Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Prince's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 9 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Prince's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 50 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Prince spent $349K on running the town office in 2019 and $691K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 50 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
2 yearsof statements with a qualified opinion for the same unfinished review (2024 final, 2025 draft)
The auditor says the Township has not finished a review the accounting rules require, so the auditor could not say how much it affects the numbers. The 2024 statements carry this, and so do the draft 2025 statements. A qualified opinion means the auditor is happy with the statements apart from one named problem.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$1,125,962long-term debt at December 31, 2025 (draft statements), up from $231,000
The draft 2025 statements show two new loans from Infrastructure Ontario's lending arm (Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation), on top of one older loan. The loan total is almost five times what it was a year earlier.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
6.45%increase in the amount raised by taxation in the 2026 budget
The 2026 budget raises $1,785,757.46 from property taxes, an increase of $108,135.47 or 6.45%. The same budget has a debt repayment line of $152,011.88 where the 2025 budget column is blank. Worked out by us, total operating expenses (which leave debt out) also rise by $155,351.10 from the 2025 budget column. We did not find the Township explaining the increase in the documents we read.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$20,340.00paid for the grader, as shown in the July 14, 2026 cheque log
Council approved buying a used grader for $18,000 plus HST. Staff said they got prices from "a local vendor" and from online listings. A letter in the same agenda package, from the Township's former road contractor, already offered a grader at $18,000 plus HST. The tender report called the equipment "fully funded through grant support", but we did not see which grant.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$3,377.50a year: the in-house estimate was lower than the compliant bid by this much (worked out by us)
Staff estimated the in-house plan at $67,000 a year against $70,377.50 for the one bid that met the tender rules. The in-house number counts only costs not already in the budget, and it relies on grant money for equipment. The gap is $3,377.50 a year, worked out by us.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$8,000the Township's share of an $80,000 project, if the grant had come through
On March 31, 2026 council agreed to put up $8,000 toward an $80,000 fencing project, and to cover any overruns from the 2026 budget. By May 12 the grant application had been denied, and one of the options before council was for the Township to pay all of the cost.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$613,566draft 2025 annual surplus, against $186,699 in the plan
In the draft 2025 statements, provincial and federal grants came in well above the plan, and general government spending came in below it. The statements also explain that the plan is built on a different basis from the audited numbers. We treat this as context, not a concern.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$163,484roads reserve at December 31, 2025 (draft), down from $312,780
A reserve is savings that council sets aside for a purpose. In the draft 2025 statements the roads reserve fell by about half, while the general working funds reserve rose. This is likely ordinary use of a reserve, but the statements do not say what it paid for.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Prince spent $349K on running the town office in 2019 and $691K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 50 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 98% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+98%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+16%
+1%
2021
+23%
+4%
2022
+40%
+11%
2023
+58%
+16%
2024
+98%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $343K a year pay for?
Why did office and administration go from $317K to $664K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $349K, 2020 $405K, 2021 $429K, 2022 $489K, 2023 $550K, 2024 $691K.
2 yearsof statements with a qualified opinion for the same unfinished review (2024 final, 2025 draft)
The auditor says the Township has not finished a review the accounting rules require, so the auditor could not say how much it affects the numbers. The 2024 statements carry this, and so do the draft 2025 statements. A qualified opinion means the auditor is happy with the statements apart from one named problem.
Why it matters
The auditor says the effect on the year's surplus, the value of buildings and roads, and the total savings (accumulated surplus) cannot be measured until the review is done.
It could be because…
The rule on asset retirement obligations (what it costs to safely close or remove old assets) is new, and it is hard and costly for a very small township to apply.
The Township may be waiting for an engineer or an inventory of its assets before it can put a number on it.
The auditor says the issue is a missing estimate, not a finding that money is missing or wrongly spent.
Questions you could ask
When will the Township finish its review of assets for asset retirement obligations, and what will it cost?
Will the 2025 statements be changed before they are final, or will the qualification repeat for a third year?
Has the auditor told council what the likely size of the obligation is?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The auditor's report on the 2024 statements is headed "Qualified Opinion". Its basis section says: "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential asset retirement obligations." It says it is not possible to quantify the effect on the 2024 and 2023 expenses and annual surplus, tangible capital assets and accumulated surplus. The report is dated October 14, 2025.
The draft auditor's report on the 2025 statements is also headed "Qualified Opinion" and repeats the same sentence: "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential asset retirement obligations." It is dated September 8, 2026. Every page of these statements is marked Draft. Council's agenda for that meeting asks it to accept the 2025 statements "as presented".
$1,125,962long-term debt at December 31, 2025 (draft statements), up from $231,000
The draft 2025 statements show two new loans from Infrastructure Ontario's lending arm (Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation), on top of one older loan. The loan total is almost five times what it was a year earlier.
Why it matters
Loans are paid back from the tax levy and from grants, for years after the money is spent. The draft statements list the loans but do not say what each one paid for.
It could be because…
A bridge replacement was under way in 2025 and was reported finished in June 2026, so some borrowing may have paid for it.
The 2026 budget lists debenture payments labelled for breathing equipment (SCBA), a fire truck and a bridge. Council may have approved each loan in a public by-law that we did not read.
Rates of 1.99%, 3.31% and 4.16% are modest, and cash at year end rose to $1,337,207 from $597,011.
Questions you could ask
What did each of the two new loans pay for, and which council by-laws approved them?
What will the loans cost in total interest over their lives?
How much of the yearly repayment is expected to be covered by grants and how much by the tax levy?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Draft note 4 lists three debentures: $189,000 (due 2030, 1.99%), $200,302 (due 2030, 3.31%) and $736,660 (due 2041, 4.16%), totalling $1,125,962, against $231,000 the year before. Principal due in 2026 is $114,580, and $509,423 is due after 2030.
The 2026 draft budget has a Debt Repayment section with lines for "Principal - Debentures SCBA" 39,602.68, "Principal - Debentures Fire Truck" 42,000.00 and "Principal - Debentures Bridge" 32,977.57, and "Total Debt Repayment" of 152,011.88.
6.45%increase in the amount raised by taxation in the 2026 budget
The 2026 budget raises $1,785,757.46 from property taxes, an increase of $108,135.47 or 6.45%. The same budget has a debt repayment line of $152,011.88 where the 2025 budget column is blank. Worked out by us, total operating expenses (which leave debt out) also rise by $155,351.10 from the 2025 budget column. We did not find the Township explaining the increase in the documents we read.
Why it matters
The levy is what property owners pay, apart from school taxes. A new fixed cost like loan repayment keeps coming back each year.
It could be because…
Debt repayment for the bridge and equipment loans is a real cost that has to be covered by someone.
Provincial funding rises in the 2026 draft: the OMPF line goes from 217,000.00 to 247,000.00, so some costs may be met without taxes.
Insurance, wages, policing and social services costs may have risen. We did not compare every line.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 6.45% increase pays loan costs, and how much pays for everything else?
Will the debt payments rise again in 2027 as the newest loans start full repayment?
Will the Township publish a short plain explanation of the levy change?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The 2026 draft budget ends with "To be raised by Taxation" 1,785,757.46 and "Levy Increase" 108,135.47, 6.45%.
"Total Operating Expenses" are 2,435,787.69 (2025 budget column) and 2,591,138.79 (2026 draft). The Debt Repayment section is a separate line: "Total Debt Repayment" 152,011.88 in 2026, with no figure in the 2025 budget column.
The minutes of the March 31, 2026 special budget meeting record Resolution 2026-71, carried, approving the 2026 budget "as presented", with a tax rate by-law to follow.
$20,340.00paid for the grader, as shown in the July 14, 2026 cheque log
Council approved buying a used grader for $18,000 plus HST. Staff said they got prices from "a local vendor" and from online listings. A letter in the same agenda package, from the Township's former road contractor, already offered a grader at $18,000 plus HST. The tender report called the equipment "fully funded through grant support", but we did not see which grant.
Why it matters
A purchase from someone who has just stopped doing business with the Township is not wrong by itself, but a second price or a valuation is how a town shows it paid fair value.
It could be because…
Used equipment is one-of-a-kind, and the Township needed a grader quickly for the summer road season.
Staff say they compared market listings and found the price within the range for comparable machines.
The Procurement By-law may allow a direct purchase at this size. We did not read it.
Questions you could ask
Which listings and which local vendor prices did staff compare, and were they written down?
What does the Procurement By-law require for a purchase of this size?
Which grant paid for the grader, and does the grant cover the HST?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
A staff report says staff "obtained pricing for comparable used graders through" direct communication with "a local vendor" and a review of available market listings, and that, "Given the time-sensitive nature of the requirement", staff are satisfied the price is fair market value and fits the Procurement By-law. The resolution in the same package left the seller and amount blank.
A letter dated August 5, 2025 to council from the Township's former snow plowing and grading contractor says it will stop those services from November 1, 2025, and adds that a grader "will be available for purchase at a selling price of $18,000 +HST".
Resolution 2026-91 (carried per the May 12 package) approves buying a used grader for $18,000 plus HST. A staff report in that package says the Township entered into an agreement for the grader, with delivery completed and accepted on May 1, 2026.
$3,377.50a year: the in-house estimate was lower than the compliant bid by this much (worked out by us)
Staff estimated the in-house plan at $67,000 a year against $70,377.50 for the one bid that met the tender rules. The in-house number counts only costs not already in the budget, and it relies on grant money for equipment. The gap is $3,377.50 a year, worked out by us.
Why it matters
A small saving can disappear if costs that are left out, such as fuel, repairs, insurance and the equipment's own upkeep, are counted, or if the grant does not cover everything.
It could be because…
Only one bid met the tender rules, and the current contractor was leaving, so the Township had little choice.
Counting only new costs is a fair way to compare when the rest is already budgeted.
Staff also say in-house service brings flexibility and control, which have value beyond the dollars.
Questions you could ask
What is the full yearly cost of the in-house plan, including fuel, repairs, insurance, the backhoe rental and the staff time, and how does it compare with $70,377.50?
What happens to the cost if the grant for equipment does not cover everything?
Will council see a report after the first winter comparing the real cost with the estimate?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The staff report dated March 18, 2026 lists "Possamai Construction $70,377.50", "Northern Fencing and Contracting Inc. $69,370.00" and "Internal Delivery of servcie $67,000.00" as estimated annual costs. It says the second bid was non-compliant because required insurance confirmation was missing, so only one compliant bid was received. It says: "The in-house option reflects only incremental costs not already included in the draft budget."
Resolution 2026-73, carried at the March 31, 2026 meeting, selected the in-house option, which includes buying a grader, renting a backhoe for the season and moving a staff position to full time.
$8,000the Township's share of an $80,000 project, if the grant had come through
On March 31, 2026 council agreed to put up $8,000 toward an $80,000 fencing project, and to cover any overruns from the 2026 budget. By May 12 the grant application had been denied, and one of the options before council was for the Township to pay all of the cost.
Why it matters
The Township's share could go from $8,000 to as much as the whole $80,000 if council picks that option.
It could be because…
Council may pick one of the cheaper options (a gate, or a tree line) or defeat the project. The May 12 package lists those choices.
The $80,000 total may change when quotes come in.
Questions you could ask
Which option did council choose on May 12, 2026, and what is the Township's expected cost?
Was the $8,000 or any other money already spent before the grant answer came?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Resolution 2026-74 on March 31, 2026 says the Township "agrees to commit a total of $8,000 towards the total project cost of $80,000" and "resolves to cover any project-related cost overruns from the 2026 budget".
The May 12, 2026 agenda says "the funding application with NOHFC has been denied with the reason being limited benefit to broader community and economic development". It offers four options: defeat the project; proceed with "the Municipality will be responsible for all associated costs"; a yellow metal gate and no fencing; or a tree line.
$613,566draft 2025 annual surplus, against $186,699 in the plan
In the draft 2025 statements, provincial and federal grants came in well above the plan, and general government spending came in below it. The statements also explain that the plan is built on a different basis from the audited numbers. We treat this as context, not a concern.
Why it matters
A bigger surplus than planned usually means money arrived ahead of spending, so it helps to know what it was for.
It could be because…
Grants often arrive in the year they are approved and are spent later, including on bridge work.
The statements say the budget leaves out amortization (the yearly wear on assets) and counts capital spending as an expense, so budget and actual cannot be compared directly.
General government spending came in at $611,760 against a plan of $805,420, which may be timing or a budget that was set high.
Questions you could ask
Which grants arrived in 2025 that were not in the plan, and what are they set aside for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Draft statement of operations: "Annual surplus" 186,699 (budget) and 613,566 (2025). Provincial grants 1,226,073 budget and 1,388,482 actual; federal grants 100,055 budget and 254,641 actual; general government 805,420 budget and 611,760 actual.
Draft note 11 says the budget "expensed all tangible capital expenditures rather than including amortization expense", and reconciles a bylaw surplus of $ - to a budget surplus per statement of operations of $186,699, with capital expenditures of 1,312,592 added and amortization of (330,060) deducted.
$163,484roads reserve at December 31, 2025 (draft), down from $312,780
A reserve is savings that council sets aside for a purpose. In the draft 2025 statements the roads reserve fell by about half, while the general working funds reserve rose. This is likely ordinary use of a reserve, but the statements do not say what it paid for.
Why it matters
Reserves are the Township's cushion for big repairs. Knowing what was drawn lets residents see how far the cushion has shrunk.
It could be because…
Council may have used the roads reserve to pay part of the bridge replacement or road work, which is what the reserve is for.
Total reserves still rose, from $2,095,562 to $2,195,396, because the working funds reserve grew.
Questions you could ask
What was drawn from the roads reserve in 2025, and by what council decision?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Prince?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Draft note 3 lists Roads reserve 163,484 (2025) and 312,780 (2024), Working funds 1,896,140 and 1,647,010, and Total reserves 2,195,396 and 2,095,562.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy