Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Machar's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Machar's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 31 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2025, Machar collected $230K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 9% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 3 of 31 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$400,000taken from reserves to keep the 2025 tax rise down
A reserve is money saved in earlier years for later costs. The 2025 letter says the Township used $400,000 from its reserves to hold the tax rise down. The 2026 letter says the 4.83% tax rise is meant to repay reserves after the capital costs of 2024. Neither letter says what the reserves hold or how fast they are being rebuilt.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$260,625the most the provincial grant (NOHFC) will pay toward the wall
The Township built a retaining wall at the Eagle Lake Narrows park to stop shoreline erosion. The 2026 letter says it was finished with an unexpected railing requirement, and that a provincial grant covers 75% of the cost up to $260,625. We did not find the final cost or the Township's share in the documents we could read. A local lake association also asked for an environmental assessment report, and the Township replied that none was commissioned.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$428,563the Township's arena share in 2025; the 2026 share is $188,851
The Township pays part of the cost of the South River Machar Arena, which it runs together with the village of South River. The Mayor's budget letters show the Township's share going from a lower amount to $428,563 in 2025, and then down to $188,851 in 2026. The Township explained both moves itself.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
40%the rise in the Administration budget for 2026, after a 3.3% drop for 2025
The Mayor's letters say the Administration budget was down 3.3% for 2025 and is up 40% for 2026. The 2026 letter does not say what changed or give a dollar amount.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$457,438.64the grand total of the May 2026 payment list; June, July and August are lower
Council approves a list of payments each month. The minutes show only the grand total. The agendas we could read are short outlines with no list attached.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
2025the year of the statements on the September 28, 2026 agenda; we did not find them posted
The financial page of the Township's website lists budgets, a letter on each budget and yearly "Financial Highlights" sheets up to 2024. We did not find the full audited statements posted. The agenda for the September 28, 2026 meeting lists the 2025 consolidated financial statements and the auditors' letters, with the auditing firm invited to speak.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
4 of 5meetings with a closed session, June 1 to September 14, 2026 (worked out by us)
In the five sets of minutes we read (June 1 to September 14, 2026), council went into closed session at four of the five meetings. The minutes give the reason each time (solicitor-client advice, labour relations, a personal matter about an identifiable employee, or a request under the freedom of information law). Votes taken after coming out were recorded in public.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
In 2025, Machar collected $230K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 9% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 3 of 31 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Why did Machar's property tax go up 9% in 2025?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M
$2.8M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$1.9M
2020
$2.0M
2021
$2.1M
2022
$2.2M
2023
$2.4M
2024
$2.5M
2025
$2.8M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $241 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $2,548,860 in 2024, $2,778,773 in 2025.
Machar spent about $389 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $110. Only 3 of 31 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Machar $389; typical similar town $110; ranked 4th highest of 32.
$400,000taken from reserves to keep the 2025 tax rise down
A reserve is money saved in earlier years for later costs. The 2025 letter says the Township used $400,000 from its reserves to hold the tax rise down. The 2026 letter says the 4.83% tax rise is meant to repay reserves after the capital costs of 2024. Neither letter says what the reserves hold or how fast they are being rebuilt.
Why it matters
Reserves pay for roads and equipment without sudden tax jumps. Knowing the balance and the repayment plan tells residents how much room the Township has.
It could be because…
A deliberate plan: draw reserves down for one big job, then rebuild them with modest yearly increases, as the letters describe.
The 2024 capital jobs may have been paid partly from reserves on purpose.
Questions you could ask
What were the reserve balances at the end of 2023, 2024 and 2025?
How much does the 2026 budget put back into reserves, and by what year will the 2024 draw be repaid?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2025 letter says "We've utilized $400,000 from our Reserves to keep the increase as reasonable as possible, while not compromising service levels and ensuring funds for the future."
The 2026 letter says the levy is "$2,924,805, up $204,839 over the 2025 levy of $2,719,966" and that "Council has struck a measured tax rate increase based on repaying the Township's reserves after the capital costs of 2024".
$260,625the most the provincial grant (NOHFC) will pay toward the wall
The Township built a retaining wall at the Eagle Lake Narrows park to stop shoreline erosion. The 2026 letter says it was finished with an unexpected railing requirement, and that a provincial grant covers 75% of the cost up to $260,625. We did not find the final cost or the Township's share in the documents we could read. A local lake association also asked for an environmental assessment report, and the Township replied that none was commissioned.
Why it matters
The grant has a ceiling (by our arithmetic, 75% reaches that ceiling once eligible costs pass about three hundred and forty-seven thousand dollars), so any cost above it falls on local taxpayers. The final total is the number that says how big that part is.
It could be because…
The final cost may sit below the level where the cap applies, so the grant covers the full 75% share.
The final invoices (the July minutes mention a hold-back payment) may not have been settled when the letter was written.
Questions you could ask
What was the final cost of the project, including engineering and the railing, and how much of it was the Township's share?
Will the Township post the final cost report and the grant claim?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2026 letter says "The Retaining Wall project at the Eagle Lake Narrows was completed this Spring with an unexpected railing requirement. Funding has been received from NOHFC for the Retaining Wall to cover 75% of the costs up to $260,625."
The minutes of June 22, 2026 record a reply to the Eagle Lake Conservation Association saying that "no environmental assessment report was commissioned for this project" and that the erosion problem was handled with planning professionals, an engineering firm and approvals from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
The minutes of July 13, 2026 say "The last engineering invoice was noted as administering the Narrows retaining wall hold back payment request for the contractor."
Machar spent $429K on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $658K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 53% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+53%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+3%
+1%
2021
−1%
+4%
2022
+7%
+11%
2023
+23%
+16%
2024
+28%
+18%
2025
+53%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $229K a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $71,969 to $241K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $429K, 2020 $442K, 2021 $426K, 2022 $459K, 2023 $529K, 2024 $549K, 2025 $658K.
$428,563the Township's arena share in 2025; the 2026 share is $188,851
The Township pays part of the cost of the South River Machar Arena, which it runs together with the village of South River. The Mayor's budget letters show the Township's share going from a lower amount to $428,563 in 2025, and then down to $188,851 in 2026. The Township explained both moves itself.
Why it matters
A share that swings this much changes the tax bill from year to year. Residents may want to know what the share will look like when the next big arena job comes up.
It could be because…
A one-time job: the 2025 letter says the share included the cost of resurfacing the rink.
A change in how the two towns split the running costs, from one third to one half.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2026 share is running cost, and how much is saved for future arena repairs?
Is another large arena job planned in the next few years, and how would it be shared?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2025 letter says the Township's "share of the South River Machar Arena has increased by 119.95% or $233,713 to $428,563 our share in 2025, largely due to a change in the Township's operating funding contributions from 1/3 to 1/2, as well as the rink resurfacing capital project $407,500 our share."
The 2026 letter says the Township's share "has decreased by 55.9% or $239,712 to $188,851 our now 50% overall stakeholder share in 2026", after the 2025 share of $428,563.
40%the rise in the Administration budget for 2026, after a 3.3% drop for 2025
The Mayor's letters say the Administration budget was down 3.3% for 2025 and is up 40% for 2026. The 2026 letter does not say what changed or give a dollar amount.
Why it matters
Administration is the cost of running the municipal office, and it is paid for by the tax levy. A rise this large in one year is worth a plain explanation.
It could be because…
One-time costs, for example the cost of running the October 2026 municipal election or an asset management study.
A move of costs from one budget heading to another.
A 2025 budget that was unusually low, so that 2026 is catching up.
Questions you could ask
What are the main items that make up the 2026 increase, in dollars?
Which of them will repeat in 2027, and which are one-time?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2026 letter says "The Township Road budget is down 15.4%, Landfill is up 8.3% and Administration is up 40% for 2026."
$457,438.64the grand total of the May 2026 payment list; June, July and August are lower
Council approves a list of payments each month. The minutes show only the grand total. The agendas we could read are short outlines with no list attached.
Why it matters
The grand total shows how much was paid but not to whom or for what. A published list would let residents check for themselves.
It could be because…
The lists may be available from the municipal office on request, or may be in a council package we could not see.
Many small towns approve a list in the meeting and keep the detail in the office.
Questions you could ask
Will the Township post each month's list of payments with the agenda?
If not, how can a resident ask to see it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Minutes of June 22, 2026: council approved the "List of Proposed Payments for May, 2026: $457,438.64 Grand Total."
2025the year of the statements on the September 28, 2026 agenda; we did not find them posted
The financial page of the Township's website lists budgets, a letter on each budget and yearly "Financial Highlights" sheets up to 2024. We did not find the full audited statements posted. The agenda for the September 28, 2026 meeting lists the 2025 consolidated financial statements and the auditors' letters, with the auditing firm invited to speak.
Why it matters
The audited statements are the one document that shows total spending, savings, debt and reserves in a form checked by an outside firm. Without them, residents cannot see the reserve balances behind the budget letters.
It could be because…
The statements may be posted after council receives them on September 28, 2026.
The Township may publish the Financial Highlights as its public summary and give the full statements on request.
Questions you could ask
Will the full audited statements for 2025 and earlier years be posted on the financial page?
Will the Township publish a yearly statement of council pay and expenses as well?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The agenda for September 28, 2026 lists, under Public Meeting/Guests and Delegations, item 2.1 "2025 Consolidated Financial Statements, Audit and Representation letters, Resolution", with representatives of the auditing firm named as presenters.
4 of 5meetings with a closed session, June 1 to September 14, 2026 (worked out by us)
In the five sets of minutes we read (June 1 to September 14, 2026), council went into closed session at four of the five meetings. The minutes give the reason each time (solicitor-client advice, labour relations, a personal matter about an identifiable employee, or a request under the freedom of information law). Votes taken after coming out were recorded in public.
Why it matters
Closed sessions are allowed for set reasons, and the minutes show those reasons. How often they happen, and whether results are reported, is a sign of how open a council is.
It could be because…
Closed sessions for freedom of information requests and legal advice are ordinary and often brief; the ones we read ran from about 14 to 23 minutes.
Council recorded its public votes after coming out, as the law requires.
Questions you could ask
Does the Township keep a public list of closed sessions with their reasons and outcomes?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Machar?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Minutes of June 1, 2026: council went into closed session "in order to address a matter pertaining to; advice that is subject to solicitor/client privilege", at "7:00 pm", and came out at "7:15 pm".
Minutes of June 22, 2026: council went into closed session for "labour relations or employee negotiations, and a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act", from "7:20 pm" to "7:43 pm".
Minutes of August 10, 2026: council went into closed session for "personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; labour relations or employee negotiations", at "7:13 pm", and came out at "7:27 pm".
Minutes of September 14, 2026: council went into closed session for a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, from "7:00 pm" to "7:19pm".
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy