Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read North Perth's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read North Perth's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 41 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
North Perth spent $2.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $5.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
North Perth spent $3.6M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $11.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$1the price United Housing paid in 2025 for a complex the Municipality bought for $5,297,241 in 2011
Perth Meadows is a seniors' complex of 18 town homes and 36 suites, on Nelson Avenue South in Listowel. The Municipality bought its assets in November 2011 for $5,297,241 and has run it since. In 2025 it transferred the property, the land and the running of it to United Housing, a not-for-profit housing provider, for $1. The audited statements say the Municipality also handed over $4,948,067 in cash and deposit balances and passed on $6,806,115 owed to residents (life lease deposits and deferred revenue), and recorded a loss of $4,948,712. The Municipality has explained why: it says it looked for a not-for-profit partner to run the complex, and kept a right to buy it back for $2 if the property stops being used as attainable seniors' housing. We did not find the price decision, a valuation or the transfer agreement in the documents we read.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$(556,082)building-code reserve at December 31, 2025, down from $84,227 at the end of 2023
A reserve is money set aside by Council for one purpose. Building permit fees are meant to pay for the building department, and the Municipality keeps a separate reserve for it. At the end of 2023 that reserve held $84,227. At the end of 2024 it was a deficit of $398,847, and at the end of 2025 a deficit of $556,082. The 2026 budget again plans to take $87,800 out of the reserve. The Municipality has explained part of this: it says Council is phasing in permit fee increases to "gradually rebuild a reasonable reserve fund" and that the department should break even once it reaches full staffing.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$(16.89) millionforecast balance of the development charge reserves in 2035, in the 2026 budget book
Development charges are fees builders pay when they build new homes, to cover roads, pipes and other growth costs. The 2026 budget book forecasts the total of the development charge reserves at $1.33 million at the end of 2026, then below zero from 2028 onward, ending at $(16.89) million in 2035. The area-specific reserve for one area (marked NEMP) is already forecast at $(5.04) million in 2026. The stormwater reserve, which pays for drainage, is forecast to go negative from 2028 and reach $(6.43) million. The book says "some experience cash flow pressures that require funding from external sources" and that these projects will be re-checked in future budgets. The ten-year capital plan totals $150.00 million, and the budget plans $15.20 million of it from debentures (borrowing).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
September 9, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2023 statements (about 20 months after year end, worked out by us)
Audited financial statements are the yearly report card on a town's finances, checked by an outside auditor. The auditor's reports on the statements now posted by the Municipality are dated September 9, 2025 for the year ended December 31, 2023, December 3, 2025 for 2024, and August 14, 2026 for 2025. We worked out that this is about 20 months, 11 months and 7 and a half months after year end. All three give a clean opinion (the statements "present fairly"). We did not find an explanation for the delay in the documents we read.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
North Perth spent $3.4M on roads and snow in 2019 and $5.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 7 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
7.15%total 2026 tax increase after the April 2026 amendment, up from 6.61% adopted on December 2, 2025
The Mayor's 2026 budget was adopted on December 2, 2025 under the strong mayor rules, with a total increase of 6.61% (about $160 on a median home). In March 2026 the Treasurer reported that two outside bills had come in higher than budgeted: the Maitland Valley Conservation Authority levy and the Ontario Provincial Police contract. The amendment adopted in April 2026 raised the total increase to 7.15% ($173.82 on a median home) and added $118,025 to the levy. The Treasurer's report also says the Province's cap on the 2026 police bill defers part of the cost, so at least $325,182 more is expected in 2027. The Municipality has explained both changes in its own report.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$2,711,521rise in budgeted staffing costs for 2026 (13.9%)
The 2026 budget book says staffing costs across the Municipality rise from $19,442,578 to $22,154,099, up $2,711,521 or 13.9%. The same book says "No additional staff or new resources have been included in the 2026 budget." It gives reasons for the rise: pay increases tied to the cost of living, more hours for volunteer firefighters to reach a full crew of 70, step increases for positions added in 2025, and the opening of a new childcare centre. Grants are budgeted to rise by $1,449,307, which the book says relates mainly to the childcare centre.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
North Perth spent $2.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $5.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 178% in 6 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%+200%
+178%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+11%
+1%
2021
+21%
+4%
2022
+101%
+11%
2023
+101%
+16%
2024
+104%
+18%
2025
+178%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $3.6M a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $1.8M to $5.3M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $2.0M, 2020 $2.2M, 2021 $2.4M, 2022 $4.0M, 2023 $4.0M, 2024 $4.1M, 2025 $5.6M.
North Perth spent $3.6M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $11.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 222% in 6 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−100%+0%+100%+200%+300%
+222%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−22%
+1%
2021
−8%
+4%
2022
+6%
+11%
2023
+45%
+16%
2024
+68%
+18%
2025
+222%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $8.0M a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $1.5M to $4.0M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
North Perth spent about $3,448 per home on long-term debt in 2025. The typical similar town spent $1,119. Only 4 of 41 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: North Perth $3,448; typical similar town $1,119; ranked 5th highest of 42.
$1the price United Housing paid in 2025 for a complex the Municipality bought for $5,297,241 in 2011
Perth Meadows is a seniors' complex of 18 town homes and 36 suites, on Nelson Avenue South in Listowel. The Municipality bought its assets in November 2011 for $5,297,241 and has run it since. In 2025 it transferred the property, the land and the running of it to United Housing, a not-for-profit housing provider, for $1. The audited statements say the Municipality also handed over $4,948,067 in cash and deposit balances and passed on $6,806,115 owed to residents (life lease deposits and deferred revenue), and recorded a loss of $4,948,712. The Municipality has explained why: it says it looked for a not-for-profit partner to run the complex, and kept a right to buy it back for $2 if the property stops being used as attainable seniors' housing. We did not find the price decision, a valuation or the transfer agreement in the documents we read.
Why it matters
A public building and a large pile of cash and deposits left the Municipality's books for a price of $1. That may be a way to move a housing project to a group built to run it, and it also ends a promise the Municipality had made to buy back residents' units. But a reader cannot tell from the statements how the terms were set, or whether Council saw a valuation first.
It could be because…
Moving the complex also moved $6,806,115 that was owed to residents, so most of the loss may be an accounting result of handing over cash and deposits that were held for the residents, not money from the tax levy.
Some life leases carry a clause that could make the Municipality repay up to 95% of the original purchase price when a resident leaves. Passing those leases to United Housing ends that risk for the Municipality.
The Municipality says it wanted the complex run on a not-for-profit model, and the agreement lets it buy the property back for $2 if that stops. A nominal price is a common way to make that kind of transfer.
The Municipality's own report to Council says the complex ran on a fully self-funded basis, so its removal does not change the tax levy.
Questions you could ask
Did Council see an independent valuation of Perth Meadows before approving the transfer, and on which public date did it vote?
What is the $4,948,712 loss made of, in plain terms, and was any of it paid from reserves or the tax levy?
What happens to the retained $519,013 Infrastructure Ontario loan if United Housing misses a payment before November 16, 2037?
Will the transfer agreement be posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 2, Perth Meadows obligation: "In November 2011, the Municipality purchased the assets of Perth Adult Life Care Residences for $5,297,241." The note says the Municipality "completed the transfer of Perth Meadows, located at 710 Nelson Avenue South, to United Housing, a not-for-profit housing provider, for nominal consideration of $1". At closing the Municipality "transferred cash and deposit-related balances totaling $4,948,067" and assigned obligations "totaling $6,806,115". United Housing repaid an $800,000 promissory note by offset. Tangible capital assets with a net book value of $6,527,658 were transferred. The Municipality kept an Infrastructure Ontario loan with a balance of $519,013 at the transfer date, which United Housing is to pay until November 16, 2037. "As a result of the transfer, the Municipality recognized a loss on disposal of $4,948,712". It may repurchase the property for $2 if, within 15 years, United Housing stops operating it as attainable seniors' housing under a not-for-profit model.
Statement of operations, 2025: expenses for "Perth meadows" were budgeted at 687,159, came in at 5,540,880, and were 527,650 in 2024. "Annual surplus" was budgeted at 4,871,144 and came in at 1,379,349 (2024 actual 6,236,702).
Note 9, Accumulated surplus: the reserve fund line "Perth Meadows" stands at a deficit of (1,138,150) at the end of 2024 and shows "-" at the end of 2025.
The Treasurer's report says: "With the transfer of Perth Meadows to United Housing completed in December 2025, the associated operating budget is no longer required and will be removed from the 2026 Budget." It adds: "As Perth Meadows operated on a fully self-funded basis, removal of this budget item has no impact on the general tax levy."
The Municipality's news release says United Housing, part of United Way Perth-Huron, is acquiring Perth Meadows and taking over its operations, and that the Municipality has been working since 2014 to find a partner to operate it. It says the plan is to keep supporting the residence as an affordable 55+ community.
Note 2: "The senior's complex is currently made up of 18 town homes and 36 suite units which the Municipality is offering as life lease or rental units."
$(556,082)building-code reserve at December 31, 2025, down from $84,227 at the end of 2023
A reserve is money set aside by Council for one purpose. Building permit fees are meant to pay for the building department, and the Municipality keeps a separate reserve for it. At the end of 2023 that reserve held $84,227. At the end of 2024 it was a deficit of $398,847, and at the end of 2025 a deficit of $556,082. The 2026 budget again plans to take $87,800 out of the reserve. The Municipality has explained part of this: it says Council is phasing in permit fee increases to "gradually rebuild a reasonable reserve fund" and that the department should break even once it reaches full staffing.
Why it matters
A negative reserve means the building department has spent more than its fees brought in, and the shortfall has been covered by other money for now. Permit fees are meant to pay for permits, not for the tax levy. If the gap keeps growing, either fees must rise or taxes will end up covering it.
It could be because…
Building activity rises and falls from year to year, and a department built for busy years can run behind in a slow one.
The Municipality says it is raising permit fees in steps and that the department is still reaching full staffing, so the gap may close as fees catch up.
The department may have hired ahead of the work expected from new housing, which would put the cost first and the fees later.
Questions you could ask
By what date does the budget expect the building-code reserve to be back above zero, and what fee increases are planned to get there?
Why does the 2026 budget fund the department by drawing a further $87,800 from a reserve that is already in deficit?
Which fund covers the deficit in the meantime?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 9, Accumulated surplus, reserves set aside by council: "Building code enforcements" (556,082) at December 31, 2025 and (398,847) at December 31, 2024.
Note 9, Accumulated surplus, reserves set aside by council: "Building code enforcements" (398,847) at December 31, 2024 and 84,227 at December 31, 2023.
Building department budget: user-pay fees (896,155) approved for 2025 and (896,200) proposed for 2026. Total expense 886,743 for 2025 and 984,000 for 2026, up 97,257 (11.0%). Transfers to/(from) reserve 9,412 for 2025 and (87,800) for 2026. The page says the department "is expected to operate on a self-sustaining basis as it reaches full staffing capacity." The reserve forecast table lists "SP5 Building Code Administration" at (0.40) in each year from 2026 to 2035 (millions of dollars).
Development and Protective Services priorities: "Council's phase-in of building permit fee increases continue to be implemented to balance cost recovery and gradually rebuild a reasonable reserve fund."
$(16.89) millionforecast balance of the development charge reserves in 2035, in the 2026 budget book
Development charges are fees builders pay when they build new homes, to cover roads, pipes and other growth costs. The 2026 budget book forecasts the total of the development charge reserves at $1.33 million at the end of 2026, then below zero from 2028 onward, ending at $(16.89) million in 2035. The area-specific reserve for one area (marked NEMP) is already forecast at $(5.04) million in 2026. The stormwater reserve, which pays for drainage, is forecast to go negative from 2028 and reach $(6.43) million. The book says "some experience cash flow pressures that require funding from external sources" and that these projects will be re-checked in future budgets. The ten-year capital plan totals $150.00 million, and the budget plans $15.20 million of it from debentures (borrowing).
Why it matters
A negative reserve is a promise to spend money that has not come in yet. The Municipality can wait for builders' fees or borrow in the meantime, and borrowing is paid back by taxpayers or ratepayers if the fees do not arrive. Residents can only judge the risk if the plan says how big the gap is and what covers it.
It could be because…
Towns often build roads and pipes first and collect builders' fees as homes go up. A negative balance on paper is normal for a growing town.
The budget includes a Development Charges Study Update, which can reset the rates so that fees match the costs.
The book says projects adding to the pressure will be re-evaluated in future budgets, so the later years may change.
The reserve table shows only what is unencumbered at year end, so it can look worse than the cash the Municipality actually holds.
Questions you could ask
How big a gap does the Municipality expect in the development charge and stormwater reserves, and what will cover it: other reserves, debentures, or later fees?
Will the Development Charges Study Update change the rates, and when?
Which of the ten-year capital projects would be delayed if the fees come in below the forecast?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Forecasted Reserve Fund Balances ($M): "Total Development Charges" 1.33 (2026), 0.51 (2027), (4.50) (2028), (7.30) (2029), (5.86) (2030), (4.42) (2031), (3.59) (2032), (16.70) (2033), (15.30) (2034), (16.89) (2035). "GR1 Development Charges (NEMP)" (5.04) in 2026 and (6.29) in each year after. "AM4 Stormwater" 1.68 (2026), 0.99 (2027), (0.29) (2028), (1.30) (2029), (2.30) (2030), (3.79) (2031), (5.63) (2032), (6.00) (2033), (5.92) (2034), (6.43) (2035). The page notes: "Reserve balances represent what is unencumbered at year end."
Capital Funding Overview: "While most reserves remain stable or are trending upward, some experience cash flow pressures that require funding from external sources. Projects contributing to these pressures will be re-evaluated through future budget processes to ensure long-term financial balance." Capital Funding Summary, total $25.30 (2026) and $150.00 (10-year forecast), in millions: Development Charges $4.20 and $36.00; Debentures $2.00 and $15.20.
Corporate Services capital projects include "5208 Development Charges Study Update" at 35,000 in each of three years, 105,000 in total. The ten-year detail lists "59005 Contribution from Debentures" of -2,035,000, -1,917,000, -6,490,000 and -4,775,000 across four years, -15,217,000 in total.
September 9, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2023 statements (about 20 months after year end, worked out by us)
Audited financial statements are the yearly report card on a town's finances, checked by an outside auditor. The auditor's reports on the statements now posted by the Municipality are dated September 9, 2025 for the year ended December 31, 2023, December 3, 2025 for 2024, and August 14, 2026 for 2025. We worked out that this is about 20 months, 11 months and 7 and a half months after year end. All three give a clean opinion (the statements "present fairly"). We did not find an explanation for the delay in the documents we read.
Why it matters
Residents and council use audited numbers to judge whether money was handled properly, and a long wait means the facts arrive after the decisions. A clean opinion shows the numbers are fair; it does not say why they were late.
It could be because…
A one-time issue, such as a new accounting system, a change in staff or the start of a new accounting standard for landfill closure costs, may have slowed the work. The statements we read do not say.
The dates may reflect when the auditor's report was re-issued or the statements were approved, rather than when the work began.
The 2025 report is dated sooner than the 2024 one, which may mean the Municipality is catching up.
Questions you could ask
Why were the 2023 and 2024 statements finished so late, and has Council been told the reason in public?
When does the Municipality expect the 2026 statements to be finished?
Did the delay mean the Financial Information Return for those years was filed late?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Independent Auditor's Report, signed "Kitchener, Canada" and dated "August 14, 2026", on the statements for the year ended December 31, 2025. Opinion: the statements "present fairly, in all material respects".
Independent Auditor's Report, signed "Kitchener, Canada" and dated "December 3, 2025", on the statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. Opinion: the statements "present fairly, in all material respects".
Independent Auditor's Report, signed "Kitchener, Canada" and dated "September 9, 2025", on the statements for the year ended December 31, 2023. Opinion: the statements "present fairly, in all material respects".
North Perth spent $3.4M on roads and snow in 2019 and $5.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 7 of 41 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 55% in 6 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%
+55%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+1%
+1%
2021
+0%
+4%
2022
+15%
+11%
2023
+29%
+16%
2024
+51%
+18%
2025
+55%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.9M a year pay for?
Why did paved roads go from $985K to $2.2M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
North Perth spent $3.7M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $5.7M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 54% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+54%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+20%
+1%
2021
+86%
+4%
2022
+57%
+11%
2023
+43%
+16%
2024
+43%
+18%
2025
+54%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $2.0M a year pay for?
Why did sewage treatment go from $1.1M to $2.9M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
7.15%total 2026 tax increase after the April 2026 amendment, up from 6.61% adopted on December 2, 2025
The Mayor's 2026 budget was adopted on December 2, 2025 under the strong mayor rules, with a total increase of 6.61% (about $160 on a median home). In March 2026 the Treasurer reported that two outside bills had come in higher than budgeted: the Maitland Valley Conservation Authority levy and the Ontario Provincial Police contract. The amendment adopted in April 2026 raised the total increase to 7.15% ($173.82 on a median home) and added $118,025 to the levy. The Treasurer's report also says the Province's cap on the 2026 police bill defers part of the cost, so at least $325,182 more is expected in 2027. The Municipality has explained both changes in its own report.
Why it matters
Residents saw one number in December and paid another after April. The reasons are published and come from bills the Municipality does not set. The open part is 2027: part of this year's police cost has been pushed into next year's bill.
It could be because…
The police contract is set by the Province and the conservation authority levy is set by its board, so the Municipality had not received the final amounts when it adopted the budget.
Budgeting a 10% police increase and being billed 11% is an ordinary forecasting gap.
The three capital items added in the amendment are paid from reserves, and the Treasurer says they do not change the levy.
Questions you could ask
What total tax increase does the Municipality expect for 2027, including the $325,182 police catch-up?
Could the 2026 budget have used the Province's published cap of 11% from the start instead of 10%?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Background: "On December 2, 2025, the 2026 Mayor's Budget was adopted pursuant to strong mayor powers", with 5.46% for general municipal services and 1.15% for the OPP, "a total tax increase of 6.61%, or approximately $160". Conservation authority levy budgeted at $494,500 and confirmed at $544,046, "a variance of $49,546". OPP contract budgeted at $3,275,400 and confirmed at $3,343,879, "a shortfall of $68,479". Revised increase: 5.69% general plus 1.46% OPP, "a total 7.15 % increase, or $173.82" on the median-assessed home.
OPP billing: "The 2026 capped amount is approximately $463,364 lower than the fully calculated cost." The report says "a minimum increase of approximately $325,182 will be required in 2027, creating additional base pressure in the next budget cycle."
Capital items added: Space Needs Study $75,000, Records Management Project an additional $60,000 to an existing $45,000, and Council Chambers A/V System Replacement $120,000, each funded from reserves. The report asks Council to shorten the legislated periods to a Council amendment period of 20 days, a Mayor veto period of 1 day and a Council veto override period of 13 days so the amendment could be considered at the April 13, 2026 meeting.
The Municipality's release says the amendment adds $118,025 to the general tax levy, bringing the total levy to $23,194,694, a combined increase of 7.15%, or about $173.82 a year for a median home.
$2,711,521rise in budgeted staffing costs for 2026 (13.9%)
The 2026 budget book says staffing costs across the Municipality rise from $19,442,578 to $22,154,099, up $2,711,521 or 13.9%. The same book says "No additional staff or new resources have been included in the 2026 budget." It gives reasons for the rise: pay increases tied to the cost of living, more hours for volunteer firefighters to reach a full crew of 70, step increases for positions added in 2025, and the opening of a new childcare centre. Grants are budgeted to rise by $1,449,307, which the book says relates mainly to the childcare centre.
Why it matters
Pay and benefits are the biggest single part of the operating budget. A 13.9% rise is more than twice the 6.61% tax increase adopted for 2026. Residents can only judge it if they can see how much comes from each reason, and how much of it is paid by grants rather than taxes.
It could be because…
A new childcare centre needs staff, and the book says grants for it are rising: its staff may be paid mostly by the Province.
Volunteer firefighters are paid for hours worked, so more hours to reach 70 firefighters raises cost without adding employees.
Positions approved in the 2025 budget were part-year in 2025 and become full-year in 2026.
Moving costs between departments can raise one line and lower another.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $2,711,521 is cost-of-living pay, how much is the childcare centre, how much is volunteer firefighters and how much is 2025 positions in their second year?
How much of the childcare staffing is paid by grants rather than the tax levy?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for North Perth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
2026 Operating Budget at a Glance: "Staffing Costs" 19,442,578 (2025 approved) and 22,154,099 (2026 proposed), change 2,711,521, 13.9%. "Total Expense" 35,582,620 and 38,898,374, up 3,315,754, 9.3%. "Grants" revenue (5,363,343) and (6,812,650), change (1,449,307), 27.0%. The page says the increase is driven by salary adjustments "in line with the Consumer Price Index, the opening of a new childcare centre, and the continued adjustment to compensation for volunteer firefighters."
Operating Budget Summary: "No additional staff or new resources have been included in the 2026 budget." The drivers listed for wages and benefits are cost-of-living adjustments, "increased Volunteer Firefighter hours to achieve a complement of 70 firefighters", and step adjustments for positions introduced through the 2025 budget process. The total operating budget is projected at $48.9M, with a levy increase of $1.8M and a total levy of $23.2M.
Development and Protective Services (fire, by-law and planning): staffing costs 1,440,006 (2025 approved) and 1,635,200 (2026 proposed), up 195,294, 13.6%.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy