Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read McGarry's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read McGarry's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 43 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2024, McGarry collected $136K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 17% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 1 of 43 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 15% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 0.0%.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 4 sources
At the end of 2024, $849K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 84% of everything billed. None of the 43 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.2M.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$938,806municipal debt at December 31, 2025, up from $511,389 a year earlier
At the end of 2025 the Township owed $938,806 in loans and a capital lease, up from $511,389 a year earlier (a rise of $427,417, worked out by us). The biggest new item is a $599,169 loan from RBC "for cash flow purposes", secured by future Province of Ontario funding and maturing in June 2030. The Township also repaid a $2,008,608 demand loan (a loan the bank can call at any time) that had financed its water upgrade. The 2026 budget report gives the Township's own view: it is "nearing its borrowing limit", so future loans will not be possible if unexpected costs arise, and the Finance Committee recommends putting $50,000 into reserves. Principal due in 2026 is $276,202, and interest paid in 2025 was $36,527 (2024: $32,608).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$2,240,330asbestos removal obligation at December 31, 2025, within $2,584,695 of total cleanup obligations
The statements record "asset retirement obligations", which are costs the Township is legally required to pay later to close or clean up what it owns. The total is $2,584,695 at December 31, 2025 (2024: $2,514,297). Of that, $2,240,330 is for asbestos removal in the Township's buildings, which the note says must be handled "upon renovation or demolition". The others are the landfill ($210,537), a gravel pit ($57,323), the water well and pumphouse ($68,243) and a fuel tank ($8,262). The statements list "Unfinanced asset retirement obligations" of $(2,584,695) in the accumulated surplus, next to net debt of $(1,966,524). The 2026 budget report says council has decided to sell the Tourist Centre and is exploring moving staff to the Community Centre. The report does not say which buildings contain asbestos.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$240,000Tourist Centre revenue in the 2026 budget, against $190 in 2025 (the report does not say what it is)
The 2026 budget report shows total revenue of $2,885,848 and total expenses of $2,911,061, a deficit of $25,213. One line stands out: the Tourist Centre has $240,000.00 of revenue in the 2026 budget, against $190.00 actually earned in 2025. Without it the deficit would be $265,213 (worked out by us). The report does not say what the $240,000 is. The same report says council "has decided to sell the Tourist Centre". In 2025 council closed the Tourist Centre for the season and its April 2025 staff report discussed moving the Township office into it if federal funding was found to renovate it.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
General government covers the running of the Township itself. The Township's budget report says it includes wages for the Mayor, council and administrative staff, legal fees, audit costs and professional services, and training, memberships and website maintenance. In the audited statements it cost $1,060,509 in 2025, against a budget of $865,797 (a gap of $194,712, or 22.5%, worked out by us) and $802,728 in 2024. In the notes the biggest non-staff lines in this group are "Materials" of $548,524, contracted services of $61,617 and rents and financial expenses of $41,352. We did not find the Township's own explanation. The 2026 budget report, which shows departments on a different basis, has Administration at $677,511.60 for 2025 (not audited) against a budget of $750,154.00, so it does not show an overspend.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
At the end of 2024, McGarry owed $2.0M on temporary loans. That is like putting 37% of a year's income on a line of credit. This is short-term borrowing for building projects, which is normal while waiting for a grant or a long-term loan. Only 4 of 43 similar towns had any temporary loans at the end of 2024.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 1 source
$479,634surplus on the tax-levy budget basis in 2025, against a budget of nil
Council sets the tax levy with a budget that counts borrowing and capital spending but leaves out amortization. On that basis the 2025 budget was balanced at nil and the actual result was a surplus of $479,634. The Township's April 2025 staff report, after council's cost cuts, said the budget had "a surplus of just over $25,277.00". The result includes new debt of $1,017,847 (budget: nothing) and debt repayments of $590,430 (budget $180,088). The net new borrowing of $427,417 (worked out by us) is part of the surplus, so without it the surplus would be $52,217 (worked out by us). The Township's reserves and surpluses grew by about the same amount as the surplus (see the question on reserve funds).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
A reserve fund is money set aside for one purpose, such as the fire department or the library. At the end of 2024 the Township listed six reserve funds worth $368,388 in total: recreation programs and facilities $217,383, fire department $28,722, future development $11,749, library $2,738, waterworks capital projects $95,025 and community events $12,771. At the end of 2025 every one of them is shown as nil. In the same year "reserves, surpluses and deficits" rose from $707,989 to $1,556,977. The statements say reserves are "non-statutory and subject to change by council at any time". We did not find a note that says where the reserve funds went.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
The water supply system carries its own balance in the accumulated surplus. At the end of 2025 it was a deficit of $(312,797), an improvement from $(457,380). The Township paid for its water upgrade project with a revolving loan facility of $2,356,033, which had $2,008,608 outstanding at the end of 2024 and nothing at the end of 2025. The 2026 budget report shows water revenue of $203,850.00 against expenses of $203,321.00, a surplus of $529.00. In 2025 the water department finished $39,231.03 ahead (not audited) after budgeting a deficit of $38,720.00, helped by a 5% increase in water, wastewater and debenture charges from July 1, 2025. The provincial grant for the water and sewer project (NORDS) is finished and will pay nothing in 2026.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
In 2019, McGarry had $374K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$1.9M. About 108% of that change ($2.5M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 13 of 43 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
In 2024, McGarry collected $136K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 17% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 1 of 43 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 15% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 0.0%.
Why did McGarry's property tax go up 17% in 2024?
$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$1.0M
$951K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$780K
2020
$778K
2021
$785K
2022
$801K
2023
$815K
2024
$951K
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $471 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2024 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $814,588 in 2023, $951,087 in 2024.
At the end of 2024, $849K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 84% of everything billed. None of the 43 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.2M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M
$849K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$1.3M
2020
$1.1M
2021
$1.1M
2022
$991K
2023
$1.2M
2024
$849K
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $1.3M, 2020 $1.1M, 2021 $1.1M, 2022 $991K, 2023 $1.2M, 2024 $849K. Of the 2024 total, $767K was from earlier years.
$938,806municipal debt at December 31, 2025, up from $511,389 a year earlier
At the end of 2025 the Township owed $938,806 in loans and a capital lease, up from $511,389 a year earlier (a rise of $427,417, worked out by us). The biggest new item is a $599,169 loan from RBC "for cash flow purposes", secured by future Province of Ontario funding and maturing in June 2030. The Township also repaid a $2,008,608 demand loan (a loan the bank can call at any time) that had financed its water upgrade. The 2026 budget report gives the Township's own view: it is "nearing its borrowing limit", so future loans will not be possible if unexpected costs arise, and the Finance Committee recommends putting $50,000 into reserves. Principal due in 2026 is $276,202, and interest paid in 2025 was $36,527 (2024: $32,608).
Why it matters
Debt has to be paid back from taxes, user fees and grants. A township that has told its own council it is near its limit has little room for a surprise. Residents may want to know which grants the cash-flow loan is waiting for, and when they are due.
It could be because…
The new loan may be a short bridge until provincial grants arrive, which the note says secure it. Receivables fell by $1,472,239 in 2025, so some of that grant money may already have come in.
Replacing a demand loan, which the bank could call, with a loan that matures in 2030 can make the Township's money safer, even though total debt looks higher.
The 2026 budget report is itself the Township's explanation, and it includes a plan to start building reserves.
Questions you could ask
Which provincial grants is the $599,169 RBC loan waiting on, and when are they due?
What is the Township's borrowing limit today, and how much room is left after the 2025 loans?
Will council see a plan for how the $276,202 due in 2026 will be paid?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 9, Municipal debt: "RBC Loan for cash flow purposes, repayable in blended monthly payments of $12,257 including interest at a variable rate of 3.95%, secured by future Province of Ontario funding, maturing June 2030." 599,169 (2024: -). "Total loans and debentures" 888,429 (2024: 408,617); capital lease 50,377 (2024: 102,772); "Total municipal debt" 938,806 (2024: 511,389). Principal repayments due: 2026 276,202; 2027 192,238; 2028 200,041; 2029 204,891; 2030 65,434.
Note 5, Short-term debt: a revolving loan facility "to finance the water upgrade project" of $2,356,033, authorized by By-Law 2024-24; outstanding balance at December 31, 2025 "$nil" (2024 $2,008,608). A line of credit authorized by By-Law 2025-02 had a balance of "$nil".
Budget for 2026, item 4, Borrowing Capacity & Cash Flow: "The Township is nearing its borrowing limit, meaning future loans will not be possible should unexpected expenses arise." The Finance Committee "recommends transferring $50,000 to the reserves for unforeseen circumstances." Item 6: "This has led to ongoing cash flow difficulties".
$2,240,330asbestos removal obligation at December 31, 2025, within $2,584,695 of total cleanup obligations
The statements record "asset retirement obligations", which are costs the Township is legally required to pay later to close or clean up what it owns. The total is $2,584,695 at December 31, 2025 (2024: $2,514,297). Of that, $2,240,330 is for asbestos removal in the Township's buildings, which the note says must be handled "upon renovation or demolition". The others are the landfill ($210,537), a gravel pit ($57,323), the water well and pumphouse ($68,243) and a fuel tank ($8,262). The statements list "Unfinanced asset retirement obligations" of $(2,584,695) in the accumulated surplus, next to net debt of $(1,966,524). The 2026 budget report says council has decided to sell the Tourist Centre and is exploring moving staff to the Community Centre. The report does not say which buildings contain asbestos.
Why it matters
The obligation grows each year (by $70,398 of accretion expense in 2025) and falls due when a building is renovated or taken down. Decisions about selling or reusing buildings could bring that day closer. Residents may want to know whether the Township has a plan to pay for it.
It could be because…
The note says the cost arises only if a building is renovated or demolished. If the buildings stay as they are, the money may never be needed in that form.
The estimate rests on assumptions about each building's remaining life and may change once surveys are done.
Statements of this kind show the amount as a future cost; they do not say that cash must be set aside now.
Questions you could ask
Which Township buildings contain the asbestos, and has a survey priced the removal?
Would selling the Tourist Centre or moving staff to the Community Centre trigger any of the removal work?
Does the Township have a plan, or a reserve, to pay these obligations when they come due?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8, Asset retirement obligations: balance, beginning of year 2,514,297; accretion expense 70,398; balance, end of year 2,584,695. At year end: landfill 210,537 (2024: 204,803); asbestos removal 2,240,330 (2,179,310); gravel pit 57,323 (55,762); water well and pumphouse 68,243 (66,385); fuel tank removal 8,262 (8,037); total 2,584,695 (2,514,297).
Note 8, Asbestos removal: "The Township owns buildings which contain asbestos, and therefore, the Township is legally required to perform abatement activities upon renovation or demolition of these assets." "Assumptions were made regarding the remaining useful life of the building".
Budget for 2026, item 5, Property Management & Cost-Cutting Measures: "the Council has decided to sell the Tourist Centre and is exploring the potential relocation of staff to the Community Centre. However, no definitive decision has been made regarding this relocation at this time."
$240,000Tourist Centre revenue in the 2026 budget, against $190 in 2025 (the report does not say what it is)
The 2026 budget report shows total revenue of $2,885,848 and total expenses of $2,911,061, a deficit of $25,213. One line stands out: the Tourist Centre has $240,000.00 of revenue in the 2026 budget, against $190.00 actually earned in 2025. Without it the deficit would be $265,213 (worked out by us). The report does not say what the $240,000 is. The same report says council "has decided to sell the Tourist Centre". In 2025 council closed the Tourist Centre for the season and its April 2025 staff report discussed moving the Township office into it if federal funding was found to renovate it.
Why it matters
A budget that depends on selling a building is only as firm as the sale. If the building is not sold in 2026, or sells for less, the gap is paid from reserves, borrowing or a larger tax increase, and the Township says it is near its borrowing limit. Residents may also want to know what the building was appraised at and whether the sale is open to everyone.
It could be because…
The $240,000 may be an estimate of what the building will sell for, in which case it is a one-time amount and the Township knows that.
Selling a building that was closed in 2025 and cost $26,561.42 to run could save money every year, as the report's cost-cutting item suggests.
Council has not yet received an offer, so the figure may be a placeholder until it does.
Questions you could ask
What is the $240,000 of Tourist Centre revenue in the 2026 budget?
Has the Tourist Centre been listed, appraised or offered for sale, and when did council decide to sell it?
If the sale does not close in 2026, how will the Township cover the gap?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Proposed 2026 revenue and expenses, "TOURIST CENTRE" (800): revenue 2026 budget 240,000.00, 2025 actual not audited 190.00, 2025 budget 0.00; expense 25,517.00, 26,561.42, 15,254.00; total $214,483.00 (2025 actual -$26,371.42). Grand total: "Total Revenue" $2,885,848.00; "Total Expenses" $2,911,061.00; "GRAND TOTAL" -$25,213.00 (2026 budget).
Budget for 2026, item 1: the Township "faced a deficit exceeding $110,000", which the Committee "reduced ... to just over $25,000". Item 5: "the Council has decided to sell the Tourist Centre". Financial Consideration: "The proposed 2.5% tax increase of $25,213 would be needed".
"A discussion was held regarding the feasibility of relocating the Township Office to the Tourist Centre Building if funding is obtained from Fed Nor to renovate the building." Council gave staff no direction on this.
General government covers the running of the Township itself. The Township's budget report says it includes wages for the Mayor, council and administrative staff, legal fees, audit costs and professional services, and training, memberships and website maintenance. In the audited statements it cost $1,060,509 in 2025, against a budget of $865,797 (a gap of $194,712, or 22.5%, worked out by us) and $802,728 in 2024. In the notes the biggest non-staff lines in this group are "Materials" of $548,524, contracted services of $61,617 and rents and financial expenses of $41,352. We did not find the Township's own explanation. The 2026 budget report, which shows departments on a different basis, has Administration at $677,511.60 for 2025 (not audited) against a budget of $750,154.00, so it does not show an overspend.
Why it matters
General government is the cost of running the Township rather than a service to the public, and it is the largest group. When it is a fifth over budget, residents may want to know what drove it and whether it will repeat.
It could be because…
The statements' budget column is rebuilt from the council budget, so the gap may be partly a difference in how costs are grouped between departments.
Costs such as insurance, legal advice, the audit or one-time costs of the water and loan work may have landed in this group.
The 2026 budget report's departmental figures differ, which suggests the groups are not drawn the same way in the two documents.
Questions you could ask
What accounts for the $194,712 by which general government spending exceeded its budget in 2025?
Why does the 2026 budget report show Administration under budget for 2025, when the audited statements show general government over budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations, expenditures: "General government" 2025 budget 865,797, actual 1,060,509, 2024 actual 802,728. "Total expenditures" 3,077,719 (budget), 3,199,013, 2,783,794.
Operating Budget, 1. General Governance, Purpose: "Covers the operational costs of running the local government." Includes: "Wages for the Mayor, Council, and administrative staff"; "Legal fees, audit costs, and professional services"; "Training, seminars, memberships, and website maintenance".
At the end of 2024, McGarry owed $2.0M on temporary loans. That is like putting 37% of a year's income on a line of credit. This is short-term borrowing for building projects, which is normal while waiting for a grant or a long-term loan. Only 4 of 43 similar towns had any temporary loans at the end of 2024.
What is the $2.0M short-term loan for, and when will it be paid off?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.5M
$2.0M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Temporary loans
2019
$0
2020
$0
2021
$0
2022
$0
2023
$0
2024
$2.0M
Why it matters
Short-term loans usually cost more interest and can be called in. If they roll over year after year, the town is really carrying debt that does not show up as long-term debt.
It could be because…
The town is waiting for a promised grant to arrive for a finished project.
A long-term loan (debenture) for the project has been approved but not yet issued.
Questions you could ask
Which project is the loan for, and what is the interest rate?
When will it be repaid or turned into a long-term loan, and where does that money come from?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$479,634surplus on the tax-levy budget basis in 2025, against a budget of nil
Council sets the tax levy with a budget that counts borrowing and capital spending but leaves out amortization. On that basis the 2025 budget was balanced at nil and the actual result was a surplus of $479,634. The Township's April 2025 staff report, after council's cost cuts, said the budget had "a surplus of just over $25,277.00". The result includes new debt of $1,017,847 (budget: nothing) and debt repayments of $590,430 (budget $180,088). The net new borrowing of $427,417 (worked out by us) is part of the surplus, so without it the surplus would be $52,217 (worked out by us). The Township's reserves and surpluses grew by about the same amount as the surplus (see the question on reserve funds).
Why it matters
A surplus built partly on borrowed money is not the same as money left over from taxes. The Township has said it needs to build reserves. Residents may want to know how much of the new reserve is cash and how much is the result of the new loans.
It could be because…
The surplus partly reflects capital grants of $675,868 (budget $569,052) that arrived to pay for projects, so some of it is committed.
Borrowing to pay for water project costs after the demand loan was repaid would show up as new debt without being money the Township can spend on anything.
The April 2025 report was written before the year's grants, penalties and sales were known.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $479,634 surplus is cash the Township can spend, and how much is committed to projects or tied to the new loans?
Why did the April 2025 report expect a surplus of about $25,277 and the year end at $479,634?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 13, Budgeting, 2025 on the tax-levy basis: total revenues budget 3,313,018, actual 4,354,245, including "New debt issued" 1,017,847 (budget: -); "Capital expenditures" budget 569,052, actual 599,009; "Long term debt repayments" budget 180,088, actual 590,430; total expenditures 3,313,018 and 3,874,611. "Surplus (deficit), tax levy budget base" budget "-", actual 479,634 (2024: 954,587).
Conclusion: "After all the modifications have been implemented, we currently have a surplus of just over $25,277.00." Earlier in the report the first draft of the 2025 budget faced a deficit "exceeding $375,000.00" and, after departments resubmitted, "just over $106,000.00".
A reserve fund is money set aside for one purpose, such as the fire department or the library. At the end of 2024 the Township listed six reserve funds worth $368,388 in total: recreation programs and facilities $217,383, fire department $28,722, future development $11,749, library $2,738, waterworks capital projects $95,025 and community events $12,771. At the end of 2025 every one of them is shown as nil. In the same year "reserves, surpluses and deficits" rose from $707,989 to $1,556,977. The statements say reserves are "non-statutory and subject to change by council at any time". We did not find a note that says where the reserve funds went.
Why it matters
Reserve funds are usually set up by a council decision for a specific purpose. If their balances were spent, moved to a general reserve or closed, residents should be able to see that decision.
It could be because…
The Township may have combined the funds into its general reserves, since the note describes reserves as a council choice that can change.
The money may have paid for the water upgrade or the loan repayments in 2025.
The statements may have been reorganized for 2025 without any money moving.
Questions you could ask
Did council vote to close or combine the six reserve funds, and where is the record?
How much of the 2024 balances was spent in 2025, and on what?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 10, Accumulated surplus, "Reserve funds": "Recreation programs and facilities" nil (2024: 217,383); "Fire department" nil (28,722); "Future development" nil (11,749); "Library" nil (2,738); "Waterworks capital projects" nil (95,025); "Community events" nil (12,771); total nil (2024: 368,388). "Working funds reserve" 383,071 (109,707). Reserves "are non-statutory and subject to change by council at any time."
The water supply system carries its own balance in the accumulated surplus. At the end of 2025 it was a deficit of $(312,797), an improvement from $(457,380). The Township paid for its water upgrade project with a revolving loan facility of $2,356,033, which had $2,008,608 outstanding at the end of 2024 and nothing at the end of 2025. The 2026 budget report shows water revenue of $203,850.00 against expenses of $203,321.00, a surplus of $529.00. In 2025 the water department finished $39,231.03 ahead (not audited) after budgeting a deficit of $38,720.00, helped by a 5% increase in water, wastewater and debenture charges from July 1, 2025. The provincial grant for the water and sewer project (NORDS) is finished and will pay nothing in 2026.
Why it matters
Water users pay for water through their bills. A deficit means other taxpayers or other funds are covering it. The 2026 budget leaves almost no room for a repair, and the upgrade's debt has to be paid back.
It could be because…
The deficit is shrinking, and the 5% rate increase in 2025 may be doing what council intended.
Part of the deficit may be debt from the upgrade that is meant to be repaid over many years through the debenture charge.
The 2026 budget may treat the water system as break-even by design.
Questions you could ask
What are the water system's expected repayments on the upgrade debt each year, and are current rates set to cover them?
When does the Township expect the water supply system deficit to be cleared?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 5, Short-term debt: a revolving loan facility "to finance the water upgrade project" of $2,356,033; outstanding balance at December 31, 2025 "$nil" (2024 $2,008,608).
Proposed 2026 revenue and expenses, "WATER" (900): revenue 2026 budget 203,850.00, 2025 actual not audited 204,325.05, 2025 budget 206,400.00; expense 203,321.00, 165,094.02, 245,120.00; total $529.00, $39,231.03, -$38,720.00. "Ontario's Northern Ontario Resource Development Support (NORDS) - This funding is complete and we will not be receiving anything in 2026."
In 2019, McGarry had $374K more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$1.9M. About 108% of that change ($2.5M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 13 of 43 similar towns are in a weaker position.
McGarry went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$4.0M−$3.0M−$2.0M−$1.0M$0$1.0M
−$1.9M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$374K
2020
−$248K
2021
−$260K
2022
−$795K
2023
−$3.0M
2024
−$1.9M
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for McGarry?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy