Council BooksGrand ValleyOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Grand Valley's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 11 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Grand Valley's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 41 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 98% in 5 years?

+98%parks, arena and library, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $819K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.6M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 4 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 63% in 5 years?

+63%roads and snow, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $1.0M on roads and snow in 2019 and $1.7M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 3 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

The Community Centre expansion was budgeted to come from reserves. Why is it now being paid for with borrowing?

$3,113,500loan to be issued at 4.53% for 20 years for the Community Centre expansion, per the 2026 budget

The 2025 budget planned to take $3,099,000 out of reserves (savings set aside for later) to build the Community Centre expansion. The Town's 2025 actuals show $99,000 taken from reserves. The 2026 budget instead records a loan of $3,113,500 from Infrastructure Ontario (the province's lending body) over 20 years, after a short-term bank loan in December 2025.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Is the automated speed enforcement program paying for itself?

$23,028net cost of the speed camera program in 2025, against a budgeted surplus of $12,000

In 2025 the speed camera program cost far more than the Town planned, and brought in far more ticket revenue than planned. The Town's 2025 actuals show the program ended $23,028 net cost, where the budget expected a $12,000 surplus. The 2026 budget sets cost and revenue equal at $50,000 each, far below 2025.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why is the Town borrowing $2.5 million from its own development charge funds to build a $5 million sewage pumping station?

$5,000,000pumping station approved December 9, 2025, with $2.5 million from internal borrowing between funds

Development charges are fees builders pay so that growth helps pay for the roads, water and sewers it needs. The Town's budget says the $5 million southeast sewage pumping station will use $2.5 million in developer contributions already collected, and $2.5 million of internal borrowing from other development charge reserve funds, to be repaid with interest. The 2024 audited statements show a parkland fund that is already below zero.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingMoney health

The landfill clean-up estimate is based on a 2004 report. Is it still right?

$167,074landfill post-closure liability at the end of 2024, based on a 2004 estimate

The Town carries a $167,074 liability for looking after its closed landfill until 2053. The audited statements say the most recent estimate of the closure and post-closure cost was based on a report prepared as of November 1, 2004.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source

Worth askingRising costs

Sewer and sewage plant repairs ran over budget in 2025. Does the 2026 budget leave enough?

$94,352spent on sewer repairs in 2025, against a budget of $15,000

Repairs to the sewers cost $94,352 in 2025 against a budget of $15,000, and repairs at the sewage treatment plant cost $149,968 against $90,000. For 2026 the sewer repair budget is $30,000. The Town's note says it was cut from $96.4 thousand at a Council meeting on February 24, 2026.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 64% in 5 years?

+64%running the town office, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $732K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.2M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 6 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowOpenness

Where are the Town's audited 2025 financial statements?

September 12, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements, the latest we found

On October 7, 2026 the Town's financial statements page lists audited statements up to 2024. The 2024 statements carry an auditor's report dated September 12, 2025, about nine months after the year ended. We did not find 2025 statements.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 98% in 5 years?

+98%parks, arena and library, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $819K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.6M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 4 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 98% in 5 years?
+98%
Show as a table
YearParks, arena and libraryPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−2%+1%
2021−2%+4%
2022+33%+11%
2023+69%+16%
2024+98%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $805K a year pay for?
  2. Why did arena and buildings go from $546K to $969K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Parks, arena and library: 2019 $819K, 2020 $801K, 2021 $802K, 2022 $1.1M, 2023 $1.4M, 2024 $1.6M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Arena and buildings, from $546K to $969K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 43%. Grand Valley ranks 5th of 42.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2024, 41 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 63% in 5 years?

+63%roads and snow, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $1.0M on roads and snow in 2019 and $1.7M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 3 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 63% in 5 years?
+63%
Show as a table
YearRoads and snowPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+13%+1%
2021+11%+4%
2022+35%+11%
2023+26%+16%
2024+63%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $655K a year pay for?
  2. Why did paved roads go from $382K to $669K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Roads and snow: 2019 $1.0M, 2020 $1.2M, 2021 $1.1M, 2022 $1.4M, 2023 $1.3M, 2024 $1.7M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Paved roads, from $382K to $669K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 30%. Grand Valley ranks 4th of 42.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2024, 41 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

The Community Centre expansion was budgeted to come from reserves. Why is it now being paid for with borrowing?

$3,113,500loan to be issued at 4.53% for 20 years for the Community Centre expansion, per the 2026 budget

The 2025 budget planned to take $3,099,000 out of reserves (savings set aside for later) to build the Community Centre expansion. The Town's 2025 actuals show $99,000 taken from reserves. The 2026 budget instead records a loan of $3,113,500 from Infrastructure Ontario (the province's lending body) over 20 years, after a short-term bank loan in December 2025.

Why it matters

Borrowing turns a one-time cost into payments that last 20 years. Residents should be able to see who makes those payments: the Town's taxes, or the Community Centre Board's yearly levy.

It could be because…

  • Borrowing is a normal way to pay for a building that will be used for decades, and spreads the cost across the people who will use it.
  • Reserves may have been kept for other needs, such as roads and water, once a loan on good terms became available.
  • The Town's notes say it will be recovered from the Community Centre Board, so the cost may not fall on general taxes.

Questions you could ask

  1. When did Council decide to borrow rather than use reserves for the expansion, and in which meeting?
  2. Who pays the yearly loan payments: the Town, the Community Centre Board, or both, and in what shares?
  3. What is the final total cost of the expansion, and how much of it is covered by grants or other sources?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The line "CC - Capital Expenditure" shows 2025 actuals of $3,464,485 against a 2025 budget of $4,176,000.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 25, line CAP24 (account 1-4-2100-8000)

  2. The line "CC - TX fr Reserve" shows -$99,000 in 2025 actuals against -$3,099,000 in the 2025 budget. For 2026 the Town notes: "Did not include as Expansion Project complete."

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 25, line CAP27 (account 1-3-5100-7780)

  3. The Town's note on the loan repayment line says "Debt of $3,113,500 will be issued @ 4.53% for 20 years, with semi-annual payments on April-15 and Oct-15 annually". The 2026 budget for this line is $148,600.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 25, Community Centre - Expansion Project, Provision for Annual Loan Repayments

  4. A separate line budgets $76,800 for the interim loan, with the note "TD Loan taken 2025-Dec-22" and an assumption of 4 months until the Infrastructure Ontario debt is secured.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 4, line OPER88 (account 1-4-2100-9002)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Is the automated speed enforcement program paying for itself?

$23,028net cost of the speed camera program in 2025, against a budgeted surplus of $12,000

In 2025 the speed camera program cost far more than the Town planned, and brought in far more ticket revenue than planned. The Town's 2025 actuals show the program ended $23,028 net cost, where the budget expected a $12,000 surplus. The 2026 budget sets cost and revenue equal at $50,000 each, far below 2025.

Why it matters

Speed cameras are meant to slow traffic, not to raise money. Residents can only judge the program if they can see what it costs and what it earns.

It could be because…

  • The contractor may be paid by the ticket or by the day, so costs rise when more tickets are issued. That would explain both numbers rising together.
  • The program may have been new in 2025, so the Town had little to base its budget on.
  • The 2026 budget may be a placeholder: the Town's note says more information is to come.

Questions you could ask

  1. How is the contractor paid: per ticket, per day, or a flat fee?
  2. Why does the 2026 budget assume revenue and cost of $50,000 when 2025 came in at $150,172 and $172,671?
  3. Where does any surplus from tickets go, and has the Town published its speed data showing whether speeds fell?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "ASE - Contracts" shows 2025 actuals of $172,671 against a 2025 budget of $35,000 and a 2026 budget of $50,000. The Town's note says: "Added note: More information to come per the decision at the 2026-Jan-27 Budget Meeting."

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 4, line OPER68 (account 1-4-2520-4010)

  2. "ASE - Ticket Revenue" shows -$150,172 in 2025 actuals against -$50,000 in the 2025 budget and -$50,000 in the 2026 budget.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 4, line OPER70 (account 1-3-3725-7375)

  3. The program total, "ADMIN-ASE Total", is $23,028 in 2025 actuals, -$12,000 in the 2025 budget and $0 in the 2026 budget.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 4, line OPER72

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why is the Town borrowing $2.5 million from its own development charge funds to build a $5 million sewage pumping station?

$5,000,000pumping station approved December 9, 2025, with $2.5 million from internal borrowing between funds

Development charges are fees builders pay so that growth helps pay for the roads, water and sewers it needs. The Town's budget says the $5 million southeast sewage pumping station will use $2.5 million in developer contributions already collected, and $2.5 million of internal borrowing from other development charge reserve funds, to be repaid with interest. The 2024 audited statements show a parkland fund that is already below zero.

Why it matters

Money collected from builders for one purpose is being lent to another. That is allowed when it is repaid, but it works only if growth keeps coming and the loan is tracked in public.

It could be because…

  • Lending between funds, with interest, is a common way to build infrastructure before all the growth fees have arrived.
  • The pumping station may serve the same new homes whose fees are being lent, so the funds are being used for the growth they were collected for.
  • A negative parkland balance may be a timing difference that the Town expects to correct as new homes are built.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which development charge funds are lending the $2.5 million, and how large are those funds now?
  2. What interest rate and repayment schedule apply, and where is the loan tracked in public?
  3. Why was the parkland fund below zero at the end of 2024, and has it been brought back?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The capital line "SE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION" carries the Town's note: "APPROVED CAPITAL - Dec 9, 2025: $5M SE Sewage Pumping Station. Funding Requirements: $2.5M in Developer Contributions already collected, & $2.5M from internal borrowing from other DC Reserve Funds to be repaid with interest." The 2026 amount on the line is -$5,000,000.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 34, line CAP190

  2. Note 8, Deferred Revenue, shows development charges ending 2024 at $5,979,262, park in lieu (cash paid instead of land for parks) at (113,852) and federal gas tax at 70,044, for a total of $5,935,454.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · PDF page 15, note 8 (Deferred revenue)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

The landfill clean-up estimate is based on a 2004 report. Is it still right?

$167,074landfill post-closure liability at the end of 2024, based on a 2004 estimate

The Town carries a $167,074 liability for looking after its closed landfill until 2053. The audited statements say the most recent estimate of the closure and post-closure cost was based on a report prepared as of November 1, 2004.

Why it matters

Costs for monitoring and clean-up change over the 22 years since that 2004 report (by our count). If the real cost is higher, residents inherit it later.

It could be because…

  • The Town has a final release on closure from the conservation authority and an amended provincial approval, so the remaining work may be small and predictable.
  • The Town subtracts what it spends each year from the liability, so a falling balance may match a plan that is on track.
  • The statements say the figure may be adjusted based on updated engineering reports, so a newer report may exist that we did not find.

Questions you could ask

  1. Has the Town had the landfill's expected costs re-estimated since 2004?
  2. What are the yearly monitoring costs, and are they still falling against the liability?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 7 says the "most recent estimate of the landfill closure and post-closure liability was based on a report prepared as of November 1, 2004, which estimated these costs at a net present value of $475,000". It puts the post-closure liability at $167,074 (2023 - $178,891), and says post-closure costs are anticipated to continue to 2053.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · PDF page 14, note 7 (Asset retirement obligation)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Sewer and sewage plant repairs ran over budget in 2025. Does the 2026 budget leave enough?

$94,352spent on sewer repairs in 2025, against a budget of $15,000

Repairs to the sewers cost $94,352 in 2025 against a budget of $15,000, and repairs at the sewage treatment plant cost $149,968 against $90,000. For 2026 the sewer repair budget is $30,000. The Town's note says it was cut from $96.4 thousand at a Council meeting on February 24, 2026.

Why it matters

Sewer costs are paid mostly from user fees, so repairs that cost more than planned can mean higher rates or less set aside for the future.

It could be because…

  • A one-time break or blockage can use a year's budget in a single event.
  • Council may have judged that 2025 included unusual repairs and cut the 2026 amount on purpose.
  • Sewer fees brought in $890,786 in 2025 against $825,000 budgeted, so the system may have covered the extra cost.

Questions you could ask

  1. What caused the $94,352 of sewer repairs in 2025, and is it likely to recur?
  2. Why does the 2026 sewer repair line fall to $30,000 while the treatment plant line rises to $153,200?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "SEWERS - Repairs & Maintenance" shows $94,352 in 2025 actuals, $15,000 in the 2025 budget and $30,000 in the 2026 budget. The Town's note: "Budget decreased by $66.4k (from $96.4k to $30k) per discussion at the 2026-Feb-24 Council Meeting."

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 22, line OPER667 (account 1-4-4550-2400)

  2. "SEWAGE TMENT PLANT - Rep/Mtc" shows $149,968 in 2025 actuals, $90,000 in the 2025 budget and $153,200 in the 2026 budget.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 22, line OPER660 (account 1-4-4520-2400)

  3. "SPC CHGS - Sewer Revenue" shows -$890,786 in 2025 actuals, -$825,000 in the 2025 budget and -$930,000 in the 2026 budget.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 22, line OPER669 (account 1-3-1015-4910)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 64% in 5 years?

+64%running the town office, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $732K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.2M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 6 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 64% in 5 years?
+64%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+10%+1%
2021+21%+4%
2022+21%+11%
2023+34%+16%
2024+64%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $467K a year pay for?
  2. Why did senior management go from $663K to $1.1M?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $732K, 2020 $808K, 2021 $888K, 2022 $884K, 2023 $983K, 2024 $1.2M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Senior management, from $663K to $1.1M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 41%. Grand Valley ranks 7th of 42.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2024, 41 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 54% in 5 years?

+54%police, fire and safety, 2019 to 2024

Grand Valley spent $819K on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $1.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time.

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 54% in 5 years?
+54%
Show as a table
YearPolice, fire and safetyPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+2%+1%
2021+18%+4%
2022+19%+11%
2023+30%+16%
2024+54%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $444K a year pay for?
  2. Why did fire department go from $205K to $537K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Police, fire and safety: 2019 $819K, 2020 $838K, 2021 $967K, 2022 $972K, 2023 $1.1M, 2024 $1.3M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Fire department, from $205K to $537K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Where are the Town's audited 2025 financial statements?

September 12, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements, the latest we found

On October 7, 2026 the Town's financial statements page lists audited statements up to 2024. The 2024 statements carry an auditor's report dated September 12, 2025, about nine months after the year ended. We did not find 2025 statements.

Why it matters

Audited statements are the check on the Town's own budget numbers. Voters go to the polls on October 26, 2026, and would benefit from the latest audited year.

It could be because…

  • The audit of 2025 may still be under way or waiting for Council to receive it.
  • The statements may be finished but not yet posted to the website.
  • The Town may have posted them somewhere we did not look, such as a meeting agenda.

Questions you could ask

  1. When will Council receive the audited 2025 statements, and will they be posted before October 26, 2026?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Independent Auditor's Report on the 2024 statements is dated September 12, 2025 and gives a clean opinion that the statements "present fairly" the Town's financial position.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2024 · PDF pages 3 and 4, Independent Auditor's Report

  2. The 2026 budget, dated March 24, 2026, labels its actuals column "2025 Actuals (Updated 2026-02-17)", and says nothing about the figures being audited.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 2, column headings

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How much more tax is the Town planning to collect in 2026 than it budgeted for 2025?

$5,686,127total tax levy in the approved 2026 budget, against $5,227,812 in the 2025 budget

The 2026 budget's total tax levy is $5,686,127. The 2025 budget was $5,227,812. The difference, worked out by us, is $458,315 more.

Why it matters

The levy is the amount the Town asks property owners to pay for its own services, apart from the county and school boards.

It could be because…

  • Costs for wages, benefits, insurance and loan payments rise each year; the Town's notes show a 1.9% cost-of-living increase for staff from July 1, 2026.
  • The new Community Centre loan payments add a new cost that was not in 2025.
  • Council cut many lines at its January 27, February 24 and March 5, 2026 sessions, so the levy could have been higher.

Questions you could ask

  1. What are the largest items that explain the change from the 2025 budget to the 2026 budget?
  2. Why do 2025 actuals show a lower levy figure of $3,903,905 than the 2025 budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Grand Valley? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The line "NET BUDGET (TOTAL TAX LEVY)" shows $3,903,905 in 2025 actuals, $5,227,812 in the 2025 budget and $5,686,127 in the 2026 budget.

    2026 Approved Operating and Capital Budget · PDF page 34, summary lines at the end

↑ All questions