Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Essa's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Essa's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 26 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
$1,892,385speed camera revenue in 2025, against a budget of $1,160,000
Automated speed enforcement (ASE) means cameras that photograph vehicles going over the limit in school and community safety zones, and the owner gets a penalty notice. Essa's 2026 budget book shows that in 2025 the program brought in $1,892,385 against a budget of $1,160,000, and cost $1,158,690 in contract services. The book prints a 2025 total for the program of $666,417, which is not what those two lines leave, so other amounts may sit in the total. A second line, the Joint Processing Data Centre, brought in $1,114,053 against a budget of $2,358,000, with a printed total of $484,672. The budget does not say what that centre is. Both lines are blank for 2026. The Township's asset plan says speed camera money goes first to traffic calming, then to roads and bridges, and the 2026 capital budget names an ASE reserve as one of the sources for several road jobs. A provincial bulletin in Essa's own agenda says changes to the Highway Traffic Act would remove municipal authority to run speed cameras. In June 2026 staff reported interim funding of $230,642.00 from the Ministry of Transportation for replacing the cameras.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 7 sources
$9,731,294yearly funding gap in the 2025 Asset Management Plan: $4,106,887 available against $13,838,181 needed
An asset management plan estimates what it will cost to keep roads, bridges, buildings, vehicles, and water and sewer pipes in working order. Essa's 2025 plan says the yearly need averages $13.8 million. It says the Township is committing about $4.1 million a year to capital projects or reserves, so there is a yearly funding gap of $9.7 million, and the Township is funding 29.7% of what its assets need. Roads alone have a gap of $2,902,852 and bridges and culverts $1,887,337. The Township's chosen plan is to close the gap slowly over 15 years: tax-funded assets to 75% of full funding, and water and sewer rates to full funding. The plan also says that for 47% of assets no condition data existed, so age was used instead.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$24,767,467held in the development charges reserve at the end of 2024, with $2,228,915 used that year
Development charges are fees the Township collects when new homes and buildings go up, to pay for the roads, water pipes, parks and buildings that growth needs. The law restricts what they can be spent on, so the statements report them as owing to future projects until the work is done. The 2024 budget expected $6,310,430 of development charges to be used. The statements show $2,228,915. At the end of 2024 the development charges reserve held $24,767,467. The statements say the Township bought $9,680,382 of capital assets in 2024 against a budget of $17,344,028. The 2026 capital budget plans to use $7,772,053 of development charges, including $4,630,000 for a new joint fire station, public works and recreation building. On December 17, 2025 staff asked Council to accept a tender of $4,838,103.27 for that building.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 7 sources
$120,000budgeted for planning legal fees in 2026, against $46,919 spent in 2025
The planning department's legal fee line was $479 in 2024, against a budget of $10,000. In 2025 it was $46,919, against a budget of $25,000. The 2026 budget raises it to $120,000, a rise of $95,000 or 380%. The planning department's contract services line is also higher, at $175,000 against $86,000 actually spent in 2025. We did not find the Township's own explanation. Closed-session agendas show Council has met in private about appeals to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the provincial body that hears planning appeals) on September 17, 2025 and about a proposed development on May 6, 2026. The 2024 financial statements say the Township "has been named in several lawsuits" and put no amount aside.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
At the end of 2025, $3.3M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 11% of everything billed. Only 5 of 26 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $3.0M.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
$550,000budgeted bank interest in 2026, against $679,926 in 2025 and a 2025 budget of $1,059,120
The audited 2024 statements show investment income of $1,772,491, against a budget of $1,059,120, and $1,938,467 the year before. The 2026 operating budget has a bank interest line that was budgeted at the same $1,059,120 for 2025, came in at $679,926 for 2025, and is cut to $550,000 for 2026. The two figures may not measure the same thing. The statements say $991,886 of interest in 2024 was added to the obligatory reserve funds (such as development charges), and the documents do not say whether that sits inside the $1,772,491. At the end of 2024 the Township held $34,524,277 in cash and $20,541,300 in guaranteed investment certificates (GICs, bank deposits that pay a fixed rate).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$439,162amortization left out of the 2023 statements, found and restated in 2024
Amortization is the yearly cost of an asset wearing out, spread over its life. The 2024 statements say the Township restated its 2023 results because amortization "previously omitted" in error had not been recorded: $439,162. The 2023 annual surplus was first stated as $3,161,267 and is now $2,722,105. Opening 2024 accumulated surplus was lowered to match. The auditor's opinion on the 2024 statements is clean ("present fairly"). The restatement is a non-cash accounting correction and did not change cash.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$169.50billed by the Integrity Commissioner for 2025, against $7,932.60 for 2024
An Integrity Commissioner is an independent person, hired by the Township, who handles complaints about council members' conduct and gives members confidential advice. The Township posts the yearly reports. For 2024 the Integrity Commissioner received one Code of Conduct complaint, which was dismissed without investigation, and three requests for advice, and billed $7,932.60. For 2025 there were no complaints, no requests for advice, one general inquiry, and the bill was $169.50. The 2023 report (a different firm) covered four requests for advice and one complaint disposed of without an investigation.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Essa spent about $112 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $50. Only 2 of 26 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Essa $112; typical similar town $50; ranked 3rd highest of 27.
$1,892,385speed camera revenue in 2025, against a budget of $1,160,000
Automated speed enforcement (ASE) means cameras that photograph vehicles going over the limit in school and community safety zones, and the owner gets a penalty notice. Essa's 2026 budget book shows that in 2025 the program brought in $1,892,385 against a budget of $1,160,000, and cost $1,158,690 in contract services. The book prints a 2025 total for the program of $666,417, which is not what those two lines leave, so other amounts may sit in the total. A second line, the Joint Processing Data Centre, brought in $1,114,053 against a budget of $2,358,000, with a printed total of $484,672. The budget does not say what that centre is. Both lines are blank for 2026. The Township's asset plan says speed camera money goes first to traffic calming, then to roads and bridges, and the 2026 capital budget names an ASE reserve as one of the sources for several road jobs. A provincial bulletin in Essa's own agenda says changes to the Highway Traffic Act would remove municipal authority to run speed cameras. In June 2026 staff reported interim funding of $230,642.00 from the Ministry of Transportation for replacing the cameras.
Why it matters
Speed camera revenue is not tax money, but it is public money that is paying for road work, and the program is changing. Residents can reasonably ask how much sits in the ASE reserve, what it is allowed to pay for, and whether road work now planned around it still goes ahead if the revenue stops.
It could be because…
The 2026 budget has no speed camera lines because the Province said it would end municipal speed cameras, not because money was moved out of sight.
The 2025 budget planned to move $449,900 to reserve from the ASE line and $1,525,850 from the data centre line. The budget report's actual column shows no transfer, and the transfer may have been made in year-end entries that this report does not show.
Revenue above budget may simply reflect more cameras running for more of the year than the budget assumed.
The Township has said what the money is for: traffic calming first, then roads and bridges, which also lowers the need for tax increases.
Questions you could ask
What was the balance of the ASE reserve at December 31, 2025, and how much of the $666,417 and $484,672 for 2025 went into it?
What is the Joint Processing Data Centre, and who paid the $1,114,053 it took in during 2025?
If the cameras are removed, which of the 2026 road jobs that name the ASE reserve are paid from taxes or other reserves instead?
Can the Township say, in public, what the October 1, 2025 closed session update on ASE and the data centre was about, once the matter is settled?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
03-020-001 Essa Automated Speed Enforcement, columns 2025 Actual, 2025 Budget, 2026 Budget: "7500 - Automated Speed Enforcement" revenue 1,892,385, 1,160,000, nothing in 2026. "6069 - Contract Services" 1,158,690, 606,000, nothing. "6091 - Transfer to Reserve from Gener" nothing, 449,900, nothing. The line total is "Essa Automated Speed Enforcement" 666,417 for 2025 and nothing for 2026.
03-020-002 Joint Processing Data Centre, columns 2025 Actual, 2025 Budget, 2026 Budget: "9500 - Joint Processing Data Centre" revenue 1,114,053, 2,358,000, nothing in 2026. "6091 - Transfer to Reserve from Gener" nothing, 1,525,850, nothing. The line total is "ASE - Joint Processing Data Centre" 484,672 for 2025 and nothing for 2026.
Financial Strategy Overview: "revenue generated from the Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) program will be allocated toward traffic calming measures, with public safety as the primary priority. Any additional funds will be reinvested directly into the road network and bridge infrastructure".
Roads/Public Works funding sources include "ASE Res. (380k)" for the micro-sealing program ($665,000) and "ASE Res.(0.1M)" for double surface treatment ($1,620,000). A further item, "OLG & Baxter School Traffic Flow & Safety Enhancement", $400,000, lists "Roads DC - ASE Res." as its source.
AMO (Association of Municipalities of Ontario) bulletin in the consent agenda: "the province has moved ahead with amendments to the Highway Traffic Act. The changes would remove municipal authority to operate Automated Speed Enforcement systems". It adds: "Red light cameras are not implicated in this change and will still be permitted."
Staff Report PW011-26: "That Council acknowledge that we have received interim funding from MTO relating to the replacement of the ASE cameras in the amount of $230,642.00". Council is also asked to authorize an application to the Road Safety Initiatives Fund for more funding for "the replacement of Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) camera equipment".
Closed session item: "Confidential Verbal Update from the Chief Administrative Officer re: ASE/JPC", with the reasons listed as personal matters about an individual (s. 239(2)(b)) and litigation or potential litigation (s. 239(2)(e)). The agenda does not say what the update was about.
$9,731,294yearly funding gap in the 2025 Asset Management Plan: $4,106,887 available against $13,838,181 needed
An asset management plan estimates what it will cost to keep roads, bridges, buildings, vehicles, and water and sewer pipes in working order. Essa's 2025 plan says the yearly need averages $13.8 million. It says the Township is committing about $4.1 million a year to capital projects or reserves, so there is a yearly funding gap of $9.7 million, and the Township is funding 29.7% of what its assets need. Roads alone have a gap of $2,902,852 and bridges and culverts $1,887,337. The Township's chosen plan is to close the gap slowly over 15 years: tax-funded assets to 75% of full funding, and water and sewer rates to full funding. The plan also says that for 47% of assets no condition data existed, so age was used instead.
Why it matters
A gap like this is common in Ontario, and the Township has been open about it. It matters because a gap that is not closed turns into worn-out roads and bridges that cost more to fix later, or into large tax or rate increases in future years. Residents can fairly ask how fast the gap is really closing.
It could be because…
The plan chose a slow, 15-year phase-in on purpose so that tax increases stay affordable. A gap in year one is the plan working as designed, not a miss.
The plan counts only steady sources (taxes, rates, the federal Canada Community-Building Fund, provincial OCIF grants and an asset reserve). It leaves out one-off money such as development charges and speed camera revenue, so actual spending in a year can be higher. The 2026 capital budget is $18,101,924.
Condition data was missing for 47% of assets, so age was used instead. The plan itself says age can over- or understate what is needed.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2026 capital budget of $18,101,924 goes to renewing existing roads, bridges and buildings, as opposed to new growth projects?
By what percentage did the yearly funding for existing assets rise from 2025 to 2026, and is that on the plan's path to 75% in 15 years?
Will the Township update its condition data so that the gap is worked out from real condition and not age?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Executive summary: "the Township's average annual capital requirement totals $13.8 million." "the Township is committing approximately $4.1 million towards capital projects or reserves per year. As a result, there is currently an annual funding gap of $9.7 million." Tax-funded strategy: "75% of full funding" phased over 15 years. Also: "assessed condition data was unavailable, and asset age was used to approximate condition".
Table 69, Asset Management Reserve: tax allocation $285,000 (2022), $417,360 (2023), $695,600 (2024 budget). Balance at December 31, 2024 $5,304,590. The plan says the anticipated closing balance for 2025 is projected to be $6,528,980.
Totals (All Department): total budget $18,101,924; taxation $635,635; user fees $50,000; development charges $7,772,053; reserve and fund sources $8,106,496; grants and government funding $1,537,740.
$24,767,467held in the development charges reserve at the end of 2024, with $2,228,915 used that year
Development charges are fees the Township collects when new homes and buildings go up, to pay for the roads, water pipes, parks and buildings that growth needs. The law restricts what they can be spent on, so the statements report them as owing to future projects until the work is done. The 2024 budget expected $6,310,430 of development charges to be used. The statements show $2,228,915. At the end of 2024 the development charges reserve held $24,767,467. The statements say the Township bought $9,680,382 of capital assets in 2024 against a budget of $17,344,028. The 2026 capital budget plans to use $7,772,053 of development charges, including $4,630,000 for a new joint fire station, public works and recreation building. On December 17, 2025 staff asked Council to accept a tender of $4,838,103.27 for that building.
Why it matters
Development charges are paid by builders and passed on in the price of new homes, and they must be spent on growth projects. A large unspent balance can mean growth projects are late, which can leave services behind the new homes. It can also mean the money is waiting for a large project. Residents can ask which it is.
It could be because…
Projects slip from year to year. The statements show capital spending of $9,680,382 against a budget of $17,344,028, so development charges were used later than planned for reasons that apply to the whole capital program.
The statements say development charges are counted as used when the related spending happens, so a low figure just means the growth projects had not been built yet.
The balance may be saved for the new joint building and other growth projects. The 2026 capital budget draws on development charges for them.
A high balance can follow a quiet development year. The reserve rose only slightly, from $24,399,487 to $24,767,467.
Questions you could ask
Which growth projects were budgeted for 2024 but not built, and when will they be built?
How much of the $24,767,467 is already promised to the new joint building and other named projects?
Is there a public list of development charge projects and the year each is expected to use the reserve?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations, 2024: "Development charges earned (note 8)" budget 6,310,430, actual 2,228,915 (2023 actual 375,563). "Parkland fees earned (note 8)" budget nil, actual 2,459,204 (2023 139,139).
Note 1(f): "Canada Community-Building Fund, Parkland fees, and development charges are recognized in the period in which the related expenditures are recorded."
Note 8, Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds: "Development charges" 24,767,467 (2023 24,399,487); parkland 3,575,339; total 29,105,958. Development charges received in 2024: 1,816,458. Development charges earned (transferred to operations): 2,228,915.
Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets, 2024: "Purchase of tangible capital assets" budget (17,344,028), actual (9,680,382) (2023 actual (2,810,426)).
"New Joint Facility (Fire Hall, Public Works, Parks & Rec.)" 44-811-870, $5,119,686, with taxation $168,450, development charges $4,600,000 and reserve $351,236. Funding listed as "Fire Services DC (1.3M) Parks & Rec DC (3.0M) Public Work & Fleet DC (0.3M) Assest Management Res. (0.3M)". Total for Fire Department $5,234,686, development charges $4,630,000.
Staff Report CAO019-25: "the quotation as received from DOMM Construction Ltd. be accepted in the amount of $4,838,103.27 (including 1.76% HST & excluding contract administration & Provisional Items), to construct the New Angus Joint Use Fire Station, Public Works, Parks and Recreation Facility".
$120,000budgeted for planning legal fees in 2026, against $46,919 spent in 2025
The planning department's legal fee line was $479 in 2024, against a budget of $10,000. In 2025 it was $46,919, against a budget of $25,000. The 2026 budget raises it to $120,000, a rise of $95,000 or 380%. The planning department's contract services line is also higher, at $175,000 against $86,000 actually spent in 2025. We did not find the Township's own explanation. Closed-session agendas show Council has met in private about appeals to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the provincial body that hears planning appeals) on September 17, 2025 and about a proposed development on May 6, 2026. The 2024 financial statements say the Township "has been named in several lawsuits" and put no amount aside.
Why it matters
Planning appeals can be costly, and the Township pays its lawyers from taxes. A budget line that grows from a few hundred dollars to $120,000 in two years is the kind of change residents should hear about in plain words, even if the reason is routine.
It could be because…
A larger number of development applications and appeals, which is common where growth is fast, would raise legal costs.
The budget may be set high on purpose so that a large appeal does not force a mid-year increase. An unused budget is not spent.
Legal costs on appeals can be recovered in part from developers through application fees or agreements. We did not see that explained.
Questions you could ask
What is the $120,000 for: a number of appeals, a particular appeal, or a general allowance?
How much of the $46,919 spent in 2025 went to Ontario Land Tribunal matters, and how much has been recovered from applicants?
Will the Township report planning legal costs to Council each year, in public, with the totals and the number of appeals?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Closed session item d: "Confidential verbal update from the Chief Administrative Officer re: OLT Appeal Statuses", with the reasons listed as plans and instructions for negotiation (s. 239(2)(k)) and litigation or potential litigation (s. 239(2)(e)).
Closed session item a: "Confidential Staff Report from the Manager of Planning, re: Proposed Development" ending "OLT Update", with the reasons listed as litigation or potential litigation (s.239(2)(e)) and plans and instructions for negotiation (s.239(2)(k)).
Note 14, Contingent liabilities: "The Township, in the course of its operations, has been named in several lawsuits, the outcome of which is indeterminable at this time. No amounts in connection with these items have been reflected in these financial statements."
Essa spent $4.5M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $8.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 84% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+84%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+9%
+1%
2021
+7%
+4%
2022
+12%
+11%
2023
+18%
+16%
2024
+26%
+18%
2025
+84%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $3.8M a year pay for?
Why did police (opp contract) go from $2.9M to $5.4M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $4.5M, 2020 $4.9M, 2021 $4.8M, 2022 $5.0M, 2023 $5.3M, 2024 $5.6M, 2025 $8.2M.
At the end of 2025, $3.3M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 11% of everything billed. Only 5 of 26 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $3.0M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M
$3.3M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$2.3M
2020
$2.7M
2021
$2.3M
2022
$2.2M
2023
$2.2M
2024
$3.0M
2025
$3.3M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $2.3M, 2020 $2.7M, 2021 $2.3M, 2022 $2.2M, 2023 $2.2M, 2024 $3.0M, 2025 $3.3M. Of the 2025 total, $855K was from earlier years.
$550,000budgeted bank interest in 2026, against $679,926 in 2025 and a 2025 budget of $1,059,120
The audited 2024 statements show investment income of $1,772,491, against a budget of $1,059,120, and $1,938,467 the year before. The 2026 operating budget has a bank interest line that was budgeted at the same $1,059,120 for 2025, came in at $679,926 for 2025, and is cut to $550,000 for 2026. The two figures may not measure the same thing. The statements say $991,886 of interest in 2024 was added to the obligatory reserve funds (such as development charges), and the documents do not say whether that sits inside the $1,772,491. At the end of 2024 the Township held $34,524,277 in cash and $20,541,300 in guaranteed investment certificates (GICs, bank deposits that pay a fixed rate).
Why it matters
Interest on savings helps pay for services and lowers the tax levy. A budget line that falls by almost half tells residents something about interest rates and about how much cash is left over, so it is worth knowing what is counted where.
It could be because…
If the $1,772,491 includes the $991,886 of interest added to reserve funds, the part left for operations would be $780,605 (worked out by us), which is nearer the $679,926 for 2025. The documents do not say, and the two years are not the same.
Interest rates fell between 2024 and 2025 and balances were spent on projects, so lower interest is expected.
A budget of $550,000 may simply be cautious.
Questions you could ask
Does the "Bank Interest" line in the budget include interest on development charge and other obligatory reserve funds, or only interest kept for operations?
Why was the 2025 bank interest budget the same $1,059,120 as the 2024 budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Operations, 2024: "Investment income" budget 1,059,120, actual 1,772,491 (2023 actual 1,938,467). Statement of Financial Position: cash 34,524,277; investments 20,541,300.
$439,162amortization left out of the 2023 statements, found and restated in 2024
Amortization is the yearly cost of an asset wearing out, spread over its life. The 2024 statements say the Township restated its 2023 results because amortization "previously omitted" in error had not been recorded: $439,162. The 2023 annual surplus was first stated as $3,161,267 and is now $2,722,105. Opening 2024 accumulated surplus was lowered to match. The auditor's opinion on the 2024 statements is clean ("present fairly"). The restatement is a non-cash accounting correction and did not change cash.
Why it matters
A mistake in the yearly books that is later fixed is better than one that is never found, and the Township has disclosed it plainly. Residents can still ask how it happened, and whether the controls over the asset records were strengthened, because the same records feed the asset management plan.
It could be because…
An asset added late in the year, or a new accounting system step, can leave amortization off a handful of assets. It is a bookkeeping slip, not a loss of money.
The correction was found and disclosed before the audit report was signed, which suggests the checking process worked.
The correction lowered the 2023 surplus by about 13.9% (worked out by us from $3,161,267 and $2,722,105), but it is a non-cash accounting entry.
Questions you could ask
How was the omitted amortization found, and by whom?
What check now makes sure every asset added is picked up for amortization?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 19, Restatement for previous period: "The Township has restated its 2023 consolidated financial statements to recognize amortization of tangible capital assets that was previously omitted in error." Accumulated amortization previously omitted (439,162). 2023 annual surplus as previously stated $3,161,267; less amortization not previously recorded (439,162); restated $2,722,105.
Independent Auditor's Report, Baker Tilly KDN LLP: "the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Township as at December 31, 2024". Signed Peterborough, Ontario, July 7, 2025.
$169.50billed by the Integrity Commissioner for 2025, against $7,932.60 for 2024
An Integrity Commissioner is an independent person, hired by the Township, who handles complaints about council members' conduct and gives members confidential advice. The Township posts the yearly reports. For 2024 the Integrity Commissioner received one Code of Conduct complaint, which was dismissed without investigation, and three requests for advice, and billed $7,932.60. For 2025 there were no complaints, no requests for advice, one general inquiry, and the bill was $169.50. The 2023 report (a different firm) covered four requests for advice and one complaint disposed of without an investigation.
Why it matters
Members of council can ask for advice before they act, which is the cheaper way to avoid a conflict of interest. A year with no requests for advice can be a good sign, or it can mean that members are not asking. Residents can reasonably ask which.
It could be because…
No complaints and no requests for advice means no work, and the bill follows the work.
The Integrity Commissioner changed firms between the 2023 and 2024 reports, and the fee terms may differ.
Council members may seek advice from the Clerk or the Township's lawyer first. We did not see that either way.
Questions you could ask
Will the Township post yearly totals of requests for advice and complaints, and the cost, for the whole term, in one place?
What do members do when they are unsure about a conflict, and is that process written down?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Essa?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Annual report, operating period January 1 to December 31, 2025: "we did not receive any complaints." "we did not receive any requests for advice." "one inquiry was received and responded to." Billings "totaled $169.50."
Annual report, operating period January 1 to December 31, 2024: "we received one Code of Conduct complaint. The complaint was dismissed without investigation". "Three requests for advice were received". Billings "totaled $7,932.60."
Annual report covering May 31, 2022 to June 1, 2023: "we responded to four (4) such requests for advice." "we responded to one (1) complaint which was able to be disposed of without an investigation and report to Council."
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy