Council BooksDeep RiverOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Deep River's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 14 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Deep River's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 30 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 59% in 6 years?

+59%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Deep River spent $1.3M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.0M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 30 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Needs an answerMoney health

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$3.1Mowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $3.1M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 38% of everything billed. None of the 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $931K.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the auditor give a qualified opinion on 2023, and why did the next audit cut the same liability by $3.9 million?

$5,777,017liability for asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2023, which the 2023 auditor could not fully support

An audit ends with an opinion on whether the statements are fair. A "qualified" opinion means the auditor was fine with most of it but could not be sure about one part. For 2023, Baker Tilly REO LLP said the Town did not give enough evidence for a new liability it recorded for asset retirement obligations (the future cost of closing landfills and removing asbestos from old buildings). The amount was $5,777,017. For 2024, a different auditor, KPMG, told council the Town had new information about its asbestos costs, and the liability fell by $3.9 million. That change added to the Town's accumulated surplus.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingMoney health

How will the Town rebuild its cash, after cash and investments fell to about $0.1 million and capital was paid for from its own funds?

$0.1 millioncash and investments at the end of 2024, down from $1.5 million, according to the Town's auditor

At the end of 2023 the Town held $918,615 in cash and $630,646 in investments. KPMG says that by the end of 2024 cash and investments were about $0.1 million, after $5.8 million was spent on capital assets (roads, pipes, vehicles). KPMG also says the Town has an "accumulated deficit" of $5.9 million that comes mostly from paying for capital projects out of its own funds, and that council approved $4.4 million of new borrowing in 2025 to deal with part of it.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the 2025 budget plan to move $2,425,500 into reserves, up from $1,122,812 the year before?

$2,425,500planned transfer to reserves in the 2025 corporate budget line, against $1,122,812 in the 2024 budget

A reserve is savings set aside for later costs. The 2025 budget asked for $9,704,318 from property taxes, 7.7% more than in 2024. The budget book says it would raise the average home's tax bill by about 4.2%. The corporate line for transfers to reserves went from $1,122,812 in the 2024 budget to $2,425,500. The Town explains part of this: extra payments in lieu of tax (PILT) from the federal nuclear site, a new reserves policy, and paying for all capital work from reserves instead of directly from taxes. This is a draft: we found the version council saw on March 19, 2025 but not the adopted one.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Will the water and sewer reserves cover the 2025 projects if the grants do not all arrive?

$360,689projected closing water and wastewater reserves after 2025, from $1,000,302 estimated at the end of 2024

Water and sewer are paid for by user fees, not property taxes, and any surplus goes to their own reserves. The 2025 budget planned $3,960,306 of water and sewer capital work, including $2,770,305 for work to bring down THM (a by-product of water treatment). Grants were to pay $2,030,926 of the total. The water and wastewater reserves were estimated at $1,000,302 at the end of 2024 and projected at $360,689 after 2025. The Town also says its water price to the nuclear site was set for much more water than the site actually uses.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingHow decisions are made

Will neighbouring municipalities pay the $369,050 the 2025 budget counts on for the pool and the arena?

$369,050counted in the 2025 capital budget as possible funding from neighbouring municipalities

The 2025 capital budget counts on $369,050 from other municipalities toward the arena and the Community Pool, split by population and households: 39.7% from Laurentian Hills and 3.8% from Head, Clara and Maria. The budget says that for the 2024 request "no commitments have been received from our neighbours". The Community Pool is also closed, and the budget says so.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did Deep River's property tax go up 10% in 2025?

+10%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, Deep River collected $854K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 10% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 5 of 30 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Does Deep River have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$5.3Min savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Deep River had $5.3M saved at the end of 2025, up from $2.7M in 2019. That is 42% of one year's spending. Only 6 of 30 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowMoney health

How much of the Town's budget depends on one ratepayer, the federal nuclear site, and how steady is it?

$2,354,725one-time catch-up PILT payment from AECL, received in 2023

The Town's budget calls Atomic Energy of Canada (AECL) its largest ratepayer. AECL pays payments in lieu of tax (PILT) because it is federal land. A 2021 agreement led to a one-time catch-up payment of $2,354,725 that came in 2023 and was put into capital projects and reserves in 2024. KPMG says total revenues dipped in 2024 because that one-time payment did not repeat, and that the PILT owed by AECL/CNL fell by $559K. The 2025 budget again counts on extra PILT for buildings the site added.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowSpending level

Why did the total paid to council and board members rise from $161,023.17 in 2024 to $193,470.10 in 2025?

$193,470.10total remuneration and expenses paid to council and others in 2025, against $161,023.17 in 2024

Each March the treasurer reports what was paid to council and to appointed board members. The 2024 report gave a total of $161,023.17 and the 2025 report gave $193,470.10. By our own subtraction (worked out by us) that is $32,446.93 more. The 2025 report explains one part: there were 27 pay periods in 2025 instead of the usual 26, which meant an extra pay period of salaries and benefits. It also lists conference registration and travel for several named conferences. We do not compare members to one another.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowConflicts of interest

How does council handle votes on the nuclear site when several members declare an interest because they work there?

3councillors who declared an interest on item 6.3.1 on January 14, 2026

The Town's public registry shows that on January 14, 2026, three councillors each declared an indirect interest on agenda item 6.3.1, "Second Resolution of Council as employed with CNL". On September 20, 2023, two councillors declared a direct interest on item 6.1.8 because they are CNL employees. Declaring is what the law asks. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories runs the site of the Town's largest ratepayer.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 59% in 6 years?

+59%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Deep River spent $1.3M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.0M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 30 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 59% in 6 years?
+59%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+0%+1%
2021+10%+4%
2022+17%+11%
2023+32%+16%
2024+31%+18%
2025+59%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $753K a year pay for?
  2. Why did senior management go from $581K to $1.8M?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $1.3M, 2020 $1.3M, 2021 $1.4M, 2022 $1.5M, 2023 $1.7M, 2024 $1.7M, 2025 $2.0M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Senior management, from $581K to $1.8M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 35%. Deep River ranks 4th of 31.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$3.1Mowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $3.1M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 38% of everything billed. None of the 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $931K.

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$3.1M
Show as a table
YearUnpaid property tax at year end
2019$333K
2020$345K
2021$373K
2022$1.5M
2023$592K
2024$931K
2025$3.1M

Why it matters

When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.

It could be because…

  • The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
  • A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
  • Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
  2. Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
  3. Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Taxes receivable: 2019 $333K, 2020 $345K, 2021 $373K, 2022 $1.5M, 2023 $592K, 2024 $931K, 2025 $3.1M. Of the 2025 total, – was from earlier years.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 0610 to 0699 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: 8.7% of taxes billed.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedules 26 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why does Deep River spend more than most similar towns on long-term debt?

$5,538per home on long-term debt, 2025

Deep River spent about $5,538 per home on long-term debt in 2025. The typical similar town spent $807. Only 1 of 30 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Long-term debt per home: Deep River $5,538; typical similar town $807; ranked 2nd highest of 31.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the auditor give a qualified opinion on 2023, and why did the next audit cut the same liability by $3.9 million?

$5,777,017liability for asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2023, which the 2023 auditor could not fully support

An audit ends with an opinion on whether the statements are fair. A "qualified" opinion means the auditor was fine with most of it but could not be sure about one part. For 2023, Baker Tilly REO LLP said the Town did not give enough evidence for a new liability it recorded for asset retirement obligations (the future cost of closing landfills and removing asbestos from old buildings). The amount was $5,777,017. For 2024, a different auditor, KPMG, told council the Town had new information about its asbestos costs, and the liability fell by $3.9 million. That change added to the Town's accumulated surplus.

Why it matters

A liability this size is a large share of what the Town owes. If the estimate is wrong in either direction, the Town's books are too bad or too good. The 2024 statements are posted only as an image, so we could not read the 2024 auditor's opinion.

It could be because…

  • 2023 was the first year the Town had to use this new accounting rule, and a first-year estimate is often rough.
  • The Town says it got more information about asbestos and other contamination during 2024, which is a normal reason to change an estimate.
  • The Town asked for proposals for a new auditor in December 2024, so a fresh audit firm may have looked at the estimate in more detail.

Questions you could ask

  1. What new information led to the $3.9 million drop, and who produced it (an engineer's report, a quote, a survey)?
  2. Did the 2024 auditor give a clean opinion on the 2024 statements, and will the Town post a readable copy?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Auditor's report, "Basis for Qualified Opinion": "The Town has not provided sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the completeness and the valuation of the amounts recorded and the disclosures required in respect of this liability." The table shows an asset retirement obligation liability of $5,777,017 for 2023 and $5,635,560 for 2022, and accretion expense of $128,152 for 2023.

    2023 consolidated financial statements (Baker Tilly REO LLP, December 18, 2024) · Independent Auditor's Report, PDF pages 4 and 5

  2. KPMG's 2024 audit slides: "During the year, the Town obtained additional information concerning its asset retirement obligation relating to asbestos and other contamination. As a result, the Town has recorded decreases in its asset retirement obligation and net book value of tangible capital assets, with a corresponding increase in its accumulated surplus." Another slide says the obligation "decreased by $3.9 million due to change in estimate for asbestos remediation costs".

    KPMG Year-End Audit Report, 2024 fiscal year (October 8, 2025) · slide 3 (Audit Highlights) and slide 7 (Financial Statement Overview), PDF pages 3 and 7

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

How will the Town rebuild its cash, after cash and investments fell to about $0.1 million and capital was paid for from its own funds?

$0.1 millioncash and investments at the end of 2024, down from $1.5 million, according to the Town's auditor

At the end of 2023 the Town held $918,615 in cash and $630,646 in investments. KPMG says that by the end of 2024 cash and investments were about $0.1 million, after $5.8 million was spent on capital assets (roads, pipes, vehicles). KPMG also says the Town has an "accumulated deficit" of $5.9 million that comes mostly from paying for capital projects out of its own funds, and that council approved $4.4 million of new borrowing in 2025 to deal with part of it.

Why it matters

Cash is what pays bills between tax instalments. Paying for projects from savings now and borrowing later is a choice that can be reasonable, but it moves cost to future taxpayers and leaves little cushion if a grant is late.

It could be because…

  • Grants and loans for capital work often arrive after the Town has paid the bills. KPMG says accounts payable rose by $0.8 million because of higher capital payables at year end.
  • Council approved $4.4 million in borrowing in 2025, so the cash gap may be temporary.
  • Interest rates on the Town's fixed loans range from 2.90% to 5.42%, so borrowing is not new to the Town.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the Town's plan, with dates, to bring the accumulated deficit and cash back to a safe level?
  2. How much of the $4.4 million in approved borrowing has been drawn, and what will it cost each year in interest and repayment?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of financial position, December 31, 2023: Cash $918,615 and Investments $630,646. Net financial assets (net debt) $(13,511,119).

    2023 consolidated financial statements (Baker Tilly REO LLP) · Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 7

  2. "Cash and investment balances decreased from $1.5 million in 2023 to $0.1 million in 2024", with acquisition of capital assets of -$5.8 million and principal repayment of long-term debt of -$0.5 million.

    KPMG Year-End Audit Report, 2024 fiscal year · slide 4 (Financial Statement Overview), PDF page 4

  3. The Town has a "reported surplus of $27.6 million" made up of tangible capital assets $32.6 million, reserves and reserve funds $4.5 million, amounts to be recovered in future years ($3.6 million) and an accumulated deficit ($5.9 million) "due primarily to internal funding of capital expenditures". "The Town has approved $4.4 million in debt issuances during the 2025 fiscal year, which will address a portion of its accumulated deficit position."

    KPMG Year-End Audit Report, 2024 fiscal year · slide 8 (Financial Statement Overview), PDF page 8

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the 2025 budget plan to move $2,425,500 into reserves, up from $1,122,812 the year before?

$2,425,500planned transfer to reserves in the 2025 corporate budget line, against $1,122,812 in the 2024 budget

A reserve is savings set aside for later costs. The 2025 budget asked for $9,704,318 from property taxes, 7.7% more than in 2024. The budget book says it would raise the average home's tax bill by about 4.2%. The corporate line for transfers to reserves went from $1,122,812 in the 2024 budget to $2,425,500. The Town explains part of this: extra payments in lieu of tax (PILT) from the federal nuclear site, a new reserves policy, and paying for all capital work from reserves instead of directly from taxes. This is a draft: we found the version council saw on March 19, 2025 but not the adopted one.

Why it matters

Putting money aside is sound if the Town has big repairs coming, and the Town says its spending on roads and buildings is still below what its asset plan calls for. The question is whether residents can see how much of the tax increase goes to savings and what that savings is for.

It could be because…

  • The Town explains that "PILT Omits" (late-billed PILT for buildings the nuclear site added) are a large part of the increase and are being saved rather than spent.
  • The Town says it now funds all capital projects from reserves where needed, instead of from that year's taxes ($330,000 in 2024), so more has to go into reserves.
  • Reserves are projected to pay for $991,154 of the 2025 projects, so some of the savings is spent in the same year.

Questions you could ask

  1. Was the 2025 budget adopted as Draft 3, and where is the adopted version posted?
  2. What did the Town actually move into reserves for 2025, and what is each reserve for?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Operating budget line "Transfers to reserves" under Corporate - Administration: 2024 Budget 1,122,812; 2025 Budget 2,425,500; change 1,302,688 (116.0%). Comment on the line: "Remainder is as per reserve policy and expected surplus $1.3 million; adjusted by $(49,500) to keep tax rate (and burden the same after change in large industrial".

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Attachment 2, operating budget detail, PDF page 33

  2. "The proposed 2025 municipal operating budget requires that $9,704,318 be raised from municipal taxation, an increase of 7.7% compared to the 2024 municipal operating budget." The average residential tax bill is expected to rise "approximately 4.2%".

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Budget Management Discussion and Analysis, sections 2 and 4.2, PDF pages 9 and 22

  3. "Note the increase in transfers to reserves and reserve funds from approximately $1,640,000 to approximately $2,680,000." Table 6: reserves 2024 estimated closing balance 5,102,259, transfers from reserves (991,154), projected 2025 closing balance 6,710,548 including the AECL PILT Agreement reserve of 1,050,000. "In 2024, direct funding of capital projects accounted for $330,000."

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 4.3 and Table 6, PDF page 28

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Will the water and sewer reserves cover the 2025 projects if the grants do not all arrive?

$360,689projected closing water and wastewater reserves after 2025, from $1,000,302 estimated at the end of 2024

Water and sewer are paid for by user fees, not property taxes, and any surplus goes to their own reserves. The 2025 budget planned $3,960,306 of water and sewer capital work, including $2,770,305 for work to bring down THM (a by-product of water treatment). Grants were to pay $2,030,926 of the total. The water and wastewater reserves were estimated at $1,000,302 at the end of 2024 and projected at $360,689 after 2025. The Town also says its water price to the nuclear site was set for much more water than the site actually uses.

Why it matters

If a grant is late or smaller, the gap comes out of reserves that are already low, or out of borrowing, or out of higher water and sewer rates. A 2026 household water and sewer bill is already $1,749.24.

It could be because…

  • The Town says the new operating contract with the Ontario Clean Water Agency has saved money, and the 2024 savings were proposed to go to the reserves.
  • The Town says it expects a new rate model with the nuclear site in 2025 and would put any extra revenue into the water reserve.
  • Grants are normally approved before a project starts, so the Town may already hold the funding letters.

Questions you could ask

  1. Were the THM grants confirmed in writing, and for how much?
  2. Was a new water rate model agreed with the nuclear site, and what did it change?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Table 7: total capital budget for water and wastewater 3,960,306, of which grant 2,030,926, transfer from reserve 1,729,380, debt 200,000. "THM Remediation" 2,770,305, grant 2,030,926, reserve 739,380. Table 9: water and wastewater reserves, 2024 estimated closing balance 1,000,302; transfers from reserves (1,729,380); transfers to reserves 1,089,767; 2025 projected closing balance 360,689.

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 5, Tables 7 and 9, PDF pages 29 and 30

  2. "The current rate model is solely consumption-based, and was developed in 2012, under the assumption of 1,500 to 2,000 m3 of utilization per day. Actual volumes have consistently been substantially lower than this, resulting in shortfall to fully fund infrastructure asset management and operational costs."

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 3.9 Water and Wastewater, PDF page 15

  3. 2026 Water & Sewer Rates: "The annual water and sewer rates for 2026 were approved by Council on February 25, 2026. The annual rate for a residential property is $1,749.24".

    Town of Deep River, Finance department page · 2026 Water & Sewer Rates section

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Will neighbouring municipalities pay the $369,050 the 2025 budget counts on for the pool and the arena?

$369,050counted in the 2025 capital budget as possible funding from neighbouring municipalities

The 2025 capital budget counts on $369,050 from other municipalities toward the arena and the Community Pool, split by population and households: 39.7% from Laurentian Hills and 3.8% from Head, Clara and Maria. The budget says that for the 2024 request "no commitments have been received from our neighbours". The Community Pool is also closed, and the budget says so.

Why it matters

If a neighbour says no, the Town either pays the share itself from reserves or borrowing, or delays the work. The Town has been open that this is a request, not a deal.

It could be because…

  • Talks with neighbours may still have been going on when the budget was written.
  • The Town says a Recreation and Culture Master Plan, due in early 2025, will guide shared recreation costs and user fees from 2026.
  • The Town can change the project or the funding mix at any time with a council vote.

Questions you could ask

  1. Have Laurentian Hills and Head, Clara and Maria agreed to any share, and in what amount?
  2. If they decline, how will the Town pay for the arena work?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "Deep River requested that both the Town of Laurentian Hills and the Township of Head Clara Maria contribute to the Community Pool repairs on a population- and number of household proportional basis." "At this time, no commitments have been received from our neighbours regarding the 2024 request."

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 3.4 Recreation and Culture, PDF page 13

  2. Table 3: Arena - slab replacement, lobby flooring, total 1,568,000 with potential funding from neighbouring municipalities of 356,000. Footnote: "39.7% contribution from Laurentian Hills; 3.8% contribution from Head Clara Maria." Total contributions from other municipalities: $369,050 of $3,796,120 in municipal capital spending.

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 4.1 and Table 3, PDF pages 20 and 21

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did Deep River's property tax go up 10% in 2025?

+10%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, Deep River collected $854K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 10% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 5 of 30 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Why did Deep River's property tax go up 10% in 2025?
$9.7M
Show as a table
YearTown property tax
2019$6.7M
2020$7.0M
2021$8.4M
2022$7.8M
2023$8.1M
2024$8.8M
2025$9.7M

Why it matters

A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $458 more each year.

It could be because…

  • Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
  • The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
  • The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
  2. Is a similar increase planned for next year?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Town property tax: $8,847,156 in 2024, $9,701,268 in 2025.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  2. Typical increase among 30 similar Ontario towns: 6.3%. Deep River ranks 6th highest.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  3. Prices (inflation) rose 2.1% over the same year.

    Statistics Canada CPI, table 18-10-0005-01 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Does Deep River have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$5.3Min savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Deep River had $5.3M saved at the end of 2025, up from $2.7M in 2019. That is 42% of one year's spending. Only 6 of 30 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Does Deep River have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$5.3M
Show as a table
YearSavings (reserves)
2019$2.7M
2020$2.3M
2021$2.9M
2022$4.6M
2023$4.1M
2024$5.8M
2025$5.3M

Why it matters

With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.

It could be because…

  • The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
  • Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
  • The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.

Questions you could ask

  1. Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
  2. What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
  3. What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Savings (reserves and reserve funds): 2019 $2.7M, 2020 $2.3M, 2021 $2.9M, 2022 $4.6M, 2023 $4.1M, 2024 $5.8M, 2025 $5.3M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, line 6420 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: savings equal to 78% of a year's spending. Deep River: 42%.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedules 40 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How much of the Town's budget depends on one ratepayer, the federal nuclear site, and how steady is it?

$2,354,725one-time catch-up PILT payment from AECL, received in 2023

The Town's budget calls Atomic Energy of Canada (AECL) its largest ratepayer. AECL pays payments in lieu of tax (PILT) because it is federal land. A 2021 agreement led to a one-time catch-up payment of $2,354,725 that came in 2023 and was put into capital projects and reserves in 2024. KPMG says total revenues dipped in 2024 because that one-time payment did not repeat, and that the PILT owed by AECL/CNL fell by $559K. The 2025 budget again counts on extra PILT for buildings the site added.

Why it matters

One-time money in a budget can make a year look better than the next one will be. The Town is open about it. The question for residents is how much of the yearly tax base rests on one payer.

It could be because…

  • The Town spent the one-time payment on capital and reserves, not on yearly costs, which is the careful way to use it.
  • The Town says it now works each year with AECL and the property assessment agency to keep the site's assessment current.

Questions you could ask

  1. What share of yearly operating revenue comes from PILT, and what is the Town's plan if the site's assessment or tax ratio changes?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "The outcome of this process was concluded in 2023 and resulted in a one-time retroactive AECL PILT payment of $2,354,725. These funds were invested into capital projects and reserves in 2024." AECL is described as "the Town's largest ratepayer".

    Report 2025-FIN-11, Draft 3 - 2025 Operating and Capital Budget · Section 3.2 AECL PILT Agreement, PDF page 12

  2. "Total revenues decreased from $15.6 million in 2023 to $15.5 million in 2024 (-1.0%), reflecting higher taxation and user fees (+$1.2 million) offset by one-time funding adjustment from AECL in 2023 not present in 2024." "Lower taxes (PIL) receivable from AECL/CNL -$559K."

    KPMG Year-End Audit Report, 2024 fiscal year · slides 4 and 11, PDF pages 4 and 11

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the total paid to council and board members rise from $161,023.17 in 2024 to $193,470.10 in 2025?

$193,470.10total remuneration and expenses paid to council and others in 2025, against $161,023.17 in 2024

Each March the treasurer reports what was paid to council and to appointed board members. The 2024 report gave a total of $161,023.17 and the 2025 report gave $193,470.10. By our own subtraction (worked out by us) that is $32,446.93 more. The 2025 report explains one part: there were 27 pay periods in 2025 instead of the usual 26, which meant an extra pay period of salaries and benefits. It also lists conference registration and travel for several named conferences. We do not compare members to one another.

Why it matters

Council pay is public money, and a jump in a total is worth a plain explanation, even when a calendar quirk accounts for part of it.

It could be because…

  • The 2025 report says 27 pay periods fell in 2025, so one extra pay period is in the total.
  • The 2025 total includes conference and travel costs that the report ties to named municipal events, which can vary by year and by who attends.
  • The 2025 total also includes board and committee payments, which are listed separately in the report.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much of the $32,446.93 increase is the extra pay period, how much is conference and travel, and how much is anything else?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "The total remuneration and expenses paid to or on behalf of Members of Council and others by the Town of Deep River and other bodies and local boards for 2025 was $193,470.10." "There were 27 pay periods in 2025, which resulted in an extra pay period of salaries and benefits."

    Report 2026-FIN-02, 2025 Council Remuneration and Expenses · Financial Implications and Table 1 note, PDF pages 3

  2. The 2024 report gives the total paid for 2024 as $161,023.17.

    Report 2025-FIN-12, 2024 Council Remuneration and Expenses · Financial Implications, PDF page 3

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How does council handle votes on the nuclear site when several members declare an interest because they work there?

3councillors who declared an interest on item 6.3.1 on January 14, 2026

The Town's public registry shows that on January 14, 2026, three councillors each declared an indirect interest on agenda item 6.3.1, "Second Resolution of Council as employed with CNL". On September 20, 2023, two councillors declared a direct interest on item 6.1.8 because they are CNL employees. Declaring is what the law asks. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories runs the site of the Town's largest ratepayer.

Why it matters

When several members step out of a vote, fewer people decide it. Residents may want to know how council makes sure these decisions still get a proper vote.

It could be because…

  • The members followed the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act by declaring.
  • The registry says the Town posts both the table and the original written forms.
  • The registry does not say what item 6.3.1 or 6.1.8 was about, so these may be routine.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were agenda items 6.3.1 (January 14, 2026) and 6.1.8 (September 20, 2023), and did council still have enough members to vote?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Registry rows: January 14, 2026, Council, three councillors, item 6.3.1, Indirect, "Second Resolution of Council as employed with CNL". September 20, 2023, Council, two councillors, item 6.1.8, Direct, "Is an employee of CNL".

    Public Registry of Pecuniary Interest · Public Registry table, rows dated January 14, 2026 and September 20, 2023

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound automatically from financial reports

Why does Deep River spend more than most similar towns on garbage, dump and recycling?

$369per home on garbage, dump and recycling, 2025

Deep River spent about $369 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar town spent $202. Only 2 of 30 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Deep River? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Deep River $369; typical similar town $202; ranked 3rd highest of 31.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions