Council BooksKawartha LakesOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Kawartha Lakes's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Ontario / Kawartha LakesUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Your city, in plain words

How Kawartha Lakes uses the money we share.

A clear, checkable guide to Kawartha Lakes' budget, taxes and council decisions. A single-tier city of about 79,000 people north-east of Toronto, with a mayor and eight ward councillors. Every figure links back to the public record.

Property tax raised in 2025$183Mall property in Kawartha Lakes86% City14% SchoolsSee where your tax bill goes →
City spending, 2025$315MAbout $7,543 per household, up 22.1% from 2024.See the money →
Property tax change+7.0%Kawartha Lakes' own property tax came to $157M in 2025, against $147M in 2024.What changed →

Where it goes

Most of every dollar supports the everyday city.

Explore every service →
Police, fire and safety$70.9M · 23%
Social services$63.2M · 20%
Roads and snow$52.9M · 17%
Running the city office$36.5M · 12%
Show all 9 servicesShow fewer
Water, sewers and garbage$27M · 9%
Health$19.8M · 6%
Housing$19.5M · 6%
Parks, arena and library$19.4M · 6%
Planning and business$5.7M · 2%

Day-to-day spending in 2025, from Kawartha Lakes' report to the Province.

Where it comes fromWho pays for Kawartha Lakes' services?Property taxes44%Grants for specific projects34%Fees people pay14%Other3%Smaller sources5%$356M came in during 2025.See the money →

Questions worth asking

A closer look at the numbers.

Each one is a question, not an accusation. Every one lists ordinary reasons it could be true, and the documents it comes from.

All 11 questions
Worth askingRising costs

Why did the City spend far more on professional fees in 2024 than it had budgeted, and why did Victoria Manor's fees come in at about double?

$8,685,000spent on professional fees in 2024 (printed as 8,685 thousand), against a 2024 budget of $5,219,520

"Professional fees" is a line in the budget book for money paid to outside firms and agencies. The 2025 budget book set the 2024 budget for this line at $5,219,520. The 2026 budget book shows 2024 actual spending of $8,685 thousand, about 66% above that (worked out by us). The biggest single piece is Victoria Manor, the City's long-term care home, which is run day to day by a private company. Its professional fees were $3,469 thousand in 2024 against a 2024 budget of $1,730,363, and the 2025 budget was set back down to $1,642,978. Planning's consultant line is also set at $1,433 thousand for 2026, up from $450 thousand in 2025. The City does not say, in the pages we read, what is inside the Manor's line. Its 2026 priorities say it wants to reduce reliance on staffing agencies. The Manor still cost the City less than budgeted in 2024, because provincial grants were higher than budgeted.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 8 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the City end 2024 with an operating deficit of $1,139,474, after a surplus of $3,204,934 the year before, and which services ran over their budgets?

$1,139,474operating fund deficit at the end of 2024, after a surplus of $3,204,934 in 2023

The audited statements show a large annual surplus for 2024 ($31,188,096), but that is the full-accounting figure, which counts assets that were built or handed over to the City. The "operating fund", the day-to-day money, finished 2024 at a deficit of $1,139,474 (a surplus of $3,204,934 in 2023). The City's 2026 budget says its actual 2024 spending was $257,254 thousand against $256,117 thousand of revenue, a gap of $1,136 thousand, and that the City cannot budget for a deficit. The September 2025 staff slides show a "prior years deficit" of $1,139,474 in the 2025 figures. In the statements, 2024 spending in total was above the budget too: expenses were $291,028,291 against a budget of $269,349,468 (a gap of about $21.7 million, worked out by us), and Protection to persons and property (police, fire and similar) was $46,754,706 against a budget of $37,610,202. The statements say the budget was prepared on a different basis and restated.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 6 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the City's cash fall from $27,162,950 to $3,393,140 in 2024, and how will it pay for capital projects that are waiting for borrowing?

$3,393,140cash at December 31, 2024, down from $27,162,950 a year earlier

At the end of 2023 the City held $27,162,950 in cash. At the end of 2024 it held $3,393,140. Investments fell too, from $73,120,648 to $62,738,229. The cash flow statement shows $83,449,422 spent on buying or building assets in 2024. The City's own accounts also show a "capital fund deficit" for projects waiting to be paid for by debentures (borrowing repaid over many years) of $21,513,324, double the $10,781,773 a year earlier. Net debt (what the City owes less its financial assets) rose to $139,008,666 from $113,090,923, while borrowed debt fell to $108,165,138 from $121,781,239. The 2026 budget plans about $127 million of tax-supported capital work and forecasts the City's debt servicing ratio at 4.40% in 2026 and 10% in 2035, which is the limit the City has set itself (the legislated limit it prints is 25%).

Found by reading the city's own documents · 5 sources

Worth askingMoney health

How will the City pay for $16,359,800 of workplace-injury claims and $31,370,637 of clean-up costs when its statements say it has set aside nothing for either?

$16,359,800estimated future workplace-injury claims, with $nil set aside in a reserve

The City insures its own workplace-injury claims (through the WSIB) rather than paying a premium. Its statements estimate the claims still to be paid at $16,359,800 and say the City has "$nil set aside in a reserve" for them. Separately, the City owes about $31,370,637 for closing its landfills (28,111,184) and removing asbestos from buildings when they are renovated or torn down (3,259,454), and says it has not designated funds for either. These are future costs recorded as debts now. The City's own statements show them as negative amounts in its accumulated surplus (money that would have to be found later). The City holds reserves of $56,275,993, and its 2026 budget lists a general tax rate stabilization reserve of $1,078,768 and a general contingency reserve of $6,730,281.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 5 sources

Show 7 more questionsShow fewer
Worth askingHow decisions are made

What was cut or delayed to close a $13,039,990 gap in the September 2025 draft, and what happens if the $7,579 thousand of "budget efficiency" savings does not appear?

$7,579,000of unnamed "budget efficiency" savings in the 2026 operating budget (printed as 7,579 thousand)

On September 16, 2025, staff showed the Budget Committee a draft 2026 operating budget with total expenses of $304,647,270 and a gap of $13,039,990 between spending and revenue. The adopted 2026 budget balances at $293,500 thousand with a 5.9% tax increase. The City says Budget Committee and staff "reviewed every department to find efficiencies in staffing, materials, fleet management, and external contracts". A line called "Budget Efficiency" of negative $7,579 thousand now sits in the budget, spread across departments (negative $527 thousand in Fire Rescue Service and negative $183 thousand at Victoria Manor, for example). The staff slides listed ways to save: starting new positions later (about $1 million), leaving some jobs vacant on purpose, recovering wage costs from grants, and replacing outside contracts. The department pages we read show the amounts but not which positions or contracts make them up.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingHow decisions are made

What did Council do with the Integrity Commissioner's recommended pay suspensions for two councillors in 2022, and where are Council's decisions on these reports posted?

3 reportsposted; two with pay-suspension recommendations (30 days and 90 days) and one with no penalty

The City posts three Integrity Commissioner reports. In March 2022 the Commissioner found that Councillor Ron Ashmore breached three sections of the Code of Conduct, and recommended that his pay be suspended for 30 days. In April 2022 the Commissioner found that Councillor Kathleen Seymour-Fagan, who was then on council, breached the Code and recommended a 90-day pay suspension. Under the law the City quotes, council may then reprimand a member or suspend pay for up to 90 days. In September 2025 a report on Councillor Dan Joyce found that one incorrect word in a statement to council was a breach but "trivial", and recommended no penalty. The City's page lists the reports and when they went to council. It does not say what council decided.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 77% in 6 years?

+77%roads and snow, 2019 to 2025

Kawartha Lakes spent $30M on roads and snow in 2019 and $52.9M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 2 sources

Good to knowRising costs

Why does the 2026 budget raise salaries and wages by about 14%, when the list of full-time positions grows by about 5%?

$96,226,000salaries and wages budgeted for 2026 (printed as 96,226 thousand), up from $84,213 thousand in 2025

The 2026 budget book shows salaries and wages of $79,202 thousand in 2024 (actual), $84,213 thousand budgeted for 2025 and $96,226 thousand for 2026, a rise of $12,013 thousand or about 14.3% (worked out by us). With benefits, the total is $125,535 thousand, which the City says is 43% of the operating budget. The City's full-time staffing tables list 731 positions in 2025 and 771 in 2026 across the departments shown, a rise of about 5.5% (worked out by us). The City explains the gap in part: it says newly ratified union contracts raised pay, and the staff slides say it is "reviewing compensation to align with 60th percentile of comparators". Part-time and seasonal staff and other budget lines are not in the position tables.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources

Good to knowOpenness

Where are the City's audited financial statements for 2025?

July 31, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements, the latest we could find posted

The City's audited statements for 2024 carry the auditor's report date of July 31, 2025 and are posted. On October 5, 2026, nine months after the end of 2025, the Previous Budgets page says that for the 2025 financial statements residents should "contact the Supervisor, Treasury" by phone. We did not find the 2025 statements posted on the pages we read. The statements are the City's audited report card for the year.

Found by reading the city's own documents · 2 sources

Where your tax bill goes

A property tax bill in Kawartha Lakes pays for the city and schools. Only part of it goes to the city, and that part is what Kawartha Lakes council controls.

Tax bill split: Kawartha Lakes 86%, Schools 14%
$183Mraised in 2025
  • Kawartha Lakes86%
  • Schools14%
  • Every fact, sourced

    Each number links to the public document it came from. Check it yourself.

  • No accusations

    We ask questions. Every one lists ordinary reasons a number could look odd.

  • Compared fairly

    Places are only compared with places of a similar size and kind, from the same yearly reports.

Council meetings are open to the public, and councillors answer to you. How to reach Kawartha Lakes' council · Council Books is free and paid for by readers: support this work.