Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Hornepayne's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Hornepayne's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 47 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Hornepayne had $1.3M saved at the end of 2024, up from $1.1M in 2019. That is 23% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 47 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
At the end of 2024, $596K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 27% of everything billed. Only 1 of 47 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $416K.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$3,770,220of long-term loans planned for 2025 capital spending of $12,037,600
A capital budget is the plan for big, one-time purchases such as buildings, trucks and roads. The 2025 capital budget adds up to $12,037,600. It plans to pay for it with $6,959,080 of grants, $3,770,220 of long-term loans and the rest from savings and fees. The biggest item is $5,582,700 for arena repairs and expansion, to be paid with $3,433,980 of federal grants and a $2,148,720 loan. The Township's total debt was $1,426,324 at the end of 2023, the last year whose statements we could read. Taxes brought in $2,224,151 in 2023. The plan is not a sign that the money has been borrowed: we could not read the 2024 statements, so we do not know what has been borrowed so far.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
A deficit is what is left when a year's spending is more than its income. The 2023 plan in the audited statements expected a result of nil. The actual result was a deficit of $1,413,180. Expenses were $6,695,955 against a plan of $4,917,120. The Township says its budget leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of buildings and equipment), which was $1,033,796 in 2023. Taking amortization out of the actual expenses leaves $5,662,159, which is still $745,039 above the plan (both worked out by us). Revenue was also higher than planned, at $5,282,775 against $4,917,120. In the budget book, the line for repairs to the grader (a road machine) was budgeted at 15,000 and came in at 84,720, and net public works cost 903,573 against a budget of 751,925.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$79,924legal costs in 2023, against a budget of $30,000
The budget book lists a line called Legal inside the administration costs. For 2023 the budget was 30,000 and the actual cost was 79,924. The 2024 budget stayed at 30,000 and the 2025 budget is 50,000. The audit line was 40,000 in the 2023 budget and 45,376 in actual cost. We did not find an explanation in the budget book.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$718,575owed for landfill closing and care at the end of 2023, against a landfill reserve of $109,386
A landfill is the town dump. When it is full it has to be capped and watched for years, and the Township has to set the cost aside in its books. The 2023 statements say the landfill was expected to reach capacity in 2 years, with 4,000 cubic metres, or 5%, of space left. The Township's estimated liability (what it owes for closing and watching the site) was $718,575. The total estimated cost, not discounted for the passage of time, was $1,098,385. The landfill reserve (money set aside for it) was $109,386. The 2025 capital summary shows $6,000 for the landfill.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Qualifiedaudit opinion on the 2023 statements, dated September 18, 2024
A qualified opinion means the auditor says the statements are fair except for one named problem. For 2023 the auditor, BDO Canada LLP, said the statements present the Township's position fairly "except for the possible effects of the matter" it describes. The matter is that the Township had not finished checking its buildings and equipment for legal obligations to clean up or take them apart (an asset retirement obligation). The auditor says it is not possible to work out what that would change. The report is dated September 18, 2024. We found no Township explanation.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
($21,255)net financial assets (debt) at the end of 2023, from $797,939 a year earlier
Net financial assets are what a town has in cash and money owed to it, less what it owes. At the end of 2022 that was $797,939. At the end of 2023 it was a net debt of $21,255. The general surplus (the part of savings not set aside for anything) went from $841,610 to a deficit of $113,942. The Township's cash rose to $1,903,685, mainly because it collected money owed to it (accounts receivable fell from $4,528,466 to $1,278,046) and used it to close a $2,629,606 bank loan taken for the airport. It also has an operating credit line of $1,000,000 that was unused at the end of 2023.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Hornepayne spent $822K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 8 of 47 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
On October 7, 2026 the Township's budget page listed the 2025 budget as the newest, and its council pay page listed 2024 as the newest year. We did not find a 2026 budget or a 2025 pay statement on those pages. The 2024 pay statement and the 2024 audited statements that are posted are scanned pages with no readable text, which makes them hard to search or copy.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
In 2019, Hornepayne had $355K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$892K. About 68% of that change ($846K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 8 of 47 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Hornepayne spent about $539 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2024. The typical similar town spent $260. Only 2 of 47 similar towns spent more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Hornepayne had $1.3M saved at the end of 2024, up from $1.1M in 2019. That is 23% of one year's spending. Only 4 of 47 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Hornepayne have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M
$1.3M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$1.1M
2020
$1.9M
2021
$1.8M
2022
$1.8M
2023
$1.5M
2024
$1.3M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2024?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
At the end of 2024, $596K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 27% of everything billed. Only 1 of 47 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $416K.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$200K$400K$600K
$596K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$370K
2020
$548K
2021
$490K
2022
$509K
2023
$416K
2024
$596K
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $370K, 2020 $548K, 2021 $490K, 2022 $509K, 2023 $416K, 2024 $596K. Of the 2024 total, $357K was from earlier years.
$3,770,220of long-term loans planned for 2025 capital spending of $12,037,600
A capital budget is the plan for big, one-time purchases such as buildings, trucks and roads. The 2025 capital budget adds up to $12,037,600. It plans to pay for it with $6,959,080 of grants, $3,770,220 of long-term loans and the rest from savings and fees. The biggest item is $5,582,700 for arena repairs and expansion, to be paid with $3,433,980 of federal grants and a $2,148,720 loan. The Township's total debt was $1,426,324 at the end of 2023, the last year whose statements we could read. Taxes brought in $2,224,151 in 2023. The plan is not a sign that the money has been borrowed: we could not read the 2024 statements, so we do not know what has been borrowed so far.
Why it matters
A loan has to be paid back, with interest, from taxes or fees, long after the project is built. If the grants do not arrive, or arrive late, the loan can grow. Residents should be able to see how much of each year's tax will go to loan payments once the projects are done.
It could be because…
The loans may only be drawn as grants are paid out, and may be smaller than planned if the grants cover more.
Grants for a project like this are often paid in stages, so a loan can bridge the wait and be repaid when the grant arrives.
The arena and the fire truck may replace old equipment that is near the end of its life, so spending on them was already coming.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $3,770,220 has been borrowed so far, and on what terms?
What will yearly loan payments be once these projects are finished, and what share of the tax levy is that?
What happens to the arena loan if the federal grants are smaller or later than planned?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Capital budget summary: capital spending total 12,037,600. Funding: "Grants 6,959,080", "Long Term Loan 3,770,220", "Transfer from Reserves 210,200", "Transfer from Deferred Revenue 1,036,500". Arena capital spending 5,592,700. The by-law adopting the budget was passed on the 12th day of February 2025.
Arena capital budget, 2025: revenues Federal Grants 3,433,980, Long Term Loan 2,148,720, Transfer from Arena Reserves 10,000, Total Revenues 5,592,700. Expenses "Construction - Repairs & Expansion" 5,582,700.
Note 8: "Net long term debt" at December 31, 2023 was $1,426,324 (2022: $1,544,376). Principal due in 2024 was $120,637. "The interest paid relating to the above long term debt was $35,020".
A deficit is what is left when a year's spending is more than its income. The 2023 plan in the audited statements expected a result of nil. The actual result was a deficit of $1,413,180. Expenses were $6,695,955 against a plan of $4,917,120. The Township says its budget leaves out amortization (the yearly wearing-out cost of buildings and equipment), which was $1,033,796 in 2023. Taking amortization out of the actual expenses leaves $5,662,159, which is still $745,039 above the plan (both worked out by us). Revenue was also higher than planned, at $5,282,775 against $4,917,120. In the budget book, the line for repairs to the grader (a road machine) was budgeted at 15,000 and came in at 84,720, and net public works cost 903,573 against a budget of 751,925.
Why it matters
Residents are told the budget is what the year will cost. When a year costs well over that even after the accounting difference, the budget may be too tight, or costs may be growing faster than the tax levy. The deficit came out of savings, which are then not there for the next surprise.
It could be because…
Some of the gap is not cash: part of the gap may be the landfill closing cost (the estimated cost of capping and monitoring the dump later), which is a bookkeeping entry and not cash; the budget book shows 111,529 for it in actual costs with no budget line.
The Township explains that the budget used savings from earlier years to bring planned spending down to nil, so a planned draw on savings is built in.
Environmental services (water, sewer and garbage) cost $2,133,481 against a plan of $1,234,325, and part of that may be grant-funded work whose grant income shows in later or earlier years.
Repair bills on old equipment can be hard to predict from year to year.
Questions you could ask
What caused the largest part of the $745,039 gap that is not amortization?
Why was the grader repair line budgeted at 15,000 when the actual cost was 84,720, and what is the plan for the grader?
How did the 2025 budget change the way these lines are planned?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Operations: 2023 budget column and 2023 actual column. Expenses total 4,917,120 (budget) and 6,695,955 (actual). Revenue total 4,917,120 (budget) and 5,282,775 (actual). Environmental services 1,234,325 (budget), 2,133,481 (actual). "Annual surplus (deficit)" nil (budget), (1,413,180) (actual), against 3,369,589 for 2022.
Note 14, Budget: "the budget expensed all tangible capital expenditures rather than including amortization expense." The budget "anticipated use of surpluses accumulated in previous years to reduce current year expenditures in excess of current year revenues to $nil."
Budget book, columns headed 2023 Budget and Actual: "Repairs & Maintenance 15,000 84,720" under Total - GRADER 16,500 85,513; Total - SANDER 19,500 35,627; NET PUBLIC WORKS 751,925 903,573; Garbage/landfill "Closing Cost Adjustment 111,529" in the actual column only.
$79,924legal costs in 2023, against a budget of $30,000
The budget book lists a line called Legal inside the administration costs. For 2023 the budget was 30,000 and the actual cost was 79,924. The 2024 budget stayed at 30,000 and the 2025 budget is 50,000. The audit line was 40,000 in the 2023 budget and 45,376 in actual cost. We did not find an explanation in the budget book.
Why it matters
Legal bills can be a sign of a dispute, a big contract or a land deal. They can also be ordinary advice that was hard to predict. Residents can only judge it if the Township says what the money was for.
It could be because…
Legal advice on land sales, contracts, hiring or the airport and arena projects can be needed in a year and not planned.
A small township can see one matter raise the whole line, and the 2025 budget raised the line to 50,000 to allow for that.
Some legal costs may have been recovered from others or from grants.
Questions you could ask
What were the 2023 legal costs for, in broad groups (for example land, contracts, hiring, other)?
Why was the 2025 line raised to 50,000?
Were any of the costs paid back by someone else?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$718,575owed for landfill closing and care at the end of 2023, against a landfill reserve of $109,386
A landfill is the town dump. When it is full it has to be capped and watched for years, and the Township has to set the cost aside in its books. The 2023 statements say the landfill was expected to reach capacity in 2 years, with 4,000 cubic metres, or 5%, of space left. The Township's estimated liability (what it owes for closing and watching the site) was $718,575. The total estimated cost, not discounted for the passage of time, was $1,098,385. The landfill reserve (money set aside for it) was $109,386. The 2025 capital summary shows $6,000 for the landfill.
Why it matters
Closing a dump is a large bill that arrives at a set time. If it has not been saved for, it falls on taxes or on new loans, and a new site or an expansion costs more again. Residents can only plan for it if the Township says when and how.
It could be because…
The Township may be planning an expansion, or an agreement to use another site, that is not in the documents we read.
Capacity estimates are often revised, and the two years in the 2023 statements may have changed.
Closing costs can be spread over thirty years of care after closing, so cash is not needed all at once.
Questions you could ask
When does the Township now expect the landfill to be full, and what is the plan after that?
How much will be set aside each year for closing and care, and from what source?
Is an expansion or a different site being planned, and what would it cost?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 9: "The reported liability as at year end was $718,575 (2022 - $602,353)". "The landfill is expected to reach its capacity in 2 years and the estimated remaining capacity is 4,000 cubic metres which is 5% (2022 - 10%) of the site's total capacity." "The total undiscounted estimated future expenses for closure and post-closure care are $1,098,385".
Qualifiedaudit opinion on the 2023 statements, dated September 18, 2024
A qualified opinion means the auditor says the statements are fair except for one named problem. For 2023 the auditor, BDO Canada LLP, said the statements present the Township's position fairly "except for the possible effects of the matter" it describes. The matter is that the Township had not finished checking its buildings and equipment for legal obligations to clean up or take them apart (an asset retirement obligation). The auditor says it is not possible to work out what that would change. The report is dated September 18, 2024. We found no Township explanation.
Why it matters
A qualified opinion does not mean money is missing. It does mean one set of numbers is incomplete and the auditor could not say how large the gap is. Lenders and grant programs can ask about it.
It could be because…
The accounting rule on these obligations is new, and the Township may simply have needed more time to finish the review.
The Township may have finished the review in 2024; we could not read the posted 2024 statements, so we do not know.
Questions you could ask
Has the asset retirement review been finished, and did the 2024 opinion stay qualified?
What does the Township estimate the missing obligation to be?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Qualified Opinion: "except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our report the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects". Basis: "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential asset retirement obligations."
($21,255)net financial assets (debt) at the end of 2023, from $797,939 a year earlier
Net financial assets are what a town has in cash and money owed to it, less what it owes. At the end of 2022 that was $797,939. At the end of 2023 it was a net debt of $21,255. The general surplus (the part of savings not set aside for anything) went from $841,610 to a deficit of $113,942. The Township's cash rose to $1,903,685, mainly because it collected money owed to it (accounts receivable fell from $4,528,466 to $1,278,046) and used it to close a $2,629,606 bank loan taken for the airport. It also has an operating credit line of $1,000,000 that was unused at the end of 2023.
Why it matters
The general surplus is the cushion for surprises. With it negative and net financial assets below zero, a small town has less room for a bad year or a late grant.
It could be because…
The 2022 position was high because of grants owed to the Township for the airport build, so the drop partly reflects that money being received and spent.
Net financial assets leave out buildings and equipment worth $17,718,386, which are not counted as cash.
Questions you could ask
What was the general surplus at the end of 2024 and 2025?
Does the Township plan to rebuild the general surplus, and how?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Financial Position, December 31, 2023 and 2022: Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,903,685 and $ 1,389,064. Accounts receivable 1,278,046 and 4,528,466. Bank indebtedness - and 2,629,606. Net financial assets (debt) (21,255) and 797,939. Tangible capital assets (Note 12) 17,718,386.
Note 5: "The Municipality has an operating line facility with a credit limit of $1,000,000 (entire balance available at December 31, 2023)." The airport line of credit "was paid in full and closed in 2023."
Hornepayne spent $822K on running the town office in 2019 and $1.3M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 8 of 47 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 61% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+61%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+15%
+1%
2021
+12%
+4%
2022
+26%
+11%
2023
+69%
+16%
2024
+61%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $499K a year pay for?
Why did office and administration go from $734K to $1.2M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $822K, 2020 $946K, 2021 $921K, 2022 $1.0M, 2023 $1.4M, 2024 $1.3M.
On October 7, 2026 the Township's budget page listed the 2025 budget as the newest, and its council pay page listed 2024 as the newest year. We did not find a 2026 budget or a 2025 pay statement on those pages. The 2024 pay statement and the 2024 audited statements that are posted are scanned pages with no readable text, which makes them hard to search or copy.
Why it matters
Residents can only check what the Township has done with documents they can find and read. A scan cannot be searched, copied into a screen reader or checked by a program.
It could be because…
The 2026 budget may be adopted later, or posted somewhere we did not look.
The 2025 pay statement may not have been posted yet.
The scanned files may have been the only form the Township had.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2026 budget and the 2025 council pay statement be posted?
Will the Township post text versions of its scanned financial documents?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Budget page: "2025 Annual budget" is the newest listed, then "Past Budgets" from 2024 back to 2018.
In 2019, Hornepayne had $355K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$892K. About 68% of that change ($846K) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 8 of 47 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Hornepayne went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$1.0M−$500K$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M
−$892K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$355K
2020
$1.0M
2021
$856K
2022
$798K
2023
−$21,255
2024
−$892K
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Hornepayne spent about $539 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2024. The typical similar town spent $260. Only 2 of 47 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Hornepayne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Hornepayne $539; typical similar town $260; ranked 3rd highest of 48.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy