Council BooksMcMurrich-MonteithOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read McMurrich-Monteith's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 12 so far

Things worth asking about

We read McMurrich-Monteith's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 31 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 75% in 6 years?

+75%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $352K on running the town office in 2019 and $616K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 31 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Needs an answerMoney health

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$654Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $654K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 25% of everything billed. None of the 31 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $493K.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingSpending level

Why was $1,278,824 spent on capital assets in 2025 against $2,231,530 in the budget reconciliation, and why did $668,321 less grant money arrive?

$1,278,824spent on capital assets in 2025, against $2,231,530 in the budget reconciliation (a gap of $952,706, worked out by us)

The statements' budget reconciliation shows $2,231,530 for buying and building long-lasting assets such as roads and bridges (the note does not say this is the capital budget, but it is the only capital figure it gives). The statements show $1,278,824 spent. Government transfers were $1,161,616 against a budget of $1,829,937. The Axe Lake Road bridge contract, signed in 2025 for $416,018, was only $41,902 done at year end.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the Township's landfill closure liability fall by $242,262 in 2025, and what is the $330,237 loss on disposals?

$343,616the landfill closure liability at December 31, 2025, down from $585,878

The estimated cost to close and monitor the landfill fell from $585,878 to $343,616. The estimate of remaining space rose from 10,000 to 24,023 cubic metres, and the years to fill it from 10 to 32. In the same year the Township wrote off $265,266 of land and land improvements, nearly the same as the $265,268 cut in the estimate (worked out by us), and reported a $330,237 loss on disposal of assets.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingHow decisions are made

Why were the Buildings, Roads and Roads equipment reserves emptied in 2025 into a new $1,435,045 Capital reserve?

$1,435,045the new Capital reserve at the end of 2025, after three reserves were emptied

Three reserves with $663,600, $491,057 and $310,213 at the start of 2025 ($1,464,870 in all, worked out by us) all end at nothing. A new reserve called Capital starts at nothing and ends at $1,435,045. Total reserves and reserve funds fell by $152,526 to $2,470,568, and the Modernization fund fell by $220,264.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source

Worth askingRising costs

Why does the average home's 2026 tax bill rise 7.7% when the Township's collected taxes rise 5.0%?

$167.88the 2026 rise on the Township's sample home bill ($2,167.83 to $2,335.71), about 7.7%

The Township's own summary says its total collected taxes rise 5.02% ($130,978) in 2026, and the residential tax rate rises 3.49%. It also says the average home's assessment rose 4.11%, which together takes the sample bill from $2,167.83 to $2,335.71, a rise of $167.88 or 7.7% (worked out by us).

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 52% in 6 years?

+52%roads and snow, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $542K on roads and snow in 2019 and $823K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 6 of 31 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 47% in 6 years?

+47%police, fire and safety, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $410K on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $605K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowRecord-keeping

Why do the 2026 budget package's own pages print different amounts for the taxes it plans to collect?

$60,000the difference between $2,385,983 and $2,325,983 (worked out by us)

The operating budget table shows $2,385,983 of general taxation revenue, and the staff summary two pages later says $2,325,983 of municipal taxes are budgeted. The table also prints a "Total increase in operating budget from 2025 to 2026" of -$29,000, while the summary prints an increase in net operating budget of $97,914.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowRising costs

Why does the 2026 budget raise net spending on fire by 22.79% and put $100,000 into a fire department vehicle?

22.79%rise in the fire department's net operating budget for 2026

The operating table shows fire's net budget rising from $239,382 to $293,947. The capital budget has $100,000 of spending on a fire department vehicle, with $30,000 of revenue, against $16,000 in 2025. Council directed staff on April 21, 2026 to source a command vehicle by direct purchase, not to exceed the approved budget amount.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 75% in 6 years?

+75%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $352K on running the town office in 2019 and $616K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 1 of 31 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 75% in 6 years?
+75%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−4%+1%
2021+16%+4%
2022+71%+11%
2023+70%+16%
2024+77%+18%
2025+75%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $263K a year pay for?
  2. Why did office and administration go from $120K to $223K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $352K, 2020 $338K, 2021 $410K, 2022 $604K, 2023 $599K, 2024 $622K, 2025 $616K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Office and administration, from $120K to $223K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 39%. McMurrich-Monteith ranks 2nd of 32.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$654Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $654K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 25% of everything billed. None of the 31 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $493K.

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$654K
Show as a table
YearUnpaid property tax at year end
2019$287K
2020$306K
2021$227K
2022$286K
2023$339K
2024$493K
2025$654K

Why it matters

When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.

It could be because…

  • The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
  • A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
  • Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
  2. Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
  3. Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Taxes receivable: 2019 $287K, 2020 $306K, 2021 $227K, 2022 $286K, 2023 $339K, 2024 $493K, 2025 $654K. Of the 2025 total, $194K was from earlier years.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 0610 to 0699 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: 10.1% of taxes billed.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedules 26 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why was $1,278,824 spent on capital assets in 2025 against $2,231,530 in the budget reconciliation, and why did $668,321 less grant money arrive?

$1,278,824spent on capital assets in 2025, against $2,231,530 in the budget reconciliation (a gap of $952,706, worked out by us)

The statements' budget reconciliation shows $2,231,530 for buying and building long-lasting assets such as roads and bridges (the note does not say this is the capital budget, but it is the only capital figure it gives). The statements show $1,278,824 spent. Government transfers were $1,161,616 against a budget of $1,829,937. The Axe Lake Road bridge contract, signed in 2025 for $416,018, was only $41,902 done at year end.

Why it matters

Projects that slip are projects residents are still waiting for, and grants for them can be lost or delayed. A smaller 2025 spend also leaves more of the work, and more of the cost, to 2026.

It could be because…

  • Grants for a project arrive as the work is done, so grant income and spending both fall short when a project slips.
  • The draft minutes show council approved the contractor's road closure plan and moved the bridge work to the fall of 2026, which is a planning choice.
  • Weather, tender timing and contractor schedules often move small-town projects by a season.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which 2025 capital projects were not finished, and are they in the 2026 budget again?
  2. How much of the 2025 grant shortfall is expected to arrive in 2026?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 18 reconciles the adopted budget to the reported one. Its adjustments list "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" of 2,231,530, amortization of (465,341), accretion of (23,006) and an "Increase in long-term debt" of (393,563).

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 18 Budget Figures, PDF page 26 (printed page 24; scanned image). The lines add to the annual surplus of 718,695

  2. The cash flow statement shows Acquisition of tangible capital assets of $(1,278,824) in 2025 and $(1,335,035) in 2024. The statement of operations shows Government transfers of $1,829,937 (budget 2025), $1,161,616 (actual 2025) and $995,880 (actual 2024).

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, PDF page 8 (printed page 6), and Consolidated Statements of Operations, PDF page 6 (printed page 4); scanned images. Cash flow lines reconcile $1,742,242 to $1,836,438; revenue lines add to $3,643,638

  3. Note 13 says "In 2025, the Municipality entered into a contract ... for the replacement of Axe Lake Road bridge at a cost of $416,018. In 2025, $41,902 of work was completed. The balance of the work is expected to be completed in 2026."

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 13 Contractual Obligations, PDF page 20 (printed page 18; scanned image)

  4. The 2026 capital budget lists "Replacement of Axe Lake bridge" with revenues of ($445,000) and expenses of $445,000. The draft minutes of April 7, 2026 record a council resolution that the replacement of the bridge "be delayed until the fall of 2026".

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 (capital budget) and April 21, 2026 (draft minutes) · April 7 package PDF page 31, 2026 Capital Budget (scanned image); the draft minutes are on PDF pages 3 to 5 of https://irp.cdn-website.com/af131183/files/uploaded/8.+Agenda+Package+-+April+21-+2026.pdf (scanned image)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the Township take on its first debt, $393,563 at 4.65%, while holding $1,836,438 in cash and $1,194,282 in investments?

$393,563long-term debt at December 31, 2025, from nothing a year earlier

The Township had no long-term debt at the end of 2024. In 2025 it borrowed $393,563 through a provincial lender, repayable to 2050. The budget reconciliation in the statements also lists the debt.

Why it matters

Debt is repaid from taxes for 25 years (2025 to November 2050, by our count). Residents can fairly ask what the money paid for, and whether other money could have covered it.

It could be because…

  • The loan is described as "secured by future Provincial funding", so it may bridge a grant or a province-backed program.
  • Much of the cash and investments is reserve money, grant money held for projects ($343,010 of obligatory reserve funds) and unpaid bills, so it may not be free to spend.
  • Borrowing for a long-lived asset spreads its cost over the years it is used.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the $393,563 debenture pay for, and which provincial funding is it secured by?
  2. Why borrow at 4.65% when the Township held $1,836,438 in cash?
  3. Does council plan more borrowing?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The statement of financial position lists Cash and cash equivalents of $1,836,438, Investments of $1,194,282 and Long-term debt of $393,563 (2024: nothing).

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 5 (printed page 3; scanned image). Financial assets add to $4,001,394 and liabilities to $1,604,747

  2. Note 9: "debenture, due November 2050, repayable in semi-annual payments of $13,395 including interest calculated at 4.65%, secured by future Provincial funding" with a balance of $393,563. Payments due in 2026 are principal $8,588 and interest $18,202. The cash flow statement shows Proceeds from long-term debt of $393,563.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 9 Long-Term Debt, PDF page 17 (printed page 15; scanned image). The yearly principal amounts add to $393,563. Cash flow statement, PDF page 8

  3. Note 15 lists "Unfunded amounts - Long-term debt" of (393,563) in the accumulated surplus, and Note 18 lists "Increase in long-term debt" of (393,563) in the budget reconciliation.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 15 Accumulated Surplus, PDF page 22 (printed page 20), and Note 18, PDF page 26 (printed page 24); scanned images. Note 15's lines add to $8,980,935

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the Township's landfill closure liability fall by $242,262 in 2025, and what is the $330,237 loss on disposals?

$343,616the landfill closure liability at December 31, 2025, down from $585,878

The estimated cost to close and monitor the landfill fell from $585,878 to $343,616. The estimate of remaining space rose from 10,000 to 24,023 cubic metres, and the years to fill it from 10 to 32. In the same year the Township wrote off $265,266 of land and land improvements, nearly the same as the $265,268 cut in the estimate (worked out by us), and reported a $330,237 loss on disposal of assets.

Why it matters

A smaller liability makes the Township look healthier on paper, and a loss on disposal lowers the surplus. Both come from estimates and accounting entries, so residents cannot tell from the statements whether any real change happened.

It could be because…

  • A newer survey may show more room in the site, which pushes closure further into the future and lowers the cost today.
  • The statements say changes to the estimate are added to or taken off the asset. The $265,266 write-off may be that entry and not a real disposal.
  • Interest-rate changes alone move this kind of estimate: the borrowing rate used rose from 3.92% to 4.85%.

Questions you could ask

  1. What new information changed the landfill estimate in 2025, and who prepared it?
  2. Is the $265,266 land write-off the same entry as the $265,268 estimate change, and what is the real loss, if any?
  3. How does the Township plan to pay the $343,616, given a $302,057 reserve?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 12: the liability was $585,878 at the start of 2025, with a change of $(265,268) "reflecting changes in the estimated cash flows, inflation and discount rate" and accretion of $23,006, ending at $343,616. "The estimated remaining capacity of the site is 24,023 cubic metres (2024 - 10,000 cubic metres), estimated to be filled in 32 years (2024 - 10 years)." "The Municipality has reserves of $302,057 (2024 - $302,057) to fund this obligation."

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 12 Asset Retirement Obligations, PDF page 20 (printed page 18; scanned image). 585,878 - 265,268 + 23,006 = 343,616

  2. The cash flow statement lists Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets of $330,237 (2024: $25,472). Note 14 shows disposals and writedowns of $(265,266) in land and land improvements, and $(844,545) in total, against amortization disposals of $(514,308).

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Cash flow statement, PDF page 8 (printed page 6), and Note 14 Tangible Capital Assets, PDF page 21 (printed page 19); scanned images. 844,545 - 514,308 = 330,237

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why were the Buildings, Roads and Roads equipment reserves emptied in 2025 into a new $1,435,045 Capital reserve?

$1,435,045the new Capital reserve at the end of 2025, after three reserves were emptied

Three reserves with $663,600, $491,057 and $310,213 at the start of 2025 ($1,464,870 in all, worked out by us) all end at nothing. A new reserve called Capital starts at nothing and ends at $1,435,045. Total reserves and reserve funds fell by $152,526 to $2,470,568, and the Modernization fund fell by $220,264.

Why it matters

Reserves are the savings residents have built up for repairs and replacements. Combining them can be good planning, but residents should be able to see the decision and what rules now govern the money.

It could be because…

  • Council may have decided to hold one pooled reserve for all capital work, which is common advice in asset management.
  • The $29,825 difference (worked out by us) may be money used during 2025.
  • The Modernization fund may simply have been spent on the projects it was kept for.

Questions you could ask

  1. Did council pass a resolution or by-law combining these reserves, and when?
  2. What are the rules for spending the new Capital reserve, and can residents see its yearly balance?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 15's reserves table shows, for the beginning balance, annual change and end of year: Capital - , 1,435,045, 1,435,045; Buildings 663,600, (663,600), -; Roads 491,057, (491,057), -; Roads equipment 310,213, (310,213), -; Modernization fund 345,605, (220,264), 125,341. The total of reserves and reserve funds was 2,623,094, (152,526) and 2,470,568.

    Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2025 · Note 15 Accumulated Surplus, PDF page 22 (printed page 20; scanned image). The end-of-year reserve lines add to 2,470,568; the beginning lines add to 2,623,094

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why does the average home's 2026 tax bill rise 7.7% when the Township's collected taxes rise 5.0%?

$167.88the 2026 rise on the Township's sample home bill ($2,167.83 to $2,335.71), about 7.7%

The Township's own summary says its total collected taxes rise 5.02% ($130,978) in 2026, and the residential tax rate rises 3.49%. It also says the average home's assessment rose 4.11%, which together takes the sample bill from $2,167.83 to $2,335.71, a rise of $167.88 or 7.7% (worked out by us).

Why it matters

Residents feel their own bill, not the Township's total. Several percentages in one table make it hard to see what grew and why.

It could be because…

  • Education taxes and the municipal levy are blended into one rate, so the rate moves for both reasons.
  • The sample home is one example, and total assessment may have grown differently from the average home's.
  • The 2025 sample used last year's assessment, so the 4.11% may reflect home improvements or sales that updated values.

Questions you could ask

  1. What explains the 3.49% rate rise on top of a 4.11% rise in the average assessment, when total taxes collected rise 5.02%?
  2. Why does the sample home bill rise 7.7%, and how much of that is education tax?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The staff summary says: increase in net operating budget $97,914, increase in net capital budget $29,000, net increase in 2026 budget $126,914; municipal taxes budgeted $2,325,983 against $2,199,069; the increase is 5.77%. Total taxes budgeted $2,741,933 against $2,610,955, an increase of $130,978 or 5.02%.

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 32, Overall 2026 Budget and Municipal Taxes (scanned image). $2,325,983 - $2,199,069 = $126,914; $2,741,933 - $2,610,955 = $130,978

  2. "The average increase on assessment in McMurrich/Monteith for 2026 is 4.11%. The residential tax rate for 2025 was 1.010851. The residential tax rate for 2026 is 1.046139 an increase of 3.49%." The sample: assessment $214,456 and taxes $2,167.83 in 2025; assessment $223,270 and taxes $2,335.71 in 2026; "Average increase in taxes for 2026 $167.88 or $13.99 per month".

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 32, Overall 2026 Budget and Municipal Taxes (scanned image). $223,270 x 0.01046139 = $2,335.71

  3. The draft minutes of April 7, 2026 record resolution 2026-78: council passed "Bylaw 21-2026 to adopt the budget estimates and set final tax rates for the year" on first, second and third readings. The April 21 minutes approve the April 7 minutes (resolution 2026-84).

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 21, 2026 (draft April 7 minutes) and Minutes of April 21, 2026 · PDF page 5, resolution 2026-78 (scanned image); approval in https://irp.cdn-website.com/af131183/files/uploaded/8.+Minutes+April+21-+2026.pdf, page 2, resolution 2026-84

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 52% in 6 years?

+52%roads and snow, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $542K on roads and snow in 2019 and $823K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 6 of 31 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 52% in 6 years?
+52%
Show as a table
YearRoads and snowPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−7%+1%
2021−14%+4%
2022+8%+11%
2023−9%+16%
2024+45%+18%
2025+52%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $281K a year pay for?
  2. Why did gravel roads go from $204K to $372K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Roads and snow: 2019 $542K, 2020 $507K, 2021 $468K, 2022 $584K, 2023 $492K, 2024 $786K, 2025 $823K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Gravel roads, from $204K to $372K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 31%. McMurrich-Monteith ranks 7th of 32.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 47% in 6 years?

+47%police, fire and safety, 2019 to 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent $410K on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $605K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 47% in 6 years?
+47%
Show as a table
YearPolice, fire and safetyPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+0%+1%
2021+16%+4%
2022+24%+11%
2023+39%+16%
2024+36%+18%
2025+47%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $195K a year pay for?
  2. Why did fire department go from $134K to $210K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Police, fire and safety: 2019 $410K, 2020 $412K, 2021 $476K, 2022 $508K, 2023 $572K, 2024 $560K, 2025 $605K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Fire department, from $134K to $210K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why does McMurrich-Monteith spend more than most similar towns on council?

$282per home on council, 2025

McMurrich-Monteith spent about $282 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $110. Only 4 of 31 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Council per home: McMurrich-Monteith $282; typical similar town $110; ranked 5th highest of 32.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 31 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why do the 2026 budget package's own pages print different amounts for the taxes it plans to collect?

$60,000the difference between $2,385,983 and $2,325,983 (worked out by us)

The operating budget table shows $2,385,983 of general taxation revenue, and the staff summary two pages later says $2,325,983 of municipal taxes are budgeted. The table also prints a "Total increase in operating budget from 2025 to 2026" of -$29,000, while the summary prints an increase in net operating budget of $97,914.

Why it matters

A budget readers cannot reconcile is hard to trust, even when each page may be correct on its own terms. The package is marked "approved", so these are the figures residents are given.

It could be because…

  • The two pages may count different things, for example one may include $60,000 of payments in lieu of taxes or penalties.
  • The -$29,000 may refer to the capital change shown on the summary ($29,000), with the label wrong.
  • The table may be a working copy that was not updated after a late change.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which figure is the amount the Township will collect in municipal taxes in 2026?
  2. Will the Township post a corrected budget summary?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The operating budget table, titled "2026 APPROVED BUDGET OPERATING BUDGET", shows General taxation 2026 revenues ($2,385,983), expenses $49,580 and 2026 net budget ($2,336,403). Total Operating Budget shows revenues ($3,847,559), expenses $3,513,184 and net ($334,375). The line below reads "Total increase in operating budget from 2025 to 2026 -$29,000".

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 29, 2026 Approved Budget, Operating Budget (scanned image). The 17 expense lines add to $3,513,184 and the 2026 net lines add to ($334,375)

  2. The summary says "Municipal taxes budgeted to be collected in 2026 $2,325,983" and "Increase in net operating budget $97,914".

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 32, Overall 2026 Budget and Municipal Taxes (scanned image)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why does the 2026 budget raise net spending on fire by 22.79% and put $100,000 into a fire department vehicle?

22.79%rise in the fire department's net operating budget for 2026

The operating table shows fire's net budget rising from $239,382 to $293,947. The capital budget has $100,000 of spending on a fire department vehicle, with $30,000 of revenue, against $16,000 in 2025. Council directed staff on April 21, 2026 to source a command vehicle by direct purchase, not to exceed the approved budget amount.

Why it matters

Fire protection is a service residents rely on, and the budget line grew faster than most. Residents should be able to see why, and how the vehicle was chosen.

It could be because…

  • Fire costs can rise with equipment, insurance and training, and we did not find the Township's own explanation for this line.
  • A direct purchase of a command vehicle can be cheaper or quicker than a tender, and council asked for a report back within 90 days with the final cost.
  • The vehicle line is partly paid for from other revenue ($30,000).

Questions you could ask

  1. Why was the request for proposals set aside for a direct purchase, and what did the report back at 90 days say?
  2. What drives the 22.79% rise in fire's net operating budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for McMurrich-Monteith? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The operating table shows Fire with a 2025 net budget of $239,382, 2026 revenues of ($3,100), expenses of $297,047, a 2026 net budget of $293,947 and a change of 22.79%.

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 29, 2026 Approved Budget, Operating Budget (scanned image). The 2026 net column adds to ($334,375)

  2. The capital budget's fire section shows a vehicle line with 2025 net budget $16,000, 2026 revenues ($30,000), expenses $100,000 and net $70,000, and Total capital fire of $115,800 expenses and a 337.50% change.

    Agenda Package, Regular Council Meeting, April 7, 2026 · PDF page 31, 2026 Capital Budget (scanned image). Capital expenses add to $1,954,800

  3. Resolution 2026-90: council received the fire department's report on RFP 2026-01 ("1500 Series Pickup Truck or SUV") and directed staff "to proceed with direct sourcing a command vehicle, with a maximum expenditure not to exceed the approved budgeted amount and to report back to Council within 90 days with the selected vehicle details, final cost and funding breakdown prior to final purchase."

    Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, April 21, 2026 · page 3, resolution 2026-90

↑ All questions