Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Gore Bay's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Gore Bay's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 29 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Gore Bay spent $528K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 29 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Gore Bay spent $729K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 29 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$264,000counted as owing in 2025 for a $1,150,000 construction claim that was settled
The 2024 statements say the Town was a defendant in a legal claim of $1,150,000 for damages related to a construction project. The Town was defending it and had set aside no money. The 2025 statements say the matter was settled after year-end and that $264,000 is now counted as owing. A contingency is a possible cost that depends on something not yet decided. We did not find a public report on the settlement or on which project it was.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$239,667general operations surplus at the end of 2025, down from $831,915
The Town's accumulated surplus is split into a surplus for running the Town, reserves (money set aside) and reserve funds. The 2025 note shows the surplus "General operations - Town" down from $831,915 to $239,667, and the working capital reserve down from $366,228 to $320,259. Reserve funds for specific purposes went up from $797,008 to $1,126,098. Net financial assets, which is what the Town holds in cash and money owed to it minus what it owes, fell from $2,579,201 at the end of 2023 to $1,342,896 and then $1,165,379. The 2026 budget presentation says the Town enters 2026 with a "Stable financial position".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$3.2 milliona year the Town's plan says it should reinvest, against about $532,000 actually spent
The Town's 2024 Asset Management Plan says the Town should be putting about $3.2 million a year into replacing and renewing its assets, but actual yearly spending is about $532,000. That is a reinvestment rate of 0.5% against a target of 2.7%. The 2026 budget presentation repeats the $3.2 million need and says meeting it would take a tax levy increase of 3.6% a year and water and sewer rate rises of 6.2% a year. It offers a 2% extra levy as an example, which it says would bring the impact on taxpayers to 5.5%. The Town's plan names the gap. The question is how it will be closed. Separately, the plan puts the Town's assets at $123 million to replace and the budget presentation says $145M, and we did not find why they differ.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$1,255,720general government expenses in 2025, against a budget of $898,858
General government is the cost of running council and the town office. The 2025 statements show a budget of $898,858 and actual spending of $1,255,720 (about 40% more, worked out by us). In 2024 the line was $858,377. The notes by type of cost show the "materials, rents and financial expenses" part rising from $190,974 in 2024 to $613,251 in 2025. We did not find the Town's explanation. The statements warn that their budget column is not on the same basis as the actual results, so some of the gap may be accounting.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
8.44%commercial increase in the budget presentation, against 2.74% for homes
The budget presentation says the 2026 increase is 2.74% for homes and 8.44% for commercial properties, and shows an average commercial property of $147,012 paying $2,856.36 in municipal tax in 2026. The tax by-law sets the same municipal rate for residential and commercial properties (ratios of 1.0000 and a rate of 0.0204520). For the median home of $160,000 that rate gives the presentation's $3,272.33 (within a cent). Applied to the commercial average of $147,012 it gives a figure about $150 higher than $2,856.36 (worked out by us). We do not know why, and we did not read the 2025 by-law. The presentation's recommendation slide is headed draft, and we did not find the adopted budget.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$3,541.53printed 2026 household total, where the parts add to $3,517.13 (worked out by us)
On the households slide, the 2026 municipal tax of $3,272.33 plus educational tax of $244.80 makes $3,517.13 (worked out by us), but the slide prints a total of $3,541.53. On the commercial slide, the 2026 parts ($2,856.36 and $1,293.71) add to $4,150.07 and the 2025 parts add to $3,927.65, but the totals are printed the other way round, so the table shows taxes falling while the change column shows a rise. These look like typing slips, and they are in the Town's own public summary.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$2,477,608of one foundation's gifts still deferred at the end of 2025
Revenue under "Other" was budgeted at $2,360,742 and came in at $4,116,011, compared with $960,958 in 2024. The notes show why this is partly timing. Gifts from one foundation are held as deferred revenue (money received but not yet counted as income until it is spent). In 2025 $2,683,508 of it was counted as income, $1,695,000 more was received, and $2,477,608 is still waiting. The budget presentation says the medical centre renovations and the splash pad washrooms are funded by donations. The open point is that a large share of capital depends on gifts that may not repeat.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$541,980federal grants held, unchanged from the end of 2024 to the end of 2025
The Town holds federal grants it has received but not yet counted as income because the work is not done. The 2024 statements show a balance of $541,980 after $115,062 was counted as income that year. In 2025 nothing was received and nothing was counted, and the balance is still $541,980. The statements do not say what the money is for.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Gore Bay spent $528K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 29 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 114% in 6 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%+120%
+114%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+7%
+1%
2021
+6%
+4%
2022
+17%
+11%
2023
+19%
+16%
2024
+48%
+18%
2025
+114%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $603K a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $302K to $724K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $528K, 2020 $565K, 2021 $557K, 2022 $619K, 2023 $629K, 2024 $781K, 2025 $1.1M.
Gore Bay spent $729K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 29 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 47% in 6 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−60%−40%−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+47%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−40%
+1%
2021
−23%
+4%
2022
+13%
+11%
2023
+37%
+16%
2024
+42%
+18%
2025
+47%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $341K a year pay for?
Why did golf, marina, ski hill go from $262K to $454K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$264,000counted as owing in 2025 for a $1,150,000 construction claim that was settled
The 2024 statements say the Town was a defendant in a legal claim of $1,150,000 for damages related to a construction project. The Town was defending it and had set aside no money. The 2025 statements say the matter was settled after year-end and that $264,000 is now counted as owing. A contingency is a possible cost that depends on something not yet decided. We did not find a public report on the settlement or on which project it was.
Why it matters
A settlement is public money. Residents can reasonably ask what happened, whether insurance or another party covers any of it, and whether $264,000 is the whole cost.
It could be because…
Claims are often settled for far less than the amount asked, so $264,000 may be the full and final cost.
Insurance or the contractor's insurer may pay some or all of it.
Settlement terms are often confidential until the matter is fully closed.
Questions you could ask
What was the total cost of the settlement, and how much did insurance or others pay?
Which year's budget carries the $264,000, and did it come from savings or from taxes?
Will Council report the outcome and the lessons for future construction contracts in public?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
2024 statements, note 14 (Contingencies): "The Town has been named defendant in an outstanding legal claim in the amount of $1,150,000 for damages related to a construction project." The note says the Town "has defended this action denying the claim" and that "No amount has been accrued in the accounts as a result of this claim."
2025 statements, note 12 (Contingencies): the claim of $1,150,000 "was settled subsequent to year-end and $264,000 has been accrued in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as a result of this claim."
$239,667general operations surplus at the end of 2025, down from $831,915
The Town's accumulated surplus is split into a surplus for running the Town, reserves (money set aside) and reserve funds. The 2025 note shows the surplus "General operations - Town" down from $831,915 to $239,667, and the working capital reserve down from $366,228 to $320,259. Reserve funds for specific purposes went up from $797,008 to $1,126,098. Net financial assets, which is what the Town holds in cash and money owed to it minus what it owes, fell from $2,579,201 at the end of 2023 to $1,342,896 and then $1,165,379. The 2026 budget presentation says the Town enters 2026 with a "Stable financial position".
Why it matters
The general operating surplus is the cushion for surprises such as the settled claim. A cushion that shrinks by about 70% in a year, while the costs of a large capital program come due, is worth a clear plan.
It could be because…
Some of the surplus may have been moved on purpose into reserve funds, which rose in the same year.
The $264,000 counted as owing for the settled claim may have been taken from this surplus.
Net financial assets often fall in a year of heavy capital spending, because the money becomes roads and pipes.
Questions you could ask
Why did the general operations surplus fall, and what did it pay for?
What level of general surplus does Council want to keep, and is there a written target?
Does the 2026 budget plan to rebuild the surplus?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 11 (Accumulated Surplus): "General operations - Town" 239,667 in 2025 and 831,915 in 2024; Working capital reserve 320,259 and 366,228; total reserve funds 1,126,098 and 797,008.
$3.2 milliona year the Town's plan says it should reinvest, against about $532,000 actually spent
The Town's 2024 Asset Management Plan says the Town should be putting about $3.2 million a year into replacing and renewing its assets, but actual yearly spending is about $532,000. That is a reinvestment rate of 0.5% against a target of 2.7%. The 2026 budget presentation repeats the $3.2 million need and says meeting it would take a tax levy increase of 3.6% a year and water and sewer rate rises of 6.2% a year. It offers a 2% extra levy as an example, which it says would bring the impact on taxpayers to 5.5%. The Town's plan names the gap. The question is how it will be closed. Separately, the plan puts the Town's assets at $123 million to replace and the budget presentation says $145M, and we did not find why they differ.
Why it matters
Roads, pipes and buildings wear out whether or not a budget sets money aside. Without a plan to pay for it, the cost moves to future councils and taxpayers.
It could be because…
Much of the work is paid for by one-time grants rather than the levy. The 2025 statements show $4,770,936 of capital additions, far above what the levy alone could pay.
The two replacement totals may be measured at different dates or with different prices.
A small town may reasonably phase in a large increase rather than raise taxes sharply in one year.
Questions you could ask
Does Council have a written plan, with dates, to move toward the $3.2 million a year?
Why does the budget presentation use $145M for the Town's assets when the plan says $123 million?
How much of the 2026 levy goes to replacing assets, and how much of the capital program depends on grants?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Asset Management Plan, key insights: "The Town's target re-investment rate is 2.7%, and the actual re-investment rate is 0.5%"; the total replacement cost of the asset portfolio is "$123 million".
Asset Management Plan, target versus actual reinvestment: the Town should be allocating "approximately $3.2 million annually"; "Actual annual spending on infrastructure totals approximately $532,000".
2026 budget presentation, Infrastructure Gap slide: "2024 Asset Management Plan indicated a need to invest $3.2 million of Capital each year for the next 20 years", requiring a levy increase of 3.6% annually and water and sewer rate increases of 6.2% annually, with "$145M of Existing Assets".
Overview slide: "2% investment to address the infrastructure gap would bring the impact to taxpayers to 5.5%"; "1% is equal to $15,012 - the total contribution would be $30,024"; Impact to Residential = 2.74%.
$1,255,720general government expenses in 2025, against a budget of $898,858
General government is the cost of running council and the town office. The 2025 statements show a budget of $898,858 and actual spending of $1,255,720 (about 40% more, worked out by us). In 2024 the line was $858,377. The notes by type of cost show the "materials, rents and financial expenses" part rising from $190,974 in 2024 to $613,251 in 2025. We did not find the Town's explanation. The statements warn that their budget column is not on the same basis as the actual results, so some of the gap may be accounting.
Why it matters
Administration is the part of the budget residents see least. A large, unexplained rise in one year is worth a plain answer, even if the answer is a one-time item.
It could be because…
The $264,000 for the settled legal claim may be counted in this line.
The budget column in the statements leaves out the budgets of boards the Town controls, and is prepared a different way from the actual figures, so the two are not like for like.
Money spent on one-time projects run through general government may explain the rise in materials and rents.
Questions you could ask
What made up the increase in materials, rents and financial expenses in general government?
Is the settled legal claim counted in this line?
Does Council see a budget-to-actual report by department during the year, and is it public?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 19, segmented information for 2025: general government "Materials, rents and financial expenses" of 613,251, within total general government expenses of 1,255,720.
Note 19, segmented information for 2024: general government "Materials, rents and financial expenses" of 190,974, within total general government expenses of 858,377.
Note 17 (Budget Figures): "The budget adopted by Council was not prepared on a basis consistent with that used to report actual results in these consolidated financial statements."
8.44%commercial increase in the budget presentation, against 2.74% for homes
The budget presentation says the 2026 increase is 2.74% for homes and 8.44% for commercial properties, and shows an average commercial property of $147,012 paying $2,856.36 in municipal tax in 2026. The tax by-law sets the same municipal rate for residential and commercial properties (ratios of 1.0000 and a rate of 0.0204520). For the median home of $160,000 that rate gives the presentation's $3,272.33 (within a cent). Applied to the commercial average of $147,012 it gives a figure about $150 higher than $2,856.36 (worked out by us). We do not know why, and we did not read the 2025 by-law. The presentation's recommendation slide is headed draft, and we did not find the adopted budget.
Why it matters
Business owners plan around these figures. If the presentation understated the commercial bill, or used a different rate than the one Council passed, they should hear it from the Town.
It could be because…
The presentation may have used a different assessment base or a rate that was changed before the by-law passed.
Some properties in the average may be in a program that lowers their taxes.
The figure may simply be a slide error. The presentation's totals on the next slides do not add up either (see the next question).
Questions you could ask
What municipal rate and assessment produce the commercial figure of $2,856.36?
Was the commercial ratio the same in 2025, and what was the commercial rate then?
Will the Town publish a corrected slide if the figure was wrong?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Impact to Commercial / Industrial: average property value $147,012; municipal tax 2,633.94 in 2025 and 2,856.36 in 2026, a change of 222.42; educational tax 1,293.71 in both years. The overview slide says "Impact to Residential = 2.74%" and "Commercial = 8.44%".
By-law 2026-04, schedule A: municipal tax rate 0.0204520 for Residential, Multi-Residential, Commercial and Industrial alike; section 2 sets the Commercial tax ratio at 1.0000, the same as Residential.
$3,541.53printed 2026 household total, where the parts add to $3,517.13 (worked out by us)
On the households slide, the 2026 municipal tax of $3,272.33 plus educational tax of $244.80 makes $3,517.13 (worked out by us), but the slide prints a total of $3,541.53. On the commercial slide, the 2026 parts ($2,856.36 and $1,293.71) add to $4,150.07 and the 2025 parts add to $3,927.65, but the totals are printed the other way round, so the table shows taxes falling while the change column shows a rise. These look like typing slips, and they are in the Town's own public summary.
Why it matters
The table is what most residents will read. Printed totals that do not add up make it hard to trust the other numbers on the page.
It could be because…
A copy-and-paste slip when the slides were built.
The total may include an item that is not shown in the table.
Questions you could ask
Will the Town correct the slides and say which figures are right?
Is there an adopted budget document that replaces the draft-headed presentation?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Impact to Households: municipal tax 3,185.16 and 3,272.33; educational tax 244.80 and 244.80; TOTAL $3,429.96 and $3,541.53.
Impact to Commercial / Industrial: municipal tax 2,633.94 and 2,856.36; educational tax 1,293.71 and 1,293.71; TOTAL $4,150.07 and $3,927.65; change 222.42.
$2,477,608of one foundation's gifts still deferred at the end of 2025
Revenue under "Other" was budgeted at $2,360,742 and came in at $4,116,011, compared with $960,958 in 2024. The notes show why this is partly timing. Gifts from one foundation are held as deferred revenue (money received but not yet counted as income until it is spent). In 2025 $2,683,508 of it was counted as income, $1,695,000 more was received, and $2,477,608 is still waiting. The budget presentation says the medical centre renovations and the splash pad washrooms are funded by donations. The open point is that a large share of capital depends on gifts that may not repeat.
Why it matters
Residents should know how much of the Town's building program depends on gifts, what the gifts are for, and what happens to the projects if the gifts end.
It could be because…
The gifts may be tied to named projects and be spent as the work is done, which is how deferred revenue is meant to work.
The foundation may have promised more years of gifts that are not yet visible in the statements.
Questions you could ask
What are the foundation's gifts for, and over how many years?
Which projects would be cut or delayed if gifts stopped?
Does the Town publish a list of gifts received and what each paid for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "Other" revenue was 2,360,742 in the 2025 budget column, 4,116,011 actual in 2025 and 960,958 in 2024.
Note 6 (Deferred Revenues), line for a foundation: balance at December 31, 2024 of 3,466,116; amounts received during the year 1,695,000; recognized as revenues during the year 2,683,508; balance at December 31, 2025 of 2,477,608.
$541,980federal grants held, unchanged from the end of 2024 to the end of 2025
The Town holds federal grants it has received but not yet counted as income because the work is not done. The 2024 statements show a balance of $541,980 after $115,062 was counted as income that year. In 2025 nothing was received and nothing was counted, and the balance is still $541,980. The statements do not say what the money is for.
Why it matters
Grant money usually has a deadline and a purpose. If a project is stalled, the Town could be asked to return the money or lose it.
It could be because…
A project funded by the grant may be planned for a later year.
The grant may have been paid in advance for work with a long schedule.
Questions you could ask
Which federal program and project is the $541,980 for, and when must it be spent?
Is the project on schedule?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8 (Deferred Revenues) in the 2024 statements: Federal grants, balance at start 657,042; recognized as revenues 115,062; balance at December 31, 2024 of 541,980.
Note 6 (Deferred Revenues) in the 2025 statements: Federal grants, balance at December 31, 2024 of 541,980; nothing received or recognized in the year (shown as a dash); balance at December 31, 2025 of 541,980.
Gore Bay spent about $317 per home on snow ploughing in 2025. The typical similar town spent $142. Only 4 of 29 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Gore Bay?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Snow ploughing per home: Gore Bay $317; typical similar town $142; ranked 5th highest of 30.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy