Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read East Zorra - Tavistock's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 9 so far
Things worth asking about
We read East Zorra - Tavistock's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 85 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
East Zorra - Tavistock spent $1.6M on roads and snow in 2019 and $2.5M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 3 of 85 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$4,234,807spent on transportation services in 2025, against a budget of $2,404,688
The audited statements show what the Township spent on transportation services (roads, bridges, winter plowing and the equipment that goes with them). For 2025 the budget column says $2,404,688 and the actual column says $4,234,807. For 2024 the budget was $2,452,962 and the actual was $3,502,711. Part of the gap is accounting: the budget column shows nothing for amortization (the yearly write-down of the value of roads, bridges and equipment as they wear out), while the actual column includes it. The transportation share of amortization was $867,643 in 2025. Taking that out leaves $3,367,164, still $962,476 above the budget (worked out by us). The Township's 2026 draft budget says it has raised its winter plowing and salting budget because of what it spent in 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$1,332,419loss on disposal of capital assets in 2024 (2025: $225,554)
When the Township replaces or scraps something it owns (a road section, a bridge, a truck), the statements record the difference between what it was still worth on the books and what the Township received. In 2024 that loss was $1,332,419 and in 2025 it was $225,554. The budget shows nothing for either year. In 2024, almost all of it sits in the transportation column ($1,348,739, with a small gain elsewhere). Assets with an original cost of $2,128,113 were taken off the books in 2024, of which $761,270 had already been written down.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$1,615,450fall in total reserves during 2025, to $7,145,535 (worked out by us)
Reserves are money set aside for later costs, like replacing a bridge or arena equipment. Total reserves rose from $8,136,773 at the end of 2023 to $8,760,985 at the end of 2024, then fell to $7,145,535 at the end of 2025, a drop of $1,615,450 (worked out by us). The reserve for capital replacement fell from $7,777,176 to $5,982,475. Cash fell from $10,692,661 to $9,246,136. The adopted 2026 budget plans to take $3,591,457 from reserves for capital projects in 2026, then $2,330,624, $1,283,912, $891,053 and $2,467,213 in the next four years.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$7,750,000borrowing planned for 2030 in the adopted capital summary
Net long-term liabilities (what the Township owes lenders) were $247,303 at the end of 2025. The capital plan in the adopted 2026 by-law shows no borrowing from 2023 to 2029 and then "Debt Financing" of $7,750,000 in 2030. The Township's draft budget shows where it comes from: a $10,000,000 line for a "Multi-Use Recreational Facility", described as "as per Recreation Advisory Committee - new indoor facility", paid for by debentures (long-term loans) of $7,750,000, developers' contributions of $1,000,000 and $1,100,000 from the community centres reserve. A plan is not a promise, and a later Council would decide.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
East Zorra - Tavistock spent $670K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.2M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 10 of 85 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$1,906,346surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $3,956,332
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The 2025 budget column planned an excess of revenue over expenditures of $3,956,332. The audited result was $1,906,346, which is $2,049,986 less (worked out by us). Most of the gap is explained by amortization: the budget column has none, and the actual 2025 figure is $1,726,904. That leaves $323,082 (worked out by us).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$8,945,280the 2026 levy for municipal purposes, up from $8,409,167
The levy is the amount the Township collects from property taxes for its own services (not the County's or the schools'). It was $8,409,167 in 2025 and is $8,945,280 in 2026, a rise of $536,113, or about 6.4% (worked out by us). The residential tax rate went from 0.00589194 to 0.00607867, about 3.2% (worked out by us), so roughly half of the rise comes from more or higher-valued properties and half from a higher rate. The Township's draft budget gives winter control and arena spending as pressures.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$2,933,746the Township's investment in ERTH Corporation at December 31, 2025
ERTH Corporation is a company in which the Township holds a share. The Township owns 5.04% of it and shows it in the statements at $2,933,746: its share of the company's equity ($2,173,746) plus a $760,000 promissory note (a loan with no end date). The note earns 7.25%, and the Township received $55,100 of interest in 2025. ERTH declared a dividend of $1,030,000 in 2025, of which the Township's share is $51,954. The statements say the note is unsecured, and that no principal repayment is expected in the next twelve months.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
East Zorra - Tavistock spent $1.6M on roads and snow in 2019 and $2.5M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 3 of 85 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 61% in 5 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+61%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+3%
+1%
2021
+22%
+4%
2022
+68%
+11%
2023
+38%
+16%
2024
+61%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $964K a year pay for?
Why did gravel roads go from $418K to $1.1M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$4,234,807spent on transportation services in 2025, against a budget of $2,404,688
The audited statements show what the Township spent on transportation services (roads, bridges, winter plowing and the equipment that goes with them). For 2025 the budget column says $2,404,688 and the actual column says $4,234,807. For 2024 the budget was $2,452,962 and the actual was $3,502,711. Part of the gap is accounting: the budget column shows nothing for amortization (the yearly write-down of the value of roads, bridges and equipment as they wear out), while the actual column includes it. The transportation share of amortization was $867,643 in 2025. Taking that out leaves $3,367,164, still $962,476 above the budget (worked out by us). The Township's 2026 draft budget says it has raised its winter plowing and salting budget because of what it spent in 2025.
Why it matters
A budget is what Council tells residents a service will cost. If roads regularly cost much more than planned, the tax levy may be set too low and the difference has to come out of savings (reserves) or later years. The Township has begun to correct it for winter work, which suggests it saw the gap.
It could be because…
The budget leaves out amortization, which is a bookkeeping charge and not cash. Of the $4,234,807, $867,643 is amortization.
Winter weather. The Township says it set a larger winter control budget for 2026 based on what it spent in 2025.
Work paid for by grants or by developers (the statements show government transfers and developer contributions for capital work) may be counted in spending without being in the operating budget.
The statements say the approved operating budget is what appears in the budget column, so capital road work counted in expenses could sit outside it.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2025 transportation spending was winter control, how much was road and bridge repair, and how much was amortization?
Did Council see a mid-year report showing roads spending running ahead of the budget, and when?
Why was the 2025 budget not raised for winter control before the 2026 budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Schedule 2, segmented information, 2025: under the Transportation column, "Amortization" 867,643; "Materials, goods and services" 2,139,984; total expenditures 4,234,807.
Statement of change in net financial assets: the budget 2025 column for "Amortization of tangible capital assets" shows "-" (nothing); the actual 2025 column shows 1,726,904.
The Township's own explanation in its 2026 draft budget: "Based on experience-related expenses for 2025 as well as the first two months of 2026, the Winter Control budget areas for Plowing, Salting and Sanding have been increased by a net amount." (We did not use that line's dollar amount, because it is a draft figure.)
$1,332,419loss on disposal of capital assets in 2024 (2025: $225,554)
When the Township replaces or scraps something it owns (a road section, a bridge, a truck), the statements record the difference between what it was still worth on the books and what the Township received. In 2024 that loss was $1,332,419 and in 2025 it was $225,554. The budget shows nothing for either year. In 2024, almost all of it sits in the transportation column ($1,348,739, with a small gain elsewhere). Assets with an original cost of $2,128,113 were taken off the books in 2024, of which $761,270 had already been written down.
Why it matters
A loss of this size is not cash leaving that year, but it shows that money spent years ago on infrastructure was written off earlier than planned. It matters for whether the Township's estimates of how long its roads and bridges last are right, because those estimates set how much it must put aside for replacement.
It could be because…
Road and bridge sections that were rebuilt before the end of their estimated life are written off when replaced; this is normal accounting.
The 2025 statements say the Township reviewed its asset list and removed fully worn-out assets from the books in the comparison year. That adjustment is described as having no effect on revenue.
The amount may include land or equipment sold to other parties.
Questions you could ask
Which assets accounted for the $1,348,739 transportation loss in 2024?
Were those assets replaced earlier than their estimated lives, and are the lives used in the statements still right?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2024: "Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets" budget "-", actual 2024 (1,332,419), actual 2023 35,887.
Schedule 1, 2024: "Disposals during the year" cost, Infrastructure (1,904,336), total (2,128,113); accumulated amortization on disposals, total (761,270).
Statement of operations, 2025: "Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets" budget "-", actual 2025 ( 225,554), actual 2024 ( 1,332,419). Schedule 2, 2025: total ( 225,554).
$1,615,450fall in total reserves during 2025, to $7,145,535 (worked out by us)
Reserves are money set aside for later costs, like replacing a bridge or arena equipment. Total reserves rose from $8,136,773 at the end of 2023 to $8,760,985 at the end of 2024, then fell to $7,145,535 at the end of 2025, a drop of $1,615,450 (worked out by us). The reserve for capital replacement fell from $7,777,176 to $5,982,475. Cash fell from $10,692,661 to $9,246,136. The adopted 2026 budget plans to take $3,591,457 from reserves for capital projects in 2026, then $2,330,624, $1,283,912, $891,053 and $2,467,213 in the next four years.
Why it matters
Savings are what let a township pay for big repairs without borrowing or sharp tax rises. Using them for planned projects is what reserves are for. The question is whether the plan also puts money back, so that the next big job is not paid for by debt or a larger levy.
It could be because…
Reserves were built up in earlier years for projects planned for exactly this time, such as bridge work, and spending them is the plan working.
The draws shown in the capital summary are gross: the operating budget also adds money to reserves each year, which this table does not show.
Some draws from reserves may come from funds that developers paid for growth projects, which can only be spent on those projects.
Questions you could ask
What is the target balance for each reserve, and what yearly contribution reaches it?
After the planned 2026 to 2030 draws and the yearly contributions, what is each reserve forecast to hold at the end of 2030?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Schedule C, Summary of Net Departmental Capital Budgets, "Transfers from Reserves and Reserve Funds": 2025 Actual (4,261,202); 2026 Proposed (3,591,457); 2027 (2,330,624); 2028 (1,283,912); 2029 (891,053); 2030 (2,467,213).
By-law 2026-10 · Schedule 'C', Proposed 2026 - 2030 Capital Budgets Summary, PDF page 5
$7,750,000borrowing planned for 2030 in the adopted capital summary
Net long-term liabilities (what the Township owes lenders) were $247,303 at the end of 2025. The capital plan in the adopted 2026 by-law shows no borrowing from 2023 to 2029 and then "Debt Financing" of $7,750,000 in 2030. The Township's draft budget shows where it comes from: a $10,000,000 line for a "Multi-Use Recreational Facility", described as "as per Recreation Advisory Committee - new indoor facility", paid for by debentures (long-term loans) of $7,750,000, developers' contributions of $1,000,000 and $1,100,000 from the community centres reserve. A plan is not a promise, and a later Council would decide.
Why it matters
A new building paid for by a loan of that size would mean yearly payments for many years. We did not find a tax effect stated for it in the documents we read. It is four years away, so a future Council would make the decision.
It could be because…
A large building that will serve residents for decades is often paid for partly by borrowing, so that future users share the cost.
The line is a placeholder for a project the Recreation Advisory Committee wants. Council may change it or drop it before 2030.
Developers' contributions and a community centres reserve are also in the funding, which may mean borrowing ends up smaller.
Questions you could ask
What would the yearly payments on $7,750,000 be, and what would they add to the tax levy?
Will Council decide on the Multi-Use Recreational Facility, and its borrowing, in public before 2030?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule C, Summary of Net Departmental Capital Budgets, "Debt Financing": 2023 to 2029 "-", 2030 Proposed (7,750,000). "Infrastructure and Community Services" expenditures 2030 Proposed 11,116,334.
By-law 2026-10 · Schedule 'C', Proposed 2026 - 2030 Capital Budgets Summary, PDF page 5
Statement of financial position: "Net long-term liabilities (note 8)" 2025 247,303, 2024 420,330. Note 8(b), debt to be retired over the next five years: 2026 $147,611 (recovered from taxation) and $31,781 (recovered from user charges); 2027 $20,896 and $16,683; 2028 $21,752 and $8,580.
Draft capital summary, Infrastructure and Community Services: "12-6-633001-4005 Construction - Multi-Use Recreational Facility" 2030 Proposed 10,000,000, note "as per Recreation Advisory Committee - new indoor facility". Revenue lines for the same year: "Debentures" (7,750,000), "Contributions from Developers" (1,000,000), "Transfer from Community Centres Reserve" (1,100,000). The totals for this department in 2030 (11,116,334) and the debt line match the adopted by-law.
East Zorra - Tavistock spent $670K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.2M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 10 of 85 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 79% in 5 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+79%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−11%
+1%
2021
+11%
+4%
2022
+33%
+11%
2023
+59%
+16%
2024
+79%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $529K a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $558K to $896K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$1,906,346surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $3,956,332
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The 2025 budget column planned an excess of revenue over expenditures of $3,956,332. The audited result was $1,906,346, which is $2,049,986 less (worked out by us). Most of the gap is explained by amortization: the budget column has none, and the actual 2025 figure is $1,726,904. That leaves $323,082 (worked out by us).
Why it matters
The surplus shown in the statements is partly an accounting figure. What matters for taxes is the cash and savings the Township holds, which are covered in a separate question.
It could be because…
Amortization is a bookkeeping charge that the budget leaves out. It accounts for most of the gap.
A loss on selling or scrapping assets, which is not budgeted, was $225,554 in 2025.
Questions you could ask
Could the Township publish, beside its statements, a one-page table that turns the budget into the statements' basis (adding amortization and capital grants)?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES" budget 2025 3,956,332, actual 2025 1,906,346, actual 2024 741,181. "Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets" 2025 actual ( 225,554).
$8,945,280the 2026 levy for municipal purposes, up from $8,409,167
The levy is the amount the Township collects from property taxes for its own services (not the County's or the schools'). It was $8,409,167 in 2025 and is $8,945,280 in 2026, a rise of $536,113, or about 6.4% (worked out by us). The residential tax rate went from 0.00589194 to 0.00607867, about 3.2% (worked out by us), so roughly half of the rise comes from more or higher-valued properties and half from a higher rate. The Township's draft budget gives winter control and arena spending as pressures.
Why it matters
The levy is what residents pay, so the reasons for the rise should be easy to see in one place. The Township's draft explains it in short remarks, but we could not see the minutes where Council discussed it.
It could be because…
More properties and new construction raise the levy without raising anyone's rate.
Costs outside the Township's control, such as contracts for policing, can rise faster than inflation.
A bad winter in 2025 pushed up the winter control budget for 2026.
Questions you could ask
Could the Township publish in one table how much of the 2026 levy increase is growth, policing, winter control, arena savings and other items, using the adopted figures?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
By-law 2026-10, section 1: "That the 2026 levy for municipal purposes shall be $8,945,280." Schedule A: "Tax Levy" 2025 Approved (8,409,167), 2026 Proposed (8,945,280), difference (536,113). Schedule B: Residential rate 0.00607867.
The Township's remarks in its 2026 draft budget summary say the Infrastructure and Community Services budget includes "increased capital funding for arena, excessive winter control effects".
$2,933,746the Township's investment in ERTH Corporation at December 31, 2025
ERTH Corporation is a company in which the Township holds a share. The Township owns 5.04% of it and shows it in the statements at $2,933,746: its share of the company's equity ($2,173,746) plus a $760,000 promissory note (a loan with no end date). The note earns 7.25%, and the Township received $55,100 of interest in 2025. ERTH declared a dividend of $1,030,000 in 2025, of which the Township's share is $51,954. The statements say the note is unsecured, and that no principal repayment is expected in the next twelve months.
Why it matters
This is nearly three million dollars of public money held in a company, not in roads or buildings. It earns a return, which helps, but residents may want to know how the loan was set up and who decides whether it is repaid.
It could be because…
The Township has held the same stake and loan since at least 2023, so nothing here is new.
The dividend and the interest are a regular source of revenue; the statements show a dividend share in both 2024 and 2025.
A loan with no end date may be a standard arrangement among the company's shareholders.
Questions you could ask
On what terms was the $760,000 note made, and when does Council review whether to ask for it back?
Is the dividend paid in cash or only added to the book value of the investment?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for East Zorra - Tavistock?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 10: "the Township owns 5.04% ( 2024 - 5.04%) of ERTH"; "Promissory note receivable" 760,000; "Equity" 2,173,746 (2024 2,016,088); total 2,933,746 (2024 2,776,088). "The promissory note receivable from ERTH is unsecured and bears interest at 7.25%"; "Interest received in the year ... is $55,100".
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy