Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read North Algona-Wilberforce's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 9 so far
Things worth asking about
We read North Algona-Wilberforce's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 28 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2025, North Algona-Wilberforce collected $413K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 11% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 2 of 28 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$726,015planned to come out of reserves in 2025; $157,012 went in instead
Reserves are money the Township sets aside for later, such as new roads. The audited statements include a schedule that compares the budget with what happened. For 2025 the budget planned a deficit of $310,000, to be covered by taking $726,015 out of reserves. The result was a surplus of $215,070, and $157,012 went into reserves instead. The 2024 budget did the same thing: it planned a deficit of $813,419, covered by $518,002 from reserves, and the year ended with a surplus of $123,747 and $221,730 put into reserves. The reserves ended 2025 at $6,101,271, up from $5,893,356.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$877,357estimated landfill closure and care cost at the end of 2025, up from $625,307
Closing and looking after old landfill sites is a cost the law requires. The Township's estimate of that cost, called the asset retirement obligation, rose from $625,307 to $877,357, an increase of $252,050 (worked out by us). The main line, "Landfill closure and post closure costs", went from $645,286 to $844,602 (up $199,316, worked out by us), and a further $32,755 was added as the cost was moved forward in time. The cash flow statement shows $219,295 of the change as a non-cash addition to the Township's assets. The Township has set aside investments of $349,800 for this, so about $527,557 is not covered (worked out by us). The statements show it as "unfunded".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
2024the last year with a posted budget by-law that we found
The Township posts its audited statements, but most of what lets residents follow council's decisions is missing or cannot be read. The by-laws page lists a by-law and budget for 2024, then only a "2025 Budget Presentation" and a "2026 Budget Presentation". The 2024 budget and the 2025 presentation have no readable text (they are scans). The 2026 presentation is a slide deck whose first slide is marked "Draft #2 Presented January 7 2026". We did not find a by-law adopting the 2025 or 2026 budget. The council page has a heading for agendas and minutes but shows only year buttons for archived minutes (2016 to 2020). We found no minutes files behind them, and none for any later meeting. The council pay statements for 2020 to 2023 are scans, and the 2024 statement is a report whose table we could not read. We did not find a 2025 statement. We therefore have not published any council pay.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$2,653,059 or $3,073,059the 2025 road budget, depending on which page of the audit you read
The 2025 statements show the 2025 budget twice. In the main statement of operations the budget for roads ("Transportation services") is $2,653,059 and total expenses are $5,813,173. In the schedule near the back the road budget is $3,073,059 and total expenses are $6,076,478. Recreation is $247,209 in one and $368,466 in the other. The planned result also differs: a surplus of $162,415 in one, a deficit of $310,000 in the other. The road and recreation actuals match in both, but the actual totals differ too. We worked out the road gap as $420,000 (worked out by us). The note on budget figures says the budget was reclassified to meet public-sector reporting rules and that reserve activity is not budgeted except where it touches operations or capital.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$950difference in both 2024 revenue and 2024 expenses between the 2024 and 2025 statements (worked out by us)
The 2024 audited statements print 2024 revenue of $5,883,628 and expenses of $5,654,780. The 2025 statements print different 2024 figures in their main statement of operations: revenue of $5,884,578 and expenses of $5,655,730. Each is $950 higher (worked out by us), so the 2024 surplus of $228,848 is the same in both. Inside the 2025 statements the notes still show the older 2024 revenue total of $5,883,628. Money has also moved between lines: transfers from Ontario are $1,034,358 in the 2024 statements and $1,022,420 in the 2025 ones, and transfers from Canada are $118,413 and $130,351, a move of $11,938 (worked out by us). The 2025 statements do not say the 2024 figures were restated.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$969,138more in reserves than cash and investments at the end of 2025 (worked out by us)
At the end of 2025 the Township held cash of $4,140,067 and investments of $992,066, together $5,132,133 (worked out by us). Its reserves were $6,101,271, which is $969,138 more (worked out by us). A year earlier cash and investments were $4,492,103 and reserves were $5,893,356, a gap of $1,401,253 (both worked out by us). The Township also had $624,764 in taxes still to be collected and $515,704 owed to it in other accounts. The notes say reserves are "internally restricted".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$960,677reserve named for the Ottawa Valley Waste Management Board, end of 2025
The Township owns a share (8.38%) of a joint waste board. Its audited statements already count its share of the board's assets: $137,658 of net financial assets and $1,471,458 of accumulated surplus. Separately, the Township's own reserve list has a line named after the board of $960,677, up from $909,774. The board ran a deficiency of revenue over expenses of $(764,439) in 2025, of which the Township's share is $(82,238). The statements do not say what the reserve is for.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$112,614paid into the OMERS pension plan in 2025, against $76,787 in 2024
The Township pays into the OMERS pension plan for its staff. The audited notes say it contributed $112,614 in 2025 and $76,787 in 2024, an increase of $35,827 or about 47% (worked out by us). The notes do not say why. This is a total for all staff in the plan.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
In 2025, North Algona-Wilberforce collected $413K more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 11% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 2 of 28 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Why did North Algona-Wilberforce's property tax go up 11% in 2025?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$5.0M
$4.1M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$3.0M
2020
$3.1M
2021
$3.3M
2022
$3.4M
2023
$3.5M
2024
$3.7M
2025
$4.1M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $213 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $3,670,950 in 2024, $4,083,560 in 2025.
$726,015planned to come out of reserves in 2025; $157,012 went in instead
Reserves are money the Township sets aside for later, such as new roads. The audited statements include a schedule that compares the budget with what happened. For 2025 the budget planned a deficit of $310,000, to be covered by taking $726,015 out of reserves. The result was a surplus of $215,070, and $157,012 went into reserves instead. The 2024 budget did the same thing: it planned a deficit of $813,419, covered by $518,002 from reserves, and the year ended with a surplus of $123,747 and $221,730 put into reserves. The reserves ended 2025 at $6,101,271, up from $5,893,356.
Why it matters
A budget is the promise made to taxpayers about what the year will cost and where the money will come from. When two years in a row end well on the safe side of the plan, taxpayers may have been asked for more than was needed, or the budget may be planning projects that do not happen on time. Either way, residents cannot tell from the budget how much of the plan is real.
It could be because…
Road and building projects are often planned for one year and finished in the next, so the money stays in reserves until the work is done.
A grant or other income arrived that the budget did not count on.
The Township may budget on the careful side on purpose, so a surplus is a cushion rather than a mistake.
In this schedule a positive figure on the "Transfer from (to) reserves" line means money taken out and a figure in brackets means money put in. We have read it that way because the schedule's own totals only add up that way.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $726,015 planned for 2025 was for projects that were not finished, and will that work be paid for in 2026?
Does Council see the budget's planned reserve draw before it adopts the budget, and is the schedule above reported to Council during the year?
Why was the reserve draw not lower in the 2025 budget, given what happened in 2024?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule of General Operations, 2025: "Transfer from (to) reserves" budget $ 726,015, actual $ (157,012), 2024 actual $ (221,730). "Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses" budget $ (310,000), actual $ 215,070, 2024 actual $ 123,747.
Schedule of General Operations, 2024: "Transfer from (to) reserves" budget $ 518,002, actual $ (221,730), 2023 actual $ (518,627). "Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses" budget $ (813,419), actual $ 123,747.
$877,357estimated landfill closure and care cost at the end of 2025, up from $625,307
Closing and looking after old landfill sites is a cost the law requires. The Township's estimate of that cost, called the asset retirement obligation, rose from $625,307 to $877,357, an increase of $252,050 (worked out by us). The main line, "Landfill closure and post closure costs", went from $645,286 to $844,602 (up $199,316, worked out by us), and a further $32,755 was added as the cost was moved forward in time. The cash flow statement shows $219,295 of the change as a non-cash addition to the Township's assets. The Township has set aside investments of $349,800 for this, so about $527,557 is not covered (worked out by us). The statements show it as "unfunded".
Why it matters
This is a bill that will come due whether or not anyone budgets for it. A larger estimate means either a bigger tax or reserve need in the years ahead, or less money for roads and other services.
It could be because…
The estimate is updated every year from new engineering advice, inflation and interest rates, so a jump can come from a better estimate and not from new cost.
The statements say the costs are discounted at 3.74% and 5.00% with inflation of 2.1%; a change in those assumptions moves the total.
The Township holds a separate $447,331 in an "Environment" reserve, which may be meant partly for this.
Questions you could ask
What new estimate or study raised the 2025 landfill figure?
Is there a plan, with yearly amounts, to fund the $877,357, and is any of the Environment reserve meant for it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Financial Position: "Asset retirement obligation (Note 6)" $ 877,357 (2024 $ 625,307). Accumulated surplus shown as "Unfunded - landfill closure and post closure costs (Note 3)" $ (877,357) (2024 $ (625,307)).
Note 6: "Landfill closure and post closure costs" $ 844,602 (2024 $ 645,286); "Accretion of asset retirement obligation" 32,755 (2024 (19,979)); total $ 877,357 (2024 $ 625,307). "The Township has set aside investments of $ 349,800 (2024 - $ 310,047) for either closure or post closure activities." Costs are discounted at 3.74% and 5.00% with annual inflation of 2.1%.
2024the last year with a posted budget by-law that we found
The Township posts its audited statements, but most of what lets residents follow council's decisions is missing or cannot be read. The by-laws page lists a by-law and budget for 2024, then only a "2025 Budget Presentation" and a "2026 Budget Presentation". The 2024 budget and the 2025 presentation have no readable text (they are scans). The 2026 presentation is a slide deck whose first slide is marked "Draft #2 Presented January 7 2026". We did not find a by-law adopting the 2025 or 2026 budget. The council page has a heading for agendas and minutes but shows only year buttons for archived minutes (2016 to 2020). We found no minutes files behind them, and none for any later meeting. The council pay statements for 2020 to 2023 are scans, and the 2024 statement is a report whose table we could not read. We did not find a 2025 statement. We therefore have not published any council pay.
Why it matters
A budget is the main public decision of the year, and minutes are the record of every other one. If residents cannot read the approved budget, the minutes or the pay report, they cannot check what was decided before the October 26, 2026 election.
It could be because…
Minutes and adopted budgets may be posted somewhere we did not look, such as the Township's YouTube channel, a notice board or on request from the office.
A small township may only have one staff member to post documents.
Scanned pages are common in small townships, and the Township may not have known they cannot be read by machines or screen readers.
Questions you could ask
Where are the adopted 2025 and 2026 budgets and the by-laws that adopted them?
Where are the minutes for 2021 to 2026?
Can the pay and expenses statements for 2020 to 2025 be posted as readable text before the election?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
By-laws and Documents page lists: "By-law 2024-12 Adopt Municipal Budget Estimates", "By-law 2024-12 Schedule A – Budget", "2025 Budget Presentation" and "2026 Budget Presentation". Remuneration statements are listed as "2019 – Remuneration statement", "2020 – Remuneration Statement", "2021 – Remuneration Statement", "2022 – Renumeration Statement", "2023 – Renumeration Statement" and "2024 – Remuneration Statement". The audited statements listed run from "2018 Financial statements" to "2025 Financial statements". We did not see a 2025 or 2026 budget by-law or a 2025 remuneration statement listed.
By-laws and Documents page · Whole page, sections for budgets, remuneration statements and financial statements
Council page: heading "Council Meeting Agenda’s and Minutes" followed by "Archived Meeting Minutes" with buttons for the years 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016; the buttons link nowhere on the page itself. The page also says: "Regular Council meetings can be viewed on" a link to the Township's YouTube channel.
$2,653,059 or $3,073,059the 2025 road budget, depending on which page of the audit you read
The 2025 statements show the 2025 budget twice. In the main statement of operations the budget for roads ("Transportation services") is $2,653,059 and total expenses are $5,813,173. In the schedule near the back the road budget is $3,073,059 and total expenses are $6,076,478. Recreation is $247,209 in one and $368,466 in the other. The planned result also differs: a surplus of $162,415 in one, a deficit of $310,000 in the other. The road and recreation actuals match in both, but the actual totals differ too. We worked out the road gap as $420,000 (worked out by us). The note on budget figures says the budget was reclassified to meet public-sector reporting rules and that reserve activity is not budgeted except where it touches operations or capital.
Why it matters
Anyone comparing the budget with what was spent needs to know which budget is meant. Depending on the page, roads cost either $237,097 more than the budget or $182,903 less (both worked out by us). Amortization (the yearly wearing-out of assets, which is a bookkeeping cost and not cash spent) is part of the audited actuals, and these pages do not show how the budgets treat it line by line, so we cannot say from them that any line was overspent.
It could be because…
The Township explains that the budget was reclassified to meet public-sector accounting rules. The two budgets may treat amortization and capital items differently; the pages do not say how.
Council may have adopted one budget on a cash basis and the auditors rebuilt it on an accounting basis for the statements.
The statement's total budget for amortization is the same as the actual ($1,572,075 in both columns), so amortization alone does not explain the total gap, but we cannot see how it was spread across roads and recreation.
Questions you could ask
Which of the two 2025 budgets is the one Council adopted?
Can the Township publish a one-page bridge from the adopted budget to each of the two budget columns in the audit?
How was the budgeted amortization of $1,572,075 spread across roads, recreation and the other services?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations, 2025 budget and actual: "Transportation services" budget 2,653,059, actual 2,890,156. "Recreation services" budget 247,209, actual 339,928. Total expenses budget $ 5,813,173, actual $ 6,071,948. "Excess of revenue over expenses" budget $ 162,415, actual $ 132,832.
Schedule of General Operations, 2025 budget and actual: "Transportation services" budget 3,073,059, actual 2,890,156. "Recreation services" budget 368,466, actual 339,928. Total expenses budget $ 6,076,478, actual $ 5,651,750. "Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses" budget $ (310,000), actual $ 215,070.
Note 8, Budget figures: "Budget figures have been reclassified for the purpose of these financial statements to comply with PSAB reporting requirements." The note also says the Township "does not budget activity within reserves and reserve funds, with the exception being those transactions which affect either operations or capital investments."
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets, 2025: "Amortization of tangible capital assets" budget 1,572,075, actual 1,572,075 (2024 actual 1,502,817).
$950difference in both 2024 revenue and 2024 expenses between the 2024 and 2025 statements (worked out by us)
The 2024 audited statements print 2024 revenue of $5,883,628 and expenses of $5,654,780. The 2025 statements print different 2024 figures in their main statement of operations: revenue of $5,884,578 and expenses of $5,655,730. Each is $950 higher (worked out by us), so the 2024 surplus of $228,848 is the same in both. Inside the 2025 statements the notes still show the older 2024 revenue total of $5,883,628. Money has also moved between lines: transfers from Ontario are $1,034,358 in the 2024 statements and $1,022,420 in the 2025 ones, and transfers from Canada are $118,413 and $130,351, a move of $11,938 (worked out by us). The 2025 statements do not say the 2024 figures were restated.
Why it matters
Last year's numbers should not change without an explanation. The amounts are small, but a statement that disagrees with itself makes every comparison harder to trust.
It could be because…
The auditors may have moved a few items between lines and corrected the main statement but not the notes.
A typing or linking slip in the 2025 file is possible; the surplus is unchanged.
A federal grant may have first been counted as Ontario money and later corrected.
Questions you could ask
Were the 2024 figures restated in the 2025 statements, and if so why is it not said?
Will the Township post a corrected copy so the main statement and the notes agree?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Operations, 2024 actual: total revenue $ 5,883,628 ("Ontario" 1,034,358; "Canada" 118,413; "Other" 1,059,907); total expenses $ 5,654,780 ("Transportation services" 2,571,086); "Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses" $ 228,848.
Statement of Operations, 2024 actual column as printed in the 2025 statements: total revenue $ 5,884,578 ("Ontario" 1,022,420; "Canada" 130,351; "Other" 1,060,857); total expenses $ 5,655,730 ("Transportation services" 2,572,036); "Excess of revenue over expenses" $ 228,848.
Note 16(e), revenues for 2024, in the 2025 statements: total $ 5,883,628 (Ontario transfers 1,034,358; Canada transfers 118,413). Note 16(c), expenses for 2024: total $ 5,654,780.
$969,138more in reserves than cash and investments at the end of 2025 (worked out by us)
At the end of 2025 the Township held cash of $4,140,067 and investments of $992,066, together $5,132,133 (worked out by us). Its reserves were $6,101,271, which is $969,138 more (worked out by us). A year earlier cash and investments were $4,492,103 and reserves were $5,893,356, a gap of $1,401,253 (both worked out by us). The Township also had $624,764 in taxes still to be collected and $515,704 owed to it in other accounts. The notes say reserves are "internally restricted".
Why it matters
People often read "reserves" as money in the bank. Here the reserves are a promise on paper, and some of the money behind them is still owed to the Township. Residents should know how much of what is set aside could be spent today.
It could be because…
Reserves are bookkeeping labels on part of the Township's surplus, not separate bank accounts. Taxes and other amounts owed to the Township will turn into cash.
Part of the surplus is tied up in roads, buildings and equipment, which cannot be spent.
The gap fell between 2024 and 2025, so cash may be catching up.
Questions you could ask
How much of the reserve balance is backed by cash or investments that could be spent if Council approved it?
Does the Township publish a list of what each reserve is for and its target size?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of Financial Position, December 31, 2025 (2024 in brackets): "Cash and cash equivalents" $ 4,140,067 ($ 3,566,806); "Taxes receivable" 624,764 (775,092); "Accounts receivable" 515,704 (911,566); "Investments (Note 13)" 992,066 (925,297); "Reserves and reserve funds (Note 15)" 6,101,271 (5,893,356).
$960,677reserve named for the Ottawa Valley Waste Management Board, end of 2025
The Township owns a share (8.38%) of a joint waste board. Its audited statements already count its share of the board's assets: $137,658 of net financial assets and $1,471,458 of accumulated surplus. Separately, the Township's own reserve list has a line named after the board of $960,677, up from $909,774. The board ran a deficiency of revenue over expenses of $(764,439) in 2025, of which the Township's share is $(82,238). The statements do not say what the reserve is for.
Why it matters
It is the second largest reserve the Township has, after roads, and the only one named for another body. Residents cannot tell whether it is for waste costs, for the board's debts or something else.
It could be because…
The reserve may hold money the Township has set aside to pay for its future share of waste hauling and landfill costs.
It may be an earlier share of the board's surplus that the Township chose to keep as a reserve.
The board's own deficiency in 2025 may be a reason to hold the money.
Questions you could ask
What is the $960,677 reserve for, and what rule says when it can be spent?
Why has it grown in a year when the board ran a deficiency?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule of Reserves and Reserve Funds: "Ottawa Valley Waste Management Board" $ 960,677 (2024 $ 909,774). "Roads" 2,902,511 (2024 2,927,244).
$112,614paid into the OMERS pension plan in 2025, against $76,787 in 2024
The Township pays into the OMERS pension plan for its staff. The audited notes say it contributed $112,614 in 2025 and $76,787 in 2024, an increase of $35,827 or about 47% (worked out by us). The notes do not say why. This is a total for all staff in the plan.
Why it matters
Pension payments follow pay and the number of staff. A jump this size may point to growth in payroll that the budget did not show.
It could be because…
More staff may have joined the plan, or staff may have moved to full job rates.
OMERS contribution rates change from year to year.
Back payments for earlier years may have been made in 2025.
Questions you could ask
What caused the rise in the 2025 OMERS contribution: more staff, higher rates or back payments?
Is a similar level planned for 2026?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Algona-Wilberforce?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 17, Pension contributions: "During the year ended 31 December 2025, the Municipality contributed $ 112,614 (2024 - $ 76,787) to the plan".
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy