Council BooksNorth StormontOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read North Stormont's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 11 so far

Things worth asking about

We read North Stormont's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 42 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 106% in 6 years?

+106%parks, arena and library, 2019 to 2025

North Stormont spent $540K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Why have the Township's audited statements carried a qualified opinion two years in a row?

Qualifiedthe auditor's opinion on both the 2024 and 2025 statements

The auditor said the 2024 and 2025 statements are fair except for one gap. The Township had not finished working out what it will owe to take its buildings, lagoons, landfill and similar assets out of service one day, so none of that was counted. The Township says it is still working on it.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

What is the $2.2 million in "accounts receivable - other", and why did it double in 2024 and stay there?

$2,221,577"accounts receivable - other" at December 31, 2025 (2023: $1,097,650)

Money owed to the Township under "accounts receivable - other" went from $1,097,650 at the end of 2023 to $2,231,237 at the end of 2024, and was $2,221,577 at the end of 2025. It is by far the largest piece of what the Township is owed outside of taxes. The notes do not say who owes it.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did overdue property taxes rise to 29% of the Township's own levy in 2025?

29 %tax arrears as a share of the Township's own levy, December 31, 2025 (2024: 23 %)

The Township's unaudited five-year review shows unpaid taxes (arrears) at 29% of its own levy at the end of 2025, up from 23% a year earlier. Taxes receivable on the balance sheet grew from $849,557 to $1,153,313. The 2025 budget said staff expected better collections.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Worth askingSpending level

How much did the Township lean on savings and new borrowing to keep the 2025 tax increase down?

$4,817,132municipal debt at December 31, 2025, up from $3,783,348 a year before

The 2025 budget says savings were drawn on and new loans taken "to keep taxes lower". The tax rate rose 4.98% (the levy rose 6.49%). In 2025 the Township's municipal debt rose from $3,783,348 to $4,817,132, and its working capital reserve fell from $2,321,280 to $1,955,590.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowRecord-keeping

Why did the Township spend $3,184,103 on capital in 2025 when its budget planned $6,922,081?

$3,184,103spent on capital assets in 2025, against a budget of $6,922,081

The statements compare the 2025 budget with actual results. Spending on buying or building assets was less than half of plan. Capital grants came in at $775,855 against a budget of $2,084,047, and the planned annual surplus of $3,937,579 ended at $1,850,509. Loan money received was $1,400,000 against a budgeted $1,725,000.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to knowMoney health

Why did the water and sewer reserve grow by about $1.1 million in one year?

$3,274,235water and sewer reserves at December 31, 2025 (2024: $2,151,409)

Water and sewer reserves went from $2,151,409 to $3,274,235 in 2025, a gain of $1,122,826 (worked out by us). Water and sewer are paid by users of the system, not through property taxes. The Township says its 5.7% yearly rate increases follow a consulting firm's long-range plan adopted in 2020.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 106% in 6 years?

+106%parks, arena and library, 2019 to 2025

North Stormont spent $540K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 42 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 106% in 6 years?
+106%
Show as a table
YearParks, arena and libraryPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−14%+1%
2021−6%+4%
2022+34%+11%
2023+44%+16%
2024+73%+18%
2025+106%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $573K a year pay for?
  2. Why did arena and buildings go from $398K to $695K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Parks, arena and library: 2019 $540K, 2020 $464K, 2021 $507K, 2022 $722K, 2023 $776K, 2024 $935K, 2025 $1.1M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Arena and buildings, from $398K to $695K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 59%. North Stormont ranks 3rd of 43.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 42 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why have the Township's audited statements carried a qualified opinion two years in a row?

Qualifiedthe auditor's opinion on both the 2024 and 2025 statements

The auditor said the 2024 and 2025 statements are fair except for one gap. The Township had not finished working out what it will owe to take its buildings, lagoons, landfill and similar assets out of service one day, so none of that was counted. The Township says it is still working on it.

Why it matters

A qualified opinion means the auditor could not fully vouch for the numbers. Here the missing piece is a future cost that is not in the statements, so the Township's real debts may be larger than the statements show. We cannot tell how much.

It could be because…

  • The work is large and technical, and many small municipalities have been slow to finish it.
  • The Township may be waiting on engineering or environmental studies to put a price on each asset.
  • Council may have decided to finish the work before the next audit.

Questions you could ask

  1. When will the Township finish its asset retirement obligation assessment, and will the 2026 statements include it?
  2. Roughly how large does staff expect the obligation to be, compared with the Township's reserves?
  3. Has council been given a plan and a date for ending the qualification?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The auditor's report for 2025 is headed "Qualified Opinion" and says: "The Township did not complete its analysis as described in note 1(j), and thus liabilities arising from legal obligations associated with the retirement of certain tangible capital assets and their related disclosures were not recorded in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025." It is dated June 9, 2026.

    Financial statements 2025 (Welch LLP report) · PDF pages 4 to 5 (printed pages 2 to 3), Independent Auditor's Report

  2. The Township's own note says: "The Township is currently in the process of completing its assessment on the impact of PS 3280's implementation on the assets described above."

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 11 (printed page 9), note 1(j) Asset Retirement Obligations

  3. The auditor's report for 2024 is also headed "Qualified Opinion" and gives the same reason: "liabilities arising from legal obligations associated with the retirement of certain tangible capital assets and their related disclosures were not recorded in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024."

    Financial statements 2024 (Welch LLP report) · PDF page 4 (printed page 2), Independent Auditor's Report

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

What is the $2.2 million in "accounts receivable - other", and why did it double in 2024 and stay there?

$2,221,577"accounts receivable - other" at December 31, 2025 (2023: $1,097,650)

Money owed to the Township under "accounts receivable - other" went from $1,097,650 at the end of 2023 to $2,231,237 at the end of 2024, and was $2,221,577 at the end of 2025. It is by far the largest piece of what the Township is owed outside of taxes. The notes do not say who owes it.

Why it matters

Most of what the Township is owed outside of taxes sits in one unlabelled line. Residents cannot tell whether it is a safe amount owed by a government, or money that is slow to arrive.

It could be because…

  • Grants or transfers the province or federal government has approved but not yet paid.
  • Money owed from the sale of land or another property deal that closes later.
  • Payments owed by a company or another municipality under an agreement.
  • A one-time item that the Township expects to collect in full in 2026.

Questions you could ask

  1. Who owes the Township the amount in "accounts receivable - other", and for what?
  2. How much of the $2,221,577 was collected in 2026, and how much is still expected?
  3. Can the notes to the statements say what is in this line each year?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 3 lists "Accounts receivable - other" at $2,221,577 for 2025 and $2,231,237 for 2024, out of total accounts receivable of $2,896,162 (2024: $2,878,064). The note does not say who owes the money.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 13 (printed page 11), note 3 Accounts Receivable

  2. The 2024 statements show "Accounts receivable - other" at $2,231,237 for 2024 and $1,097,650 for 2023, out of total accounts receivable of $2,878,064 (2023: $1,612,556).

    Financial statements 2024 · PDF page 13 (printed page 11), note 3 Accounts Receivable

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did overdue property taxes rise to 29% of the Township's own levy in 2025?

29 %tax arrears as a share of the Township's own levy, December 31, 2025 (2024: 23 %)

The Township's unaudited five-year review shows unpaid taxes (arrears) at 29% of its own levy at the end of 2025, up from 23% a year earlier. Taxes receivable on the balance sheet grew from $849,557 to $1,153,313. The 2025 budget said staff expected better collections.

Why it matters

When more taxes go unpaid, the Township has to cover the gap with cash from other sources or borrow short term. It had drawn $1,000,000 on its credit line at the end of 2024.

It could be because…

  • Taxes billed late in the year that were paid after December 31.
  • A few large accounts, such as a business or a property in a sale or dispute, that distort the share.
  • A change in how the Township measures arrears between years.
  • Council may have allowed more time to pay for some taxpayers.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is behind the rise in arrears in 2025, and how much had been paid by mid-2026?
  2. What steps does the Township take to collect overdue taxes, and when does it start them?
  3. Does the Township expect to need its credit line again to cover the gap before taxes arrive?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Schedule 1 (marked unaudited) lists "Tax Arrears", "% of own levy": 29 % for 2025, 23 % for 2024, 25 % for 2023, 29 % for 2022 and 32 % for 2021. The share of the total levy is shown as 9 % for 2025.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 24 (printed page 22), Schedule 1 - Five year financial review (unaudited)

  2. The statement of financial position shows "Taxes receivable" of $1,153,313 for 2025 and $849,557 for 2024.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 6 (printed page 4), Statement of Financial Position

  3. Note 4 says the Township "had drawn $nil (2024 - $1,000,000) on the credit facility", a revolving facility of up to $2,800,000 used to finance spending until property taxes arrive.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 13 (printed page 11), note 4 Credit Facility

  4. The Township's explanation: in its list of major changes from 2024 to 2025, the 2025 budget includes the line "Reduction in tax penalties due to increased collections 25,000".

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 7 (printed page [6]), Major changes from 2024 to 2025

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

How much did the Township lean on savings and new borrowing to keep the 2025 tax increase down?

$4,817,132municipal debt at December 31, 2025, up from $3,783,348 a year before

The 2025 budget says savings were drawn on and new loans taken "to keep taxes lower". The tax rate rose 4.98% (the levy rose 6.49%). In 2025 the Township's municipal debt rose from $3,783,348 to $4,817,132, and its working capital reserve fell from $2,321,280 to $1,955,590.

Why it matters

Savings and loans can smooth a tax increase, but they push costs to later years: reserves have to be rebuilt and loans repaid with interest. Residents may want to know how much of the cost of this year's services is being deferred.

It could be because…

  • Borrowing for long-lived buildings and vehicles is a normal way to spread cost over the years the assets are used.
  • The Township's own limit on debt payments is far from being reached, which the budget notes.
  • Reserves exist to be used; drawing them down in one year can be planned.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much of the 2026 tax increase depends on drawing down reserves or taking on new debt?
  2. What is the plan to rebuild the working capital reserve?
  3. What will debt payments be each year over the life of the new loans, as a share of the tax levy?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The 2025 budget's key assumptions say: "Transfer from reserves of approximately $776,540 and $410,524 moved to reserves in order to keep the tax rate increase lower." and "Additional borrowing of $1.725 million for the new Township Office and snowplow in order to keep taxes lower".

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 3 (printed page [2]), Executive Summary, Key Assumptions and Rationale

  2. The budget snapshot shows the "Total Tax Levy" going from $3,614,211 to $3,848,843, a change of $234,632 or 6.49%.

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 4 (printed page [3]), Current Budget Snapshot

  3. The Township's explanation: "The annual debt repayment limit from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is 25% of total revenues or $1,569,169. With existing and new debt, the Township will be at $619,612 or roughly 10%."

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 10 (printed page [9]), Debentures and Long-Term Debt

  4. The statement of financial position shows "Municipal debt (note 8)" of $4,817,132 for 2025 and $3,783,348 for 2024. Note 8 lists a new Bank of Montreal debenture loan at 4.88%, due August, 2035, with a balance of $1,386,155 at the end of 2025.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF pages 6 and 15 (printed pages 4 and 13), Statement of Financial Position and note 8 Municipal Debt

  5. Note 10 shows the "Working capital" reserve at $1,955,590 for 2025 and $2,321,280 for 2024.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 17 (printed page 15), note 10 Accumulated Surplus

  6. The Executive Summary says: "Proposed municipal tax rate increase for 2025 is 4.98%, for total municipal tax dollars of $3,848,843", and "Municipal tax rate is proposed at an 4.98% increase which would increase the municipal portion by $19 to the residential rate per $100,000 of assessment."

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 3 (printed page [2]), Executive Summary

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did environmental services (waste and recycling) cost $726,292 against a budget of $421,369?

$726,292spent on environmental services in 2025, against a budget of $421,369

In 2025 the Township's environmental services spending was 72% over its budget (worked out by us from the two printed figures). It was $806,079 in 2024. General government was also above budget, at $1,562,699 against $1,404,895.

Why it matters

Waste collection and disposal are costs most residents use every week. A large miss in one area suggests the budget was off, or something changed during the year. Either way, it should be explained to those who pay.

It could be because…

  • Budgeted revenue or cost sharing for waste may be recorded in a different department from the cost.
  • A change in the recycling program during 2025, which the budget notes was being removed.
  • Higher hauling or disposal costs than planned.
  • A one-time cost, such as landfill work.

Questions you could ask

  1. What made environmental services cost more than the budget in 2025?
  2. How much of the difference was covered by revenue booked in the same area?
  3. Was the 2026 budget for waste services set using the 2025 actual cost?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The statement of operations shows "Environmental services" at 421,369 budgeted, 726,292 actual for 2025 and 806,079 actual for 2024. "General government" shows 1,404,895 budgeted, 1,562,699 actual for 2025.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 7 (printed page 5), Statement of Operations, operating expenditures

  2. Note 11 says: "Environmental services includes waste collection, disposal and recycling services."

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 18 (printed page 16), note 11 Segmented Information

  3. Context from the 2025 budget's list of major changes: "Reduction in recycling costs (154,000)" and "Reduction in waste diversion funding 118,051" with the comment "Due to removed of recycling program - Stewardship funding".

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 7 (printed page [6]), Major changes from 2024 to 2025

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 60% in 6 years?

+60%police, fire and safety, 2019 to 2025

North Stormont spent $717K on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $1.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 60% in 6 years?
+60%
Show as a table
YearPolice, fire and safetyPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+9%+1%
2021+21%+4%
2022+36%+11%
2023+33%+16%
2024+50%+18%
2025+60%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $429K a year pay for?
  2. Why did fire department go from $421K to $700K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Police, fire and safety: 2019 $717K, 2020 $782K, 2021 $866K, 2022 $973K, 2023 $957K, 2024 $1.1M, 2025 $1.1M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Fire department, from $421K to $700K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 52% in 6 years?

+52%water, sewers and garbage, 2019 to 2025

North Stormont spent $948K on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $1.4M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 52% in 6 years?
+52%
Show as a table
YearWater, sewers and garbagePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+20%+1%
2021+29%+4%
2022+48%+11%
2023+35%+16%
2024+77%+18%
2025+52%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $496K a year pay for?
  2. Why did the dump (landfill) go from $237K to $590K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Water, sewers and garbage: 2019 $948K, 2020 $1.1M, 2021 $1.2M, 2022 $1.4M, 2023 $1.3M, 2024 $1.7M, 2025 $1.4M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: The dump (landfill), from $237K to $590K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why does North Stormont spend more than most similar towns on council?

$98per home on council, 2025

North Stormont spent about $98 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $52. Only 5 of 42 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Council per home: North Stormont $98; typical similar town $52; ranked 6th highest of 43.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 42 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the Township spend $3,184,103 on capital in 2025 when its budget planned $6,922,081?

$3,184,103spent on capital assets in 2025, against a budget of $6,922,081

The statements compare the 2025 budget with actual results. Spending on buying or building assets was less than half of plan. Capital grants came in at $775,855 against a budget of $2,084,047, and the planned annual surplus of $3,937,579 ended at $1,850,509. Loan money received was $1,400,000 against a budgeted $1,725,000.

Why it matters

Residents are asked to approve a budget that includes projects and the loans and grants to pay for them. A large gap raises the question of which projects slipped, and whether they will cost more later.

It could be because…

  • Projects that were started in 2025 and finish in 2026, so the money is still committed.
  • Grants that are paid as work is done, so they arrive when the project does.
  • Bids that came in under the budgeted cost.
  • A planned purchase, with its loan, that moved to a later year.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which planned 2025 capital projects were not finished, and what is their new timeline and cost?
  2. Is the unspent money, and the grants that did not arrive, carried into the 2026 budget?
  3. Why was the loan received smaller than the loan budgeted?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The statement of changes in net financial assets shows "Acquisition of tangible capital assets and assets under construction" of (6,922,081) budgeted and (3,184,103) actual for 2025, and "Annual surplus" of $3,937,579 budgeted and $1,850,509 actual.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 8 (printed page 6), Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets

  2. The statement of operations shows "Government transfers - capital" of 2,084,047 budgeted and 775,855 actual for 2025.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 7 (printed page 5), Statement of Operations

  3. Note 15 reconciles the budget and lists "Loan proceeds included as income (1,725,000)". The statement of cash flows shows "Proceeds from long-term debt" of 1,400,000 for 2025.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF pages 21 and 9 (printed pages 19 and 7), note 15 Budgeted Figures and Statement of Cash Flows

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the water and sewer reserve grow by about $1.1 million in one year?

$3,274,235water and sewer reserves at December 31, 2025 (2024: $2,151,409)

Water and sewer reserves went from $2,151,409 to $3,274,235 in 2025, a gain of $1,122,826 (worked out by us). Water and sewer are paid by users of the system, not through property taxes. The Township says its 5.7% yearly rate increases follow a consulting firm's long-range plan adopted in 2020.

Why it matters

Water customers pay rates that rise each year. A reserve is meant to pay for future repairs, so it is worth knowing how large it should be and what it is saving for.

It could be because…

  • The reserve is saving for major plant or pipe work that the long-range plan calls for.
  • A one-time grant or payment received in 2025 was set aside.
  • Reserve targets in the plan were set when costs were lower.

Questions you could ask

  1. What are the water and sewer reserves saving for, and what is the target balance in the long-range plan?
  2. Is the plan's 5.7% a year increase still needed once the target is reached?
  3. What caused the $1.1 million gain in 2025?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for North Stormont? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 10 lists the "Water and sewer" reserve at $3,274,235 for 2025 and $2,151,409 for 2024.

    Financial statements 2025 · PDF page 17 (printed page 15), note 10 Accumulated Surplus

  2. The Township's explanation: "Water and wastewater are user fee based and only those on the systems, pay for the service. This does not affect the tax base." and "The 2025 budget includes a 5.7% rate increase which aligns with the recommendations outlined in the BMA Management Consulting Inc.'s water and wastewater long range financial plan adopted by Council in 2020."

    Final 2025 Capital and Operating Budgets · PDF page 6 (printed page [5]), Water and Wastewater

↑ All questions