Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Rideau Lakes's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 8 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Rideau Lakes' financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 90 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Rideau Lakes had $3.7M saved at the end of 2024, up from $1.9M in 2019. That is 25% of one year's spending. None of the 90 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$6,820,840owed in long-term liabilities at December 31, 2024, up from $4,648,821 a year earlier
Long-term liabilities (money the Township has borrowed and still owes) were $4,648,821 at the end of 2023 and $6,820,840 at the end of 2024. That is $2,172,019 more, or about 47% (worked out by us). The statements say the Township took on $3,528,000 of new debt and repaid $1,355,981. A $1,600,000 interim loan from Ontario Infrastructure Corporation is part of the total. The Township's net debt (what it owes minus its cash and money owed to it) also grew, from $4,177,729 to $5,265,634.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$2,574,139asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2024, listed as unfunded
An asset retirement obligation is a bill the Township already knows will come: closing landfills, removing asbestos from six buildings and sealing three wells. The statements list it at $2,574,139 at the end of 2024, of which $2,211,402 is for landfills. The statements call it "unfunded" and take it off the Township's equity (its net worth) as a negative amount. They also show $3,558,816 in reserves (savings Council has set aside), but none of the reserves listed is named for this bill.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$61,1002025 year-to-date legal fees in corporate services administration, against an approved budget of $12,000
The 2026 budget book prints, beside each line, the 2025 approved budget and the 2025 "YTD Actuals" (spending so far, as the Township labels it). In corporate services administration, legal fees were approved at $12,000 and show $61,100. Other professional fees were approved at $20,000 and show $52,475. In treasury, audit fees were approved at $40,000 and show $65,483. The year before, the 2025 budget book shows $10,844 for legal fees, $30,503 for other professional fees and $41,892 for audit fees.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
32complaints received from October 17, 2024 to December 31, 2025, with fees of $50,262.40
An Integrity Commissioner is an outside person who checks whether members of council follow the Code of Conduct and the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. The commissioner's annual report covers October 17, 2024 to December 31, 2025. In that time the commissioner received 32 complaints: 30 under the Code of Conduct and 2 under the conflict of interest law. The report says 21 Code of Conduct complaints were investigated and 19 of those ended in a finding of a contravention. The bill for the period was $50,262.40.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
6recommendations made to Council in the March 25, 2026 closed meeting report
Councils may only meet in private for a short list of reasons, and they must say in public, in general terms, what the private part is about. A closed meeting investigator reviewed a request about council's closed meetings. The report is dated March 25, 2026. It found that on January 5, 2026 Council's closed session on "Board Operations" broke the open meeting rule: the description was too broad, part of the discussion did not qualify to be private, and a vote was taken in private. It found that a 2023 committee meeting did not break the rule.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$388,5242025 year-to-date winter control materials, North Crosby patrol, against $275,000 approved
The North Crosby patrol is one of the Township's road crews. Its line for "Winter Control - Materials" (such as salt and sand) was approved at $345,000 for 2024 and the 2024 actual was $170,604. For 2025 the approved amount was cut to $275,000, and the 2025 year-to-date actual is $388,524.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$554,254year-end budget surplus for 2024, from the statements' own reconciliation
The Township's budget is built a different way from its audited statements, so the statements include a table that lines the two up. It shows a "year-end surplus" of $554,254 on the budget basis, because revenue came in at $26,007,540 against a budget of $25,629,453 and capital projects cost less than planned.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Rideau Lakes had $3.7M saved at the end of 2024, up from $1.9M in 2019. That is 25% of one year's spending. None of the 90 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Rideau Lakes have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M
$3.7M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$1.9M
2020
$1.7M
2021
$2.0M
2022
$2.4M
2023
$3.0M
2024
$3.7M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2024?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$6,820,840owed in long-term liabilities at December 31, 2024, up from $4,648,821 a year earlier
Long-term liabilities (money the Township has borrowed and still owes) were $4,648,821 at the end of 2023 and $6,820,840 at the end of 2024. That is $2,172,019 more, or about 47% (worked out by us). The statements say the Township took on $3,528,000 of new debt and repaid $1,355,981. A $1,600,000 interim loan from Ontario Infrastructure Corporation is part of the total. The Township's net debt (what it owes minus its cash and money owed to it) also grew, from $4,177,729 to $5,265,634.
Why it matters
Borrowing spreads the cost of roads, vehicles and buildings over many years, which can be fair. It also means future taxpayers pay interest, and more of each year's tax money goes to repaying loans instead of services. 2025 alone has $2,625,534 of principal coming due.
It could be because…
The 2024 budget planned for new borrowing of $3,466,600, so most of the increase was in the plan Council approved.
The Township pays for large one-time items (trucks, road rebuilds, buildings) partly with debentures, which are loans repaid over a fixed number of years.
The $1,600,000 interim loan may be short-term financing for a project that will later be replaced by a longer debenture.
The notes say the payments are within the annual repayment limit set by the province.
Questions you could ask
Which projects did the $3,528,000 of new debt in 2024 pay for, and when will each loan be repaid?
When will the $1,600,000 interim loan be replaced by a longer loan, and at what interest rate?
How much of each year's tax levy now goes to repaying debt, and how is that expected to change by 2030?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 5, long-term liabilities: total $6,820,840 (2023 - $4,648,821). It lists "Township interim financing with Ontario Infrastructure Corporation, interest rate is monthly construction rate, matures in 2029" of 1,600,000. The principal payments due in 2025 are $2,576,355 for the Township and $2,625,534 in total.
Note 5(c) and (d): "Interest expense on long-term liabilities in 2024 amounted to $148,756 (2023 - $121,354)." The statements add that the payments are "within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing."
$2,574,139asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2024, listed as unfunded
An asset retirement obligation is a bill the Township already knows will come: closing landfills, removing asbestos from six buildings and sealing three wells. The statements list it at $2,574,139 at the end of 2024, of which $2,211,402 is for landfills. The statements call it "unfunded" and take it off the Township's equity (its net worth) as a negative amount. They also show $3,558,816 in reserves (savings Council has set aside), but none of the reserves listed is named for this bill.
Why it matters
A bill with no savings behind it will, sooner or later, be paid from taxes or borrowing. Landfill care runs for at least 25 years after closure, so a plan matters more than a single year's number. The estimate also moved: the landfill part fell by $950,000 in 2024, and residents should know why.
It could be because…
The Township may be paying down the landfill work as it happens, out of each year's budget, rather than saving for it.
The $950,000 fall may reflect work that was done and paid for in 2024, or a better cost estimate.
The accounting rule for these obligations is new, and many Ontario municipalities show them as unfunded at first.
The Portland landfill closure is under a provincial order, so the Township may have a work plan the statements do not describe.
Questions you could ask
Does the Township have a written plan and schedule for paying the landfill, asbestos and well obligations, and where will the money come from?
What work was settled in 2024 that reduced the landfill obligation by $950,000, and who was paid?
Will Council set up a reserve for these costs in a coming budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8(a): "The estimated total landfill closure costs are calculated to be $2,211,402 (2023 - $3,161,402) and are included in liabilities under asset retirement obligations." It says a 2019 provincial order required the Portland landfill site to be closed, and the Township also has four inactive sites (Delta, Elgin, Hartsgravel Road and Westport).
$61,1002025 year-to-date legal fees in corporate services administration, against an approved budget of $12,000
The 2026 budget book prints, beside each line, the 2025 approved budget and the 2025 "YTD Actuals" (spending so far, as the Township labels it). In corporate services administration, legal fees were approved at $12,000 and show $61,100. Other professional fees were approved at $20,000 and show $52,475. In treasury, audit fees were approved at $40,000 and show $65,483. The year before, the 2025 budget book shows $10,844 for legal fees, $30,503 for other professional fees and $41,892 for audit fees.
Why it matters
Legal and professional bills can be large and one-time, but a line that runs several times over its budget is a sign the budget did not expect something. Residents can ask what the money bought and whether the budget will expect it again.
It could be because…
A single large legal matter, such as a land, employment or planning issue, could account for most of it.
Audit fees may be higher in a year when new accounting rules (such as the asset retirement obligations) add work, or when the audit takes longer than planned.
Costs for investigations, advice on council procedure or the Integrity Commissioner's work might be booked to these lines.
The "YTD Actuals" column may include invoices for work that belongs to more than one budget year.
Questions you could ask
What did the legal and professional fees in 2025 pay for, and are they one-time or likely to repeat?
Why did the audit cost more than the approved amount in 2025?
Were the final 2025 figures higher or lower than the year-to-date figures printed in the 2026 budget book?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
2026 budget book, 120 Corporate Services Administration: "Legal Fees" 12,000 approved for 2025, 2025 YTD actuals 61,100. "Other Professional Fees" 20,000 approved for 2025, 2025 YTD actuals 52,475.
32complaints received from October 17, 2024 to December 31, 2025, with fees of $50,262.40
An Integrity Commissioner is an outside person who checks whether members of council follow the Code of Conduct and the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. The commissioner's annual report covers October 17, 2024 to December 31, 2025. In that time the commissioner received 32 complaints: 30 under the Code of Conduct and 2 under the conflict of interest law. The report says 21 Code of Conduct complaints were investigated and 19 of those ended in a finding of a contravention. The bill for the period was $50,262.40.
Why it matters
A high number of complaints about a nine-person council in a short time can mean real problems with how members work together, or a complaint process being used for other disputes. Either way, residents pay for each investigation, and an election is on October 26, 2026.
It could be because…
A new commissioner, a revised Code of Conduct and an easier complaint process can bring complaints that went unreported before.
Several complaints may come from the same event or meeting, so 32 complaints may not mean 32 separate problems.
Most of the penalties recommended were apologies (11 of 19), which are the mildest outcome.
The fees also paid for advice and general questions, which are a normal use of the office.
Questions you could ask
Which budget line pays for the Integrity Commissioner, and what is the budget for 2026?
Has Council reviewed why complaints rose, and has it changed its Code of Conduct or complaint process in response?
What is the cost so far for the period after December 31, 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"During this operating period, I received a total of 32 complaints. 30 of these were Code of Conduct ("COC") complaints and 2 were Municipal Conflict of Interest Act ("MCIA") complaints." Of the 30: investigation completed 21, not accepted for investigation 7, withdrawn before investigation completed 2. Of the 21, 19 had contraventions and 2 did not. Penalties recommended for the 19: apologies for 11, remuneration penalties for 4, a reprimand for 1, no penalty for 3.
Fees: "the billing for Integrity Commissioner services in the October 17, 2024 to December 31, 2025 operating period totaled $50,262.40 ($44,480.00 plus $5,782.40 HST)." The report adds that the fees for some matters not yet billed "will be included in the billing total that appears in my next annual report." It also reports 2 requests for advice and 6 general inquiries.
6recommendations made to Council in the March 25, 2026 closed meeting report
Councils may only meet in private for a short list of reasons, and they must say in public, in general terms, what the private part is about. A closed meeting investigator reviewed a request about council's closed meetings. The report is dated March 25, 2026. It found that on January 5, 2026 Council's closed session on "Board Operations" broke the open meeting rule: the description was too broad, part of the discussion did not qualify to be private, and a vote was taken in private. It found that a 2023 committee meeting did not break the rule.
Why it matters
Open meetings are how residents see decisions being made. When the official who checks says a council closed a meeting without a valid reason, residents should be able to see what Council did in response. The law requires a council to pass a resolution saying how it will deal with such a report.
It could be because…
The investigator noted that part of the closed session did qualify (a personal matter about an identifiable person), so the problem was mixing topics, not meeting in private for no reason.
The report found no problem with the October 16, 2023 committee meeting, which was about possible litigation.
Council may already have passed its required resolution, and we did not read the minutes after March 25, 2026.
Questions you could ask
Did Council pass the resolution the law requires on how it will address the report, and when?
Have closed-session descriptions on agendas changed since March 25, 2026?
Will Council say in public how many closed sessions it has held since January 2026 and which exceptions it used?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Conclusion, January 5, 2026 meeting: "it is my view that the Council contravened the open meeting rule in relation to parts of the January 5, 2026 Meeting." Six recommendations follow, including clear resolution language for going into closed session and holding votes in closed session only on matters that qualify. The report says that because it found contraventions, "Council is required by subsection 239.2(12) to "pass a resolution stating how [Council] intends to address the report".
Analysis: the public agenda described the closed session as "Board Operations". The investigator found the resolution to go into closed session "did not comply with subsection 239(4)" because the description was overly broad, and that "the vote was not properly taken in camera" on part of the matter.
$388,5242025 year-to-date winter control materials, North Crosby patrol, against $275,000 approved
The North Crosby patrol is one of the Township's road crews. Its line for "Winter Control - Materials" (such as salt and sand) was approved at $345,000 for 2024 and the 2024 actual was $170,604. For 2025 the approved amount was cut to $275,000, and the 2025 year-to-date actual is $388,524.
Why it matters
Winter cost swings with the weather, so some difference is normal. But a budget that was set below the 2024 actual was then beaten by a wide margin, and residents may want to know whether the Township keeps a reserve for bad winters.
It could be because…
A snowier or icier winter in 2025 than in 2024 would explain it.
Salt may have been bought ahead for the next winter, or a shared stockpile may have been booked to this patrol.
The Township may fund bad winters from a reserve, so the overspend is covered without raising taxes.
Questions you could ask
How did the Township cover the 2025 overspend on winter materials?
Does the Township keep a winter control reserve, and how is the yearly budget set?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
2026 budget book, 301 North Crosby Patrol, "Winter Control - Materials": 2025 approved 275,000; 2025 YTD actuals 388,524.
$554,254year-end budget surplus for 2024, from the statements' own reconciliation
The Township's budget is built a different way from its audited statements, so the statements include a table that lines the two up. It shows a "year-end surplus" of $554,254 on the budget basis, because revenue came in at $26,007,540 against a budget of $25,629,453 and capital projects cost less than planned.
Why it matters
Taxes are set to match the budget. A surplus is not wrong, but a regular surplus can mean taxes are set a little higher than needed, and residents should know where the extra goes.
It could be because…
The Township says its budget is cash-based and includes capital spending, debt repayment and reserve transfers, so differences from the statements are mostly accounting.
Capital projects can run over more than one year, so planned spending that did not happen in 2024 may be spent later.
The surplus is about 2% of revenue (worked out by us), and the budget's prior-year surplus of $1,058,797 was used in the 2024 budget.
Questions you could ask
How is each year's surplus used: reserves, lower taxes, or the next year's budget?
Was the $554,254 added to reserves, and which ones?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Rideau Lakes?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 14, budget figures: Revenue budget $ 25,629,453, actual $ 26,007,540. Operating expenses budget (16,710,010), actual (16,732,787). Capital projects budget (8,919,443), actual (8,720,499). "Year-end surplus/year-end budget variance" actual 554,254. "Prior year end surplus" (1,058,797) is shown as revenue included in budget but not under public sector accounting rules.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy