Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Magnetawan's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 9 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Magnetawan's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 20 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Magnetawan spent $1.6M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.8M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 20 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$4,535,670spent on transportation services in 2025, against a budget of $3,458,927
The audited statements show the Municipality's transportation services (road maintenance, culverts, bridges, winter control and streetlights) cost $4,535,670 in 2025. The budget in the same statement was $3,458,927, and the year before the cost was $2,782,139. The statements say their budget figures were adjusted to match the way the statements are prepared, and the budget reconciliation lists amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets) as part of that budget. Amortization for this service was $703,738 in 2025 and $682,964 in 2024, so it does not explain the gap. We did not find the Municipality's own explanation.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$(1,225,362)general surplus (deficit) at December 31, 2025, against $38,898 a year earlier
The statements split the Municipality's accumulated surplus into pieces. The part called the general surplus was $38,898 at the end of 2024 and $(1,225,362) at the end of 2025, a deficit. The statements show the main reason: $(2,318,011) for the net change in tangible capital assets (what was spent on buildings, roads and equipment beyond the money set aside for it). The Municipality's own budget planned to borrow $1,700,000 in 2025, but the only debt in the statements is a $130,000 loan that ends in December 2026. The reserve for asset management, money saved for replacing assets, fell from $4,289,959 to $2,876,197.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$3,870,998approximate contract for the new fire hall and a bridge, with about $2,958,700 left to complete at December 31, 2025
The audited statements say that during 2025 the Municipality entered a contract for the new fire hall and a bridge for approximately $3,870,998 plus taxes, with approximately $2,958,700 plus taxes still to be completed at December 31, 2025. The 2026 budget carries $2,780,189 on a fire department capital line, against $391,549 spent in 2025 on a line budgeted at $3,218,000. Over the year, cash fell from $3,312,067 to $2,008,841 and trade payables (bills owed to suppliers) rose from $92,101 to $1,303,364. A payment of $348,209.50 ("Draw #8") to the builder is on the October 7, 2026 list of accounts. We did not find a published total project budget or a report that shows total cost so far.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$2,853,537estimated landfill closure and after-care cost at December 31, 2025, up from $2,545,923
The statements record a legal duty to close and look after the Municipality's landfill sites, called an asset retirement obligation. The landfill part of it grew from $2,545,923 to $2,853,537 in 2025, and the whole obligation from $2,749,760 to $3,057,374, partly through a remeasurement adjustment of $231,236. The statements list reserves for waste disposal ($324,618) and landfill rehabilitation ($638,710). These are the only waste or landfill reserves named in the statements. The statements do not say how the rest will be paid.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Magnetawan spent $532K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.0M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 20 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
At the end of 2025, $947K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 12% of everything billed. Only 4 of 20 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $861K.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
The auditor signed the 2024 statements on June 25, 2025 and the 2025 statements on August 19, 2026. Both opinions are clean ("present fairly"). We did not find a reason for the later date in the documents we read.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$900,186net financial assets at December 31, 2025, down from $3,340,994 (budget: $(824,356))
Net financial assets are what the Municipality owns in cash, investments and amounts owed to it, minus what it owes. They fell by $2,440,808 in 2025, mainly because of capital spending of $2,986,308. The budget in the same statement planned a bigger fall, to $(824,356), a net debt. So the result was better than planned. We include it as context for the fire hall questions above.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Magnetawan spent $1.6M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.8M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 20 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 134% in 6 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%
+134%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+13%
+1%
2021
+33%
+4%
2022
+8%
+11%
2023
+19%
+16%
2024
+28%
+18%
2025
+134%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $2.2M a year pay for?
Why did gravel roads go from $891K to $2.4M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$4,535,670spent on transportation services in 2025, against a budget of $3,458,927
The audited statements show the Municipality's transportation services (road maintenance, culverts, bridges, winter control and streetlights) cost $4,535,670 in 2025. The budget in the same statement was $3,458,927, and the year before the cost was $2,782,139. The statements say their budget figures were adjusted to match the way the statements are prepared, and the budget reconciliation lists amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets) as part of that budget. Amortization for this service was $703,738 in 2025 and $682,964 in 2024, so it does not explain the gap. We did not find the Municipality's own explanation.
Why it matters
Roads are the biggest service in a small municipality's budget. A cost that is about a third above budget, and over 60 percent above the year before (both worked out by us), is worth understanding before the next budget is set.
It could be because…
Road or bridge work that was budgeted as a capital project but was counted as an expense in the statements, for example because it repaired an asset rather than building a new one.
Work paid for by a grant that arrived the same year, such as the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund, which the statements show as $564,706 recognized as revenue in 2025.
Repairs after unusual weather, or contract work that was planned for 2024 or 2026 and landed in 2025.
Questions you could ask
Which projects make up the $3,223,931 of materials, contracted services and rents in transportation in 2025, compared with $1,563,219 in 2024?
How much of the 2025 transportation cost was budgeted as capital, and why was it counted as an expense instead?
Will council see a budget-to-actual report for roads each year, so a gap this size shows up before the audit?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations: Transportation services expenses of $3,458,927 (budget, unaudited), $4,535,670 (2025 actual) and $2,782,139 (2024 actual).
Note 21 says the budget figures "have been adjusted to conform with this basis of accounting" and lists "Less: Amortization of tangible capital assets (1,159,758)" in the step from the budget by-law to the budget surplus of $1,621,592.
Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund: $279,062 at the start of 2025, $307,815 received during the year, $564,706 recognized as revenues, $22,171 left at December 31, 2025.
$(1,225,362)general surplus (deficit) at December 31, 2025, against $38,898 a year earlier
The statements split the Municipality's accumulated surplus into pieces. The part called the general surplus was $38,898 at the end of 2024 and $(1,225,362) at the end of 2025, a deficit. The statements show the main reason: $(2,318,011) for the net change in tangible capital assets (what was spent on buildings, roads and equipment beyond the money set aside for it). The Municipality's own budget planned to borrow $1,700,000 in 2025, but the only debt in the statements is a $130,000 loan that ends in December 2026. The reserve for asset management, money saved for replacing assets, fell from $4,289,959 to $2,876,197.
Why it matters
A negative general surplus means more has been spent than has been saved or borrowed for so far. It has to be repaid from future taxes, reserves or borrowing, so residents should know which.
It could be because…
A timing gap: the fire hall is being paid for before the planned $1,700,000 loan has been drawn, and the gap will close when the loan arrives.
An ordinary result of a large building project, where cash goes out ahead of grants and borrowing.
Reserves being used on purpose, as they are meant to be, for asset replacement.
Questions you could ask
When will the $1,700,000 fire hall loan be drawn, on what terms, and what will it cost taxpayers each year to repay?
If the loan does not come in 2026, which reserves will cover the $(1,225,362)?
Does the 2026 budget plan to rebuild the asset management reserve, which fell from $4,289,959 to $2,876,197 in one year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Accumulated surplus: General (see note (a) below) $(1,225,362) in 2025 and $38,898 in 2024. Asset management reserve $2,876,197 (2025) and $4,289,959 (2024). Total reserves $4,909,242 (2025) and $5,944,098 (2024).
Note 13(a) reconciles the general surplus: opening balance $38,898; annual surplus $(138,943); transfer to reserves $1,034,856; net change in tangible capital assets $(2,318,011); closing balance $(1,225,362).
$3,870,998approximate contract for the new fire hall and a bridge, with about $2,958,700 left to complete at December 31, 2025
The audited statements say that during 2025 the Municipality entered a contract for the new fire hall and a bridge for approximately $3,870,998 plus taxes, with approximately $2,958,700 plus taxes still to be completed at December 31, 2025. The 2026 budget carries $2,780,189 on a fire department capital line, against $391,549 spent in 2025 on a line budgeted at $3,218,000. Over the year, cash fell from $3,312,067 to $2,008,841 and trade payables (bills owed to suppliers) rose from $92,101 to $1,303,364. A payment of $348,209.50 ("Draw #8") to the builder is on the October 7, 2026 list of accounts. We did not find a published total project budget or a report that shows total cost so far.
Why it matters
This is the largest single project in the documents we read. A published total cost and a plan for paying for it let residents see whether it is on track.
It could be because…
A project that spans two years, so most of the money goes out in 2026, as the budget lines suggest.
Grants and borrowing that are still to arrive. The budget reconciliation planned $1,700,000 of borrowing for 2025.
The year-end jump in what the Municipality owed suppliers is ordinary: builders bill for work done up to December, and payment follows in the new year.
Questions you could ask
What is the total approved cost of the fire hall and the bridge, and how much has been paid so far?
How much of it is paid by grants, reserves and borrowing, and how much by the tax levy?
Will council receive a regular published update on the project's cost against its budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 15, Commitments: "During the year the Municipality entered into a contract for the new Fire Hall and a bridge for approximately $3,870,998 plus applicable taxes. At December 31, 2025, there was approximately $2,958,700 plus applicable taxes remaining to be completed."
Cash was $2,008,841 at December 31, 2025 and $3,312,067 at December 31, 2024. Authorized credit facilities total $500,000, unsecured, with $0 used at December 31, 2025 (2024 - $0), at interest of 4.95%.
2026 budget, Fire Department: account 1-4-2000-8000 FD - CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, printed as 3,218,000, 391,549 and 2,780,189, with a change of 2,388,640 (610.05 percent).
$2,853,537estimated landfill closure and after-care cost at December 31, 2025, up from $2,545,923
The statements record a legal duty to close and look after the Municipality's landfill sites, called an asset retirement obligation. The landfill part of it grew from $2,545,923 to $2,853,537 in 2025, and the whole obligation from $2,749,760 to $3,057,374, partly through a remeasurement adjustment of $231,236. The statements list reserves for waste disposal ($324,618) and landfill rehabilitation ($638,710). These are the only waste or landfill reserves named in the statements. The statements do not say how the rest will be paid.
Why it matters
Closing a landfill is a real future cost. The amount grows as sites fill and as cost estimates rise, and it is paid by future residents unless money is set aside.
It could be because…
The cost falls due many years from now, and the Municipality may plan to add to its reserves each year.
The estimate is based on a capacity study dated April 2, 2025 and could change when the study is updated.
Grants or other funding for closure may be expected, which the statements would not show.
Questions you could ask
What is the Municipality's plan, and the yearly amount, for filling the gap between the landfill reserves and the $2,853,537 estimate?
When will the landfill capacity study be updated, and will council see the result in public?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Asset retirement obligations: balance at the beginning of 2025 $2,749,760; remeasurement adjustment $231,236; accretion expense $76,378; balance at the end of the year $3,057,374. Landfill $2,853,537 (2025) and $2,545,923 (2024).
"The most recent waste capacity study for the landfill site was performed in a report dated April 2, 2025." The note also says changes in estimates "would be recognized prospectively".
Magnetawan spent $532K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.0M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 20 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 89% in 6 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+89%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−6%
+1%
2021
+6%
+4%
2022
+48%
+11%
2023
+52%
+16%
2024
+52%
+18%
2025
+89%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $475K a year pay for?
Why did parks go from $179K to $410K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
At the end of 2025, $947K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 12% of everything billed. Only 4 of 20 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $861K.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$1.0M
$947K
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$414K
2020
$437K
2021
$367K
2022
$573K
2023
$608K
2024
$861K
2025
$947K
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $414K, 2020 $437K, 2021 $367K, 2022 $573K, 2023 $608K, 2024 $861K, 2025 $947K. Of the 2025 total, $205K was from earlier years.
The auditor signed the 2024 statements on June 25, 2025 and the 2025 statements on August 19, 2026. Both opinions are clean ("present fairly"). We did not find a reason for the later date in the documents we read.
Why it matters
Timely audited statements let council and residents see the year's result while it still matters for the next budget. A later date is context, not a sign of a problem.
It could be because…
A larger year than usual: the fire hall and bridge contract, a new asset retirement estimate, and more capital work.
The auditor's own schedule, or waiting on grant reporting.
The 2025 statements include a $231,236 remeasurement adjustment for asset retirement obligations (2024 shows none), which can add audit work.
Questions you could ask
When does council plan to receive the 2026 audited statements, and will the date be published ahead of time?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Auditor's report on the 2025 consolidated statements: opinion that they "present fairly, in all material respects"; signed "North Bay, Ontario ... August 19, 2026".
$900,186net financial assets at December 31, 2025, down from $3,340,994 (budget: $(824,356))
Net financial assets are what the Municipality owns in cash, investments and amounts owed to it, minus what it owes. They fell by $2,440,808 in 2025, mainly because of capital spending of $2,986,308. The budget in the same statement planned a bigger fall, to $(824,356), a net debt. So the result was better than planned. We include it as context for the fire hall questions above.
Why it matters
This figure shows how much room the Municipality has before it must borrow. It is positive, but it fell by about 73 percent in a year (worked out by us), and the fire hall and bridge still had about $2,958,700 left to complete.
It could be because…
The planned $1,700,000 loan has not been drawn, which keeps net financial assets higher than budgeted for now.
Capital spending came in lower than the $6,946,700 budgeted because some work slipped into 2026.
Questions you could ask
Will council publish a multi-year plan showing when the fire hall work will be paid for and when net financial assets are expected to recover?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Magnetawan?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets: acquisition of tangible capital assets $(6,946,700) (budget) and $(2,986,308) (2025 actual); increase (decrease) in net financial assets $(4,165,350) budget and $(2,440,808) actual; net financial assets (debt), end of year $(824,356) budget, $900,186 (2025) and $3,340,994 (2024).
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy