Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Drummond-North Elmsley's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 7 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Drummond-North Elmsley's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 41 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Drummond-North Elmsley had $3.7M saved at the end of 2025, down from $4.6M in 2019. That is 48% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 41 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$1,879,522estimated reserves at December 31, 2026 in the December 2, 2025 draft, down from an estimated $3,159,342
A reserve is money set aside in earlier years for later costs. The draft 2026 budget slide shows an estimated reserve balance of $3,159,342 at December 31, 2025, new transfers into reserves of $1,185,935, transfers out of $2,465,755, and an estimated $1,879,522 at the end of 2026. By our own division (worked out by us), that is about 41% lower. The slide's note gives one reason. We could not read the adopted budget.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$200,000draft 2026 capital line for a financial system replacement
The December 2025 draft budget slides list "Financial System Replacement $200,000", paid from the Information Technology Reserve. A 2020 outside review set out a move to Microsoft Dynamics GP, which council opted to pursue, with a one-time cost of $68k and about $100k of services in the first year, 2021. The draft slide gives no reason for the new spending.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Development charges are fees on new homes that pay for growth-related costs. In February 2025 a staff report recommended raising them each January and said the applicable increase would be 2.3%, from $6,135 to $6,276 for a single-detached home. The Township's 2025 statement, written in April 2026, says the rates in effect from December 1, 2024 "remained unchanged for 2025". We do not know whether council approved the recommendation.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$544,437draft 2026 levy increase shown December 2, 2025 (9.73%), before council adopted a budget
At the public budget meeting on December 2, 2025, the Township showed a draft 2026 tax levy of $6,138,293, an increase of $544,437 or 9.73%. The slide lists the reasons. The biggest was "2025 Received One-time Credit" at $181,011, and the next was the policing contract at $140,445. By our own addition (worked out by us), the listed reasons add up to $489,096, which is $55,341 less than $544,437. The slides name December 9, 2025 as the day of proposed adoption. We could not read the adopted budget, so we do not know whether these draft figures changed.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
The Township pays about $113,616 a year on a loan for bridges. In 2023 the whole payment came out of the development charge reserve. In 2025 the reserve paid $30,348.61 of it. The rest, about $83,267 (worked out by us as $113,615.76 less $30,348.61), had to come from somewhere else, most likely taxes. The Township's own draft budget slide explains the change: the new 2024 study counts only the growth share. The reserve itself rose from $206,184.30 at the end of 2023 to $511,423.09 at the end of 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
In 2019, Drummond-North Elmsley had $3.7M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$1.4M. About 95% of that change ($4.9M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 9 of 41 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Drummond-North Elmsley had $3.7M saved at the end of 2025, down from $4.6M in 2019. That is 48% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 41 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Drummond-North Elmsley have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$5.0M
$3.7M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$4.6M
2020
$3.9M
2021
$3.8M
2022
$3.0M
2023
$2.9M
2024
$2.8M
2025
$3.7M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$1,879,522estimated reserves at December 31, 2026 in the December 2, 2025 draft, down from an estimated $3,159,342
A reserve is money set aside in earlier years for later costs. The draft 2026 budget slide shows an estimated reserve balance of $3,159,342 at December 31, 2025, new transfers into reserves of $1,185,935, transfers out of $2,465,755, and an estimated $1,879,522 at the end of 2026. By our own division (worked out by us), that is about 41% lower. The slide's note gives one reason. We could not read the adopted budget.
Why it matters
Reserves are the Township's cushion for repairs, equipment and surprises. Spending them on planned projects is normal, but a large fall in one year leaves less for the next.
It could be because…
Reserves are meant to be spent on planned projects, and the draft capital programs are large.
The slide's note says the plan includes money to replenish reserves used for the Ferguson Falls community hall, so the low point may be short.
The adopted budget may differ from the draft.
Questions you could ask
Did the adopted 2026 budget keep these reserve transfers?
When does the Township expect reserves to be back to their level at the end of 2025, and how will that be paid for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Total Estimated Balance at Dec. 31, 2025 $ 3,159,342", "PLUS: Draft 2026 Transfers TO Reserves $ 1,185,935", "LESS: Draft 2026 Transfers FROM Reserves ($ 2,465,755)", "Total Estimated Balance at Dec. 31, 2026 $ 1,879,522". Note: "Proposed financing to replenish reserves utilized for FFCH construction".
The slides show "2026 Capital Programs - $2,168,470". Richmond's Road / Drummond Conc. 5B is $1,278,720, paid $478,720 from the Construction Reserve and $800,000 from the Canada Community Building Fund. Grader and mounted roller packer $549,750 is paid from the Equipment Reserve. Financial System Replacement $200,000 is paid from the Information Technology Reserve.
$200,000draft 2026 capital line for a financial system replacement
The December 2025 draft budget slides list "Financial System Replacement $200,000", paid from the Information Technology Reserve. A 2020 outside review set out a move to Microsoft Dynamics GP, which council opted to pursue, with a one-time cost of $68k and about $100k of services in the first year, 2021. The draft slide gives no reason for the new spending.
Why it matters
A finance system holds the Township's books, payroll and tax billing. It is a large one-off cost for a small township. Residents can only judge it if the Township says what it replaces and why.
It could be because…
The 2020 system may be near the end of its supported life, or the vendor may have changed it.
The $200,000 may cover new modules, hosting or a move with the County, not only software.
The amount may have changed in the adopted budget.
Questions you could ask
What is the $200,000 financial system replacement for, and what does it replace?
Was the 2020 plan carried out, and what did it cost in total?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The slide reads "2026 Capital Programs, Financial System Replacement $ 200,000, Information Technology Reserve $200,000".
The executive summary says "DNE Council opted to pursue a partnership with the County and the implementation of Microsoft Dynamics GP". It says "the initial investment includes a one-time cost of $68k" and that the first-year services in 2021 are estimated at "$100k".
Development charges are fees on new homes that pay for growth-related costs. In February 2025 a staff report recommended raising them each January and said the applicable increase would be 2.3%, from $6,135 to $6,276 for a single-detached home. The Township's 2025 statement, written in April 2026, says the rates in effect from December 1, 2024 "remained unchanged for 2025". We do not know whether council approved the recommendation.
Why it matters
If the charges were meant to rise each January but did not, the reserve for growth costs would get slightly less. Residents need to know what council decided.
It could be because…
Council may not have adopted the recommendation, or may have waived the increase, which the by-law allows.
Council may have approved it for later years and the 2025 statement shows the table as first set.
Questions you could ask
Did council approve annual indexing of development charges, and from what date?
Were the 2025 charges collected at the table rates or at indexed rates?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The report recommends that the schedule of development charges "be adjusted annually as of January 1st each year". It says the applicable increase "would be 2.3% which would increase the current DC fee for a Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling of $6,135 to $6,276, being an increase of $141".
The report says the rates in effect from December 1, 2024 "remained unchanged for 2025". It says $151,305 was collected in development charges during 2025.
$544,437draft 2026 levy increase shown December 2, 2025 (9.73%), before council adopted a budget
At the public budget meeting on December 2, 2025, the Township showed a draft 2026 tax levy of $6,138,293, an increase of $544,437 or 9.73%. The slide lists the reasons. The biggest was "2025 Received One-time Credit" at $181,011, and the next was the policing contract at $140,445. By our own addition (worked out by us), the listed reasons add up to $489,096, which is $55,341 less than $544,437. The slides name December 9, 2025 as the day of proposed adoption. We could not read the adopted budget, so we do not know whether these draft figures changed.
Why it matters
Property taxes are most of the Township's income. A draft is a starting point, and the adopted levy is what residents pay. The slide also says part of the increase is a credit that does not repeat.
It could be because…
The slide may leave out small items, or an item may be combined with another one.
Council may have changed the draft at the December 9 meeting.
A one-time credit in one year means the next year looks bigger without any new spending.
Questions you could ask
What levy and what residential tax increase did council adopt for 2026, and how did they differ from the December 2 draft?
What makes up the $55,341 between the reasons listed on the slide and the $544,437 increase?
Is the one-time credit in 2025 expected to repeat, and how much of the 2026 increase is only the loss of that credit?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The slide says "Total Tax Requirement: $6,138,293" and "Increase of $544,437 or 9.73% More than was required in 2025". The budget schedule slide gives "December 9th – Proposed Adoption of the Budget and Fee Amendments".
The slide titled "Proposed Levy Increase of $544,437" lists: OPP Contract Increase $140,445; 2025 Received One-time Credit $181,011; Wages & Benefits $111,725; Fire Services $ 27,365; Library Board Increase $ 11,155; Audit Fees $ 5,100; Reduced Contribution to Reserves ($ 42,520); Increased Investment Income ($ 11,025). It lists eleven more smaller lines, up and down.
The "Tax Rates" table shows a residential 2026 final rate of 0.01057811 and a 2025 final rate of 0.01016244. The table says each rate "includes: Municipal, County, Education", so it is not the Township's own rate and cannot be compared with the draft levy.
The Township pays about $113,616 a year on a loan for bridges. In 2023 the whole payment came out of the development charge reserve. In 2025 the reserve paid $30,348.61 of it. The rest, about $83,267 (worked out by us as $113,615.76 less $30,348.61), had to come from somewhere else, most likely taxes. The Township's own draft budget slide explains the change: the new 2024 study counts only the growth share. The reserve itself rose from $206,184.30 at the end of 2023 to $511,423.09 at the end of 2025.
Why it matters
Who pays for a loan, new homes or all taxpayers, is a choice written into the development charge study. It is useful to see it printed in the statements.
It could be because…
The 2024 study decided only part of the loan is for growth, so only that part may come from development charges.
The earlier by-law may have charged everything to the reserve.
Questions you could ask
How much of each year's bridge loan payment is now paid from taxes, and where does the 2026 budget show it?
How would the plan the report mentions, announced March 30, 2026, to cut development charges in half for three years change the reserve and the loan payments?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2023 table shows "Less $113,616 for bridges" and the text says expenses for 2023 include "$113,615.76 for loan payments for the bridge loan". It gives the balance of the reserve at December 31, 2023 as "$206,184.30".
The report lists "$30,348.61 - Bridge Loan repayment" and says the development charges study "includes a portion of the loan repayment that is attributable to growth". It gives the reserve balance on December 31, 2025 as "$511,423.09".
The debt slide says "2022 Loan for Bridges $1,000,000, 10 Year Loan at 2.59%", "Repayment was from Development Charges, until Dec. 2024", annual payments "$ 113,616", maturity date "February 1, 2032".
In 2019, Drummond-North Elmsley had $3.7M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$1.4M. About 95% of that change ($4.9M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 9 of 41 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Drummond-North Elmsley went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$4.0M−$2.0M$0$2.0M$4.0M
−$1.4M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$3.7M
2020
$2.7M
2021
$1.6M
2022
$1.2M
2023
−$2.0M
2024
−$1.8M
2025
−$1.4M
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Drummond-North Elmsley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy