Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Middlesex Centre's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 7 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Middlesex Centre's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 34 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$41,268,385forecast total of all reserve funds in 2030, down from $71,479,027 in 2024
A reserve fund is money set aside for a named purpose, such as replacing roads or vehicles. The 2026 budget book forecasts the total of all reserve funds falling from $71,479,027 (2024 actual) to $41,268,385 in 2030, a drop of $30,210,642 (worked out by us). In the same forecast, the Stormwater Capital reserve fund goes to $(3,714,604) in 2027, the General Vehicles & Equipment fund to $(3,107,901) in 2030 and the new Growth Reserve Fund to $(6,033,641) in 2030. The Municipality explains that a negative fund is borrowing from the funds that are positive, and says it is not meeting its own target balances for several funds. It also says reserves have grown by $65 million since 2015.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$88,013,436planned new borrowing for 14 projects, 2029 to 2031, of which $71,661,869 is development charge share
Development charges are fees collected from developers to pay for the roads, water and sewer lines and buildings that new homes and businesses need. At the end of 2025 Middlesex Centre's long-term debt was $13,740,386. The 2026 budget book lists fourteen water and wastewater projects to be paid for by new borrowing from 2029 to 2031, totalling $88,013,436, of which $71,661,869 is the share development charges are meant to cover. It says the interest on this borrowing would be $30,304,272 over 20 years, and that the debt payment limit used would rise to 19.95% of own-source revenue. The Municipality has explained why the development charge fund goes negative: projects are built before the charges are collected. It says the fund was negative until the end of 2024 and returned to a positive balance in 2025 because many projects were deferred as growth declined, and warns that larger projects will bring significant negative balances and borrowing.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$1,122,080budgeted for servicing cost expenses in 2026, against $175,800 in the 2025 budget
The 2026 budget book lists "Servicing Cost Expenses" of $1,122,080, up from $175,800 in the 2025 budget and $172,600 in the 2024 budget. Its notes say the increase "stems from anticipated legal costs" to be covered by the Legal Reserve Fund. The department page lists "Ongoing legal costs related to planning and development" as a trend. The Legal Reserve Fund is forecast to fall from $1,294,331 (2025) to $313,746 (2026), a fall of $980,585 (worked out by us). Separately, the 2025 financial statements say the Municipality is working with a developer on a cost-sharing agreement for services, where actual costs have not been documented and "may vary significantly" from staff estimates. The documents we read do not say whether the two are connected, or what the legal matters are.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$2,197,384long-term loan approved after year end 2025 under the Community Improvement Plan
The 2025 statements report a subsequent event: after the year end, the Municipality approved, subject to certain terms, a long-term loan of $2,197,384 under its Community Improvement Plan (CIP). The note says the plan was created to encourage private construction of facilities that improve recreation, that the loans are backed by security or guarantees, and that they will be repaid over no more than 15 years at the Infrastructure Ontario rate. The 2026 budget book says CIP grants issued in 2025 were worth $16,218. The documents we read do not say who the loan is for, what is being built, or when Council approved it.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
5.71%increase in the 2026 municipal tax rate (4.27% in 2025)
The 2026 budget raises the municipal tax rate by 5.71% (4.27% in 2025). The amount raised from property taxes, the levy, rises 7.48% (6.11% in 2025). Staff say the budget is balanced but needed $48,250 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund to get there, and say using reserves this way is neither recommended nor a lasting fix. The Municipality's own reasons for the rise are about $1,000,000 a year moved to reserve funds for infrastructure, pay and benefit changes, and higher OPP policing costs. For an average home assessed at $400,000, it says municipal property tax goes up by $159 and, with water, wastewater and stormwater fees, the total change is $262.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$8,054,557actual 2025 expenditures above budget in the statements (worked out by us)
Amortization is the yearly charge for the wearing out of roads, buildings and other assets. In the 2025 statements, budgeted expenditures were $29,834,567 and actual expenditures were $37,889,124, a gap of $8,054,557 (worked out by us). Amortization actually charged was $9,314,002, and the statement of change in net financial assets shows no amount for it in the budget column. Transportation services shows $6,121,227 budgeted against $10,765,978 actual. Note 11 says only that the approved operating budget is what appears on the statement. So most of the gap looks like a difference in what is counted, not overspending, but the statements do not say so.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
December 17, 2025date the 2026 budget was deemed adopted, per the budget book
The Province gave Middlesex Centre Strong Mayor Powers in 2025. Under them the mayor presents the budget, and council can amend it and the mayor can veto changes within set time limits. The 2026 budget book says the proposed budget "was deemed adopted by Council as of December 17, 2025" and that the mayor and council "agreed to shortened amendment and veto timelines" through written direction from the mayor and a council resolution in July 2025. The Municipality's Budget 2027 page says instead that "Council approved the 2026 Budget at their meeting on December 17, 2025". The documents we read do not show a recorded vote.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$41,268,385forecast total of all reserve funds in 2030, down from $71,479,027 in 2024
A reserve fund is money set aside for a named purpose, such as replacing roads or vehicles. The 2026 budget book forecasts the total of all reserve funds falling from $71,479,027 (2024 actual) to $41,268,385 in 2030, a drop of $30,210,642 (worked out by us). In the same forecast, the Stormwater Capital reserve fund goes to $(3,714,604) in 2027, the General Vehicles & Equipment fund to $(3,107,901) in 2030 and the new Growth Reserve Fund to $(6,033,641) in 2030. The Municipality explains that a negative fund is borrowing from the funds that are positive, and says it is not meeting its own target balances for several funds. It also says reserves have grown by $65 million since 2015.
Why it matters
Reserves are what pay for big repairs and growth without borrowing or sharp tax jumps. A forecast that spends them down tells residents that the plan depends on later tax or fee increases, borrowing, or projects being delayed. The Municipality has published this openly, which is why it is a watch item and not an ask.
It could be because…
Reserves exist to be spent. Building the planned water, wastewater and road projects would draw them down on purpose.
The forecast is staff's best estimate, and the book says balances are hard to predict because of project timing and interest rates.
Negative balances are an internal loan between funds under the Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy, with interest charged, not unpaid bills.
Questions you could ask
Which projects in the five-year plan cause each reserve fund to go negative, and what will repay them?
If the target balances are not met and the funds fall as forecast, what tax and fee increases does the long-range plan need each year?
Why do the 2025 statements show reserve funds of $71,749,967 when the budget book projected $69,238,672 for 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
"In the forecast below, where a particular reserve fund has a negative balance, it means that the reserve fund is borrowing against the sum of the positive reserve funds." It adds: "Currently, the municipality is not achieving these targets for many reserve funds, such as Roads Capital Reserve Fund, Buildings and Facilities Reserve Fund and Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund."
"This disciplined approach has strengthened the Municipality's financial position, as evidenced by a $65 million increase in reserve funds since 2015."
Note 10, Accumulated surplus: "Reserve funds set aside for specific purpose" 71,749,967 (2024 68,300,944); "Reserves set aside for specific purpose" 2,088,979.
$88,013,436planned new borrowing for 14 projects, 2029 to 2031, of which $71,661,869 is development charge share
Development charges are fees collected from developers to pay for the roads, water and sewer lines and buildings that new homes and businesses need. At the end of 2025 Middlesex Centre's long-term debt was $13,740,386. The 2026 budget book lists fourteen water and wastewater projects to be paid for by new borrowing from 2029 to 2031, totalling $88,013,436, of which $71,661,869 is the share development charges are meant to cover. It says the interest on this borrowing would be $30,304,272 over 20 years, and that the debt payment limit used would rise to 19.95% of own-source revenue. The Municipality has explained why the development charge fund goes negative: projects are built before the charges are collected. It says the fund was negative until the end of 2024 and returned to a positive balance in 2025 because many projects were deferred as growth declined, and warns that larger projects will bring significant negative balances and borrowing.
Why it matters
If growth is slower than hoped, the charges that were meant to repay this debt arrive late or not at all, and the gap is covered by water and wastewater fees or by tax. The Municipality has been open about this risk, so this is a question about the plan, not a finding of fault.
It could be because…
Borrowing against future charges is how growth projects are normally built, and the Development Charges Act allows it.
The projects may be delayed again if growth stays slow, which would reduce or move the borrowing. The book says staff reviewed the project schedule for this reason.
The 19.95% figure is calculated using the 2023 Financial Information Return, and the book says it will be lower when later revenue is counted.
Questions you could ask
What happens to the repayments if development charges for these 14 projects come in well below the $71,661,869 planned?
Which of the 14 projects can be deferred again without stopping homes and businesses from being approved?
How was the 19.95% debt payment share worked out, and what is it if the borrowing is issued at a rate above 3%?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Table, Proposed Borrowing, 2029 to 2031: borrowing proposed (DC portion) 71,661,869; (user rate portion) 16,351,567; total borrowing proposed 88,013,436; proposed debt payment at 3% interest rate 5,915,885.40. Largest line: "28-4801 - Komoka WWTP Expansion Phase 1" 24,057,415.
"Currently, fourteen projects have been identified for debt borrowing, with the initiation of borrowing scheduled to begin in 2029." Also: "Total interest paid on the debt borrowings proposed is $30,304,272 over the 20-year period." The debt payment share of own-source revenue rises to "19.95% based on the December 17, 2025, ARL calculation".
"Over the past five years, projects have been occurring earlier than the funding is coming in, which resulted in a negative balance up to the end of 2024 for the Development Charge Reserve Fund." It says deferrals "have helped return the Municipality to a positive DC reserve fund balance for the end of 2025", but "larger DC-funded projects are anticipated in future years, which will lead to significant negative balances and will require debt borrowings to manage."
Note 8, Deferred revenue, obligatory reserve funds: "Development charges" $449,563 (2024 $(754,159)). Note 9, Long-term debt: total $13,740,386 (2024 $14,955,293). Note 8 adds: "The Municipality has borrowed money from future development charges to fund certain qualifying capital assets in advance of receiving the development charges as allowed under the DCA".
$1,122,080budgeted for servicing cost expenses in 2026, against $175,800 in the 2025 budget
The 2026 budget book lists "Servicing Cost Expenses" of $1,122,080, up from $175,800 in the 2025 budget and $172,600 in the 2024 budget. Its notes say the increase "stems from anticipated legal costs" to be covered by the Legal Reserve Fund. The department page lists "Ongoing legal costs related to planning and development" as a trend. The Legal Reserve Fund is forecast to fall from $1,294,331 (2025) to $313,746 (2026), a fall of $980,585 (worked out by us). Separately, the 2025 financial statements say the Municipality is working with a developer on a cost-sharing agreement for services, where actual costs have not been documented and "may vary significantly" from staff estimates. The documents we read do not say whether the two are connected, or what the legal matters are.
Why it matters
Nearly a million dollars of legal cost in one year is large for a municipality of this size. It is paid from a reserve rather than tax this year, but it still comes from money residents have set aside. The Municipality has given a reason in the budget (planning and development), but not who the dispute is with or what it is about.
It could be because…
Councils normally keep a legal reserve for exactly this, and the book describes the fund's purpose as covering "annual fluctuations in cost of legal invoices and claims".
The legal work may be a planning appeal or development dispute where the Municipality is defending its decisions, which can be expensive whatever the outcome.
The sum is a budget for anticipated costs, not money already spent, and may not be spent in full.
Questions you could ask
What legal matters make up the $1,122,080, and how much has been spent so far in 2026?
Is the legal work connected to the developer cost-sharing agreement in Note 13(b)?
If legal costs run past the $980,585 the reserve fund drops by, what pays the rest?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Servicing Cost Expenses 1,121,080, budgeted increase 537.7%, long-range plan forecast 4.0%: "The large increase in 2026 stems from anticipated legal costs which will be covered by the Legal Reserve Fund."
Note 13(b), Development agreement, contingent liability: "The Municipality is currently working with a developer on a cost sharing agreement for services required for the development to be completed." It adds that the Municipality "has not received documentation of actual costs which may vary significantly from these estimates."
$2,197,384long-term loan approved after year end 2025 under the Community Improvement Plan
The 2025 statements report a subsequent event: after the year end, the Municipality approved, subject to certain terms, a long-term loan of $2,197,384 under its Community Improvement Plan (CIP). The note says the plan was created to encourage private construction of facilities that improve recreation, that the loans are backed by security or guarantees, and that they will be repaid over no more than 15 years at the Infrastructure Ontario rate. The 2026 budget book says CIP grants issued in 2025 were worth $16,218. The documents we read do not say who the loan is for, what is being built, or when Council approved it.
Why it matters
A loan of this size to a private builder is a very different scale from the plan's usual grants, and it uses public money and the Municipality's borrowing room. Residents can reasonably ask how repayment is protected and who decides.
It could be because…
A loan is repaid with interest, unlike a grant, so the scale of the loan does not mean $2,197,384 is given away.
The loan is described as backed by security or guarantees, which could protect taxpayers if the borrower cannot pay.
The facility may serve the public, since the note says the plan is for facilities that "enhance recreational uses for the residents".
Questions you could ask
Who is the loan to, what will it pay for, and on what date did Council approve it?
What security backs the loan, and does the Municipality's debt payment limit count it?
Does Council have a limit on how much it will lend under the Community Improvement Plan, and was this loan within it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 18, Subsequent event: "the Municipality approved, subject to certain terms, a long-term loan of $2,197,384 under the Middlesex Centre Community Improvement Plan (CIP)." "The loans are backed by security and/or guarantees. The loans will be repaid over a term of no longer than 15 years and will bear interest at the Infrastructure Ontario borrowing rate at the time of the loan approval."
By the Numbers: "Value of Council Grants Issued: $19,865 (2025)"; "Value of Community Improvement Plan Grants Issued: $16,218 (2025)"; "Total Value of Projects Supported by Community Improvement Plan Grants (grant plus company investment): $33,395 (2025)".
5.71%increase in the 2026 municipal tax rate (4.27% in 2025)
The 2026 budget raises the municipal tax rate by 5.71% (4.27% in 2025). The amount raised from property taxes, the levy, rises 7.48% (6.11% in 2025). Staff say the budget is balanced but needed $48,250 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund to get there, and say using reserves this way is neither recommended nor a lasting fix. The Municipality's own reasons for the rise are about $1,000,000 a year moved to reserve funds for infrastructure, pay and benefit changes, and higher OPP policing costs. For an average home assessed at $400,000, it says municipal property tax goes up by $159 and, with water, wastewater and stormwater fees, the total change is $262.
Why it matters
The Municipality has given its reasons and been open about the use of the reserve, so this is a note. The question residents may have is how long increases of this size will last, since the plan relies on regular increases to close the gap in infrastructure funding.
It could be because…
Putting more into reserves is the plan's stated way to close the infrastructure gap, so part of the rise is saving, not spending.
The levy rises faster than the rate because the budget adds new homes to the tax base; the book gives both numbers.
The $48,250 is a small amount next to the $20,338,321 being moved into reserves.
Questions you could ask
What tax-rate increase per year does the long-range plan need to close the infrastructure gap, and for how many years?
Why was a reserve draw needed to balance the 2026 operating budget when $20,338,321 is moved into reserves?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Additional factors driving operating budget expenses include a dedicated annual amount of approximately $1,000,000 transferred to reserve funds for infrastructure, changes to salaries and benefits, and an increase in OPP costs." 2026 Transfers to Reserve Funds = $20,338,321 (2025: $18,126,573).
Net operating budget increase $1,927,179, tax levy increase 7.48% (2025: 6.11%), "2026 Tax Rate Increase = 5.71%" (2025: 4.27%). "The 2026 budget is balanced, however, to accomplish this staff recommended using $48,250 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund. Using reserve funds to balance the operating budget is neither recommended nor is it a continuous solution to balance the budget."
Implications for an average residential property assessed at $400,000: change in municipal property tax $159; change in water, wastewater and stormwater fees $103; total change $262.
$8,054,557actual 2025 expenditures above budget in the statements (worked out by us)
Amortization is the yearly charge for the wearing out of roads, buildings and other assets. In the 2025 statements, budgeted expenditures were $29,834,567 and actual expenditures were $37,889,124, a gap of $8,054,557 (worked out by us). Amortization actually charged was $9,314,002, and the statement of change in net financial assets shows no amount for it in the budget column. Transportation services shows $6,121,227 budgeted against $10,765,978 actual. Note 11 says only that the approved operating budget is what appears on the statement. So most of the gap looks like a difference in what is counted, not overspending, but the statements do not say so.
Why it matters
Someone reading the statements alone would think spending ran far over budget. The Municipality has not explained the basis in the notes we read, so residents cannot easily compare budget to actual.
It could be because…
The budget may have been prepared on a cash basis, which leaves out amortization, while the audited statements must include it. The notes do not say.
Amortization of $9,314,002 is larger than the whole gap, so other lines may have come in under budget.
Questions you could ask
Does the budget column in the statements leave out amortization and transfers to and from reserves, and could a note say so?
Can the Municipality publish a yearly budget-to-actual report on the same basis as the budget Council votes on?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2025 expenditures: budget total 29,834,567; actual total 37,889,124 (2024 actual 40,181,979). "Transportation services" budget 6,121,227, actual 10,765,978. "Excess of revenue over expenditures" budget 18,902,038, actual 15,148,184.
December 17, 2025date the 2026 budget was deemed adopted, per the budget book
The Province gave Middlesex Centre Strong Mayor Powers in 2025. Under them the mayor presents the budget, and council can amend it and the mayor can veto changes within set time limits. The 2026 budget book says the proposed budget "was deemed adopted by Council as of December 17, 2025" and that the mayor and council "agreed to shortened amendment and veto timelines" through written direction from the mayor and a council resolution in July 2025. The Municipality's Budget 2027 page says instead that "Council approved the 2026 Budget at their meeting on December 17, 2025". The documents we read do not show a recorded vote.
Why it matters
Voting in public on the budget is how residents see where each councillor stands. Under the Strong Mayor rules a budget can take effect without a vote, so a recorded vote, if there was one, is the only way to see how members decided.
It could be because…
A council may meet on the deadline day and vote even though the law would deem the budget adopted anyway; the Budget 2027 page suggests this happened.
The book's wording may reflect the legal rule, while the website describes what happened at the meeting.
Questions you could ask
Was there a recorded council vote on the 2026 budget on December 17, 2025, and where are the minutes?
Where are the mayor's written direction and the July 2025 council resolution on the shortened timelines posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Middlesex Centre?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"The proposed budget was deemed adopted by Council as of December 17, 2025." The draft budget was presented to Council at its "November 13, 2025" meeting.
"In 2025, Middlesex Centre was granted Strong Mayor Powers by the Province of Ontario". "Under this framework, the mayor is responsible for presenting the budget, which must be submitted by February 1." "the mayor and council agreed to shortened amendment and veto timelines. These changes were formalized through written direction from the mayor and a Council resolution in July 2025."
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy