Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Erin's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Erin's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 87 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
At the end of 2024, $6.4M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 19% of everything billed. Only 1 of 87 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $5.4M.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
-$15,171,601balance of the "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" fund at the end of 2025, in the 2026 budget book
The Town is building a new wastewater plant (it calls it the Water Resource Recovery Facility). The Town says the builders of new housing are paying the costs up front, which is called front-ending. The 2023 audited statements show $23,254,957 of developer money for the plant still held at the end of 2023. The 2026 budget book's reserve table has a fund called "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" at minus $12,111,059 at the end of 2024 and minus $15,171,601 at the end of 2025. A year earlier, the 2025 budget book had expected that fund to hold $27,903,866 at the end of 2024 and $34,122,659 at the end of 2025. A reserve fund is money set aside for a purpose. A minus balance means more has gone out than has come in. We worked out that the end-of-2025 figure is $49,294,260 lower than the 2025 budget book expected (worked out by us). We could not tell from the documents whether the audited line and the budget fund are the same money.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$30,000,000recreation centre in the 2027 capital plan, funded by development charges
The 2026 budget book lists "Construction of Multi-Use Recreation" at $30,000,000 in 2027, paid for by development charges. Development charges are fees the Town collects from builders of new homes to pay for growth. The Town's reserve table forecasts the recreation development charge fund at $5,654,015 at the end of 2026. The 2025 budget book had put the same $30,000,000 in 2026, so the date has already moved back a year. The budget book also says design and a Class C cost estimate (an early, rough price) for the centre are still to start. So the $30,000,000 may be an early placeholder, not a priced figure. We worked out that the amount is $24,345,985 more than the fund (worked out by us).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$8,959,005labour costs in the 2026 budget, up from $5,941,674 in the 2024 budget
Labour costs in the budget were $5,941,674 for 2024. The 2025 budget raised them to $8,055,293, and the 2026 budget raises them again to $8,959,005. We worked out that this is a rise of about 51% in two years, or $3,017,331 (worked out by us). The 2026 budget book says the number of staff, counting part-time, contract and co-op students, was 135 in 2024, rose to 168 after new positions were approved in 2025, and is expected to fall to 163 in 2026. The Town's own explanation is growth and pay: it says it brought in new positions to prepare for growth, filled 21 permanent full-time positions, and completed a market review of its wage grid. A message from senior staff in the 2026 budget describes the year as one of "cost containment".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$300,000building permit revenue in the 2026 budget, against $1,500,000 in the 2025 budget
The 2025 budget counted on $1,500,000 from building permits, double the year before. The 2026 budget cuts that line to $300,000. The Town explains that new development has slowed, and a message from senior staff in the 2026 budget says housing starts have dropped. To cover the gap in 2026 the Building budget takes $403,451 from reserves. The reserve table then forecasts the "Building Residential" reserve fund at minus $344,139 at the end of 2026. A reserve fund is money set aside for a purpose. The 2025 budget book had forecast building revenue of $1,668,111 for 2026, so the 2026 figure is far from what was expected a year earlier.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$741,517taken from reserves to pay 2026 wastewater costs, up from $183,984
The Town's wastewater budget for 2026 is $1,491,517 of costs. In the 2025 budget it was $183,984, and the 2025 budget book had forecast $187,664 for 2026. The 2026 budget covers the costs with $750,000 of "cost recovery" (charges to users of the new plant) and $741,517 taken from reserves. The Town gives its own explanation: costs rise because of "OCWA operating costs" (OCWA is the operator the budget names for the plant) and cost recovery is up because of new fees for new facilities. We worked out that the 2026 cost is $1,303,853 higher than the 2025 budget book forecast a year earlier (worked out by us).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$(2,047,439)general deficit in the 2023 budget note, against an annual surplus of $74,994,188
The audited 2023 statements show an annual surplus of $74,994,188. Almost all of it is developer money for the wastewater plant. Note 5 lists $75,326,282 of development charge revenue, and the deferred revenue schedule shows $74,790,328 recognized from developer contributions for the plant. A note called "Budget" then shows a "General surplus (deficit)" of $(2,047,439) for 2023 and $(1,751,082) for 2022. The note says budgets are prepared on a cash basis, which means counting money in and out, and are changed to match the statements. So the headline surplus does not describe how the Town's own day-to-day operations did. Unrestricted cash (cash the Town can spend on anything) rose to $11,490,278 from $2,324,494.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$1,369,588taken from reserves to balance the 2026 budget, up from $840,179
The 2026 budget raises the Town's tax rate by 3.8%, which the budget says is about $12 per $100,000 of assessment. The "Tax Levy" line in the budget (money raised from property taxes) rises from $10,063,945 to $10,203,000, a rise of $139,055, or about 1.4% (worked out by us). Other lines carry more of the load. Revenue from supplementary taxes (extra tax billed on new buildings during the year) is budgeted at $625,882, up from $253,000. Transfers from reserves rise from $840,179 to $1,369,588. The Tax Stabilization reserve (a fund meant to smooth tax rises) drops from $827,399 at the end of 2024 to a forecast $332,783 at the end of 2026. The 2025 budget book also shows two different 2025 tax levy figures, $10,123,945 and $10,063,945.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Erin spent $1.1M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $2.0M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 15 of 87 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
At the end of 2024, $6.4M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 19% of everything billed. Only 1 of 87 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $5.4M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M
$6.4M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$2.3M
2020
$2.6M
2021
$3.1M
2022
$3.9M
2023
$5.4M
2024
$6.4M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $2.3M, 2020 $2.6M, 2021 $3.1M, 2022 $3.9M, 2023 $5.4M, 2024 $6.4M. Of the 2024 total, $1.7M was from earlier years.
-$15,171,601balance of the "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" fund at the end of 2025, in the 2026 budget book
The Town is building a new wastewater plant (it calls it the Water Resource Recovery Facility). The Town says the builders of new housing are paying the costs up front, which is called front-ending. The 2023 audited statements show $23,254,957 of developer money for the plant still held at the end of 2023. The 2026 budget book's reserve table has a fund called "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" at minus $12,111,059 at the end of 2024 and minus $15,171,601 at the end of 2025. A year earlier, the 2025 budget book had expected that fund to hold $27,903,866 at the end of 2024 and $34,122,659 at the end of 2025. A reserve fund is money set aside for a purpose. A minus balance means more has gone out than has come in. We worked out that the end-of-2025 figure is $49,294,260 lower than the 2025 budget book expected (worked out by us). We could not tell from the documents whether the audited line and the budget fund are the same money.
Why it matters
A plant that costs tens of millions of dollars is a large part of the Town's finances. If a fund meant to be paid for by developers is below zero, residents will want to know who covers the gap if developers do not pay back what is owed, and when.
It could be because…
The two documents may not count the same thing. The audited statements record developer money as "deferred revenue", and the budget book tracks a reserve fund. They may be different measures of the same agreements.
Under front-ending, developers pay first and are paid back later from charges on other builders. A minus balance may only show what the Town owes back as work is finished, ahead of the money coming in.
Construction bills may have come sooner than the 2025 budget book expected, or the Town may have changed how it tracks the fund between the two budget books.
The Town says the plant and its pipes are due to finish in 2026, and the fund may return toward zero as developers pay.
Questions you could ask
Do the "Developer contributions - Wastewater plant" line in the audited statements and the "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" fund in the budget book track the same money? If so, what moved the balance from $23,254,957 at the end of 2023 to minus $12,111,059 at the end of 2024?
How much of the plant's cost has been paid so far, how much is still owed to developers under the front-ending agreements, and when will the fund be back at zero?
If developers do not pay what the plan expects, who pays the difference?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Schedule of deferred revenue: "Developer contributions - Wastewater plant" 19,225,393 at December 31, 2022, contributions received 77,555,465, investment income 1,264,427, revenue recognized (74,790,328), and a balance of 23,254,957 at December 31, 2023.
Reserve fund table, 2025: "WWTP Front Ended Agreements" 27,903,866, additions 19,000,000, disbursements 12,781,207, balance December 31, 2025 of 34,122,659.
The budget message on finances says the plant's construction "started in 2022 is slated to be completed in 2026, with the developers of the new residential developments front-ending the costs."
$30,000,000recreation centre in the 2027 capital plan, funded by development charges
The 2026 budget book lists "Construction of Multi-Use Recreation" at $30,000,000 in 2027, paid for by development charges. Development charges are fees the Town collects from builders of new homes to pay for growth. The Town's reserve table forecasts the recreation development charge fund at $5,654,015 at the end of 2026. The 2025 budget book had put the same $30,000,000 in 2026, so the date has already moved back a year. The budget book also says design and a Class C cost estimate (an early, rough price) for the centre are still to start. So the $30,000,000 may be an early placeholder, not a priced figure. We worked out that the amount is $24,345,985 more than the fund (worked out by us).
Why it matters
A $30,000,000 building is much larger than anything else in the Town's capital plan. If the development charges do not arrive as fast as hoped, the Town may have to borrow or raise taxes, or the project may slip again.
It could be because…
Development charges are collected as new homes get permits, and the new subdivisions may bring in the money over several years before construction starts.
Many of the 2027 amounts in the capital plan are forecasts. The figure may be there to hold a place until the design and cost estimate are done.
The Town may plan to borrow against future charges. The 2027 list already includes $3,155,000 of debt for a road project shared with a neighbouring town, so the Town does use debt.
The Town's June 2026 development charge reduction program may change how much comes in. We could not read the presentation to council on it.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan for paying the $30,000,000: how much from development charges collected by 2027, how much from borrowing, and how much from taxes or other sources?
Why did the construction date move from 2026 to 2027, and does the Town expect it to move again?
When will the Class C cost estimate be done, and will council see it before it commits to the amount?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
2027 Capital Requests: "Construction of Multi-Use Recreation", Community Services, funding source Development Charges, 30,000,000. "Total Capital Projects 45,390,800". Funding sources: Development Charges 35,000,000 (77%), Debt 3,155,000 (7%).
$8,959,005labour costs in the 2026 budget, up from $5,941,674 in the 2024 budget
Labour costs in the budget were $5,941,674 for 2024. The 2025 budget raised them to $8,055,293, and the 2026 budget raises them again to $8,959,005. We worked out that this is a rise of about 51% in two years, or $3,017,331 (worked out by us). The 2026 budget book says the number of staff, counting part-time, contract and co-op students, was 135 in 2024, rose to 168 after new positions were approved in 2025, and is expected to fall to 163 in 2026. The Town's own explanation is growth and pay: it says it brought in new positions to prepare for growth, filled 21 permanent full-time positions, and completed a market review of its wage grid. A message from senior staff in the 2026 budget describes the year as one of "cost containment".
Why it matters
Wages are the largest single cost in the budget and they come back every year. Residents may want to know what the new positions deliver and whether the Town is paying for them from growth in taxes or from reserves.
It could be because…
The Town has grown fast. The 2026 budget book says 420 building permits were issued in 2025, and a big new subdivision is being occupied. More homes need more staff for water, roads, planning and recreation.
Some of the cost may be a one-time catch-up. The budget notes mention a "2025 market review" of pay levels.
Some of the new staff may be paid for by fees (for example building permits and water charges) and not by property taxes.
The staff count figures include part-time, contract and co-op staff, so they are not the same as full-time jobs.
Questions you could ask
How many of the 168 staff in 2025 are full-time, and how many are part-time, contract or co-op?
How much of the labour cost increase is paid from development-related fees and charges, and how much from the property tax levy?
What does the Town expect to do with its staff numbers if the slowdown in new homes continues?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Budget by account: "Labour Costs" 2024 total budget 5,941,674, 2025 total budget 8,055,293, variance 2,113,619 (36%).
Staffing overview: staff in 2024 "stood at 135"; "Following the approval of the budget for new positions in 2025, the staff count rose to 168"; for 2026 the staff number "is expected to decrease to 163".
Human Resources achievements: "Completed a comprehensive market compensation review, aligning the Town of Erin's wage grid with industry standards and best practices" and "Filled 21 permanent full-time positions".
$300,000building permit revenue in the 2026 budget, against $1,500,000 in the 2025 budget
The 2025 budget counted on $1,500,000 from building permits, double the year before. The 2026 budget cuts that line to $300,000. The Town explains that new development has slowed, and a message from senior staff in the 2026 budget says housing starts have dropped. To cover the gap in 2026 the Building budget takes $403,451 from reserves. The reserve table then forecasts the "Building Residential" reserve fund at minus $344,139 at the end of 2026. A reserve fund is money set aside for a purpose. The 2025 budget book had forecast building revenue of $1,668,111 for 2026, so the 2026 figure is far from what was expected a year earlier.
Why it matters
Building permit fees pay for the building department. When development slows, fees fall faster than costs. A reserve that goes below zero means the department would have spent more than it saved, and the Town would need to cover the difference.
It could be because…
The Town gives its own reason: "Building permit revenue declined as a result of a reduction in new development." Permits fall when builders pause, and may come back.
The 2025 figure of $1,500,000 may have been set high to match a big subdivision that was expected to be issued permits in 2025, and the 2026 figure may be a prudent reset.
The Town is changing its staffing in the department, which lowers 2026 labour costs, so the department may be sized to the lower volume.
The reserve table is a forecast. Actual permits in 2026 may differ.
Questions you could ask
How much did the Town actually collect in building permit fees in 2024 and 2025, against the budget?
What does the Town plan to do if the building reserve fund does go below zero?
How did the Town arrive at $1,500,000 for 2025, and what has changed in its permit forecast since?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Building budget: "Building Permits (Note 1)" 2025 budget 1,500,000, 2026 budget 300,000, variance (1,200,000). "Transfer from Reserves and Res Funds" 403,451 in 2026. Note 1: "Building permit revenue declined as a result of a reduction in new development."
A budget message from senior staff: "A slowing economy and a notable reduction in new housing starts have directly impacted our level of new assessment".
$741,517taken from reserves to pay 2026 wastewater costs, up from $183,984
The Town's wastewater budget for 2026 is $1,491,517 of costs. In the 2025 budget it was $183,984, and the 2025 budget book had forecast $187,664 for 2026. The 2026 budget covers the costs with $750,000 of "cost recovery" (charges to users of the new plant) and $741,517 taken from reserves. The Town gives its own explanation: costs rise because of "OCWA operating costs" (OCWA is the operator the budget names for the plant) and cost recovery is up because of new fees for new facilities. We worked out that the 2026 cost is $1,303,853 higher than the 2025 budget book forecast a year earlier (worked out by us).
Why it matters
A reserve can only be used once. If the plant's running costs are more than the fees from its users, the difference has to come from reserves, taxes or higher fees in the future.
It could be because…
The plant starts operating in 2026, so a first-year budget may be set high until the real costs are known.
The cost recovery charges depend on how many new homes are connected, and the number connected will rise as the new subdivisions fill up.
The reserve may be one set aside for this purpose. The reserve table shows a "WWTP Current Resident Allocation" fund of $3,546,169, and the budget does not say which reserve pays the $741,517.
Questions you could ask
Which reserve pays the $741,517, and how many years can it keep paying at that rate?
What fee does a household or business on the new plant pay, and what share of the plant's running costs do those fees cover by 2028?
Why does the budget overview describe a 4.5% increase in cost recovery revenue when the budget table shows no cost recovery in the 2025 column?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Wastewater budget: "Waste Water Cost Recovery" 750,000; "Transfer from Reserves and Res Funds" 183,984 (2025) and 741,517 (2026); "Total Expenses" 183,984 (2025) and 1,491,517 (2026). Note 1: "Cost recovery income is projected to increase due to the implementation of fees for new facilities." Note 2: "The rise in expenses is attributable to elevating OCWA operating costs."
Budget overview: "Wastewater Revenue: There is a 4.5% increase in revenue from wastewater cost recovery charges, driven by the commencement of operations at the Water Resource Recovery Facility."
$(2,047,439)general deficit in the 2023 budget note, against an annual surplus of $74,994,188
The audited 2023 statements show an annual surplus of $74,994,188. Almost all of it is developer money for the wastewater plant. Note 5 lists $75,326,282 of development charge revenue, and the deferred revenue schedule shows $74,790,328 recognized from developer contributions for the plant. A note called "Budget" then shows a "General surplus (deficit)" of $(2,047,439) for 2023 and $(1,751,082) for 2022. The note says budgets are prepared on a cash basis, which means counting money in and out, and are changed to match the statements. So the headline surplus does not describe how the Town's own day-to-day operations did. Unrestricted cash (cash the Town can spend on anything) rose to $11,490,278 from $2,324,494.
Why it matters
The big surplus is the number most people see. The deficit is the number that says whether taxes covered the cost of running the Town. Residents may want to know how the deficit was covered and whether it was repeated in 2024 and 2025.
It could be because…
The big surplus is a timing effect. Developer money is counted as revenue as the plant is built, while the cost is counted as an asset and not an expense.
The general deficit line carries forward the 2022 figure, so most of the $2,047,439 may be the deficit from before 2023. We worked out that the 2023 change alone is $296,357 (worked out by us).
Unrestricted cash grew in 2023, which suggests the deficit may have been covered by money the Town already had on hand.
Questions you could ask
How was the $2,047,439 general deficit covered, and was it cleared in 2024?
What were the general surplus or deficit results for 2024 and 2025?
Why were the 2023 statements signed on November 14, 2024, and when will the 2024 and 2025 audited statements be posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 4, Budget: "Prior year general surplus" (1,751,082) for 2023 and 124,982 for 2022; "General surplus (deficit)" $0 (2023 budget), $ (2,047,439) (2023 actual), $ (1,751,082) (2022 actual). The note says the budgeted figures "are prepared on a cash basis of accounting and have been restated to conform to the accrual basis".
$1,369,588taken from reserves to balance the 2026 budget, up from $840,179
The 2026 budget raises the Town's tax rate by 3.8%, which the budget says is about $12 per $100,000 of assessment. The "Tax Levy" line in the budget (money raised from property taxes) rises from $10,063,945 to $10,203,000, a rise of $139,055, or about 1.4% (worked out by us). Other lines carry more of the load. Revenue from supplementary taxes (extra tax billed on new buildings during the year) is budgeted at $625,882, up from $253,000. Transfers from reserves rise from $840,179 to $1,369,588. The Tax Stabilization reserve (a fund meant to smooth tax rises) drops from $827,399 at the end of 2024 to a forecast $332,783 at the end of 2026. The 2025 budget book also shows two different 2025 tax levy figures, $10,123,945 and $10,063,945.
Why it matters
A budget that leans on one-time money (reserves, extra taxes on new buildings) can look balanced this year and leave a bigger tax rise next year. The Town itself says slower new building has cut the growth in assessment it normally relies on.
It could be because…
The 3.8% is on the Town's share of a tax bill and is a rate. The levy line also depends on how many new properties were added, and the Town says new assessment is lower this year.
The two 2025 levy figures may reflect a $60,000 change made after the budget was first drafted. The 2026 book uses $10,063,945 and a reserve transfer of $840,179 for 2025, which is $60,000 higher than the 2025 book's own by-account table.
Reserves are meant to be used for one-time needs, including a $2,027,529 draw on the Infrastructure Renewal reserve for projects in 2026.
Supplementary taxes depend on new homes being finished and assessed, and the Town may have budgeted more because the new subdivision is being occupied.
Questions you could ask
Why does the tax levy line rise only $139,055 when the rate rises 3.8%? How much of the levy comes from new properties?
Which one-time items are in the 2026 budget, and what does the 2027 forecast assume when they are gone?
What is the plan for rebuilding the Tax Stabilization reserve, which is forecast to fall to $332,783?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Budget by account: "Tax Levy" 10,063,945 (2025), 10,203,000 (2026), variance (139,055). "PILS and Supplementary Taxes" 253,000 and 625,882. "Transfer from Reserves and Res Funds" 840,179 and 1,369,588, variance 529,409.
Reserve tables: "TAX STABILIZATION RESERVE" 827,399 at December 31, 2024, transfer out 437,517, 389,882 at December 31, 2025; then a transfer out of 57,099 and 332,783 at December 31, 2026. "INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL" 6,750,784, additions 950,000, disbursements 2,027,529, balance 5,673,255 at December 31, 2026.
Budget by department: "Tax Levy" 8,344,275 (2024), 10,063,945 (2025). Budget by account: "Tax Levy" 8,344,275 and 10,123,945. "Trf from Reserves and Res Funds" 788,419 and 780,179. "Tax Rate Change 2.4%".
Erin spent $1.1M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $2.0M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 15 of 87 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 72% in 5 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−40%−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+72%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−8%
+1%
2021
−29%
+4%
2022
+4%
+11%
2023
+46%
+16%
2024
+72%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $819K a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $998K to $1.8M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Erin spent $1.3M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $2.4M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 77% in 5 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+77%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+20%
+1%
2021
+7%
+4%
2022
+38%
+11%
2023
+85%
+16%
2024
+77%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.0M a year pay for?
Why did building permits go from $264K to $768K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Erin?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $1.3M, 2020 $1.6M, 2021 $1.4M, 2022 $1.9M, 2023 $2.5M, 2024 $2.4M.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy