Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Older reportDetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you An older report. We have no 2024 report for Madoc in the Province's latest release, so these pages use its 2022 report. It may simply be filed late. Read by hand. We read Madoc's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 8 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Madoc's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 29 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
At the end of 2022, $774K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 25% of everything billed. None of the 29 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $799K.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
June 5, 2024date of the auditor's report on the 2022 statements, the newest audited year posted on the Township's site
Every Ontario township has its books audited each year by an outside accountant, and the result (the audited financial statements) is how residents see what the Township owns and owes. The newest statements the Township posts are for 2022, and the auditor signed that report on June 5, 2024, about a year and a half after the year ended. The 2021 report was signed on March 1, 2024, more than two years after its year ended. Council's minutes of July 8, 2026 record that it accepted the 2023 statements. We did not find them posted, and we did not find 2024 or 2025. On September 10, 2026 the Township said that there is a backlog of financial reporting, that it is working with its auditors, and that it is "not a situation that will be resolved overnight".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
On holdbackthe provincial OMPF grant, until the overdue Financial Information Returns are filed (mayor's statement, September 10, 2026)
The Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) is a yearly provincial grant that helps smaller municipalities pay for services. The mayor's statement, quoted in the Township's September 10, 2026 release, says the OMPF money "is currently on holdback, pending submission of the FIR's (Financial Information Returns)" and that it "is not frozen". A Financial Information Return is the yearly report every Ontario municipality sends the Province, built from its audited statements. The Township does not say how much is held back, for which years, or when it expects to file. The last audited year, 2022, ended with cash of $850,806, down from $1,348,056, and with a bank line of credit of up to $250,000 that was not being used.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$50,000budgeted for audit in 2025 and not used, moved to working reserves
The 2026 budget notes say that in 2025 the Township "did not use any funds associated with" the audit line, so the $50,000 budgeted for audit moved to working reserves at the end of 2025. The notes give the reason for moving it: to avoid "charging the tax payer double for the same task". The notes say part of it moves back to the 2026 audit line and the rest stays in reserve for 2027. The 2026 budget line reads "Audit (moved to working reserves as not used)" with $50,000 in the 2025 column and $70,000 in the 2026 column. The 2026 budget file we read is headed "Preliminary #3 - Mar 19, 2026"; the by-law adopting the 2026 estimates sets a levy of $2,754,472, and the pages we read do not say whether this line changed afterwards.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
0.01185866 vs 0.011588212026 Township residential rate in Schedule A and in Schedule B of the same by-law
Property taxes are the Township's rate multiplied by a property's assessed value. Two documents posted with By-Law 1800-2026 give two different 2026 Township rates for residential property. Schedule A, the rates the by-law levies, prints 0.01185866. Schedule B, a one-page comparison with last year, prints 0.01158821 as the 2026 local rate, with a year-over-year change of 4.43%. The County and school rates match in both (0.00371008 and 0.00153000). Added to those, the Township rate in Schedule A gives a total residential rate of 0.01709874, and in Schedule B 0.01682829 (worked out by us). Last year's local rate in Schedule B is 0.01109663. Measured from that, the Schedule A rate is 6.87% higher (worked out by us), not 4.43%.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$544,417owed to the County at December 31, 2022 (2021: $12,984)
The Township collects property tax for the County of Hastings and for the school boards, and passes it on. In the audited 2022 statements, "Due to County" is one of the amounts the Township owed at December 31, 2022: $544,417, against $12,984 at the end of 2021. The Township's cash at the same date was $850,806. The statements do not explain the jump.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$69,009"Rents and financial" in 2022, against a budget of $7,900
The audited 2022 statements break spending down by type. One type is called "Rents and financial". Its budget for 2022 was $7,900, the actual cost was $69,009, and the year before it was $4,862. The statements do not say what it contained. Amortization, the yearly accounting cost of assets wearing out, is shown on its own line in the same table, so this gap is not that.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
6 closed sessionslisted or held between July 29 and October 7, 2026 (counted by us from the documents cited)
A council may meet in private only for reasons the Municipal Act lists, such as legal advice or staffing. The Township's news page lists closed-session agendas for July 29 and August 20, 2026. Council also went into closed session on August 5, 2026, for legal advice, and the agendas for September 2, September 24 and October 7, 2026 each list a closed session, for legal advice or staffing matters. On August 5, council received a "confidential verbal report" about litigation or potential litigation in public. The 2026 budget draft shows a legal line of $30,000 for 2025 and $40,000 for 2026. We did not read the closed-session content and the Township posts none.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
At the end of 2022, $774K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 25% of everything billed. None of the 29 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $799K.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K
$774K
2019202020212022
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$492K
2020
$597K
2021
$799K
2022
$774K
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $492K, 2020 $597K, 2021 $799K, 2022 $774K. Of the 2022 total, $313K was from earlier years.
June 5, 2024date of the auditor's report on the 2022 statements, the newest audited year posted on the Township's site
Every Ontario township has its books audited each year by an outside accountant, and the result (the audited financial statements) is how residents see what the Township owns and owes. The newest statements the Township posts are for 2022, and the auditor signed that report on June 5, 2024, about a year and a half after the year ended. The 2021 report was signed on March 1, 2024, more than two years after its year ended. Council's minutes of July 8, 2026 record that it accepted the 2023 statements. We did not find them posted, and we did not find 2024 or 2025. On September 10, 2026 the Township said that there is a backlog of financial reporting, that it is working with its auditors, and that it is "not a situation that will be resolved overnight".
Why it matters
Audited statements are the check that a township's own reports are right. Without them for three years, residents cannot see whether reserves are being kept up, and the Province can hold back money (see the next question). Both audit reports we read give a clean opinion, so this is about timing, not about a problem the auditor found.
It could be because…
The Township says staff and council are working through a backlog, and that there has been a change in the Treasury Department.
Small townships often have only one or two finance staff, and a gap in staffing can delay an audit for years.
The 2023 statements were accepted by council on July 8, 2026 and may simply not have been posted yet.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2023, 2024 and 2025 audited statements be posted, and will the Township publish a dated plan for catching up?
Will council be told, in public, each time the auditors finish a year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Independent auditor's report on the December 31, 2021 statements: opinion "present fairly, in all material respects"; signed Baker Tilly KDN LLP, Peterborough, Ontario, "March 1, 2024".
Independent auditor's report on the December 31, 2022 statements: opinion "present fairly, in all material respects"; signed Baker Tilly KDN LLP, Peterborough, Ontario, "June 5, 2024".
Item 10, Presentations - Baker Tilly: Motion # 164-26: "That council accept the 2023 Audited Financial Statements presented by Baker Tilly for the Township of Madoc." CARRIED.
"The Township acknowledges that there is a backlog of financial reporting that must be addressed." "The Township continues to work with its external auditors, Baker Tilly KDN LLP, as part of this process." "This is not a situation that will be resolved overnight." Dated September 10, 2026.
On holdbackthe provincial OMPF grant, until the overdue Financial Information Returns are filed (mayor's statement, September 10, 2026)
The Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) is a yearly provincial grant that helps smaller municipalities pay for services. The mayor's statement, quoted in the Township's September 10, 2026 release, says the OMPF money "is currently on holdback, pending submission of the FIR's (Financial Information Returns)" and that it "is not frozen". A Financial Information Return is the yearly report every Ontario municipality sends the Province, built from its audited statements. The Township does not say how much is held back, for which years, or when it expects to file. The last audited year, 2022, ended with cash of $850,806, down from $1,348,056, and with a bank line of credit of up to $250,000 that was not being used.
Why it matters
A grant that is on hold has to be replaced from somewhere if bills come due before it arrives. Residents should know whether the Township is using its reserves, delaying work, or borrowing while it waits.
It could be because…
The holdback is a normal Provincial rule and the money will be paid in full once the returns are filed, as the mayor says.
Other provincial funding is still coming in, as the release says.
Reserves may be enough to cover the gap without borrowing.
Questions you could ask
How much OMPF money is on holdback, and for which years?
Has the Township borrowed, or delayed any work, because of the holdback?
On what date does the Township expect to file the returns?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"The OMPF funding is currently on holdback, pending submission of the FIR's (Financial Information Returns). Upon submission of the FIR's, the money will be released. It is not frozen." "The Township has received and continues to receive other provincial funding streams."
Note 16, Credit facility agreement: "The amount available at any time is limited to $250,000 via an operating loan." "At December 31, 2022 there was no balance outstanding."
$50,000budgeted for audit in 2025 and not used, moved to working reserves
The 2026 budget notes say that in 2025 the Township "did not use any funds associated with" the audit line, so the $50,000 budgeted for audit moved to working reserves at the end of 2025. The notes give the reason for moving it: to avoid "charging the tax payer double for the same task". The notes say part of it moves back to the 2026 audit line and the rest stays in reserve for 2027. The 2026 budget line reads "Audit (moved to working reserves as not used)" with $50,000 in the 2025 column and $70,000 in the 2026 column. The 2026 budget file we read is headed "Preliminary #3 - Mar 19, 2026"; the by-law adopting the 2026 estimates sets a levy of $2,754,472, and the pages we read do not say whether this line changed afterwards.
Why it matters
Auditors usually bill when they do the work. If 2025 passed with nothing spent on audit while 2023, 2024 and 2025 were all outstanding, residents may want to know when the work will be done and whether one year's cost will land in a later year.
It could be because…
Audit bills are paid when the work is finished, so the 2023 statements accepted in July 2026 may be billed in 2026.
The Township says it moved the money to reserves on purpose so that taxpayers would not be charged twice.
Staff changes in the Treasury Department may have slowed the work, as the Township's release suggests.
Questions you could ask
How much has the Township paid its auditors for the 2021 and 2022 work (2024) and the 2023 work (2026), and when does it expect to be billed for the rest?
Was the audit line changed between the March 19 draft and the budget council adopted on April 16, 2026?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Admin: Audit Expenses: "In 2025 we did not use any funds associated with that expense so the following will be done to ensure we are not charging the tax payer double for the same task"; "All $50,000 will move to working reserves at end of 2025"; "The remaining $30,000 will stay in working reserves and be brought to the audit line in 2027".
Administration budget, line 812-3452: "Audit (moved to working reserves as not used)" 50,000.00 (2025 Budget column) and 70,000.00 (2026 Proposed Budget column). Page header: "Preliminary #3 - Mar 19, 2026".
0.01185866 vs 0.011588212026 Township residential rate in Schedule A and in Schedule B of the same by-law
Property taxes are the Township's rate multiplied by a property's assessed value. Two documents posted with By-Law 1800-2026 give two different 2026 Township rates for residential property. Schedule A, the rates the by-law levies, prints 0.01185866. Schedule B, a one-page comparison with last year, prints 0.01158821 as the 2026 local rate, with a year-over-year change of 4.43%. The County and school rates match in both (0.00371008 and 0.00153000). Added to those, the Township rate in Schedule A gives a total residential rate of 0.01709874, and in Schedule B 0.01682829 (worked out by us). Last year's local rate in Schedule B is 0.01109663. Measured from that, the Schedule A rate is 6.87% higher (worked out by us), not 4.43%.
Why it matters
Every tax bill is built from this rate. If the two documents differ, residents cannot tell from the Township's own pages which rate was actually billed, or what the real increase was.
It could be because…
Schedule B may be an earlier draft that was posted by mistake, or Schedule A may carry a later, corrected rate.
One schedule may have been made before the final budget changes (the budget notes show the target tax rate moving several times in 2026).
A typing error in one file that did not reach the tax bills.
Questions you could ask
Which Township residential rate was used on the 2026 tax bills?
Will the Township post a corrected schedule so that A and B agree?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule A, 2026 property tax rates: row RT, Residential, Full, tax ratio 1.000000, Township rate 0.01185866, County rate 0.00371008, Provincial education rate 0.00153000.
Schedule B, year-over-year compare, row RT: Local prior year 0.01109663, current year 0.01158821, difference 4.43%; County 0.00352337 to 0.00371008; Education 0.00153000 to 0.00153000; Total 0.01615000 to 0.01682829.
$544,417owed to the County at December 31, 2022 (2021: $12,984)
The Township collects property tax for the County of Hastings and for the school boards, and passes it on. In the audited 2022 statements, "Due to County" is one of the amounts the Township owed at December 31, 2022: $544,417, against $12,984 at the end of 2021. The Township's cash at the same date was $850,806. The statements do not explain the jump.
Why it matters
A large bill to another government at year end is worth understanding, because it takes cash that the Township would otherwise have. It is worth asking whether it was paid on time and whether it recurred in later years, which have no audited statements yet.
It could be because…
A tax instalment collected just before year end and not yet passed on to the County.
A County bill that arrived late in the year and was paid early in 2023.
A one-time item such as a corrected levy.
Questions you could ask
What was the $544,417 owed to the County for, and when was it paid?
Did the Township owe the County a similar amount at the end of 2023, 2024 and 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, 2022 (2021): Government of Ontario 54,681 (80,672); trade payables and accruals 197,243 (628,146); prepaid property taxes 63,973 (50,916); due to cemetery trust 51,212 (51,212); due to County 544,417 (12,984); source deductions 19,207 (14,125); total 930,733 (853,460).
$69,009"Rents and financial" in 2022, against a budget of $7,900
The audited 2022 statements break spending down by type. One type is called "Rents and financial". Its budget for 2022 was $7,900, the actual cost was $69,009, and the year before it was $4,862. The statements do not say what it contained. Amortization, the yearly accounting cost of assets wearing out, is shown on its own line in the same table, so this gap is not that.
Why it matters
A line that runs nine times over plan is easy to explain if it was a single item, and worth a plain explanation if not. We found no management explanation in the posted file.
It could be because…
Tax write-offs or bank and card fees, which can fall under this heading.
A one-time payment for rent, a lease buyout or an insurance claim.
A budget that was set too low for a category that is hard to predict.
Questions you could ask
What made up the 2022 "rents and financial" cost, and did it recur in 2023 to 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 13, expenses by object, budget 2022 (unaudited) / actual 2022 / actual 2021: rents and financial 7,900 / 69,009 / 4,862.
6 closed sessionslisted or held between July 29 and October 7, 2026 (counted by us from the documents cited)
A council may meet in private only for reasons the Municipal Act lists, such as legal advice or staffing. The Township's news page lists closed-session agendas for July 29 and August 20, 2026. Council also went into closed session on August 5, 2026, for legal advice, and the agendas for September 2, September 24 and October 7, 2026 each list a closed session, for legal advice or staffing matters. On August 5, council received a "confidential verbal report" about litigation or potential litigation in public. The 2026 budget draft shows a legal line of $30,000 for 2025 and $40,000 for 2026. We did not read the closed-session content and the Township posts none.
Why it matters
Closed meetings are lawful for these topics, and they come up often in a year with changes in senior staff. Residents can still ask whether council reports back what it decided, and whether legal costs are rising.
It could be because…
Staff changes in the clerk and treasury roles may need private staffing discussions.
Legal advice about a dispute can only be discussed in private.
Council appears to pass a public motion after closed sessions, which is the usual way to report back.
Questions you could ask
Will council publish a short public summary after each closed session of what it decided, within the limits of section 239?
What were legal costs in 2025, and what is budgeted for 2026 after any changes?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Madoc?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
August 5, 2026 minutes: council moved into closed session at 5:32pm under section 239 (2) (f), advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, and out at 6:33pm; then received "the confidential verbal report" regarding litigation or potential litigation.
Item 9, Closed Session in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001: "(b) (f)", solicitor-client advice and personal matters about an identifiable individual, including employees.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy