget basis, the 2025 deficit was $90,090 against a budgeted $5,000, and $40,883 the year before. The accumulated surplus (everything the Town has built up over the years, mostly buildings, roads and pipes) fell from $14,373,961 at the start of 2024 to $13,122,648, which is $1,251,313 less (worked out by us).

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingHow decisions are made

Why did Cobalt spend $79,218 on capital in 2025 against a plan of $317,243 while holding $391,968 of unspent provincial infrastructure money?

$79,218capital assets added in 2025, against $317,243 budgeted in the statements and $360,443 in the capital budget

Capital spending is money spent on buildings, roads, pipes and equipment that last for years. The 2025 capital budget lists seven projects totalling $360,443, including $125,000 for a wetland sewer project under a Director's Order, $98,433 for water treatment plant upgrades and $73,010 for a road. The audited statements show only $79,218 of tangible capital assets added in 2025, of which $10,300 was donated land and $68,918 heavy equipment (worked out by us from the schedule). At the end of 2025 the Town held $391,968 of Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) money it had been given but not yet used, up from $194,683. The Town's cash rose by $229,581 in 2025 even though it ran a deficit.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why does Cobalt have only $99,126 of cushion on its books, with a $440,712 general deficit and a $664,082 asbestos cleanup obligation?

$99,126all reserves, surpluses and deficits together at the end of 2025, down from $197,504

The Town's note on its accumulated surplus lists its reserves, surpluses and deficits together at $99,126 at the end of 2025, down from $197,504. The only named reserve is a library reserve of $18,075. The general municipal fund is $440,712 in deficit, up from $394,438, and waterworks is $88,048 in deficit. The Town also carries an asset retirement obligation of $664,082 (money it expects to spend someday on removing asbestos, $658,081, and a fuel tank, $6,001). The note lists it as "unfinanced", which means no money has been set aside for it. The Town holds $607,260 in cash, but $517,809 of the money it holds is deferred revenue: grant money it was given for projects (worked out by us from $437,377 and $80,432). It has a $250,000 bank line of credit with nothing borrowed.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did Cobalt's water system run an $88,184 deficit in 2025, even after $111,418 of federal gas tax money?

$88,184waterworks deficit in 2025, up from $50,682

The Town's waterworks schedule shows total revenue of $602,422 and spending of $690,606, a deficit of $88,184, after a deficit of $50,682 in 2024. Revenue includes $111,418 of federal operating grants, the same amount as the Canada Community Building Fund money the Town used in 2025, so without it the deficit would have been $199,602 (worked out by us). Contracted services rose to $335,647 from $199,890, up $135,757 (worked out by us). The waterworks account went from a surplus of $136 to a deficit of $88,048. Water and sewer user fees came in at $611,476 against $609,312 budgeted, so the gap is not a shortfall in fees.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowMoney health

Why did Cobalt's yearly interest on its debt double to $53,487, and why does one vehicle loan cost 8.65% when its other loans cost between 0% and 4.41%?

$53,487interest paid on long-term debt in 2025, up from $25,069

The Town owed $1,462,300 on five loans at the end of 2025, down from $1,562,160. Interest paid on the debt was $53,487, up from $25,069 (more than double, worked out by us). The Town took on $713,201 of new debt in 2024. Its three Infrastructure Ontario loans carry rates of 1.43%, 2.47% and 4.41%. One vehicle loan with Ford Credit carries 0% and another 8.65%, with a balance of $82,530. The note says its payments are $948 a month, which is $11,376 a year (worked out by us), but the balance fell $16,739 in 2025.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to knowRecord-keeping

Why do the 2025 budget pages Cobalt posted not match the 2025 budget printed in its audited statements?

$43,200gap between the posted capital budget and the capital budget in the audited statements (worked out by us)

The Town posts a one-page 2025 Operating Budget and a one-page 2025 Capital Budget. They differ from the budget the audited statements print as adopted by Council. The capital budget totals $360,443; the statements' budget has $317,243 of capital spending, a gap of $43,200 (worked out by us). The operating budget shows provincial grants of $993,540.00 and federal grants of $15,404.45; the statements show $1,017,970 and $68,174. It shows user charges of $194,254.24 against $202,274. Both budgets agree on property taxes ($881,929) and on water and sewer fees ($609,312).

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to knowHow decisions are made

How likely is it that Cobalt would have to pay on its $1,517,500 housing guarantee, or on old mine site costs?

$1,517,500provincial contribution the Town guaranteed in 2010, for a 20-year housing agreement

A contingent liability is money a town might have to pay if something happens. The audited statements disclose two. In March 2010 the Town became guarantor for an agreement between a non-profit housing organization and the Province of Ontario, to offer affordable housing for 20 years. The Province's contribution was $1,517,500. The statements also say the Town "has many old mine sites and tailing ponds", that the Province's mines ministry has always taken responsibility for the cost, and that management's opinion is that all contaminated sites have been remedied and the Town is not responsible for future liabilities. The statements record no amount for either.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowMoney health

Cobalt went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?

−$2.0Mnet financial position, 2025

In 2019, Cobalt had $511K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$2.0M. About 26% of that change ($664K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 1 of 31 similar towns are in a weaker position.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did Cobalt's property tax go up 133% in 2025?

+133%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, Cobalt collected $1.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 133% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. None of the 31 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Why did Cobalt's property tax go up 133% in 2025?
$1.9M
Show as a table
YearTown property tax
2019$568K
2020$586K
2021$617K
2022$633K
2023$712K
2024$819K
2025$1.9M

Why it matters

A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $2,006 more each year.

It could be because…

  • Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
  • The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
  • The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
  2. Is a similar increase planned for next year?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Town property tax: $819,006 in 2024, $1,906,505 in 2025.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  2. Typical increase among 31 similar Ontario towns: 4.7%. Cobalt ranks 1st highest.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  3. Prices (inflation) rose 2.1% over the same year.

    Statistics Canada CPI, table 18-10-0005-01 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Does Cobalt have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$18,075in savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Cobalt had $18,075 saved at the end of 2025, down from $259K in 2019. That is 1% of one year's spending. None of the 31 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Does Cobalt have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$18,075
Show as a table
YearSavings (reserves)
2019$259K
2020$293K
2021$220K
2022$28,075
2023$28,075
2024$18,075
2025$18,075

Why it matters

With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.

It could be because…

  • The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
  • Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
  • The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.

Questions you could ask

  1. Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
  2. What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
  3. What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Savings (reserves and reserve funds): 2019 $259K, 2020 $293K, 2021 $220K, 2022 $28,075, 2023 $28,075, 2024 $18,075, 2025 $18,075.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, line 6420 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: savings equal to 68% of a year's spending. Cobalt: 1%.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedules 40 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$309Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $309K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 16% of everything billed. Only 7 of 31 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $299K.

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$309K
Show as a table
YearUnpaid property tax at year end
2019$254K
2020$231K
2021$321K
2022$395K
2023$411K
2024$299K
2025$309K

Why it matters

When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.

It could be because…

  • The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
  • A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
  • Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
  2. Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
  3. Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Taxes receivable: 2019 $254K, 2020 $231K, 2021 $321K, 2022 $395K, 2023 $411K, 2024 $299K, 2025 $309K. Of the 2025 total, $62,722 was from earlier years.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 0610 to 0699 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: 10.3% of taxes billed.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedules 26 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did Cobalt end 2025 with a deficit of $595,737 when its budget planned for $327,197?

$595,737annual deficit in 2025, against a budgeted $327,197

The audited statements show an annual deficit (spending above income) of $595,737 for 2025, against a budget deficit of $327,197 and a 2024 deficit of $655,576. The gap to budget, $268,540 (worked out by us), is $170,894 of extra spending and $97,646 of missing income. Most of the extra spending is in three areas: environmental services (water, sewer and garbage) $1,380,502 against $1,282,013 budgeted, general government $776,986 against $711,350, and recreation and culture $247,268 against $210,350. The Town's own note explains that these statements count amortization (the yearly wearing-out of buildings, roads and equipment, $666,088) which is not cash. On the Town's own budget basis, the 2025 deficit was $90,090 against a budgeted $5,000, and $40,883 the year before. The accumulated surplus (everything the Town has built up over the years, mostly buildings, roads and pipes) fell from $14,373,961 at the start of 2024 to $13,122,648, which is $1,251,313 less (worked out by us).

Why it matters

A deficit that is not cash can look scarier than it is, but a deficit on the Town's own budget basis means it spent more than it planned and more than it raised. Provincial grants of $1,081,898 were about 30% of the year's revenue (worked out by us), so a Town this small depends on grants it does not control.

It could be because…

  • Most of the gap between the statements and the budget is accounting. The budget leaves out amortization and the statements include it, and the Town explains this in Note 14.
  • Water and sewer costs may have gone up for one-off repairs (see the separate question on water).
  • Some income lines were above plan (federal grants were $113,088 against a budgeted $68,174) and others below (investment income was $8,691 against $19,200).

Questions you could ask

  1. Which parts of the $170,894 of extra 2025 spending were planned for by Council during the year, and which were surprises?
  2. What is the 2026 budget deficit on the Town's own basis, and where is the 2026 budget?
  3. What is the Town's plan if provincial grants of about $1.1 million fall further?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of operations: "Total revenues" budget 3,705,447, actual 3,607,801 (2024 3,464,762). "Total expenditures" budget 4,032,644, actual 4,203,538 (2024 4,120,338). "ANNUAL DEFICIT" budget (327,197), actual (595,737), 2024 (655,576). Expenditure lines, budget and actual: "Environmental services" 1,282,013 and 1,380,502; "General government" 711,350 and 776,986; "Recreation and cultural services" 210,350 and 247,268. "Provincial grants" 1,017,970 budget, 1,081,898 actual (2024 1,169,858). "Accumulated surplus, beginning of year" 2024 14,373,961, end of year 2025 13,122,648.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Operations, PDF page 7 (printed page 5, image; the expense lines add to 4,203,538 and 3,607,801 less 4,203,538 is the deficit of 595,737)

  2. Note 17, Budgeting: "The consolidated statement of operations on page 5 has been modified here to exclude amortization and accretion expenses and to include tangible capital asset expenditures and the principal repayments on long-term debt." "Deficit - full budget based" budget (5,000), actual (90,090), 2024 (40,883). Total revenues 3,755,447, 3,607,801 and 4,389,895; total expenditures 3,760,447, 3,697,891 and 4,430,778.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 17, Budgeting, PDF page 24 (printed page 22, image; 3,607,801 less 3,697,891 is (90,090))

  3. Note 14, Budget: "The budget was prepared on a modified accrual basis while Public Sector Accounting Standards now require a full accrual basis." Reconciliation: "Actual budget deficit for the year" (5,000); add repayment of long-term debt 105,768 and investment in tangible capital assets 317,243; less estimated amortization (679,965), proceeds from long-term debt (50,000) and estimated accretion expenses (15,243); "Budget deficit per statement of operations" (327,197).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 14, Budget, PDF page 19 (printed page 17, image; the column adds to (327,197))

  4. Statement of cash flows: "Amortization of tangible capital assets" 666,088 (2024 679,965); "Annual deficit" (595,737) (2024 (655,576)).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, PDF page 9 (printed page 7, image; cash end of year 607,260 equals the position statement)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did Cobalt spend $79,218 on capital in 2025 against a plan of $317,243 while holding $391,968 of unspent provincial infrastructure money?

$79,218capital assets added in 2025, against $317,243 budgeted in the statements and $360,443 in the capital budget

Capital spending is money spent on buildings, roads, pipes and equipment that last for years. The 2025 capital budget lists seven projects totalling $360,443, including $125,000 for a wetland sewer project under a Director's Order, $98,433 for water treatment plant upgrades and $73,010 for a road. The audited statements show only $79,218 of tangible capital assets added in 2025, of which $10,300 was donated land and $68,918 heavy equipment (worked out by us from the schedule). At the end of 2025 the Town held $391,968 of Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) money it had been given but not yet used, up from $194,683. The Town's cash rose by $229,581 in 2025 even though it ran a deficit.

Why it matters

Grant money usually has to be spent on named projects by a deadline. A sewer project under a provincial order also has to be finished. If plans slip year after year, residents may want to know that the money is safe and the work will be done.

It could be because…

  • Large projects often take more than one year to design, tender and build, so grant money is held until costs are paid. That is how deferred revenue works.
  • 2024 was a very large capital year ($867,885), and the Town may have chosen a quieter year in 2025.
  • The trackless vehicle in the capital budget was to be paid by $50,000 of new long-term debt, and no debt was issued in 2025, so it may be waiting.

Questions you could ask

  1. Has the Director's Order wetland project started, and what is its deadline?
  2. Which capital projects in the 2025 budget were finished, and which moved to 2026?
  3. Is any of the $391,968 of OCIF money at risk if it is not used by a set date?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. 2025 Capital Budget table: "Wetland's Renewal, Rehabilitation, Director's Order Project" $125,000 (Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund); "Upgrade-WTP Filters / Distribution Valves /Service Lines Project" $60,000 and "Upgrade - WTP Drive / Effluent Valves Project" $38,433 (gas tax); "Commission St and Miller Ave (continuation)" $73,010 (NORDS); "Trackless" $50,000 (long-term debt). Total "2025 Budget" $360,443.

    Town of Cobalt, 2025 Capital Budget · 2025 Capital Budget, page 1 (the seven projects add to $360,443)

  2. Statement of change in net debt: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (317,243), actual (79,218), 2024 (867,885).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Debt, PDF page 8 (printed page 6, image; net debt end of year (2,027,256) equals the position statement)

  3. Note 5, Deferred revenue - other: "Provincial government - OCIF" December 31, 2024 194,683; funds received 243,247; revenue earned 45,962; December 31, 2025 391,968. "Provincial government - NORDS" received 73,010, earned 69,896, 2025 balance 3,114. Total 2025 437,377 (2024 236,295).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 5, PDF page 14 (printed page 12, image; the columns add to 437,377 and 194,683 plus 243,247 less 45,962 is 391,968)

  4. Note 16, Schedule of tangible capital assets, 2025: additions "Land" 10,300 and "Heavy equipment" 68,918; total additions 79,218.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 16, Schedule of tangible capital assets, PDF page 22 (printed page 20, image; the additions column adds to 79,218)

  5. Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: "INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 229,581" (2024 (199,884)); "Cash, beginning of year 377,679"; "CASH, END OF YEAR $ 607,260".

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, PDF page 9 (printed page 7, image; 377,679 plus 229,581 is 607,260)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why does Cobalt have only $99,126 of cushion on its books, with a $440,712 general deficit and a $664,082 asbestos cleanup obligation?

$99,126all reserves, surpluses and deficits together at the end of 2025, down from $197,504

The Town's note on its accumulated surplus lists its reserves, surpluses and deficits together at $99,126 at the end of 2025, down from $197,504. The only named reserve is a library reserve of $18,075. The general municipal fund is $440,712 in deficit, up from $394,438, and waterworks is $88,048 in deficit. The Town also carries an asset retirement obligation of $664,082 (money it expects to spend someday on removing asbestos, $658,081, and a fuel tank, $6,001). The note lists it as "unfinanced", which means no money has been set aside for it. The Town holds $607,260 in cash, but $517,809 of the money it holds is deferred revenue: grant money it was given for projects (worked out by us from $437,377 and $80,432). It has a $250,000 bank line of credit with nothing borrowed.

Why it matters

A reserve is savings for a rainy day or a known future cost. If a town has almost none, one big repair or one lost grant can force a tax increase or borrowing. The asbestos obligation is a legal duty to clean up when buildings are renovated or torn down, which the Town may not control.

It could be because…

  • Asbestos removal only happens if a building is renovated or demolished, so the cost may be many years away or never.
  • Many small towns show a large unfunded obligation of this kind in their statements.
  • The Town may plan to raise taxes or use grants for large costs when they arrive rather than save ahead.
  • The unused $250,000 line of credit gives the Town short-term room.

Questions you could ask

  1. Does Council have a policy for building reserves, and what is the target?
  2. Has the Town costed any planned renovation or demolition that would trigger the asbestos work?
  3. How will the $440,712 general municipal deficit be recovered?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 13, Accumulated surplus: "Library reserve" 18,075; "General municipal deficit" (440,712) (2024 (394,438)); "Library surplus (deficit)" (1,019); "Cemetery surplus" 49,090; "Sewer (wetlands) surplus" 561,740; "Waterworks surplus (deficit)" (88,048). Subtotal 99,126 (2024 197,504). "Unfinanced municipal debt" (1,462,300); "Unfinanced asset retirement obligations" (664,082); "Net debt" (2,027,256). The note says reserves "are non-statutory and subject to change by council at any time."

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 13, Accumulated surplus, PDF page 18 (printed page 16, image; the lines add to 99,126 and the note ends at accumulated surplus 13,122,648)

  2. Note 7, Asset retirement obligations: balance end of year 664,082 (2024 650,420). "Asbestos removal" 658,081 (2024 644,543); "Fuel storage tank" 6,001. "The Town owns buildings and sewer segments which contain asbestos, and therefore, the Town is legally required to perform abatement activities upon renovation or demolition of these assets." Note 4: "The Town has a $250,000 business operating line negotiated with CIBC with a balance outstanding of $nil".

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Notes 4 to 7, PDF pages 14 and 15 (printed pages 12 and 13, image; 658,081 plus 6,001 is 664,082)

  3. Statement of financial position: "Cash" 607,260 (2024 377,679); "Taxes receivable" 309,141; "Accounts receivable" 26,210; financial assets 942,611. "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" 325,676; "Deferred revenue - other" 437,377; "Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds" 80,432; "Asset retirement obligations" 664,082; "Municipal debt" 1,462,300. Liabilities 2,969,867. "NET DEBT" (2,027,256).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 6 (printed page 4, image; 942,611 less 2,969,867 is net debt (2,027,256))

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did Cobalt's water system run an $88,184 deficit in 2025, even after $111,418 of federal gas tax money?

$88,184waterworks deficit in 2025, up from $50,682

The Town's waterworks schedule shows total revenue of $602,422 and spending of $690,606, a deficit of $88,184, after a deficit of $50,682 in 2024. Revenue includes $111,418 of federal operating grants, the same amount as the Canada Community Building Fund money the Town used in 2025, so without it the deficit would have been $199,602 (worked out by us). Contracted services rose to $335,647 from $199,890, up $135,757 (worked out by us). The waterworks account went from a surplus of $136 to a deficit of $88,048. Water and sewer user fees came in at $611,476 against $609,312 budgeted, so the gap is not a shortfall in fees.

Why it matters

Water is meant to be paid for by the people who use it, not by property taxes. A water account that loses money each year either draws on other money or needs higher rates. Residents of a town this small will want to know what the contract work was.

It could be because…

  • The schedule says it "includes capital revenue and expenses", so some of the contracted-services increase may be capital work on the water plant, which the capital budget planned at $98,433 for filters and valves (worked out by us from $60,000 and $38,433).
  • Contract work for water treatment may be priced by outside operators and vary from year to year.
  • The Town sells water to a neighbouring township ($28,030), whose rate may be set by agreement.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the $335,647 of waterworks contracted services buy, and how much of it was capital work?
  2. Does Council plan to raise water rates, or to keep using gas tax money for operating costs?
  3. How much of the $111,418 of gas tax money went to operating costs rather than to capital work?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 18, Waterworks - Schedule of Operations: "Sale of water - Cobalt residents" 451,504 (2024 415,533); "Sale of water - Coleman Township" 28,030; "Federal grants - operating" 111,418 (2024 58,034); "Total revenue" 602,422 (2024 520,173). "Contracted services" 335,647 (2024 199,890); "Total expenditures" 690,606 (2024 570,855). "Annual deficit" (88,184) (2024 (50,682)); accumulated deficit end of year (88,048). "This statement is not prepared according to PSAB. It is operational. It excludes amortization, includes capital revenue and expenses".

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 18, PDF page 25 (printed page 23, image; revenue lines add to 602,422 and expense lines to 690,606)

  2. Note 6, Canada Community Building Fund: December 31, 2024 125,490; funds received 66,360; "Revenue Earned" 111,418; December 31, 2025 80,432.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 6, PDF page 14 (printed page 12, image; 125,490 plus 66,360 less 111,418 is 80,432)

  3. Statement of operations: "Water and sewer user fees" budget 609,312, actual 611,476 (2024 575,020).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Operations, PDF page 7 (printed page 5, image; revenue lines add to 3,597,501)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 81% in 6 years?

+81%water, sewers and garbage, 2019 to 2025

Cobalt spent $576K on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $1.0M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 81% in 6 years?
+81%
Show as a table
YearWater, sewers and garbagePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+18%+1%
2021+21%+4%
2022+54%+11%
2023+59%+16%
2024+83%+18%
2025+81%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $469K a year pay for?
  2. Why did water pipes go from $308K to $693K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Water, sewers and garbage: 2019 $576K, 2020 $679K, 2021 $699K, 2022 $886K, 2023 $917K, 2024 $1.1M, 2025 $1.0M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Water pipes, from $308K to $693K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did Cobalt's yearly interest on its debt double to $53,487, and why does one vehicle loan cost 8.65% when its other loans cost between 0% and 4.41%?

$53,487interest paid on long-term debt in 2025, up from $25,069

The Town owed $1,462,300 on five loans at the end of 2025, down from $1,562,160. Interest paid on the debt was $53,487, up from $25,069 (more than double, worked out by us). The Town took on $713,201 of new debt in 2024. Its three Infrastructure Ontario loans carry rates of 1.43%, 2.47% and 4.41%. One vehicle loan with Ford Credit carries 0% and another 8.65%, with a balance of $82,530. The note says its payments are $948 a month, which is $11,376 a year (worked out by us), but the balance fell $16,739 in 2025.

Why it matters

A loan at 8.65% costs roughly twice what the Town pays on its fire truck loan. A small town pays for each point of interest out of taxes and fees. The gap between the stated payment and the fall in the balance may be only a lump payment or a typing error, but residents should be able to rely on the note.

It could be because…

  • The interest rise is mostly the new loan taken in 2024. The garage loan balance of $669,788 is close to the $713,201 borrowed in 2024, though the statements do not link the two.
  • Vehicle dealers sometimes offer a 0% loan on one vehicle and a higher rate on another, which could explain two Ford Credit loans.
  • The Town may have made an extra payment on the 8.65% loan, which would explain the larger fall in the balance.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which loan was taken in 2024 for $713,201, and what did it pay for?
  2. When was the 8.65% vehicle loan taken, for how much, and could it be paid off early?
  3. Is $948 the right monthly payment on the 8.65% loan?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 8, Municipal debt, 2025 balances (2024): garage debenture at 2.47%, 669,788 (703,549); wheel loader debenture at 1.43%, 117,676 (140,222); fire truck debenture at 4.41%, 586,115 (605,500); Ford Credit vehicle loan, "monthly installments of $619 with interest at 0%", 6,191 (13,620); Ford Credit vehicle loan, "payable in monthly blended (principal and interest) payments of $948 with interest at 8.65% per annum", final payment November 2029, 82,530 (99,269). Total $1,462,300 ($1,562,160).

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 8, Municipal debt, PDF page 15 (printed page 13, image; the five balances add to 1,462,300)

  2. Note 8, continued: principal due 2026 $102,158; 2027 100,505; 2028 103,728; 2029 106,017; 2030 86,490; 2031 and later 963,402; total $1,462,300. "Total interest paid during the year on the long-term debt is $53,487 (2024 $25,069)."

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 8, continued, PDF page 16 (printed page 14, image; the schedule adds to 1,462,300)

  3. Statement of cash flows, financing: "Proceeds from municipal debt" nil in 2025, 713,201 in 2024; "Repayment of municipal debt" (99,860) in 2025, (71,031) in 2024.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, PDF page 9 (printed page 7, image; the financing lines add to (99,860))

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why do the 2025 budget pages Cobalt posted not match the 2025 budget printed in its audited statements?

$43,200gap between the posted capital budget and the capital budget in the audited statements (worked out by us)

The Town posts a one-page 2025 Operating Budget and a one-page 2025 Capital Budget. They differ from the budget the audited statements print as adopted by Council. The capital budget totals $360,443; the statements' budget has $317,243 of capital spending, a gap of $43,200 (worked out by us). The operating budget shows provincial grants of $993,540.00 and federal grants of $15,404.45; the statements show $1,017,970 and $68,174. It shows user charges of $194,254.24 against $202,274. Both budgets agree on property taxes ($881,929) and on water and sewer fees ($609,312).

Why it matters

A budget is the promise made to residents, and the audited result is compared with it. If the posted budget is not the one the auditor used, residents cannot check the Town's year against what it said it would do.

It could be because…

  • Council may have amended the budget after it was posted, and the statements use the amended version. We did not find the date it was adopted.
  • The statements' budget separates grants into operating and capital, while the posted budget shows operating totals only.
  • The two documents may count some items on different bases, such as debt repayments of $160,978.84 in the posted operating budget (principal and interest) and $105,768 (principal only) in the statements.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which version of the 2025 budget did Council adopt, and on what date?
  2. Will the 2026 budget be posted before the October 26, 2026 election?
  3. Can the Town post a reconciliation between the posted budget and the statements' budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. 2025 Operating Budget: "Total revenues" $3,313,096.87; "Municipal Taxation" $881,929.36; "Water / Sewer Charges" $609,311.91; "User Charges" $194,254.24; "Provincial Grants" $993,540.00; "Federal Grant" $15,404.45. "Long Term Debt Repayments" $160,978.84. "Total Expenditures" $3,313,096.87.

    Town of Cobalt, 2025 Operating Budget · 2025 Operating Budget, page 1

  2. 2025 Capital Budget, total "2025 Budget" $360,443: Municipal Taxes $0, gas tax $112,433, OCIF $125,000, NORDS $73,010, long-term debt $50,000.

    Town of Cobalt, 2025 Capital Budget · 2025 Capital Budget, page 1 (the funding columns add to 360,443)

  3. Note 17, 2025 Budget column: "User charges" 202,274; "Provincial grants" 1,017,970; "Federal grants" 68,174; capital revenues provincial grants 188,010, federal grants 79,233, long-term debt proceeds 50,000; "Capital expenditures" 317,243; "Long-term debt repayments" 105,768.

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 17, Budgeting, PDF page 24 (printed page 22, image; capital revenues add to 317,243)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How likely is it that Cobalt would have to pay on its $1,517,500 housing guarantee, or on old mine site costs?

$1,517,500provincial contribution the Town guaranteed in 2010, for a 20-year housing agreement

A contingent liability is money a town might have to pay if something happens. The audited statements disclose two. In March 2010 the Town became guarantor for an agreement between a non-profit housing organization and the Province of Ontario, to offer affordable housing for 20 years. The Province's contribution was $1,517,500. The statements also say the Town "has many old mine sites and tailing ponds", that the Province's mines ministry has always taken responsibility for the cost, and that management's opinion is that all contaminated sites have been remedied and the Town is not responsible for future liabilities. The statements record no amount for either.

Why it matters

A guarantee can turn into a bill if the housing organization cannot keep to the agreement, and the Town's cushion is small (see the separate question). Residents are told management's view, but not what the guarantee ends or what would happen if a site were found to need work.

It could be because…

  • The organization may be in good standing and the guarantee may never be called. The statements record no amount for it.
  • The 20-year term would end around March 2030 (worked out by us), so the exposure may be shrinking.
  • The Province has handled old mine sites in the past, which is the basis for the statement.

Questions you could ask

  1. Is the housing organization current on its agreement with the Province, and when does the Town's guarantee end?
  2. Has the Town asked the Province to confirm in writing that old mine sites are not the Town's responsibility?
  3. What would the Town do if a guarantee were called, given its reserves?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 11, Contingent liabilities, Guarantee: "The Town became guarantor for a Provincial Contribution Agreement between [a non-profit housing organization] and the Province of Ontario in March 2010 for the purpose of offering affordable housing for a period of 20 years. The contribution from the Province was $1,517,500." Contaminated and hazardous sites: "The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt has many old mine sites and tailing ponds throughout its municipality." "It is of management's opinion that all contaminated sites have been remedied by MNDM and that the Town is not responsible for future liabilities, if any, related to old mine sites or tailing ponds."

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 11, Contingent liabilities, PDF page 17 (printed page 15, image)

  2. Note 11, Contingent liabilities, Funding agreements: "Under the terms of various funding agreements, the Town could have provincial and federal grants become repayable if it is determined that funding was applied towards ineligible costs or if other terms of the agreements were not met. At year end management is of the opinion that all conditions have been met, and funding was applied towards eligible costs."

    The Corporation of the Town of Cobalt, Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 (Kemp Elliott & Blair LLP, August 18, 2026) · Note 11, Contingent liabilities, PDF page 16 (printed page 14, image)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound automatically from financial reports

Cobalt went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?

−$2.0Mnet financial position, 2025

In 2019, Cobalt had $511K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$2.0M. About 26% of that change ($664K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 1 of 31 similar towns are in a weaker position.

Cobalt went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$2.0M
Show as a table
YearNet financial position
2019$511K
2020$254K
2021−$208K
2022−$354K
2023−$1.4M
2024−$2.0M
2025−$2.0M

Why it matters

This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.

It could be because…

  • A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
  • Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
  2. Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Cobalt? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Net financial assets: 2019 $511K, 2020 $254K, 2021 −$208K, 2022 −$354K, 2023 −$1.4M, 2024 −$2.0M, 2025 −$2.0M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, line 9945 · archived copy

  2. Future landfill and similar closing costs recorded: $664K. Long-term debt: $1.5M. Temporary loans: $0.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 2920, 2699, 2099 · archived copy

↑ All questions