Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Port Colborne's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Port Colborne's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 32 similar Ontario places. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Places keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Port Colborne had $4.5M saved at the end of 2025, down from $17.7M in 2019. That is 10% of one year's spending. None of the 32 similar places had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$4,521,721in reserves at the end of 2025, down from $24,768,519 a year earlier
A reserve is money a city sets aside for later, such as repairs or a new fire truck. The audited statements show the City's reserves and reserve funds at $4,521,721 at the end of 2025, against $24,768,519 a year earlier. Almost all of the fall is one line, "Allocated capital and related projects", which went from a positive $7,898,322 to a negative $12,930,169. The City says this is internal financing: it spent its own reserve money on projects that it plans to pay for later with borrowed money. It also raised its bank line of credit (a loan it can draw on) from $6,000,000 to $20,000,000, and used $2,331,139 of it by the end of 2025.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 3 sources
$39,071,384of capital assets acquired in 2025, against a budget of $10,249,350
The statements show the City acquired tangible capital assets (things it builds or buys that last for years, like pipes, roads and buildings) worth $39,071,384 in 2025. The budget in the statements planned $10,249,350. In 2024 the figure was $14,884,527. Net debt (what the City owes less the money and investments it has on hand) went from $10,990,317 to $30,410,927 against a planned $8,498,396. The City explains in its 2024 year-end report that projects approved in earlier years stay open until they are finished, so a year's spending includes work approved before that year's budget.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources
80,290forecast total borrowing in 2027, in thousands of dollars, up from 25,842 in 2025
The debt table in the 2026 budget lists the City's total borrowing, inside and outside, in thousands of dollars: 25,842 for 2025, 51,238 for 2026 and 80,290 for 2027. The City's audited long-term debt at the end of 2025 was $23,881,042. The same table shows the City's "annual repayment limit" (the share of its yearly income the Province lets it use on debt payments) rising from 3.7% to 9.9% in 2027. The City's own limit is 15.0% and the Province's is 25.0%. The budget says the 2027 jump comes from projects "subject to separate and future approval by Council". Council has not yet approved them.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 3 sources
3.87%2026 levy increase after growth, down from the 8.38% staff first proposed
Under the Province's strong mayor powers, which Port Colborne received on May 1, 2025, the Mayor prepares the budget. Staff first proposed a 2026 levy (the amount raised from property taxes) increase of 8.38% after growth. The Mayor, William C. Steele, directed two changes that brought it to 3.87%, a saving of 4.51%. One was to borrow for the $3,000,000 ladder truck instead of paying for it from the levy, and to pause growth in yearly savings for future asset replacement for one year. The other was to budget "gapping dollars" of $326,000, which means counting on savings when staff positions are empty between jobs. The result is a levy of $28,572,000, up $1,710,800.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources
$2,501,388shortfall in the Economic Development reserve at the end of 2025, against a November 2025 forecast of a $1,180,874 shortfall
Two City reserves are negative: the City has spent more than it has set aside. The audited statements show the Marina reserve at (990,332) at the end of 2025, worse than (912,319) a year earlier. The Economic Development reserve is at (2,501,388), worse than (1,600,874). When the City presented its 2026 budget in November 2025, it forecast the 2025 year-end balances at (791,403) for the marina and (1,180,874) for economic development. The City says the marina deficit will be repaid from user fees and the economic development deficit from future land sales.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 2 sources
$1,950,000in three-year funding for healthcare work and Seaway land matters, worked out by us from $1,000,000 and $950,000
The 2026 capital budget includes two three-year items that are mostly advice, studies and legal work. One is "Healthcare" at $1,000,000, of which $400,000 is shown as levy (property tax) money and $600,000 as "Other (Future Capital Budgets)". The other is "St. Lawrence Seaway Land Matters" at $950,000, all shown as "Other (Future Capital Budgets/Costs Recovered from Another Project)". The City says the Seaway item follows an audit of leases that found several properties where the City has built assets but has no lease, and that the Seaway wants to raise rents on the leases it does have.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 2 sources
In 2025, Port Colborne collected $2.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 6 of 32 similar places raised theirs by more.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 3 sources
At the end of 2025, $6.5M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 12% of everything billed. Only 5 of 32 similar places had a higher share. A year earlier it was $4.6M.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 2 sources
$13,119,702annual surplus in 2025, against a budget of $5,770,477
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The statements show an annual surplus of $13,119,702 for 2025, against a budget of $5,770,477. Most of the gap is one line: government transfers were $11,394,858 against a budget of $5,081,269, and the capital part of that (grants for building things) was $8,222,654 against $1,997,669. The City explains that its budget is prepared on a different accounting basis from the statements. Government transfers explain about $6.3 million of the $7.3 million gap (worked out by us), so the surplus does not by itself mean spare cash.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 3 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Places keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Port Colborne had $4.5M saved at the end of 2025, down from $17.7M in 2019. That is 10% of one year's spending. None of the 32 similar places had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Port Colborne have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$10M$20M$30M
$4.5M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$17.7M
2020
$19.1M
2021
$24M
2022
$26.8M
2023
$26.2M
2024
$24.8M
2025
$4.5M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The city spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The city has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the city have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$4,521,721in reserves at the end of 2025, down from $24,768,519 a year earlier
A reserve is money a city sets aside for later, such as repairs or a new fire truck. The audited statements show the City's reserves and reserve funds at $4,521,721 at the end of 2025, against $24,768,519 a year earlier. Almost all of the fall is one line, "Allocated capital and related projects", which went from a positive $7,898,322 to a negative $12,930,169. The City says this is internal financing: it spent its own reserve money on projects that it plans to pay for later with borrowed money. It also raised its bank line of credit (a loan it can draw on) from $6,000,000 to $20,000,000, and used $2,331,139 of it by the end of 2025.
Why it matters
Reserves are the cushion for surprises. A negative reserve means the City has spent money it has not yet raised. The plan only works if the borrowing is approved and issued as the projects finish. Residents will pay the interest, so it is fair to ask how large the gap can get and when it will be repaid.
It could be because…
The City has said the negative balance is temporary. It will be filled when long-term debt is issued for projects that are mostly finished.
The Niagara Region sets the dates when a city can borrow through it, so there can be a delay of a year or more between spending and borrowing.
Many large water, wastewater and storm sewer projects were under way at once in 2025, so a one-year dip may not repeat.
Questions you could ask
How large can the "Allocated capital and related projects" negative balance get before the City issues the debt, and what is the City's limit on it?
When does the City expect to issue the debt that will refill this reserve, and what will the interest cost between now and then?
Has Council set a minimum reserve level that the City must stay above while it waits to borrow?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 11, Reserves and reserve funds: "Total reserves and reserve funds" 4,521,721 (2024: 24,768,519). "Allocated capital and related projects" (12,930,169) (2024: 7,898,322). The note says the marina, economic development, drains and allocated capital reserves "represent internal financing balances that will be funded from future revenue sources" and that "The allocated capital and related projects reserve will be replenished as projects intended to be debt financed reach substantial completion and the related debt is issued."
Note 4, Bank indebtedness: an operating line of credit of 20,000,000 (2024: 6,000,000) with the CIBC, of which 2,331,139 (2024: nil) was used at December 31, 2025. The note says the increase "reflects the temporary internal financing of infrastructure projects pending the issuance of long-term debt".
$39,071,384of capital assets acquired in 2025, against a budget of $10,249,350
The statements show the City acquired tangible capital assets (things it builds or buys that last for years, like pipes, roads and buildings) worth $39,071,384 in 2025. The budget in the statements planned $10,249,350. In 2024 the figure was $14,884,527. Net debt (what the City owes less the money and investments it has on hand) went from $10,990,317 to $30,410,927 against a planned $8,498,396. The City explains in its 2024 year-end report that projects approved in earlier years stay open until they are finished, so a year's spending includes work approved before that year's budget.
Why it matters
A budget is the plan residents are told about. If actual building is almost four times the plan, residents may not see the full size of the commitments until the bills arrive. The City is heading into a larger debt load, so it matters how much of the 2025 work was approved earlier and how much was new.
It could be because…
The year's budget only covers the projects newly approved that year. Money approved in earlier years for projects still open is spent later, and the City says it carries many open projects.
Much of the work was paid for by grants. Capital grants received were $8,222,654, against a budget of $1,997,669.
Large water and wastewater projects, such as the watermain and wastewater relining programs, can take several years and spend most of their money in the middle years.
Questions you could ask
Of the $39,071,384 acquired in 2025, how much was for projects first approved in 2025 and how much for earlier years' projects?
Does Council see a yearly list showing, for each open project, the amount approved, the amount spent and the amount still to spend?
Which open projects were completed in 2025, and which are expected to need the borrowing the City has planned?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Statement of Changes in Net Debt: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (10,249,350), actual 2025 (39,071,384), actual 2024 (14,884,527). "End of year" net debt budget (8,498,396), actual 2025 $ (30,410,927), 2024 (10,990,317).
The report says staff "completed 53 projects" and that 75 approved capital and related projects remain open in 2024: "The dollar figure associated with the 75 remaining projects is $27,642,703. The three largest projects are Wastewater Relining, East Side Employment Lands, and the Watermain Replacement and Looping project."
The report says the number of open capital and related projects at the end of 2025 is forecast at 79, so that staff "anticipate starting 2026 with 110 (31 + 79) Capital and Related Projects", against 111 projects at the start of 2025.
80,290forecast total borrowing in 2027, in thousands of dollars, up from 25,842 in 2025
The debt table in the 2026 budget lists the City's total borrowing, inside and outside, in thousands of dollars: 25,842 for 2025, 51,238 for 2026 and 80,290 for 2027. The City's audited long-term debt at the end of 2025 was $23,881,042. The same table shows the City's "annual repayment limit" (the share of its yearly income the Province lets it use on debt payments) rising from 3.7% to 9.9% in 2027. The City's own limit is 15.0% and the Province's is 25.0%. The budget says the 2027 jump comes from projects "subject to separate and future approval by Council". Council has not yet approved them.
Why it matters
Borrowing builds things now and spreads the cost over many years, and residents and rate payers pay the interest. The total roughly triples in two years. The question is who decides each step, and how it will be paid for.
It could be because…
The forecast is a planning tool that includes projects Council has not agreed to. The City may drop or phase some of them.
The City stays well under its own 15.0% limit and the Province's 25.0% limit in every year of the table, and its policy requires it to publish this table.
The 2026 budget says the new borrowing is for water and wastewater projects and a ladder truck. Borrowing for long-lived assets can be fair to future users who will also benefit.
Questions you could ask
Which of the projects behind the 2027 forecast has Council already approved, and which are still ideas?
What yearly cost to the property tax and the water and wastewater rates does the City expect from the borrowing in the table?
Will Council see a full cost and borrowing plan for East Side Employment Lands, Canal Crossing, Marina District/Sugarloaf and Lockview District before it votes on them?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Appendix I, Debt Management ('000s in thousands): "Total Borrowing (External & Internal)" 25,842 (2025), 51,238 (2026), 80,290 (2027), 77,099 (2028), 73,825 (2029), 70,428 (2030). "External Borrowing Charges" 1,996 (2025), 3,677 (2026), 6,101 (2027). "Illustrative In-Year ARL" 3.7%, 6.4%, 9.9%, 9.1%. "City Self Imposed Max" 15.0%, "Provincial Imposed Max" 25.0%. A note says "Forecasted debt in 2027 relates to future projects related to East Side Employment Lands, Canal Crossing, Marina District/Sugarloaf and Lockview District subject to separate and future approval by Council."
The report says the budget includes "$14.4 million in debt financing, of which $3.0 million is attributed to the levy for the ladder truck and $11.4 million is for water and wastewater projects".
Note 7, Long term debt: net long term debt 23,881,042 (2024: 25,079,923). Principal repayments due: 2026 923,963; 2027 954,543; 2028 948,248; 2029 941,202; 2030 972,487. Interest on long term debt 792,294 (2024: 805,886).
3.87%2026 levy increase after growth, down from the 8.38% staff first proposed
Under the Province's strong mayor powers, which Port Colborne received on May 1, 2025, the Mayor prepares the budget. Staff first proposed a 2026 levy (the amount raised from property taxes) increase of 8.38% after growth. The Mayor, William C. Steele, directed two changes that brought it to 3.87%, a saving of 4.51%. One was to borrow for the $3,000,000 ladder truck instead of paying for it from the levy, and to pause growth in yearly savings for future asset replacement for one year. The other was to budget "gapping dollars" of $326,000, which means counting on savings when staff positions are empty between jobs. The result is a levy of $28,572,000, up $1,710,800.
Why it matters
A lower tax increase this year can mean a higher cost later. Borrowing adds interest, and pausing the savings plan delays the replacement fund. A gapping budget only works if enough positions stay empty. The election is on October 26, 2026, and the tax number residents see is lower than staff first proposed.
It could be because…
Borrowing for a long-lived asset such as a ladder truck spreads its cost over the years it is used, and many cities do this.
The pause in the savings plan is for one year only, and the City says the core long-term funding model remains the same.
Gapping is a common budgeting tool that counts on normal staff turnover.
Questions you could ask
How many positions' worth of savings does the $326,000 of gapping dollars assume, and what happens to services if fewer positions are empty?
When does the one-year pause in the asset replacement funding end, and what will the 2027 levy increase be if it restarts at the old level?
What is the total interest the City will pay over the life of the ladder truck loan?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Property Tax Impacts: "Staff Proposed Budget % (After Assessment Growth)" 8.38%. "Mayoral Direction - Debt Finance Ladder Truck": "Deduct: One Year Pause - Asset Management Financing Model" (1,173,082); "Add: Cost of borrowing to finance Ladder Truck" 286,600. "Mayoral Direction - Budget for savings from natural turnover": "gapping dollars" (326,000). "Savings from Mayoral Directions" (1,212,482), (4.51%). "Total Levy Increase" 1,710,800. "Mayor's Budget % (After Assessment Growth)" 3.87%.
Property tax impact: the budget changes the average residential property valued at $203,084 by 3.87% or $90. The proposed levy is $28,572,000. "Specific budget direction from the Mayor during the budget process brought the change to 3.87% from 8.38% for a total savings of 4.51%." The report adds that "A pause will occur with respect to growing the core funding for the Capital and Related Project Budget."
The 2025 forecast says personnel costs are forecast to be $830 thousand above budget, driven in part by firefighter overtime costs ($150 thousand), and that a surplus at year end would be recommended for reserves.
Capital and Related Project highlights: "$3.0 million for a new ladder truck for the Fire Department". The report adds that the budget "includes $14.4 million in debt financing, of which $3.0 million is attributed to the levy for the ladder truck and $11.4 million is for water and wastewater projects".
$2,501,388shortfall in the Economic Development reserve at the end of 2025, against a November 2025 forecast of a $1,180,874 shortfall
Two City reserves are negative: the City has spent more than it has set aside. The audited statements show the Marina reserve at (990,332) at the end of 2025, worse than (912,319) a year earlier. The Economic Development reserve is at (2,501,388), worse than (1,600,874). When the City presented its 2026 budget in November 2025, it forecast the 2025 year-end balances at (791,403) for the marina and (1,180,874) for economic development. The City says the marina deficit will be repaid from user fees and the economic development deficit from future land sales.
Why it matters
These are in effect loans the City has made to itself. Repayment depends on boat fees and on land sales that have not yet happened. If land sells for less, or later, the taxpayers and rate payers are left to cover the gap.
It could be because…
The forecast was made in October and November 2025, before year-end entries. Spending after that date could explain the difference.
The City has set up repayment from future land sales (the East Side Employment Lands) and marina fees, and has put it in its published reserve plan.
Council approved the negative balances, so the City says they are deliberate and not a surprise.
Questions you could ask
What was spent from the Economic Development reserve in 2025 beyond the forecast, and on what?
Which land sales will repay the Economic Development reserve, in what year, and for roughly how much?
Why did the marina reserve get worse in 2025 when the plan was for it to improve?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 11, self-sustaining entities: "Marina" (990,332) (2024: (912,319)). General government: "Economic development" (2,501,388) (2024: (1,600,874)). The note says "The marina and drains reserves will be replenished from future user fees. The economic development reserve will be replenished from future land sales."
Appendix G, Reserve Forecast: "Sugarloaf Marina Reserve" 2024 year end (912,319), 2025 year end forecast (791,403), 2026 proposed budget 86,000, 2026 forecast (705,403), noted "Council approved negative balance to be repaid through Sugarloaf Marina budget". "Economic Development Reserve" 2024 year end (1,600,874), 2025 year end forecast (1,180,874), noted "Council approved negative balance to be repaid through future land sales".
$1,950,000in three-year funding for healthcare work and Seaway land matters, worked out by us from $1,000,000 and $950,000
The 2026 capital budget includes two three-year items that are mostly advice, studies and legal work. One is "Healthcare" at $1,000,000, of which $400,000 is shown as levy (property tax) money and $600,000 as "Other (Future Capital Budgets)". The other is "St. Lawrence Seaway Land Matters" at $950,000, all shown as "Other (Future Capital Budgets/Costs Recovered from Another Project)". The City says the Seaway item follows an audit of leases that found several properties where the City has built assets but has no lease, and that the Seaway wants to raise rents on the leases it does have.
Why it matters
The 2026 levy shows only part of the cost. The rest is expected to come from budgets Council has not yet passed or from other projects. Residents need to know the full multi-year cost of questions that could change what the City owns or pays rent on.
It could be because…
Both items are described as three-year processes, so the full amounts are planned over 2026 to 2028. Council will vote each year.
The Seaway work may protect City buildings and trails built on land the City does not have a lease for.
Recruiting doctors and planning health services needs lawyers, studies and a staff resource, and the City has set up a healthcare advisory committee for this.
Questions you could ask
Which future budgets or projects will provide the $600,000 for healthcare and the $950,000 for Seaway matters?
How much rent does the City pay the Seaway now, and what increase has the Seaway asked for?
What will Council receive in writing at the end of the healthcare work, and who will own it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Capital Request E.3, Healthcare: "Recently Council approved the establishment of a healthcare advisory committee". Funding: Levy 400,000; "Other (Future Capital Budgets)" 600,000; Total 1,000,000. The request lists a people resource, legal, studies (such as the approved healthcare equity study), consultations with the community and communications over the next three years.
Capital Request E.2, St. Lawrence Seaway Land Matters: "Following a recent audit of St. Lawrence Seaway (the Seaway) leases and discussions with the Seaway it's been noted that several properties, to which the City has built assets, are without lease." Funding: "Other (Future Capital Budgets/Costs Recovered from Another Project)" 950,000; Total 950,000. Timeline 2026 to 2028.
In 2025, Port Colborne collected $2.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 6 of 32 similar places raised theirs by more.
Why did Port Colborne's property tax go up 8% in 2025?
$0$10M$20M$30M
$27.8M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
City property tax
2019
$18.4M
2020
$19.6M
2021
$20.9M
2022
$22.2M
2023
$23.8M
2024
$25.6M
2025
$27.8M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $204 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the city cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The city kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The city is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
City property tax: $25,608,838 in 2024, $27,753,455 in 2025.
Port Colborne spent $4.0M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $7.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 88% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+88%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+9%
+1%
2021
+0%
+4%
2022
+31%
+11%
2023
+30%
+16%
2024
+32%
+18%
2025
+88%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The city added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $3.6M a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $3.2M to $5.8M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $4.0M, 2020 $4.4M, 2021 $4.1M, 2022 $5.3M, 2023 $5.2M, 2024 $5.3M, 2025 $7.6M.
Port Colborne spent $9.2M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $14.7M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 61% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+61%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+1%
+1%
2021
−4%
+4%
2022
+15%
+11%
2023
+26%
+16%
2024
+54%
+18%
2025
+61%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The city added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $5.6M a year pay for?
Why did sewer pipes go from $4.8M to $7.9M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
At the end of 2025, $6.5M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 12% of everything billed. Only 5 of 32 similar places had a higher share. A year earlier it was $4.6M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M
$6.5M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$3.5M
2020
$4.3M
2021
$3.8M
2022
$3.2M
2023
$3.5M
2024
$4.6M
2025
$6.5M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the city may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the city's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the city may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the city registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the city sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $3.5M, 2020 $4.3M, 2021 $3.8M, 2022 $3.2M, 2023 $3.5M, 2024 $4.6M, 2025 $6.5M. Of the 2025 total, $2.2M was from earlier years.
$13,119,702annual surplus in 2025, against a budget of $5,770,477
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The statements show an annual surplus of $13,119,702 for 2025, against a budget of $5,770,477. Most of the gap is one line: government transfers were $11,394,858 against a budget of $5,081,269, and the capital part of that (grants for building things) was $8,222,654 against $1,997,669. The City explains that its budget is prepared on a different accounting basis from the statements. Government transfers explain about $6.3 million of the $7.3 million gap (worked out by us), so the surplus does not by itself mean spare cash.
Why it matters
A reader might see a $13 million surplus and think there is money to spare. Much of the gap is grant money, which is usually for capital projects. This note helps residents read the number correctly.
It could be because…
Capital grants are counted as revenue in the year they are earned but are spent on projects over several years. The surplus does not mean unspent tax money.
The budget Council adopts is prepared on a modified accrual basis, and the statements say it was adjusted to show the budget figures.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $8,222,654 in capital grants was for projects finished in 2025, and how much for projects still under way?
Does the City publish a one-page bridge between its budget basis and the audited statements each year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Port Colborne?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Consolidated Statement of Operations: "Government transfers (Note 15)" budget 5,081,269, actual 2025 11,394,858, actual 2024 8,770,056. "Annual surplus" budget 5,770,477, actual 2025 13,119,702, actual 2024 7,973,396.
Note 15, Government transfers: capital total budget 1,997,669, actual 2025 8,222,654, actual 2024 5,759,414; operating total budget 3,083,600, actual 2025 3,172,204.
Note 24, Budget: the budget bylaw adopted by Council on October 16, 2024 "was not prepared on a basis consistent with that used to report actual results". It was prepared on a modified accrual basis. Budgeted annual surplus 1,666, plus acquisition of tangible capital assets 10,249,350, plus repayment of long term debt 1,443,909, plus transfers from reserves, net 1,046,345, less amortization of tangible capital assets (6,970,794), gives a budgeted surplus per the statement of operations of 5,770,476.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy