Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Russell's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 15 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Russell's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 25 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2025, Russell collected $2.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 11% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 1 of 25 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Russell spent $3.4M on roads and snow in 2019 and $7.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 25 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$66,371,834estimated borrowing for the Recreation Complex, on a project cost of $102,291,653 (2026 budget)
The 2025 budget said the Township needed no new debt and listed a loan of $0 in its capital budget of $10,610,623. During 2025 the Township actually bought or built $66,341,688 of capital assets and took in $22,200,000 of long-term debt. At the end of 2025 it owed $26,200,000 on loans that charge the bank’s prime rate plus 2.00% and need only interest payments until 2027, up from $4,000,000 a year earlier. Its cash fell to $1,680,840. The 2026 budget says the new Recreation Complex will need long-term borrowing in 2026: an estimated $66,371,834 on a project cost of $102,291,653. At 4.65% over 25 years, the Township says the repayment would be about $4.5 million a year, with about $46 million of interest in total. The Township has explained that the 2026 borrowing moves the project from construction financing to long-term debt. It does not say, in the documents we read, which loan pays for which project.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 11 sources
$7,133,000land sale revenue budgeted for 2025, against a reported loss of $198,000
The 2025 budget counted on $7,133,000 from land sales at the 417 Industrial Park. The 2025 statements show a loss of $198,000 on the sale of land held for resale. In 2024 the budget was $2,000,000 and the sales were $2,952,000. The 2026 budget now expects $4,878,000 of deferred sale revenue (money that comes in later) from the same park. At the end of 2025 the Township held land for resale valued at $8,799,496, and its accumulated surplus shows $13,129,233 of expenses waiting to be funded by land sales, up from $11,290,682. The Township has explained that the sale money is used to offset the purchase price and the cost of building roads on the land.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$16,048,941accounts receivable at the end of 2025, up from $3,899,173
Accounts receivable is money other people or governments owe the Township. It grew by $12,149,768 in 2025, to $16,048,941. The Township’s cash fell from $4,609,935 to $1,680,840 over the same year, and what it owed to suppliers and others (accounts payable and accrued liabilities) rose from $8,723,179 to $17,856,174. The statements do not break the receivable down. The Province of Ontario transfers reported as revenue were $12,080,500 against a budget of $1,469,794, which may be related, but the documents do not say so. A further $7,701,000 of capital purchases was paid after year end.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
7.44%projected 2027 tax increase in the 2026 budget book, before any new initiatives
The first draft of the 2026 budget raised the tax levy from $19,823,466 to $22,377,563, an 8.4% increase. After two days of work with Council in October 2025 the final increase was 3.94%. The same budget book says that if nothing unexpected happens, 2027 would need a tax increase of 7.44%, with about $1.525 million not yet paid for. Part of the 2026 saving came from phasing in new fire staff over four years, from moving costs onto user fees and reserves, and from pausing $1.2 million a year that was set aside to replace four buildings, which the Township says is "paused, not eliminated". The Township says it chose to avoid putting off tax pressure, and it published the 2027 outlook openly.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Russell had $25.9M saved at the end of 2025, up from $14.5M in 2019. That is 66% of one year's spending. Only 5 of 25 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
$34,345,209surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $19,003,550
A surplus is what is left when a year’s revenue is more than its spending. For 2025 the budget planned a surplus of $19,003,550 and the audited statements show $34,345,209. For 2024 the budget planned $13,388,864 and the statements show $25,766,165. In both years two lines were far above budget: donations (budgeted at $5,000 for 2025 and $38,478 for 2024, actual $13,096,138 and $13,564,679) and development charges (budgeted $2,718,404 for 2025, actual $7,825,454). The statements explain most of it: $13,057,925 of the 2025 donations were assets given in kind, not cash. Without those, the surplus would have been about $21,287,284 (worked out by us), still above the budget.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$635,441a year of Corporate Services costs moved from taxes to user-fee departments
Corporate Services (clerk, finance, communications, IT, human resources) used to be paid about 85% by taxes and 15% by user fees. The 2026 budget changes this to 65% by taxes and 35% by user fees, which the budget says brings in an additional $635,441 and lowers the tax bill by the same amount. For daycares, building and the 417 Industrial Park, reserves absorb the new charges so their fees do not rise. Waste collection users face no increase in 2026 but about $8.58 more in each of 2027 and 2028. Water and sewer users see no impact. The Township gives its reason: the old split put an unfair burden on tax-supported services. The final summary page rounds the savings to $650,000.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$2,862,994advance to the Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc., fully set aside as an allowance
The Township lent the Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc. $2,862,994 with no interest and no repayment dates. The statements set aside the whole amount as an allowance, so it counts as nothing on the books in both 2024 and 2025. The Township explains that the amount is repayable only if the cooperative is sold, wound up or goes bankrupt.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
In 2025, Russell collected $2.1M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 11% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 1 of 25 similar towns raised theirs by more.
Why did Russell's property tax go up 11% in 2025?
$0$5.0M$10M$15M$20M$25M
$20.5M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$12.3M
2020
$13.5M
2021
$14.5M
2022
$15.6M
2023
$17M
2024
$18.5M
2025
$20.5M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $245 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $18,457,952 in 2024, $20,513,254 in 2025.
Russell spent $3.4M on roads and snow in 2019 and $7.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 25 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 125% in 6 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%+150%
+125%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−12%
+1%
2021
−10%
+4%
2022
−9%
+11%
2023
+42%
+16%
2024
+10%
+18%
2025
+125%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $4.2M a year pay for?
Why did paved roads go from $306K to $5.0M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Russell spent about $4,432 per home on long-term debt in 2025. The typical similar town spent $1,212. Only 1 of 25 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: Russell $4,432; typical similar town $1,212; ranked 2nd highest of 26.
$66,371,834estimated borrowing for the Recreation Complex, on a project cost of $102,291,653 (2026 budget)
The 2025 budget said the Township needed no new debt and listed a loan of $0 in its capital budget of $10,610,623. During 2025 the Township actually bought or built $66,341,688 of capital assets and took in $22,200,000 of long-term debt. At the end of 2025 it owed $26,200,000 on loans that charge the bank’s prime rate plus 2.00% and need only interest payments until 2027, up from $4,000,000 a year earlier. Its cash fell to $1,680,840. The 2026 budget says the new Recreation Complex will need long-term borrowing in 2026: an estimated $66,371,834 on a project cost of $102,291,653. At 4.65% over 25 years, the Township says the repayment would be about $4.5 million a year, with about $46 million of interest in total. The Township has explained that the 2026 borrowing moves the project from construction financing to long-term debt. It does not say, in the documents we read, which loan pays for which project.
Why it matters
Borrowing this size is the biggest money decision in the budget books we read. A payment of about $4.5 million a year sits next to a 2026 tax levy (the part of the property tax the Township keeps) of $21,557,078. A rate that floats with the bank’s prime rate can go up or down before the loans are turned into long-term debt. Residents will want to know what the final cost is, who pays the repayments (taxes, development charges or user fees) and why the 2025 budget did not show any of this.
It could be because…
The 2025 capital budget is a list of projects chosen for that year. The statements say the capital budget is project by project, can run over several years, and may not be comparable with a year’s actual purchases. The Recreation Complex may have been approved by Council separately from the 2025 budget.
The $26,200,000 may be short-term construction financing that the Township plans to replace with a long-term loan at a fixed rate, which is what the 2026 budget describes.
Grants of $10 million from the Province and higher development charges (fees paid by builders) have already cut the borrowing estimate from $79,945,116 to $66,371,834.
Interest-only loans keep payments low while a building is still being built.
Questions you could ask
Which loans pay for which project, and when will the $26,200,000 of prime-plus-2.00% loans be replaced by long-term debt?
What is the latest total cost of the Recreation Complex, and how much of the repayment will come from taxes, from development charges and from user fees?
When did Council approve the Recreation Complex spending and borrowing that was not in the 2025 budget, and where is that decision published?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Capital Budget Summary: "Total Capital Budget: $10,610,623". The list of how it is funded includes "Loan: $0".
Debt: "The 2025 budget does not require any additional debt. Our total debt payments in 2025 are estimated at $1,377,385, well within our borrowing limitations."
Statement of change in net debt: "Purchase of tangible capital assets" budget (10,610,623), actual (66,341,688) (2024 actual (36,076,406)). "Net debt, end of year" budget (4,442,453), actual (36,843,896).
Note 9, Debts: debts bearing interest "at bank’s prime rate plus 2.00% with interest only payment until 2027" were 26,200,000 in 2025 (2024 4,000,000). Total debts 37,251,265 (2024 15,897,444).
Note 16, Budget amounts: "The budget established for capital investments in tangible capital assets is on a project-oriented basis, the costs of which may be carried out over one or more years and, therefore, may not be comparable with current year’s actual purchase amounts."
Debt: "Long-term financing will be required in 2026 for the Recreation Complex project." "The original project cost was $104,309,044, with projected borrowing of $79,945,116. Following the $10 million provincial grant, increased Development Charges, and interest savings, the updated project cost is $102,291,653, and the estimated borrowing requirement has decreased to $66,371,834." "At an interest rate of 4.65% over 25 years, the projected annual repayment is approximately $4.5 million ($374,590 per month), with a total interest cost of about $46 million."
Recreation Complex: "Given the scale of the borrowing, a $10,000 allocation has been included in the 2026 operational budget to obtain expert financial advice and identify the most advantageous borrowing strategy as the project transitions from construction financing to long-term debt."
$7,133,000land sale revenue budgeted for 2025, against a reported loss of $198,000
The 2025 budget counted on $7,133,000 from land sales at the 417 Industrial Park. The 2025 statements show a loss of $198,000 on the sale of land held for resale. In 2024 the budget was $2,000,000 and the sales were $2,952,000. The 2026 budget now expects $4,878,000 of deferred sale revenue (money that comes in later) from the same park. At the end of 2025 the Township held land for resale valued at $8,799,496, and its accumulated surplus shows $13,129,233 of expenses waiting to be funded by land sales, up from $11,290,682. The Township has explained that the sale money is used to offset the purchase price and the cost of building roads on the land.
Why it matters
The Township pays for the land and the roads first and is paid back as lots sell. If sales are late or fewer than planned, the gap has to be covered by reserves, user fees, taxes or borrowing. Residents can then ask how sure the next $4,878,000 is.
It could be because…
Sales may simply have moved from one year to the next. The 2025 budget calls the $7,133,000 "deferred" revenue, and the 2026 budget carries a similar line.
A sale that closes in January instead of December changes which year the revenue falls in without changing the total.
The $13,129,233 is an accounting entry that shows costs the Township has already paid and expects land sales to repay. It is not an extra debt.
Questions you could ask
How many lots were sold at the 417 Industrial Park in 2025 and 2026 so far, and for how much?
What happens to the roads and land costs already paid if the 2026 sales do not reach $4,878,000?
When does the Township expect the $13,129,233 to be repaid by land sales?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "(Loss) gain on sale of land held for resale" budget 7,133,000, actual (198,000), 2024 actual 2,952,000.
Reserves and development charges: "We are anticipating a $7,133,000, in deferred to 2025 sale revenue from the 417 Industrial Park. These revenues are used to offset the purchase price as well as the road construction for the lands in question."
Reserves and development charges: "We are anticipating $4,878,000 in deferred sale revenue from the 417 Industrial Park in 2026. This revenue will be used to offset the purchase price, as well as the cost of constructing roads on the land in question."
Schedule 2, Consolidated accumulated surplus: "Land held for resale" 8,799,496 (2024 8,367,374). "Expenses to be funded by the sale of land held for resale" (13,129,233) (2024 (11,290,682)).
$16,048,941accounts receivable at the end of 2025, up from $3,899,173
Accounts receivable is money other people or governments owe the Township. It grew by $12,149,768 in 2025, to $16,048,941. The Township’s cash fell from $4,609,935 to $1,680,840 over the same year, and what it owed to suppliers and others (accounts payable and accrued liabilities) rose from $8,723,179 to $17,856,174. The statements do not break the receivable down. The Province of Ontario transfers reported as revenue were $12,080,500 against a budget of $1,469,794, which may be related, but the documents do not say so. A further $7,701,000 of capital purchases was paid after year end.
Why it matters
Money owed is not money in the bank. If most of it is a grant from another government that has been approved, it will probably arrive. If it is something else, such as unpaid bills from builders or other parties, residents will want to know who owes it and how long it has been owed.
It could be because…
Grant money for the Recreation Complex or road projects may have been counted as revenue when it was approved but not yet received. The Treasurer’s message in the 2026 budget says the Township secured more than $25 million in major grants.
Payments owed back to the Township for work it paid up front, such as developer costs, may be waiting.
Most of the $17,856,174 owed to suppliers may be for construction invoices that the Township is waiting to be reimbursed for.
Questions you could ask
Who owes the $16,048,941, and how much of it is from the Province or the federal government?
How much of it had been collected by September 30, 2026?
What is the Township paying for with the $17,856,174 it owes to suppliers and others?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Statement of cash flow: "Increase in accounts receivable" (12,149,768) (2024 (500,771)). "Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities" 3,823,114.
7.44%projected 2027 tax increase in the 2026 budget book, before any new initiatives
The first draft of the 2026 budget raised the tax levy from $19,823,466 to $22,377,563, an 8.4% increase. After two days of work with Council in October 2025 the final increase was 3.94%. The same budget book says that if nothing unexpected happens, 2027 would need a tax increase of 7.44%, with about $1.525 million not yet paid for. Part of the 2026 saving came from phasing in new fire staff over four years, from moving costs onto user fees and reserves, and from pausing $1.2 million a year that was set aside to replace four buildings, which the Township says is "paused, not eliminated". The Township says it chose to avoid putting off tax pressure, and it published the 2027 outlook openly.
Why it matters
Residents who saw a 3.94% increase in 2026 may be surprised by a much larger one in 2027. The Township has been open about this. The question is how much of the 2027 figure is cost that was only moved from 2026.
It could be because…
The 2027 estimate includes ordinary growth costs the Township lists by name, such as policing, pay and new staff already approved.
The 2027 budget is not drafted until February 2027, and Council may choose differently.
Growth in the number of homes may bring in more tax than assumed.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 7.44% for 2027 comes from costs that were moved out of 2026?
Will the Township publish the 2027 draft budget before the February 8, 2027 date on its budget page?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Original scenario: "the first draft of the 2026 Budget includes an overall 8.4% tax increase." "The tax levy is projected to increase from $19,823,466 to $22,377,563, representing an increase of $2,554,097".
Final budget: "With all changes applied, the final tax increase is 3.94%, a significant reduction from the original 8.4%." A revised four-year plan for new fire full-time positions saved "approximately $250,000", and the Corporate Services cost-recovery change generated "$650,000 in savings to the taxation".
Looking ahead to 2027: "the remaining unfunded amount would still total approximately $1.525 million. This represents a projected tax increase of 7.44% in 2027, before any new initiatives, inflationary impacts beyond assumptions, or unforeseen costs."
The Township’s own explanation: "One of Council’s key priorities was to avoid deferring tax pressures to future years, recognizing that delaying difficult decisions will not make them easier later."
Russell spent $4.2M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $6.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 55% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%
+55%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+3%
+1%
2021
+9%
+4%
2022
+14%
+11%
2023
+28%
+16%
2024
+43%
+18%
2025
+55%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $2.3M a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $647K to $1.8M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $4.2M, 2020 $4.4M, 2021 $4.6M, 2022 $4.9M, 2023 $5.4M, 2024 $6.1M, 2025 $6.6M.
Russell spent $7.3M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $11.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 55% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+55%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+7%
+1%
2021
+13%
+4%
2022
+15%
+11%
2023
+30%
+16%
2024
+72%
+18%
2025
+55%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $4.0M a year pay for?
Why did garbage pickup go from $457K to $1.8M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Russell had $25.9M saved at the end of 2025, up from $14.5M in 2019. That is 66% of one year's spending. Only 5 of 25 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Russell have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$10M$20M$30M
$25.9M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$14.5M
2020
$12.6M
2021
$18.3M
2022
$2.9M
2023
$21.9M
2024
$24.8M
2025
$25.9M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Russell spent about $100 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $50. Only 3 of 25 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Russell $100; typical similar town $50; ranked 4th highest of 26.
$34,345,209surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $19,003,550
A surplus is what is left when a year’s revenue is more than its spending. For 2025 the budget planned a surplus of $19,003,550 and the audited statements show $34,345,209. For 2024 the budget planned $13,388,864 and the statements show $25,766,165. In both years two lines were far above budget: donations (budgeted at $5,000 for 2025 and $38,478 for 2024, actual $13,096,138 and $13,564,679) and development charges (budgeted $2,718,404 for 2025, actual $7,825,454). The statements explain most of it: $13,057,925 of the 2025 donations were assets given in kind, not cash. Without those, the surplus would have been about $21,287,284 (worked out by us), still above the budget.
Why it matters
A budget is the promise made to taxpayers about how a year will go. A surplus that is far above the budget two years running means the budget is not a close guide to the year. Here the main reason is published and is not about cash, so this is context. The question that is left is how much of each surplus is cash that can be spent.
It could be because…
Developers give the Township roads, pipes and other assets when they build subdivisions. The accounting rules require the Township to count them as revenue at their value when received, and nobody can know the amount when the budget is set.
Development charges are counted as revenue when the Township spends them on projects, so a year with more construction shows more of them.
The 2025 operating budget does not try to forecast gifts or grants that arrive during the year.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $34,345,209 surplus for 2025 is cash and how much is assets given in kind or money already promised to projects?
Why does the operating budget leave out expected development charges and gifts of assets when they have been large two years in a row?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2025: "Annual surplus" budget 19,003,550, actual 34,345,209 (2024 actual 25,766,165). "Donations" budget 5,000, actual 13,096,138 (2024 actual 13,564,679). "Development charges" budget 2,718,404, actual 7,825,454. "Province of Ontario" transfers budget 1,469,794, actual 12,080,500.
Note 11: "TCA were acquired at an aggregate cost of $66,341,688 ($36,076,406 in 2024), of which ... $13,057,925 ($13,467,579 in 2024) of donations in kind".
Accounting policy, Contribution of tangible capital assets: "TCA received as contributions are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at their fair value at the date of receipt, and that fair value is also recorded as revenue."
$635,441a year of Corporate Services costs moved from taxes to user-fee departments
Corporate Services (clerk, finance, communications, IT, human resources) used to be paid about 85% by taxes and 15% by user fees. The 2026 budget changes this to 65% by taxes and 35% by user fees, which the budget says brings in an additional $635,441 and lowers the tax bill by the same amount. For daycares, building and the 417 Industrial Park, reserves absorb the new charges so their fees do not rise. Waste collection users face no increase in 2026 but about $8.58 more in each of 2027 and 2028. Water and sewer users see no impact. The Township gives its reason: the old split put an unfair burden on tax-supported services. The final summary page rounds the savings to $650,000.
Why it matters
The tax increase is lower in 2026. Part of the reason is that some costs moved to reserves, which are savings, and to user fees. Reserves can only be used once. Residents will want to know how long they cover the daycares, building and industrial park, and what happens when they run out.
It could be because…
Water, sewer, daycares and building use head-office services too, so charging them a share is a fair way to count costs.
Using reserves to phase in fees avoids a sudden jump for users, which Council chose on purpose.
The $650,000 on the summary page is a later, rounded figure after user-fee departments grew more than expected.
Questions you could ask
How much of the reserves will the daycares, building and industrial park charges use in 2026, and how long will the reserves last?
Will the waste collection fee rise in 2027 and 2028 as the budget book says?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Currently, the Corporate Services Department is funded approximately 85% through taxation and only 15% through user fees". "a more accurate and equitable split would be 65% funded by taxation and 35% by user fees."
Council direction: "For the Daycares, Building, and 417 Industrial Park departments, reserves will fully absorb the additional Corporate Services charges, resulting in no fee increase for users at this time. For Waste Collection, users will see no impact in 2026, with modest increases of approximately $8.58 in both 2027 and 2028."
$2,862,994advance to the Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc., fully set aside as an allowance
The Township lent the Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc. $2,862,994 with no interest and no repayment dates. The statements set aside the whole amount as an allowance, so it counts as nothing on the books in both 2024 and 2025. The Township explains that the amount is repayable only if the cooperative is sold, wound up or goes bankrupt.
Why it matters
This is public money that was handed over and may never come back. The amount has not changed between 2024 and 2025, so this is not a new loss. Residents may still want to know what the money was for and whether anything is expected back.
It could be because…
The advance may have been made years ago to start the cooperative, and the allowance is a cautious accounting choice, not a sign of a new problem.
The cooperative may still own assets that would repay the Township if it were sold.
Questions you could ask
What was the $2,862,994 advance for, and when did Council approve it?
Has the cooperative ever reported to Council on its finances?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6, Note receivable: "Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc., interest free, no specified terms of repayment" 2,862,994 (2024 2,862,994); "Allowance" (2,862,994) (2024 (2,862,994)). "At the time of the creation of the Embrun Hydro Cooperative Inc., the Municipality agreed to provide it with an advance of $2,862,994. According to this agreement, this amount is repayable only in the occurrence of a specific event such as a sale, liquidation or a bankruptcy of the cooperative."
Russell spent about $308 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar town spent $84. None of the 25 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Russell?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Russell $308; typical similar town $84; ranked 1st highest of 26.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy