Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Front of Yonge's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Front of Yonge's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 28 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
$1,020,707capital assets bought in 2025, against a budget of $295,730
Capital spending is money spent on buildings, roads, vehicles and equipment that last for years. The statements show $1,020,707 of tangible capital assets bought in 2025, about 3.5 times the $295,730 budgeted (worked out by us). The largest item was $555,049 of vehicles, and the Township took out a new debenture (a long-term loan, here from Infrastructure Ontario) of $335,925 for a new fire tanker. Total debt rose from $864,985 to $1,109,699. Net financial assets, which is what the Township owns in cash and receivables less what it owes, fell from $264,526 to $59,942. Reserve funds fell from $1,013,133 to $960,326, with the fire equipment fund down from $235,288 to $140,496 and the roads fund from $125,142 to $46,880. In the same year the Township held $430,517 in cash and $935,716 in investment certificates and bond fund units (worked out by us from $699,585 and $236,131).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$296,438transportation spending above budget in 2025 (worked out by us)
Transportation covers roads, bridges and winter maintenance. The statements show it cost $1,156,879 in 2025 against a budget of $860,441, which is $296,438 more (worked out by us), and against $958,183 in 2024. It is the largest area of spending. General government also came in above budget ($804,314 against $663,354, $140,960 more, worked out by us), while recreation and culture came in $159,731 below ($278,825 against $438,556, worked out by us). Overall spending was $3,408,830 against $3,171,586, which is $237,244 more (worked out by us). The Township's budget leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets, $488,590) and the accretion of asset retirement obligations ($36,081); the notes show spending before these items as $2,884,159 (worked out by us), which is $287,427 under the budget. So the over-spending in the statement is explained by non-cash items, but not the shift between services.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$4,364,527estimated costs to complete post-closure care, up from $2,402,322
A landfill has to be closed and looked after for years after it is full. The Township records this future cost as a liability (an asset retirement obligation). The statements estimate total closure costs of $747,764 (2024 $731,955) and costs to complete post-closure care of $4,364,527 (2024 $2,402,322), an increase of $1,962,205 (worked out by us), or 82%. The recorded liability, however, fell from $419,040 to $333,286, because most of the cost is counted only as the years go by (the statements show $4,249,270 still to be recognized in future). The estimated remaining life of the site changed from 35 years to 44 years in one year, even though 1,069 cubic meters of the 70,182 were used. The Township's landfill reserve fund is $489,469, up from $408,789, which is more than the recorded liability but a small share of the $5,112,291 total estimate (worked out by us from $747,764 plus $4,364,527).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$2,172,700amount to be raised in taxes in the 2025 budget by-law
The finance page links a 2025 Budget By-law, which is three scanned pages: the tax rates, the amount to be raised by taxes ($2,172,700), and a one-page summary by department. It says the by-law adopts "the 2025 Township of Front of Yonge Current and Capital Budgets attached hereto". The statements say the 2025 operating budget was approved by Council on March 7, 2025 (By-law 08-25) and the by-law was passed on April 7, 2025. The attached summary is printed with the date March 31, 2025. We found no capital budget, no line-by-line budget and no 2026 budget on the page on October 10, 2026. The by-law's file address shows it was added to the website in June 2026, after the 2025 year had ended.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Front of Yonge spent $446K on running the town office in 2019 and $740K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 5 of 28 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Front of Yonge had $1.1M saved at the end of 2025, down from $1.2M in 2019. That is 38% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 28 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
$59,942net financial assets at the end of 2025, down from $264,526
Net financial assets are what a municipality holds in cash, investments and money owed to it, less everything it owes. A positive figure means it can pay its bills from what it has. Front of Yonge's fell from $264,526 to $59,942 in 2025, a fall of $204,584, after having been $1,189 at the end of 2023 (the opening figure for 2024). The Township holds guaranteed investment certificates and a bond fund of $935,716 (worked out by us), but owes $1,109,699 in debentures, $333,286 for landfill obligations and $85,380 in employee future benefits. In 2026 it must repay $128,105 of debt principal. The statements say its debt payments are within the Province's annual repayment limit.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$697,802provincial grants in 2025, up from $534,560
The Township's 2025 annual surplus was $203,456, against a budget of $383,936 and $91,416 in 2024. Provincial grants were $697,802, up from $534,560, which is $163,242 more (worked out by us), and about 19% of revenue (worked out by us). User charges (fees for services such as the waste site and recreation) were $334,960 against a budget of $442,574, which is $107,614 less (worked out by us). Investment income was $74,514 against $131,530 the year before, and gains on selling assets were $33,714.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Front of Yonge spent about $570 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $83. Only 1 of 28 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Front of Yonge $570; typical similar town $83; ranked 2nd highest of 29.
$1,020,707capital assets bought in 2025, against a budget of $295,730
Capital spending is money spent on buildings, roads, vehicles and equipment that last for years. The statements show $1,020,707 of tangible capital assets bought in 2025, about 3.5 times the $295,730 budgeted (worked out by us). The largest item was $555,049 of vehicles, and the Township took out a new debenture (a long-term loan, here from Infrastructure Ontario) of $335,925 for a new fire tanker. Total debt rose from $864,985 to $1,109,699. Net financial assets, which is what the Township owns in cash and receivables less what it owes, fell from $264,526 to $59,942. Reserve funds fell from $1,013,133 to $960,326, with the fire equipment fund down from $235,288 to $140,496 and the roads fund from $125,142 to $46,880. In the same year the Township held $430,517 in cash and $935,716 in investment certificates and bond fund units (worked out by us from $699,585 and $236,131).
Why it matters
A budget is the promise made to taxpayers. A year with capital spending several times the plan, paid by new debt and savings, leaves the Township with a thin cushion and higher debt payments from now on: $128,105 of principal falls due in 2026, rising to $142,719 in 2030. Residents may want to know whether Council approved the extra spending in public, and when.
It could be because…
Council may have approved the extra purchases by resolution during the year. The statements say the budget figures include "subsequent council approved amendments", but the budget column is still $295,730.
The new fire tanker may have been planned and funded in the budget by a loan, with the loan listed apart from the capital line.
Borrowing at 3.54% can be cheaper than selling guaranteed certificates that earn up to 5.15%, so holding savings and borrowing may be a sensible choice.
Some of the money spent was paid from grants: gas tax funding of $84,987 and OCIF money of $100,000 were applied to capital in 2025.
Questions you could ask
On what date did Council approve capital spending above the $295,730 in the budget, and where is that decision published?
How much of the $1,020,707 was paid by grants, by the new debenture and by reserve funds?
What is the plan for rebuilding the fire equipment and roads reserve funds after 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of change in net financial assets: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (295,730), actual (1,020,707), 2024 (342,803). "Net financial assets, end of year" 59,942 (2024 264,526). Annual surplus budget 383,936, actual 203,456.
Note 7, Net Long-Term Liabilities: "In 2025, the Municipality obtained a debenture from the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation to finance the purchase of a new fire tanker. The debenture is payable in semi-annual principal payments of $16,796, plus interest at a rate of 3.54%." Principal due: 2026 $128,105; 2027 $131,541; 2028 $135,118; 2029 $138,842; 2030 $142,719; thereafter $433,374; total $1,109,699. Interest expense "$31,904 (2024 - $36,252)".
Statement of cash flows: "Advances of debentures" 335,925; "Principal payments on debentures" (91,212) (2024 (87,609)); "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" (1,020,707) (2024 (342,803)); "Proceeds from disposal of tangible capital assets" 33,714; "Cash, end of year" 430,517.
Note 13, Reserve funds: Roads 46,880 (2024 125,142); Fire equipment 140,496 (2024 235,288); Landfill closure and post closure 489,469; total reserve funds 960,326 (2024 1,013,133). Note 2: guaranteed investment certificates "mature at various dates from September 2026 to November 2030. The interest rates range from 2.00% to 5.15%." Note 4, Gas tax funding 84,987 and OCIF 100,000 "To capital" 184,987.
$296,438transportation spending above budget in 2025 (worked out by us)
Transportation covers roads, bridges and winter maintenance. The statements show it cost $1,156,879 in 2025 against a budget of $860,441, which is $296,438 more (worked out by us), and against $958,183 in 2024. It is the largest area of spending. General government also came in above budget ($804,314 against $663,354, $140,960 more, worked out by us), while recreation and culture came in $159,731 below ($278,825 against $438,556, worked out by us). Overall spending was $3,408,830 against $3,171,586, which is $237,244 more (worked out by us). The Township's budget leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets, $488,590) and the accretion of asset retirement obligations ($36,081); the notes show spending before these items as $2,884,159 (worked out by us), which is $287,427 under the budget. So the over-spending in the statement is explained by non-cash items, but not the shift between services.
Why it matters
Roads are what most residents see their taxes buy. A service that costs a third more than planned either had a surprise (a bad winter, repairs) or was budgeted too low. If budgets are set too low for roads and too high for recreation, the budget is a weak guide to where money goes.
It could be because…
Transportation includes amortization of roads ($228,043 in 2025), which the budget leaves out, so much of the gap may be accounting. The statements do not split amortization by service in the pages we read.
A hard winter or a washed-out road can push costs up in one year.
Recreation and culture may have had projects that did not go ahead, which would free money to cover roads, and the budget by-law shows recreation budgeted to rise to $186,857 from $73,423 the year before.
Questions you could ask
How much of the transportation total is amortization, and how much is spending on roads, bridges and winter control?
Why was recreation budgeted at $438,556 in the statements and $186,857 in the budget by-law, when the year came in at $278,825?
Was Council told during 2025 that roads were running over budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, expenses: "Transportation services" budget 860,441, actual 1,156,879 (2024 958,183); "General government" 663,354, 804,314 (792,831); "Recreation and cultural services" 438,556, 278,825 (213,718); total expenses 3,171,586, 3,408,830 (3,167,645). Annual surplus 383,936, 203,456 (91,416).
Note 18, Expenses by object: amortization of tangible capital assets 488,590; accretion of asset retirement obligation 36,081; total 3,408,830 (budget 3,171,586, with nil for both). Note 16: "The budgeted expenses presented in the consolidated statement of operations do not include amortization of tangible capital assets." Note 8: roads infrastructure amortization 228,043 in 2025.
Attached department summary ("Income Statement", for the period ending 31-Dec-2025, printed March 31, 2025), budget current year and prior year: "3000 Public Works" 1,013,454.00 and 930,936.00; "7000 Recreation" 186,857.00 and 73,423.00; "7900 Heritage & Culture" 74,926.00 and 22,902.00; "2000 Fire" 362,030.00 and 320,737.00; "Total Surplus (-)/Deficit" 2,172,700.00 and 2,052,055.00.
$4,364,527estimated costs to complete post-closure care, up from $2,402,322
A landfill has to be closed and looked after for years after it is full. The Township records this future cost as a liability (an asset retirement obligation). The statements estimate total closure costs of $747,764 (2024 $731,955) and costs to complete post-closure care of $4,364,527 (2024 $2,402,322), an increase of $1,962,205 (worked out by us), or 82%. The recorded liability, however, fell from $419,040 to $333,286, because most of the cost is counted only as the years go by (the statements show $4,249,270 still to be recognized in future). The estimated remaining life of the site changed from 35 years to 44 years in one year, even though 1,069 cubic meters of the 70,182 were used. The Township's landfill reserve fund is $489,469, up from $408,789, which is more than the recorded liability but a small share of the $5,112,291 total estimate (worked out by us from $747,764 plus $4,364,527).
Why it matters
If the real cost is closer to the larger figure, today's reserve is a small part of what will be owed, and the bill would land on future taxpayers. A near doubling of an estimate in one year is the kind of change residents may want explained: it may reflect a new study, a change in rules, or a different way of counting.
It could be because…
The estimate may have been updated after an engineer's report or new Ministry rules. The note says the inflation rate used rose from 5.35% to 5.61% and the discount rate from 8.35% to 8.61%.
The recorded liability is the present value of the part earned to date, which is why it fell even as the full estimate rose.
Most of the post-closure cost falls decades from now, over a period of "approximately 20 years" after the site closes.
Questions you could ask
What caused the post-closure estimate to rise by $1,962,205, and was there a new engineer's report?
Why did the estimated remaining life of the landfill increase to 44 years from 35?
How much does the Township plan to put into the landfill reserve fund each year toward the $5,112,291 estimate?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6, Asset Retirement Obligation: "Estimated closure costs" $747,764 (2024 $731,955); "Recorded closure liabilities" 218,029 (2024 273,956); "Estimated costs to complete post-closure" 4,364,527 (2024 2,402,322); "Less: amount to be recognized in future" (4,249,270) (2024 (2,257,238)); "Recorded post-closure liabilities" 115,257 (2024 145,084); "Total solid waste landfill closure and post-closure liability" $333,286 (2024 $419,040). "Remaining capacity of the site is approximately 69,113 cubic meters (2024 - 70,182 cubic meters) and the site has an estimated remaining life of 44 years (2024 - 35 years)." The landfill closure and post-closure reserve fund "is $489,469 (2024 - $408,789)".
Note 6, continued: "Asset Retirement Obligation, beginning of year" $419,040 (2024 $407,512); "Increase (Decrease) to Land tangible capital asset" (121,835); "Accretion expense" 36,081; end of year 333,286.
$2,172,700amount to be raised in taxes in the 2025 budget by-law
The finance page links a 2025 Budget By-law, which is three scanned pages: the tax rates, the amount to be raised by taxes ($2,172,700), and a one-page summary by department. It says the by-law adopts "the 2025 Township of Front of Yonge Current and Capital Budgets attached hereto". The statements say the 2025 operating budget was approved by Council on March 7, 2025 (By-law 08-25) and the by-law was passed on April 7, 2025. The attached summary is printed with the date March 31, 2025. We found no capital budget, no line-by-line budget and no 2026 budget on the page on October 10, 2026. The by-law's file address shows it was added to the website in June 2026, after the 2025 year had ended.
Why it matters
A budget is the promise made to taxpayers. If residents can see only a department summary, they cannot check what was planned for roads, the fire hall or recreation before the year, or compare it with what was spent. An election is on October 26, 2026.
It could be because…
The full budget may have been presented to Council in a meeting package on the portal that asks automated tools not to read it, so we cannot say whether it is public there.
Small townships often post only the by-law. The Township may provide detail on request.
The website address date may reflect when the file was moved to the page, not when it was first public.
Questions you could ask
Where can residents read the full 2025 and 2026 operating and capital budgets?
Why do the statements refer to a March 7, 2025 approval (By-law 08-25) and the posted by-law to an April 7, 2025 one?
Will the Township post each year's adopted budget as text, next to its audited statements?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
By-law 15-25: "A By-law to adopt estimates of revenue and expenditures and provide for the levying of taxes for municipal purposes for the year 2025". "Township of Front of Yonge, $ 2,172,700". Section 6: "THAT the 2025 Township of Front of Yonge Current and Capital Budgets attached hereto are hereby adopted and form part of this By-Law." "READ a third time and passed this 7th day of April, 2025."
Note 16, Budget: "The budget data presented in these consolidated financial statements is based upon the 2025 operating budget approved by Council on March 7, 2025." "Budget figures reported on the Consolidated Statement of Operations are based on 2025 operating and capital budgets as approved by Council on March 7, 2025 (By-law 08-25) and includes subsequent council approved amendments. Budget figures reported in these financial statements are not subject to an audit." Reconciliation: approved budget annual surplus (deficit) nil; add capital expenses 295,730; net transfer to reserve funds (22,537); less net debt to be repaid 110,743; budget annual surplus 383,936.
The Finance & Taxes page lists "2025 Village Levy By-law", "2025 Budget By-law" and "2025 Tax Rates" under the property tax heading. It links no 2026 budget and no budget book. Read October 10, 2026.
Front of Yonge spent $446K on running the town office in 2019 and $740K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 5 of 28 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 66% in 6 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+66%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+9%
+1%
2021
+17%
+4%
2022
+48%
+11%
2023
+31%
+16%
2024
+63%
+18%
2025
+66%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $293K a year pay for?
Why did council go from $446K to $740K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $446K, 2020 $484K, 2021 $524K, 2022 $660K, 2023 $585K, 2024 $728K, 2025 $740K.
Front of Yonge spent $173K on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $284K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 65% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%+200%
+65%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+180%
+1%
2021
+61%
+4%
2022
+43%
+11%
2023
+47%
+16%
2024
+82%
+18%
2025
+65%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $112K a year pay for?
Why did the dump (landfill) go from $25,796 to $243K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Front of Yonge had $1.1M saved at the end of 2025, down from $1.2M in 2019. That is 38% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 28 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Front of Yonge have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$1.0M$1.2M
$1.1M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$1.2M
2020
$1.1M
2021
$1.1M
2022
$1.1M
2023
$1.0M
2024
$1.1M
2025
$1.1M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$59,942net financial assets at the end of 2025, down from $264,526
Net financial assets are what a municipality holds in cash, investments and money owed to it, less everything it owes. A positive figure means it can pay its bills from what it has. Front of Yonge's fell from $264,526 to $59,942 in 2025, a fall of $204,584, after having been $1,189 at the end of 2023 (the opening figure for 2024). The Township holds guaranteed investment certificates and a bond fund of $935,716 (worked out by us), but owes $1,109,699 in debentures, $333,286 for landfill obligations and $85,380 in employee future benefits. In 2026 it must repay $128,105 of debt principal. The statements say its debt payments are within the Province's annual repayment limit.
Why it matters
A figure this close to zero means a bad year, a large repair, or a grant that does not arrive could push the Township into negative net financial assets, and then into borrowing or tax increases. It is also close to the level at the start of 2024.
It could be because…
Net financial assets are low largely because the Township invested in long-lasting assets: tangible capital assets are $6,717,232. The Township is a small place with an old road network, and this is typical.
The landfill reserve fund of $489,469 already covers the recorded landfill obligation of $333,286.
Grants and the annual tax levy come in each year, so the Township is not relying only on its savings.
Questions you could ask
What level of net financial assets does Council aim to keep, and is there a written policy?
How does the Township plan its 2026 and 2027 capital spending so as not to draw this down further?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Statement of change in net financial assets: "Net financial assets, beginning of year" 264,526 (2024 1,189); "Change in net financial assets" (204,584) (2024 263,337). Note 7: "The annual principal and interest payments required to service the debenture and capital lease obligation are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing."
$697,802provincial grants in 2025, up from $534,560
The Township's 2025 annual surplus was $203,456, against a budget of $383,936 and $91,416 in 2024. Provincial grants were $697,802, up from $534,560, which is $163,242 more (worked out by us), and about 19% of revenue (worked out by us). User charges (fees for services such as the waste site and recreation) were $334,960 against a budget of $442,574, which is $107,614 less (worked out by us). Investment income was $74,514 against $131,530 the year before, and gains on selling assets were $33,714.
Why it matters
Grants help a small township keep taxes low, but they are decided by others and can change. If the surplus depends on grants and one-time gains, residents may want to know what a normal year would show.
It could be because…
Note 4 shows $184,987 of gas tax and OCIF money was applied to capital work in 2025, so part of the grants is capital money that must be spent on projects.
The budget for user charges may have counted recreation income that was later lower because programs ran at lower cost (recreation spending was also $159,731 under budget).
Lower investment income reflects lower balances and rates.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2025 provincial grants was one-time or tied to named projects?
Why were user charges $107,614 below budget, and which service was it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Front of Yonge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 11, Government Grants: "Included in government grants is $697,802 (2024 - $534,560) of provincial grants and $109,835 (2024 - $92,846) of federal grants." Note 4, Obligatory Reserve Funds: gas tax funding 84,987 and OCIF 100,000 received, "To capital" 184,987, balance at end of year nil.
Statement of operations: "Annual surplus" budget 383,936, actual 203,456 (2024 91,416). Statement of change in net financial assets: "(Gain) loss on disposal of tangible capital assets" (33,714) (2024 26,606); "Proceeds from disposal of tangible capital assets" 33,714.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy