Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Older reportDetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you An older report. We have no 2024 report for Manitouwadge in the Province's latest release, so these pages use its 2023 report. It may simply be filed late. Read by hand. We read Manitouwadge's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Manitouwadge's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 30 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2023, Manitouwadge collected $452K more in its own property tax than in 2022. That is a 14% jump, while prices went up about 3.9%. Only 1 of 30 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 3% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 0.3%.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 4 sources
At the end of 2023, $1.2M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 31% of everything billed. Only 1 of 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $798K.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
April 8, 2026the date the auditor signed the 2023 statements, for the year ended December 31, 2023
A municipality's audited financial statements tell residents what it earned, spent, owns and owes. The auditor signed the 2022 statements on July 30, 2025 and the 2023 statements on April 8, 2026. That is about two and a half years after each year ended. The Township's page lists nothing newer than 2023.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
August 20, 2026when the 2026 budget by-law passed, per the Township's page
The Township's budget page says the 2025 budget by-law passed on July 30, 2025 and the 2026 one on August 20, 2026. The 2023 and 2024 budgets were passed together on September 13, 2023. By those dates, most of the year's spending had already happened.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$980,553Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund balance, the same at the end of 2022 and 2023
The Township holds grant money it has not yet spent as "deferred revenue". The Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund balance was $980,553 at the end of both 2022 and 2023, while the total of all deferred revenue rose from $1,792,285 to $2,105,370.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$113allowance for property and business tax arrears in 2023, down from $162,971
Unpaid property taxes rose from $1,054,977 to $1,211,222 between 2022 and 2023. The allowance, a cushion for taxes unlikely to be collected, fell from $162,971 to $113.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$1,212,591capital assets bought in 2023, against $1,598,836 of amortization (both as printed)
The 2023 statements show an annual deficit of $734,819. That is not overspending: the approved plan was balanced at $9,114,733, and the budget column's deficit is mostly amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets, which budgets usually leave out). The question is a different one. In 2023 the Township bought $1,212,591 of capital assets against $1,598,836 of amortization, and in 2022 $565,072 against $1,632,004.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Reserve funds are savings council sets aside for later needs. In 2023 nothing was added from the budget, $728,568 was taken out, and the balance fell from $8,781,871 to $8,421,989. Reserves (a separate pot) fell from $2,119,324 to $1,951,718.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$3,436,423asset retirement obligations at the end of 2023
Under new accounting rules, the Township now shows a liability of $3,436,423 for closing its landfill ($2,295,579) and removing asbestos from buildings ($1,140,844). Separately, council has designated $8,421,989 to support reserve funds. The statements do not say how much, if any, is earmarked for these obligations. The landfill note also says the remaining capacity is 105,703 cubic metres "representing 69%" of a 329,000 cubic metre site; by our working out, 105,703 is about 32% of 329,000, so the wording looks mixed up.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Manitouwadge spent about $798 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2023. The typical similar town spent $376. Only 1 of 30 similar towns spent more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
In 2023, Manitouwadge collected $452K more in its own property tax than in 2022. That is a 14% jump, while prices went up about 3.9%. Only 1 of 30 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 3% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 0.3%.
Why did Manitouwadge's property tax go up 14% in 2023?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$5.0M
$3.7M
20192020202120222023
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$4.0M
2020
$4.1M
2021
$3.5M
2022
$3.2M
2023
$3.7M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $418 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2023 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $3,221,870 in 2022, $3,674,023 in 2023.
At the end of 2023, $1.2M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 31% of everything billed. Only 1 of 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $798K.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M
$1.2M
20192020202120222023
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$693K
2020
$971K
2021
$1.0M
2022
$798K
2023
$1.2M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $693K, 2020 $971K, 2021 $1.0M, 2022 $798K, 2023 $1.2M. Of the 2023 total, $29,582 was from earlier years.
April 8, 2026the date the auditor signed the 2023 statements, for the year ended December 31, 2023
A municipality's audited financial statements tell residents what it earned, spent, owns and owes. The auditor signed the 2022 statements on July 30, 2025 and the 2023 statements on April 8, 2026. That is about two and a half years after each year ended. The Township's page lists nothing newer than 2023.
Why it matters
Until the statements are signed, residents and council are working from budgets without a checked record of what happened. Every later year is also delayed.
It could be because…
A small staff may have had a backlog, for example while moving to new accounting rules in 2023 (asset retirement obligations).
The 2022 statements were restated in the 2023 statements, which may have taken extra audit time.
The 2024 and 2025 statements may exist but not be posted yet.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2024 and 2025 audited statements be finished and posted?
What caused the delay, and what has changed so later years are on time?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The auditor's report on the 2023 statements is signed "April 8, 2026" and covers the year ended December 31, 2023.
The Financial Statements list on the Township's budget page runs from "2023 Annual Financial Statement" back to 2020. There is no 2024 or 2025 entry. Read October 7, 2026.
August 20, 2026when the 2026 budget by-law passed, per the Township's page
The Township's budget page says the 2025 budget by-law passed on July 30, 2025 and the 2026 one on August 20, 2026. The 2023 and 2024 budgets were passed together on September 13, 2023. By those dates, most of the year's spending had already happened.
Why it matters
A budget passed in August cannot guide spending from January. Residents also get little chance to comment before money is spent.
It could be because…
The Township may wait for provincial grant and policing figures before finalizing.
Council may approve interim spending earlier in the year; we did not open the minutes.
A small staff with delayed audits may not have year-end results to plan from.
Questions you could ask
Does council approve any interim spending before the budget passes, and where is that recorded?
Will the 2027 budget be passed before the year starts, and when is the public meeting?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The page lists: "2026 Bylaw 2026-30, passed August 20, 2026", "2025 Bylaw 2025-28, passed July 30, 2025" and "2023/2024 Bylaw 2023-47, passed September 13, 2023".
$980,553Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund balance, the same at the end of 2022 and 2023
The Township holds grant money it has not yet spent as "deferred revenue". The Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund balance was $980,553 at the end of both 2022 and 2023, while the total of all deferred revenue rose from $1,792,285 to $2,105,370.
Why it matters
Grant money is meant for specific projects. Unspent balances can mean projects are delayed.
It could be because…
A larger project may be saving up several years of funding.
The fund's rules may let the Township hold money for a time.
Projects may be waiting on design or tender.
Questions you could ask
Which project is the infrastructure fund money meant for, and when will it be spent?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Deferred revenue lists "Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (obligatory reserve) $ 980,553 $ 980,553" and "Canada Community-Building Fund (obligatory reserve) $ 597,902 $ 445,374", with total "$ 2,105,370 $ 1,792,285".
$113allowance for property and business tax arrears in 2023, down from $162,971
Unpaid property taxes rose from $1,054,977 to $1,211,222 between 2022 and 2023. The allowance, a cushion for taxes unlikely to be collected, fell from $162,971 to $113.
Why it matters
A tiny allowance against a million dollars of unpaid taxes means the statements assume nearly all will be paid. If not, a loss would show up later.
It could be because…
Old arrears may have been collected or written off, so the allowance was no longer needed.
The Township may expect to recover the rest through tax sales.
Questions you could ask
Have the old tax arrears been collected or written off, and how much unpaid tax is more than a year old?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Property and business taxes receivable $ 1,211,222 $ 1,054,977" and "Allowance for property and business tax arrears (113) (162,971)".
Manitouwadge spent $1.1M on roads and snow in 2019 and $1.7M in 2023. Prices only went up about 16% in that time.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 56% in 4 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%
+56%
20192020202120222023
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+25%
+1%
2021
+13%
+4%
2022
+36%
+11%
2023
+56%
+16%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $596K a year pay for?
Why did airport go from $168K to $381K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Manitouwadge spent $1.1M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $1.6M in 2023. Prices only went up about 16% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 48% in 4 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+48%
20192020202120222023
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−10%
+1%
2021
+26%
+4%
2022
+19%
+11%
2023
+48%
+16%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $519K a year pay for?
Why did garbage pickup go from $38,438 to $448K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$1,212,591capital assets bought in 2023, against $1,598,836 of amortization (both as printed)
The 2023 statements show an annual deficit of $734,819. That is not overspending: the approved plan was balanced at $9,114,733, and the budget column's deficit is mostly amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets, which budgets usually leave out). The question is a different one. In 2023 the Township bought $1,212,591 of capital assets against $1,598,836 of amortization, and in 2022 $565,072 against $1,632,004.
Why it matters
If assets wear out faster than they are replaced, the cost lands later, on future taxpayers and ratepayers.
It could be because…
Much of the infrastructure may be young or last longer than its accounting life.
Grant-funded projects may be planned for later years.
The Township holds large reserve funds that may be earmarked for replacement.
Questions you could ask
What yearly amount does the Township's asset management plan say is needed to replace assets, and how much is being set aside?
Which projects are planned for the next three years, and how will each be paid for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The approved fiscal plan shows Annual surplus "$ 0" and an adjusted result of "(1,659,211)". The reconciliation lists "Purchase of tangible capital assets (846,446)", "Amortization 1,598,836" and "Accretion 124,207", and expenses of "9,114,733" as approved.
Annual deficit "$ (734,819)"; "Acquisition of tangible capital assets (1,212,591)" and "Amortization of tangible capital assets 1,598,836" for 2023, against "(565,072)" and "1,632,004" for 2022.
Reserve funds are savings council sets aside for later needs. In 2023 nothing was added from the budget, $728,568 was taken out, and the balance fell from $8,781,871 to $8,421,989. Reserves (a separate pot) fell from $2,119,324 to $1,951,718.
Why it matters
Reserves cushion the Township against surprises and pay for big repairs. Residents can only judge a drawdown if they know what it funded.
It could be because…
It may have paid for the $1,212,591 of capital assets bought in 2023.
It may be an ordinary use of savings set aside for that purpose.
Interest of $368,686 was added back that year.
Questions you could ask
Which projects or costs were paid from the $728,568?
Where does council record each withdrawal from reserve funds?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Reserve funds: "Transfer from reserve funds (728,568)", "Interfund allocation of interest 368,686", balance end of year "$ 8,421,989" (beginning "$ 8,781,871"). Reserves: "Transfer from reserves (167,606)", balance end of year "$ 1,951,718".
$3,436,423asset retirement obligations at the end of 2023
Under new accounting rules, the Township now shows a liability of $3,436,423 for closing its landfill ($2,295,579) and removing asbestos from buildings ($1,140,844). Separately, council has designated $8,421,989 to support reserve funds. The statements do not say how much, if any, is earmarked for these obligations. The landfill note also says the remaining capacity is 105,703 cubic metres "representing 69%" of a 329,000 cubic metre site; by our working out, 105,703 is about 32% of 329,000, so the wording looks mixed up.
Why it matters
The money has to come from somewhere when the landfill closes or buildings come down, either from savings or from future taxes and fees.
It could be because…
The reserve funds may already cover it in practice.
The costs fall many years out and are discounted to today's value.
The 69% may be the share already used, printed with the wrong label.
Questions you could ask
Is any reserve money specifically earmarked for landfill closing and asbestos removal?
How much landfill capacity is left, and what is the planned closing year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"An asset retirement obligation of $2,295,579 has been recorded for the landfill" and "An asset retirement obligation of $1,140,844 has been recorded for the buildings". The landfill "was opened in 1987 with a capacity of 329,000 cubic metres", and the remaining capacity is "105,703 cubic metres representing 69% of the total capacity".
Of the financial assets, "Council has designated $8,421,989" to support reserve funds; the asset retirement obligations are "$3,436,423" at the end of 2023.
Manitouwadge spent about $798 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2023. The typical similar town spent $376. Only 1 of 30 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Manitouwadge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Manitouwadge $798; typical similar town $376; ranked 2nd highest of 31.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy