Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Grimsby's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 8 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Grimsby's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 40 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Grimsby spent $3.5M on running the town office in 2019 and $9.1M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 0 of 40 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$2,085,780wastewater division deficit in 2024, per the Town's report on its statements
Wastewater is the sewage service, paid partly by taxes and partly by bills based on water use. The Town's report on the 2024 statements says the wastewater division ended 2024 with a deficit of $2,085,780, which is more than the Town's whole year-end deficit of $1,544,290 because other parts of the budget finished ahead. Wastewater reserves fell from $15,949,483 to $15,185,010 over the year. The Town has since moved the whole cost onto water bills. Its budget books say the Region of Niagara's charges explain 90% of the 2025 increase and 83% of the 2026 increase.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$7,369,926borrowed in 2024 for the hospital contribution, at 4.39% to 2044
The Town committed $9,300,926 to the West Lincoln Memorial Hospital Foundation's building campaign. It collected $1,931,000 through the tax levy and borrowed the rest, $7,369,926, at 4.39% until 2044. Its long-term debt went from $1,696,130 to $8,656,871 in one year. In the same year its portfolio investments (savings held in bonds and similar) rose from $37,465,951 to $58,281,160 and its cash fell from $43,412,014 to $23,059,486. The Town calls the hospital and the Peach King Centre a "historic commitment" and puts the yearly debt payments in the tax levy.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$7,647,530annual surplus in the 2024 statements, against a year-end operating deficit of $1,544,290 on the budget basis
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The audited statements for 2024 show an annual surplus of $7,647,530, against a budgeted deficit of $1,716,404. The Town's own report to the Finance Committee says its year-end result, counted the way the budget is counted, was a deficit of $1,544,290. The Town explains the gap: the statements follow public-sector accounting rules (which count grants for building projects and the value of assets handed to the Town as revenue), while the budget is prepared on a cash basis.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$1.6 millionowed to the Region after a meter calibration error, per the Town's report
The Town's report on its 2024 statements says it owed the Region of Niagara $1.6 million for water and wastewater, after the Region found a calibration error in its meter readings that had under-billed the Town "over the past few years." Accounts payable (bills the Town owes) rose from $8,630,433 to $10,679,975 in 2024. The Town has explained what happened. What the documents we read do not show is the years covered, who checked the new bill, or how the cost was paid for.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
4.70%minimum Town levy increase for 2026, after estimated growth; 3.99% projected for 2027
The Town's own levy (its share of the property tax bill) rose by a minimum of 5.88% for 2025 and 4.70% for 2026, after counting growth in the number of properties. The multi-year projection shows 3.99% for 2027 and 3.34% for 2028, before any new spending. The Town says 4.7% is $70 a year for an average home assessed at $442,000, and 6.57% overall once Regional and school taxes are counted. The Town explains why: it says its asset management plans show funding gaps, and it adds money for reserves each year (1.00% of the levy in each year of the 2026 projection).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$48,168.47training, conferences and meeting expenses for council members in 2025
Council members' pay and expenses are published every year under section 284 of the Municipal Act. For 2025 the column "Training, Conferences, & Meeting Expenses" totals $48,168.47. Three members' amounts are $9,079.04 (the first line, Jordan, Jeffrey), $8,984.91 (Baradziej, Jacob) and $8,165.71 (Freake, Reginald), while one member's is $21.38 (Davoli, Delight). In 2024 the same kinds of costs were printed in three columns (conferences $22,611.84, seminars $2,591.45, meeting expense $939.19), which we added to $26,142.48 (worked out by us). The Council Expense Policy was amended on August 11, 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Oct. 7, 2024date of the auditor's report on the 2023 statements; the 2024 report is dated August 11, 2025
A municipality's audited statements show whether its books are in order. The 2023 statements carry a clean opinion ("present fairly") dated October 7, 2024. For 2024 the Town changed auditors: KPMG LLP signed a clean opinion on August 11, 2025, and says the 2023 figures were audited by another auditor. KPMG's report to the Finance Committee found no uncorrected misstatements and no significant control deficiencies. On the Town's financial statements page on October 5, 2026 we found statements through 2024 but none for 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Grimsby spent $3.5M on running the town office in 2019 and $9.1M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 0 of 40 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 158% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%+200%
+158%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+25%
+1%
2021
+43%
+4%
2022
+107%
+11%
2023
+83%
+16%
2024
+158%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $5.5M a year pay for?
Why did office and administration go from $3.2M to $8.4M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $3.5M, 2020 $4.4M, 2021 $5.0M, 2022 $7.3M, 2023 $6.4M, 2024 $9.1M.
$2,085,780wastewater division deficit in 2024, per the Town's report on its statements
Wastewater is the sewage service, paid partly by taxes and partly by bills based on water use. The Town's report on the 2024 statements says the wastewater division ended 2024 with a deficit of $2,085,780, which is more than the Town's whole year-end deficit of $1,544,290 because other parts of the budget finished ahead. Wastewater reserves fell from $15,949,483 to $15,185,010 over the year. The Town has since moved the whole cost onto water bills. Its budget books say the Region of Niagara's charges explain 90% of the 2025 increase and 83% of the 2026 increase.
Why it matters
A service that runs over budget by this much, and whose reserve then shrinks, is one residents will be asked to pay more for. The Town has explained where most of the new cost comes from (the Region). It has not, in the documents we read, explained why 2024 ran $2 million over.
It could be because…
The Town says the Region's bills drive most of the increases. A Region price change in the middle of a year can leave a local budget short.
The Town moved from a mixed tax and fee model to a full user-fee model in 2026 to cover costs it had been under-recovering.
The Region found a meter reading error that led to an under-bill to the Town for several years (see the next question). That may be part of why earlier budgets were too low.
Questions you could ask
What caused the $2,085,780 wastewater deficit in 2024, line by line (Region charges, repairs, lower fee revenue)?
How much of the wastewater reserve is planned to be used in 2026 and 2027, given the fee increases already set?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Report FIN-25-40: "a $2,085,780 deficit in the Wastewater division." The total 2024 year-end deficit was $1,544,290, which "includes a $565,164 operational levy surplus for the Town".
The Town's explanation for 2026: "Regional cost allocations are the primary driver of the water and wastewater cost increase, accounting for 83% of our 2026 increase."
The Town's explanation for 2025: "Regional cost allocations are the primary driver of the wastewater cost increase, accounting for 90% of our 2025 increase." It adds that the wastewater user rate is $1.72 per cubic metre.
$7,369,926borrowed in 2024 for the hospital contribution, at 4.39% to 2044
The Town committed $9,300,926 to the West Lincoln Memorial Hospital Foundation's building campaign. It collected $1,931,000 through the tax levy and borrowed the rest, $7,369,926, at 4.39% until 2044. Its long-term debt went from $1,696,130 to $8,656,871 in one year. In the same year its portfolio investments (savings held in bonds and similar) rose from $37,465,951 to $58,281,160 and its cash fell from $43,412,014 to $23,059,486. The Town calls the hospital and the Peach King Centre a "historic commitment" and puts the yearly debt payments in the tax levy.
Why it matters
Paying interest at 4.39% while holding large savings can be a sound choice or a costly one, depending on what those savings are for and what they earn. The Town's documents say the debt payments add to the tax levy each year. Residents are owed a plain reason why borrowing was chosen over paying from reserves.
It could be because…
Most of the Town's savings may be set aside for other things: reserves, development charges and grants for the $36 million Peach King Centre, none of which can be used for the hospital.
Spreading a one-time gift over 20 years can keep the yearly tax increase smaller than paying it all at once.
The investments may earn about as much as the debt costs, so borrowing may cost little in practice.
Questions you could ask
Why was borrowing chosen over using reserves for the hospital contribution, and what rate do the Town's investments earn compared with 4.39%?
What share of the $58,281,160 in investments is earmarked (reserves, development charges, grants), and what share is free to spend?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 24, Commitments: "The Municipality has committed to providing financial assistance of $9,300,926 to the West Lincoln Memorial Hospital Foundation's building campaign. As of December 31, 2024, $1,931,000 has been collected through the operating tax levy with the remaining funds of $7,369,926 secured through a debenture."
Note 10, Long-term debt: West Lincoln Memorial Hospital, interest rate 4.39%, maturity 2044, 7,369,926 (2023: nil). Total long-term debt $8,656,871 (2023: $1,696,130). Interest charges for the year $46,329.
The Town's explanation: "The 2025 budget includes funding for debt payments related to the Town of Grimsby's historic commitment to the redevelopment of the West Lincoln Memorial Hospital and the Peach King Centre. The 2025 budget includes increases for debt funding of 0.84% or $12 for an average residential household assessed at $442,000."
Report FIN-25-40 on the investment rise: "The Portfolio Investments increased $20.8 million over the prior year. As investments matured, surplus funds were strategically reinvested and surplus cash was allocated to new investments". It does not mention the hospital debt in that passage.
$7,647,530annual surplus in the 2024 statements, against a year-end operating deficit of $1,544,290 on the budget basis
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The audited statements for 2024 show an annual surplus of $7,647,530, against a budgeted deficit of $1,716,404. The Town's own report to the Finance Committee says its year-end result, counted the way the budget is counted, was a deficit of $1,544,290. The Town explains the gap: the statements follow public-sector accounting rules (which count grants for building projects and the value of assets handed to the Town as revenue), while the budget is prepared on a cash basis.
Why it matters
Residents who read only the audited surplus could think the Town had $7.6 million to spare. The Town says it did not. The two numbers measure different things, and the Town has published a page that bridges them. What is worth asking is what covered the $1.5 million budget shortfall, because the Town's budget is meant to balance.
It could be because…
Most of the gap is accounting. The Town's reconciliation shows $7,624,593 of capital grants and $1,183,311 of development charges counted as revenue in the statements, while $7,164,527 of amortization (the wearing out of buildings and roads) is counted as an expense.
The Town says it budgets on a cash basis, so a deficit on that basis can sit beside an accounting surplus in the same year.
The operating deficit may have been met from reserves set aside for that purpose. The Town transfers money to and from reserves each year.
Questions you could ask
What reserve or other source paid for the 2024 year-end deficit of $1,544,290, and was council told at the time?
Can the Town show, on one page each year, how the audited surplus ties to the budget-basis result, so residents do not have to compare two documents?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations, 2024: "Annual surplus" budget (1,716,404), actual 7,647,530 (2023 actual 9,501,648). "Government transfers" budget 2,730,880, actual 8,017,440. "General government" expenses budget 13,166,592, actual 7,475,502. Total revenue budget 47,420,310, actual 52,110,084; total expenses budget 49,136,714, actual 44,462,554.
Reconciliation of Operating Surplus to Financial Statement Surplus: "Surplus (Deficit)" actual (1,520,616). "Grant funding - Capital" actual 7,624,593. "Development Charges" actual 1,183,311. "Amortization on capital assets" actual (7,164,527). "Annual Surplus (Deficit) Per 2024 Financial Statements" actual 7,647,530, budget (1,716,404).
The Town's explanation: "the Town budget is prepared on a cash basis." It adds that "the year-end deficit was reduced by $109,268, bringing the total deficit to $1,544,290." The report says this includes "a $565,164 operational levy surplus for the Town, a $23,674 deficit for the Grimsby Downtown Business Improvement Area, and a $2,085,780 deficit in the Wastewater division."
$1.6 millionowed to the Region after a meter calibration error, per the Town's report
The Town's report on its 2024 statements says it owed the Region of Niagara $1.6 million for water and wastewater, after the Region found a calibration error in its meter readings that had under-billed the Town "over the past few years." Accounts payable (bills the Town owes) rose from $8,630,433 to $10,679,975 in 2024. The Town has explained what happened. What the documents we read do not show is the years covered, who checked the new bill, or how the cost was paid for.
Why it matters
A bill that arrives years late hits the budget of the year it is paid, not the years it belongs to. Residents who paid wastewater charges in earlier years may have paid less than the true cost, and later ones more.
It could be because…
Meter errors do happen, and the Town was undercharged, not overcharged, so the Region's correction was fair.
The Town may have checked the Region's calculation with its own flow data before agreeing to pay.
The amount may have been paid from the wastewater reserve, which would explain part of the reserve's fall.
Questions you could ask
Which years did the Region's metering error cover, and did the Town check the corrected bill against its own readings?
Which budget or reserve paid the $1.6 million, and was it counted in the 2024 wastewater deficit?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Report FIN-25-40: "The increase of $2 million in payables and accruals primarily relates to $1.6 million water and wastewater reconciliation payable to the region as a result of a calibration error in their meter readings, causing an under-bill to the Town over the past few years."
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position: "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" 10,679,975 at December 31, 2024, and 8,630,433 at December 31, 2023.
4.70%minimum Town levy increase for 2026, after estimated growth; 3.99% projected for 2027
The Town's own levy (its share of the property tax bill) rose by a minimum of 5.88% for 2025 and 4.70% for 2026, after counting growth in the number of properties. The multi-year projection shows 3.99% for 2027 and 3.34% for 2028, before any new spending. The Town says 4.7% is $70 a year for an average home assessed at $442,000, and 6.57% overall once Regional and school taxes are counted. The Town explains why: it says its asset management plans show funding gaps, and it adds money for reserves each year (1.00% of the levy in each year of the 2026 projection).
Why it matters
The Town levy is about a quarter of the total property tax bill, so its increases compound with the Region's. The Town has published the reasons. The open question for the voters in the October 26, 2026 election is how long the asset management funding will keep adding a full percentage point a year.
It could be because…
The Town says its asset management reviews found funding deficits "common to all Ontario municipalities", and adding to reserves now is meant to avoid larger jumps later.
Opening the $36 million Peach King Centre adds running costs and debt payments to the levy.
The 2026 increase came in below the 5.28% the 2025 budget book projected for 2026, so the Town has landed under its own plan once.
Questions you could ask
What is the size of the asset management funding gap in dollars, and in how many years does the 1.00% a year close it?
Which parts of the 2026 increase come from the Peach King Centre, WSIB funding and asset reserves, in dollars rather than percentages?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Multi-year projection in the 2025 budget: "Minimum Levy % Increase After Estimated Growth" 5.88% (2025), 5.28% (2026), 4.13% (2027). "Levy % Increase for Asset Management Levy" 1.00% (2025), 1.00% (2026), 1.50% (2027).
Multi-year projection in the 2026 budget: "Minimum Levy % Increase After Estimated Growth" 4.70% (2026), 3.99% (2027), 3.34% (2028). "Levy % Increase for Asset Management Levy" 1.00% in each year. "Levy % Increase for WSIB Funding" 0.53% (2026).
Executive Summary: "an increase of 4.7%, translating to a Town levy tax increase of $70 per year or approximately $0.19 per day, for an average residential household assessed at $442,000." The overall increase "is forecasted to be 6.57% once Regional tax increases and education taxes are factored in." The 2026 Budget includes $190,000 for increased investments in asset management reserves.
The Town's explanation: "The Town further refined its' asset management plans for all capital infrastructure, arriving at recommended levels of service. While there are funding deficits – something that is common to all Ontario municipalities – the review has highlighted the importance of beginning to address the gaps."
$48,168.47training, conferences and meeting expenses for council members in 2025
Council members' pay and expenses are published every year under section 284 of the Municipal Act. For 2025 the column "Training, Conferences, & Meeting Expenses" totals $48,168.47. Three members' amounts are $9,079.04 (the first line, Jordan, Jeffrey), $8,984.91 (Baradziej, Jacob) and $8,165.71 (Freake, Reginald), while one member's is $21.38 (Davoli, Delight). In 2024 the same kinds of costs were printed in three columns (conferences $22,611.84, seminars $2,591.45, meeting expense $939.19), which we added to $26,142.48 (worked out by us). The Council Expense Policy was amended on August 11, 2025.
Why it matters
Training and conferences are an allowed expense, and the Town has a written policy with daily meal limits. Even so, spending that doubles, and varies from $21.38 to about $9,000 a member, is worth a plain explanation. It is also the last full year before an election.
It could be because…
Conferences are held in different years and places. A big national or provincial conference one year, or a new member's training, can double a total.
Some members may attend more because they sit on more boards or committees that need them there.
The 2024 and 2025 reports group costs differently, so our 2024 comparison is approximate.
Questions you could ask
What conferences and training courses make up the 2025 total, and which members attended each one?
Does the amended Council Expense Policy of August 11, 2025 change what a member can claim for conferences?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Appendix B, 2025 Statement of Remuneration and Expenses, "Training, Conferences, & Meeting Expenses": Jordan, Jeffrey 9,079.04; Baradziej, Jacob 8,984.91; Charrois, Veronica 7,539.10; Davoli, Delight 21.38; Diflavio, Nick 2,199.39; Freake, Reginald 8,165.71; Howe, William 3,496.76; Korstanje, Jennifer 4,181.48; Vardy, Lianne 4,500.70. Total for Town Council 48,168.47. Total of all amounts 321,087.81.
Appendix B, 2024 statement, Town Council totals: "Training & Conference" 22,611.84; "Seminars" 2,591.45; "Meeting Expense" 939.19; "Mileage & Cellphone" 234.13; total of all amounts 295,240.06.
Council Expense Policy A09-GOV-130, effective October 5, 2020; amended December 19, 2022 and August 11, 2025. Expenses must be submitted "within 60 calendar days" and the Treasurer approves every request.
Oct. 7, 2024date of the auditor's report on the 2023 statements; the 2024 report is dated August 11, 2025
A municipality's audited statements show whether its books are in order. The 2023 statements carry a clean opinion ("present fairly") dated October 7, 2024. For 2024 the Town changed auditors: KPMG LLP signed a clean opinion on August 11, 2025, and says the 2023 figures were audited by another auditor. KPMG's report to the Finance Committee found no uncorrected misstatements and no significant control deficiencies. On the Town's financial statements page on October 5, 2026 we found statements through 2024 but none for 2025.
Why it matters
Late or missing statements make it hard for voters to judge the Town before an election. The 2024 audit was clean and was done earlier in the year than 2023. The question is only whether the 2025 statements are coming and when.
It could be because…
The 2023 audit was the first year the Town adopted a new standard for asset retirement obligations, and it restated 2022 for it, which can slow an audit.
The change of auditor in 2024 may be why the 2024 audit was finished sooner.
The 2025 statements may be on a council agenda that is not yet posted, or may be approved in the fall. We did not find a date.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2025 audited consolidated financial statements go to council, and where will they be posted?
What delayed the 2023 audit to October 7, 2024?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Grimsby?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Independent Auditor's Report: "In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly in all material respects". Signed at Port Colborne, Canada, October 7, 2024. 2022 comparatives are marked "As restated (Note 2)". Annual surplus 2023 $9,501,648.
Independent Auditor's Report: "present fairly, in all material respects". "The comparative information as at and for the year ended end of December 31, 2023 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on those financial statements on October 7, 2024." Dated August 11, 2025.
KPMG audit findings: "We did not identify any misstatements during our audit which were not corrected in the financial statements." "We did not identify any significant control deficiencies during the process understanding of our audit."
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy