Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Southwold's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Southwold's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 33 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Southwold spent $1.2M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.5M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 33 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$24,808,800in reserves at the end of 2025, against $10,257,449 in cash and investments (worked out by us)
A reserve is money a council sets aside for a named purpose. At the end of 2025 the Township's reserves were $24,808,800 (2024: $18,791,421). Its cash was $3,151,075 and its investments $7,106,374, which add to $10,257,449 (worked out by us). The same note shows three funds below zero: the general revenue fund at ($4,399,045), the "benefiting land owners" fund at ($2,508,950) and "unfunded capital" at ($6,302,346). Unfunded capital was ($2,738,348) a year before and ($196,288) two years before. The three deficits add up to $13,210,341 (worked out by us). Reserves are a bookkeeping balance, not a pile of cash, so a gap like this is common when a township builds ahead of its funding. The statements do not say how the gap will be closed.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$14,296,770in assets under construction at the end of 2025, up from $5,347,465
Work in progress (assets still being built) rose to $14,296,770 at the end of 2025 from $5,347,465. In the 2025 year alone the Township added $11,765,191 to it. After year end the statements record three pieces of funding: a second Health and Safety Water Stream grant of $24.6 million for the Talbotville wastewater plant, a second payment of $16,737,491 from the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund for the Shedden/Fingal plant, and a bylaw to borrow up to $4.8 million from Infrastructure Ontario for the new public works building. The statements say the loan "does not constitute grant funding". Unfunded capital, the amount spent on capital projects with no funding yet assigned, is ($6,302,346). The statements do not give the total cost of any of the three projects.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
($2,508,950)balance of the benefiting land owners fund at the end of 2025, down from ($1,220,705)
A local improvement levy is a charge on the owners of land that benefits from works such as sewers. The 2025 budget counted on $3,150,000 of these levies. The Township collected $180,318 (2024: $342,084). The fund the Township keeps for these owners, "benefiting land owners", stood at ($2,508,950) at the end of 2025. It was ($1,220,705) a year before and ($1,340,612) two years before. A note explains that the Township fronted money for the Talbotville sanitary sewers, to be recovered from future development and connection charges, and expects a significant part within two years.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$2,573,882building permit revenue the Township moved out of 2023 reserves and surplus when it corrected an error
In its 2024 statements the Township said it "identified an error recording revenues from the sale of building permits" and restated 2023, reducing reserves and the surplus by $2,573,882. The same note corrects a second error in the recording of sanitary sewer recoveries ($319,625) and a third in investment gains and losses. Permit fees collected under the Building Code Act can only be spent on the building service, so they are held as an obligatory reserve fund. That fund was $2,245,951 at the end of 2025 (2024: $2,482,539). A separate "building purposes" reserve has held $3,209 for three years. The Township has already published its explanation of the error. What the statements do not say is how it was found and what has changed.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$3,563,933set aside for property tax assessment appeals at the end of 2025, up from $1,812,211 two years earlier
Owners can ask for their property's assessed value to be lowered, and if they win the Township must refund tax. Southwold keeps a reserve for this: "property tax assessment appeals" held $3,563,933 at the end of 2025, up from $2,664,533 a year earlier and $1,812,211 the year before that. The Township raised $8,391,395 in property tax for its own purposes in 2025, so the reserve is about 42 per cent of it (worked out by us). In the note on credit risk the Township says it provided an allowance of $nil for these challenges, because it could not make a reasonable estimate.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$14,327,574surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $2,230,112
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The 2025 budget in the statements planned for $2,230,112. The audited result is $14,327,574 (2024: $4,573,792). Spending came in under budget ($15,246,354 against $15,552,419), so the gap is almost all revenue: $29,573,928 against $17,782,531. Three one-time items add up to $13,832,254 (worked out by us): $6,973,954 of provincial grant money for the Shedden/Fingal wastewater plant, $4,858,300 from selling land, and a $2,000,000 donation for the firehall. The Township explains the grant in a note. The same year it spent $15,079,991 buying and building assets, so most of the surplus is already in buildings and pipes, not in the bank.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$4,858,300from land sales in 2025, against a budget of $3,150,000
The Township counted $4,858,300 from "sales on land held for sale" in 2025, against a budget of $3,150,000. The 2024 statements had already said, as a subsequent event, that the Township "closed on the sale of land held for sale totalling $4.5 million" and that a deposit had been received on another sale. A deposit of $1,575,000 held at the end of 2024 is nil at the end of 2025. The land still held for resale was $644,103 at the end of 2025 (2024: $441,065). The reserve "other municipal services" rose from $1,202,634 to $6,047,850, which is close to the land sale amount, but the statements do not say the two are linked.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
(15,079,991)shown as both the budget and the actual for buying capital assets in 2025
The note on budget figures in the 2025 statements says the operating budget "approved by Council on February 26, 2024" is shown on the statement of operations. The 2024 statements use the identical sentence, with the same date, but their budget column has different numbers (2024 property taxation budget 6,863,999, 2025 budget 7,238,453). The date in the 2025 note looks carried forward from the year before. In the statement of change in net financial assets the "Budget" column for buying capital assets, (15,079,991), is the same to the dollar as the actual. Note 12 explains that capital budgets run by project over several years and so are not comparable.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Southwold spent $1.2M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.5M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 33 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 190% in 6 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%+200%
+190%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+43%
+1%
2021
+91%
+4%
2022
+120%
+11%
2023
+93%
+16%
2024
+145%
+18%
2025
+190%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $2.3M a year pay for?
Why did gravel roads go from $325K to $1.5M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$24,808,800in reserves at the end of 2025, against $10,257,449 in cash and investments (worked out by us)
A reserve is money a council sets aside for a named purpose. At the end of 2025 the Township's reserves were $24,808,800 (2024: $18,791,421). Its cash was $3,151,075 and its investments $7,106,374, which add to $10,257,449 (worked out by us). The same note shows three funds below zero: the general revenue fund at ($4,399,045), the "benefiting land owners" fund at ($2,508,950) and "unfunded capital" at ($6,302,346). Unfunded capital was ($2,738,348) a year before and ($196,288) two years before. The three deficits add up to $13,210,341 (worked out by us). Reserves are a bookkeeping balance, not a pile of cash, so a gap like this is common when a township builds ahead of its funding. The statements do not say how the gap will be closed.
Why it matters
If reserves are shown as set aside but the cash is already spent on buildings, a council that wants to use a reserve may find the money has to be borrowed or raised from taxes instead. The size of the gap is also growing: unfunded capital has gone from ($196,288) to ($6,302,346) in two years.
It could be because…
Large grants arrived after year end and are meant to fill the capital gap: the statements say a $24.6 million grant was approved and $16,737,491 was received for the two wastewater plants.
Some money the Township is owed is not cash yet: HST receivable (tax refunds from the government) was $2,302,729, up from $1,014,989.
The Township is allowed to spend on a project first and recover the cost from developers, grants or a loan later. The deficit in "benefiting land owners" is of that kind.
Questions you could ask
Which reserves are backed by cash or investments today, and which have been lent to capital projects inside the Township?
Does Council have a plan, with dates, to bring the general revenue fund and unfunded capital back above zero?
Is the reserve balance reported to Council with the matching cash and investments each year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$14,296,770in assets under construction at the end of 2025, up from $5,347,465
Work in progress (assets still being built) rose to $14,296,770 at the end of 2025 from $5,347,465. In the 2025 year alone the Township added $11,765,191 to it. After year end the statements record three pieces of funding: a second Health and Safety Water Stream grant of $24.6 million for the Talbotville wastewater plant, a second payment of $16,737,491 from the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund for the Shedden/Fingal plant, and a bylaw to borrow up to $4.8 million from Infrastructure Ontario for the new public works building. The statements say the loan "does not constitute grant funding". Unfunded capital, the amount spent on capital projects with no funding yet assigned, is ($6,302,346). The statements do not give the total cost of any of the three projects.
Why it matters
These projects are large for a township of this size. Grants are not the same as a full price: any part of the cost not covered by grants lands on water and sewer users, developers or tax payers, and a loan is paid back with interest.
It could be because…
The two grants may cover most or all of the wastewater plants, and the loan may be small next to the building it pays for.
Unfunded capital is normal while a project is being built and grant payments are still arriving.
Some of the cost may be charged to developers who will use the new plants, as the Township does with its earlier sewer works.
Questions you could ask
What is the total cost of each of the three projects, and how much of it is covered by grants?
How much of each cost will be paid by water and sewer users, by developers and by property taxes?
What will the yearly payments on the $4.8 million loan be, and which budget do they come from?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 5, Tangible capital assets, 2025: "Work In Progress" opening 5,347,465, additions 11,765,191, disposals (2,815,886), ending 14,296,770.
Note 15, Subsequent event: "Township Council enacted By-Law 2026-08, authorizing the Township to borrow up to $4.8 million from Infrastructure Ontario to finance the construction of the new Public Works Building. The financing will be provided through a loan arrangement and does not constitute grant funding."
Note 16, One-time government grants: "The Township was approved for a second Health and Safety Water Stream (HSWS) grant in the amount of $24.6 million for the Talbotville Wastewater Treatment Plant project." It adds that the Township "received the second remittance relating to the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund (HEWSF) grant for the Shedden/Fingal Wastewater Treatment Plant project in the amount of $16,737,491".
($2,508,950)balance of the benefiting land owners fund at the end of 2025, down from ($1,220,705)
A local improvement levy is a charge on the owners of land that benefits from works such as sewers. The 2025 budget counted on $3,150,000 of these levies. The Township collected $180,318 (2024: $342,084). The fund the Township keeps for these owners, "benefiting land owners", stood at ($2,508,950) at the end of 2025. It was ($1,220,705) a year before and ($1,340,612) two years before. A note explains that the Township fronted money for the Talbotville sanitary sewers, to be recovered from future development and connection charges, and expects a significant part within two years.
Why it matters
When a township pays first and expects landowners or developers to repay later, taxpayers carry the risk if the development is slow. The note gives a two-year window for part of it. The fund has grown, not shrunk, so residents can ask what is expected and when.
It could be because…
The levies are charged when works are finished or lots are built on, so a budget set for a full year can run well ahead of what is collected.
The Township says a significant part of what it fronted should be recovered in the next two years.
A deficit in this fund is a timing gap that the developer's later payments are meant to close, not a loss.
Questions you could ask
What project was the $3,150,000 of local improvement levies budgeted for, and when will it be charged?
The note covers $399,022 and $256,442 of sewer recoveries. What makes up the rest of the ($2,508,950)?
Is the Township's published plan for recovering these costs tied to development that has been approved?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "Local improvement levies" budget 3,150,000, actual 180,318 (2024 342,084).
Note 2, Accounts receivable: "Recoveries from Talbotville Sanitary" 399,022 (2024 441,874); "Recoveries from Talbotville Meadows Sanitary" 256,442 (2024 306,442). "Recoveries from Talbotville Sanitary is $399,022 (2024 - $441,874) representing funds fronted by the Municipality directly which are to be recovered from future subdivision development charges and sanitary sewer connection charges relating to the developments in the Municipality. It is anticipated a significant portion of the directly fronted charges will be recovered in the next two years."
$2,573,882building permit revenue the Township moved out of 2023 reserves and surplus when it corrected an error
In its 2024 statements the Township said it "identified an error recording revenues from the sale of building permits" and restated 2023, reducing reserves and the surplus by $2,573,882. The same note corrects a second error in the recording of sanitary sewer recoveries ($319,625) and a third in investment gains and losses. Permit fees collected under the Building Code Act can only be spent on the building service, so they are held as an obligatory reserve fund. That fund was $2,245,951 at the end of 2025 (2024: $2,482,539). A separate "building purposes" reserve has held $3,209 for three years. The Township has already published its explanation of the error. What the statements do not say is how it was found and what has changed.
Why it matters
Building permit fees may only pay for building services, so the balance matters to builders and to residents. An error of this size, found by the Township itself, shows the checks worked in the end. It also shows the books were wrong for at least a year.
It could be because…
The error was one of timing: fees are collected before the service is done, so they belong in deferred revenue first. Moving them there is the correct fix.
Finding and correcting the error in the next audit is a sign the process works.
The Building Code Act fund fell by $236,588 in 2025 (worked out by us), which may be a normal year of fees below costs, drawn from a healthy balance.
Questions you could ask
How was the building permit error found, and what check now stops it happening again?
Does the Township publish a yearly report on building permit fees and the costs of the building service?
Why is the "building purposes" reserve held at $3,209 when the Building Code Act fund holds $2,245,951?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8, Prior period adjustments, Building Permits: "During the year, the Municipality identified an error recording revenues from the sale of building permits." Decrease in reserves (2,573,882); decrease in annual surplus (2,573,882). Recovery of Sanitary Sewers: decrease in accounts receivable 319,625; decrease in annual surplus 319,625.
$3,563,933set aside for property tax assessment appeals at the end of 2025, up from $1,812,211 two years earlier
Owners can ask for their property's assessed value to be lowered, and if they win the Township must refund tax. Southwold keeps a reserve for this: "property tax assessment appeals" held $3,563,933 at the end of 2025, up from $2,664,533 a year earlier and $1,812,211 the year before that. The Township raised $8,391,395 in property tax for its own purposes in 2025, so the reserve is about 42 per cent of it (worked out by us). In the note on credit risk the Township says it provided an allowance of $nil for these challenges, because it could not make a reasonable estimate.
Why it matters
A reserve this size means the Township expects to refund tax, or is guarding against a large change in value of some property. Taxpayers are building it up each year. They may reasonably ask what it is for and when it will be used or released.
It could be because…
Large properties such as industrial buildings or utilities can have big assessment appeals, so a township with some of these may keep a large reserve on purpose.
The Township may be keeping a reserve instead of a formal allowance because the amount cannot be estimated, which the statements say.
The reserve may be partly general cover for slow-moving tax risks, not one named appeal.
Questions you could ask
What appeals or risks is the $3,563,933 reserve meant to cover, in general terms?
Why does the Township add to this reserve each year, and is there a target balance?
When an appeal is settled, does the refund come out of this reserve or out of the year's budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 11, Wording on credit risk: "At year end the Municipality has provided an allowance of $nil (2024 - $nil) for these assessment challenges and $nil (2024 - $nil) in potential uncollectible tax assessments."
Southwold spent $1.3M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $2.3M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 78% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+78%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+3%
+1%
2021
+16%
+4%
2022
+33%
+11%
2023
+47%
+16%
2024
+56%
+18%
2025
+78%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.0M a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $501K to $1.0M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $1.3M, 2020 $1.3M, 2021 $1.5M, 2022 $1.7M, 2023 $1.9M, 2024 $2.0M, 2025 $2.3M.
Southwold spent $1.9M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $3.7M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 96% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%
+96%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+10%
+1%
2021
+49%
+4%
2022
+72%
+11%
2023
+80%
+16%
2024
+97%
+18%
2025
+96%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.8M a year pay for?
Why did water pipes go from $1.5M to $2.4M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$14,327,574surplus in 2025, against a budgeted $2,230,112
A surplus is what is left when a year's revenue is more than its spending. The 2025 budget in the statements planned for $2,230,112. The audited result is $14,327,574 (2024: $4,573,792). Spending came in under budget ($15,246,354 against $15,552,419), so the gap is almost all revenue: $29,573,928 against $17,782,531. Three one-time items add up to $13,832,254 (worked out by us): $6,973,954 of provincial grant money for the Shedden/Fingal wastewater plant, $4,858,300 from selling land, and a $2,000,000 donation for the firehall. The Township explains the grant in a note. The same year it spent $15,079,991 buying and building assets, so most of the surplus is already in buildings and pipes, not in the bank.
Why it matters
A surplus this size can look like spare money. It is not, if it is grant money for a plant that is still being built. Residents can reasonably ask how much of it can be spent on anything else.
It could be because…
The budget only counted ordinary yearly money. Grants, land sales and donations for named projects are one-time and are hard to budget before they are approved.
The firehall donation may have been received in earlier years and held as deferred revenue (money received before it can be counted as income), then counted as revenue in 2025. The statements show $1,427,500 held for the firehall at the end of 2024.
Surplus under public sector accounting rules includes money that has already been spent on capital assets, so it is not the same as cash on hand.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $14,327,574 surplus is grant, donation or land money that can only be used for the plants and the firehall, and how much is free to use?
Why was only $552,125 of provincial money budgeted when the Township was working on a grant-funded plant?
Is there a published plan showing where the $4,858,300 of land money and the $2,000,000 donation will be spent?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "Total revenues" budget 17,782,531, actual 29,573,928 (2024 17,993,482). "Total expenses" budget 15,552,419, actual 15,246,354 (2024 13,419,690). "ANNUAL SURPLUS" budget 2,230,112, actual 14,327,574 (2024 4,573,792). Provincial transfers: budget 552,125, actual 7,876,749 (2024 1,167,326). "Sales on land held for sale": budget 3,150,000, actual 4,858,300. "Donation - firehall": actual 2,000,000.
Note 16, One-time government grants: "The Township recognized the first remittance of the HEWSF grant in 2025 in the amount of $6,973,954 which is shown in the provincial line of the statement of operations." HEWSF is the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund grant for the Shedden/Fingal Wastewater Treatment Plant project.
Statement of change in net financial assets: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" (15,079,991) in 2025 (2024 (8,439,158)); "Amortization of tangible capital assets" 2,221,201.
$4,858,300from land sales in 2025, against a budget of $3,150,000
The Township counted $4,858,300 from "sales on land held for sale" in 2025, against a budget of $3,150,000. The 2024 statements had already said, as a subsequent event, that the Township "closed on the sale of land held for sale totalling $4.5 million" and that a deposit had been received on another sale. A deposit of $1,575,000 held at the end of 2024 is nil at the end of 2025. The land still held for resale was $644,103 at the end of 2025 (2024: $441,065). The reserve "other municipal services" rose from $1,202,634 to $6,047,850, which is close to the land sale amount, but the statements do not say the two are linked.
Why it matters
Selling public land is a one-time event. Residents may want to know what was sold, whether the price was fair, and whether the money is being kept for something that benefits them.
It could be because…
The land may be industrial or commercial land held for sale on purpose, which is the Township's stated purpose for "land held for resale".
The reserve increase may be the proceeds set aside for future projects, which would be sensible.
The sale price may be above budget because a deposit and a second sale were agreed before year end.
Questions you could ask
What land was sold in 2025, and how was the price set?
What did the land cost the Township, and is that cost shown anywhere in the 2025 expenses?
Is the "other municipal services" reserve increase the land money, and what is it meant to pay for?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations: "Sales on land held for sale" budget 3,150,000, actual 4,858,300 (2024 nil). Statement of financial position: "Land held for resale" 644,103 (2024 441,065).
Note 10, Subsequent events: "Subsequent to year end, the Municipality closed on the sale of land held for sale totalling $4.5 million. Additionally there is an agreement in place for the sale of the land held for sale. A deposit has been recieved but the sale is still to be finalized later this year."
(15,079,991)shown as both the budget and the actual for buying capital assets in 2025
The note on budget figures in the 2025 statements says the operating budget "approved by Council on February 26, 2024" is shown on the statement of operations. The 2024 statements use the identical sentence, with the same date, but their budget column has different numbers (2024 property taxation budget 6,863,999, 2025 budget 7,238,453). The date in the 2025 note looks carried forward from the year before. In the statement of change in net financial assets the "Budget" column for buying capital assets, (15,079,991), is the same to the dollar as the actual. Note 12 explains that capital budgets run by project over several years and so are not comparable.
Why it matters
A budget column helps residents see whether the Township did what it said. If the date is wrong, or the capital column just repeats the actual, the comparison says less than it seems to.
It could be because…
A typing slip in one note: the date was not updated when the notes were reused from the year before.
The Township may have no single year budget for capital, as Note 12 says, so the statements repeat the actual.
Council may have approved the 2025 operating budget at a different meeting and the note simply names the wrong date.
Questions you could ask
On what date did Council approve the 2025 operating budget shown in the statements?
Is the 2025 budget document posted where residents can compare it with the audited result?
How is the capital budget for 2025 shown to Council, and does it match the 2025 statements?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 12, Budget figures: "The operating budget approved by Council on February 26, 2024 is reflected on the statement of operations." Budgeted "Property taxation" 7,238,453.
Note 14, Budget figures: "The operating budget approved by Council on February 26, 2024 is reflected on the statement of operations." Statement of operations, 2024 budget: "Property taxation" 6,863,999.
Statement of change in net financial assets, 2025: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (15,079,991), actual (15,079,991). "NET FINANCIAL ASSETS, END OF YEAR" budget (2,178,136), actual 9,800,024.
Southwold spent about $609 per home on snow ploughing in 2025. The typical similar town spent $141. Only 1 of 33 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. Your town office can tell you how to reach council.
Speak for Southwold?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Snow ploughing per home: Southwold $609; typical similar town $141; ranked 2nd highest of 34.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy