Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Stirling-Rawdon's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 10 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Stirling-Rawdon's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 65 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
At the end of 2024, $1.7M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 17% of everything billed. None of the 65 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.5M.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 4 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
14½ monthsfrom December 31, 2024 to the date the auditor signed the 2024 statements (March 19, 2026), worked out by us
Every year a town must produce financial statements that an outside auditor has checked. The auditor signed the 2021 statements on November 10, 2023 and the 2022 statements on November 16, 2023. The 2023 statements were signed on December 5, 2024. The 2024 statements were signed on March 19, 2026, and council approved a revised version on July 7, 2026. In May 2026 the town’s staff still listed finishing the audits as a next step, and said it was working with the auditors on both 2024 and 2025. All four audit reports we read say the statements “present fairly”, so the problem is timing, not the numbers. The 2024 statements are in council’s July 7, 2026 package, but the town’s budget and financial statements page lists only 2021 to 2023.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 7 sources
$52,410,000the town’s own 2024 estimate for work on 32 bridges and large culverts
In its 2024 budget presentation the Township said its 2023 bridge inspections found 32 bridges and large culverts needing about $52,410,000 of major repair or replacement. About $8,980,000 of that was replacement within one to five years. The town said doing the five-year part would take an average of $1,796,000 a year, or a 27.79% increase in the tax levy. The whole 2025 tax levy was $7,158,249. At the end of 2025 the town’s list of savings shows $13,941.25 in its capital works reserve and $65,687.29 in its roads reserve. The 2026 budget moves one bridge replacement ($460,000) to 2027 “due to risk of failure” and another ($800,000) to 2028. On February 17, 2026 council took a culvert project on Stirling-Marmora Road out of the 2026 budget.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$4,000,000loan in the 2026 budget for a $15 million water, sewer and road project
The 2026 budget includes a rebuild of Belleville Road, East Front Street and North Street, with water and sewer lines. The town calls it a $15 million project with a $10.8 million provincial grant. The budget shows a $4,000,000 loan for most of the rest, so the project adds nothing to the 2026 tax levy. The loan has not been priced yet. In February the CAO said a report on financing would come to council later. Using the 4.4% rate and 20 years that the town’s own consultant used for its debt estimates, a $4,000,000 loan would cost about $305,000 a year (our arithmetic). The town says 1% of its tax levy is $71,582, so that would be roughly 4% of the levy, unless water and sewer rates pay part of it. Council hired an engineer for the project on June 16, 2026 for $378,333.91.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 9 sources
+37%net cost of general administration, 2025 budget to 2026 budget
“General administration” pays for the office staff, computers, insurance and the municipal building. The 2026 budget puts its net cost at $1,086,602, which is $291,902 (37%) more than the $794,700 budgeted for 2025. In 2025 it actually came in at $727,926.94. Spending alone was $911,973 in 2025 and is budgeted at $1,217,102 for 2026. The town says the reason is changes in the number of office staff in 2025, plus higher computer leasing costs. It lists wages and benefits as the first of four reasons for the 2026 tax increase. It does not say how many positions were added or what contract help costs.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
In 2024, Stirling-Rawdon collected $919K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 15% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 5 of 65 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 13% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 1.6%.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 11 sources
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Stirling-Rawdon had $2.2M saved at the end of 2024, down from $3.1M in 2019. That is 23% of one year's spending. Only 1 of 65 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 6 sources
Stirling-Rawdon spent $2.3M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.4M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 9 of 65 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 7 sources
+23%the mayor’s yearly council pay, 2023 to 2025 (councillors +13%, deputy mayor +30%)
Council members are paid a yearly amount called an indemnity. The mayor received $16,272.88 in 2023 and $19,999.98 in 2025. The deputy mayor went from $13,818.13 to $18,000.06, and two councillors from $13,271.18 to $15,000.18. The town’s pay policy says council pay rises each year with the cost-of-living increase for non-union staff. That does not obviously explain two years of 13% to 30% increases. We did not find the council statement for 2024, so we cannot see in which year the change happened or which decision caused it.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
At the end of 2024, $1.7M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 17% of everything billed. None of the 65 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.5M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M
$1.7M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$1.1M
2020
$1.0M
2021
$1.1M
2022
$1.3M
2023
$1.5M
2024
$1.7M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $1.1M, 2020 $1.0M, 2021 $1.1M, 2022 $1.3M, 2023 $1.5M, 2024 $1.7M. Of the 2024 total, $425K was from earlier years.
Taxes receivable (billed but not yet paid) were $1,695,952 at the end of 2024, up from $1,466,660 a year earlier. Penalties and interest on taxes earned were $190,905 against a budget of $170,000.
The town’s 2026 budget notes: “General revenues also include interest and penalties on taxes. This estimate has been increased from $170,000 to $190,000 due to increasing tax arrears.” We did not find an explanation of why arrears are rising.
14½ monthsfrom December 31, 2024 to the date the auditor signed the 2024 statements (March 19, 2026), worked out by us
Every year a town must produce financial statements that an outside auditor has checked. The auditor signed the 2021 statements on November 10, 2023 and the 2022 statements on November 16, 2023. The 2023 statements were signed on December 5, 2024. The 2024 statements were signed on March 19, 2026, and council approved a revised version on July 7, 2026. In May 2026 the town’s staff still listed finishing the audits as a next step, and said it was working with the auditors on both 2024 and 2025. All four audit reports we read say the statements “present fairly”, so the problem is timing, not the numbers. The 2024 statements are in council’s July 7, 2026 package, but the town’s budget and financial statements page lists only 2021 to 2023.
Why it matters
Audited statements are how residents, lenders and the Province know the town’s numbers are right. When they arrive more than a year late, the town sets its next budget without knowing how the last year ended. For example, the town said on February 12, 2026 that the final amount of capital spending not yet paid for in earlier budgets “is not available”, because the 2024 reports were not finished. The 2026 budget was approved five days later, on February 17, 2026, a month before the auditor signed the 2024 statements.
It could be because…
Senior staff changed during this period. The CAO’s May 2026 report mentions a contract treasurer, a clerk transition, and says its first months went to “becoming familiar with all Township operations”.
New accounting rules added work: landfill and asbestos closing costs were first recorded for 2023, and a new revenue standard started in 2024.
The town was catching up from an older backlog. The 2021 and 2022 statements were both signed in November 2023.
Year-end transfers to reserves had to be settled first. The July 2026 revision was about exactly that.
Questions you could ask
What caused the delays for 2021 to 2024, and what did the auditor say about them in its findings report?
When will the 2025 statements be ready, and what is the plan to bring the audit closer to the end of the year?
Can the 2024 audited statements and the auditor’s findings report be added to the budget and financial statements page?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The management report and auditor’s report on the 2024 statements are both dated March 19, 2026, and the opinion is clean (“present fairly”). Council received the draft on March 17, 2026. On July 7, 2026 it approved a revised version, which the CAO’s report says reflects “minor year-end adjustments resulting from reserve transfers”. The copy in the July package is stamped “Draft June 24, 2026”.
The CAO’s May 2026 report lists “Ongoing work with auditors (Baker Tilly) on 2024 and 2025 year-end audits and financial statement preparation” and, under next steps, “Complete outstanding financial audits and present financial statements”. It also mentions “Collaboration with the Contract Treasurer and finance staff to improve financial processes and reporting”.
On February 12, 2026 the CAO wrote: “With the finalization of the 2024 financial reports and the work being completed by staff to prepare for the 2025 year end, this final unfinanced capital amount is not available.”
The town’s budget and financial statements page lists audited financial statements for 2023, 2022 and 2021 only. The Province’s file for the town’s 2024 financial return shows a last-updated date of July 24, 2026 (the 2022 and 2023 returns show January 22, 2024 and February 24, 2025).
$52,410,000the town’s own 2024 estimate for work on 32 bridges and large culverts
In its 2024 budget presentation the Township said its 2023 bridge inspections found 32 bridges and large culverts needing about $52,410,000 of major repair or replacement. About $8,980,000 of that was replacement within one to five years. The town said doing the five-year part would take an average of $1,796,000 a year, or a 27.79% increase in the tax levy. The whole 2025 tax levy was $7,158,249. At the end of 2025 the town’s list of savings shows $13,941.25 in its capital works reserve and $65,687.29 in its roads reserve. The 2026 budget moves one bridge replacement ($460,000) to 2027 “due to risk of failure” and another ($800,000) to 2028. On February 17, 2026 council took a culvert project on Stirling-Marmora Road out of the 2026 budget.
Why it matters
Bridges cannot be patched forever. A bridge that fails closes a road, and farm and emergency vehicles may have to detour. The town has been open about the size of the problem. What residents cannot see is how, and in what order, it expects to pay for it.
It could be because…
Most small towns have more bridges than they can afford and plan to rely on provincial and federal grants. The CAO’s May 2026 report says the town asked the Minister of Finance at the ROMA conference for more infrastructure funding.
The $52 million is an estimate from inspections. Prices change when each job is designed and tendered.
Ready-made bridges may cost less than older estimates. The town’s estimate for three bought in 2025 was $510,550.
Replacing a bridge with a culvert, or closing a little-used one, may be cheaper than a like-for-like replacement.
Questions you could ask
Is there a ranked list of bridge and culvert work, with years and costs, that residents can see?
How much of the $52 million does the town expect from grants, and what happens if the grants do not come?
How much will be set aside each year for bridges, and when will that savings reach a stated target?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
“2023 OSIM Bridge Inspection Reports indicate 32 bridges/large culvert structures, with an estimated $52,410,000 of significant maintenance, rehabilitation or replacement. Within 1 to 5 years we have $8,980,000 worth of bridges/large structures requiring replacement. To do the recommended replacements over the next five years we would need an average $1,796,000 per year or 27.79% tax levy increase.”
The 2025 tax levy was $7,158,249, up from $6,463,134.55 in 2024. The 2025 budget includes buying three prefabricated bridge structures for installation in later years.
A September 2025 staff report says the bridge on Wellman’s Road North “is failing and should be replaced as soon as possible”, and so it was installed that year. The three bridges cost an estimated $510,550: $170,175 from taxes and $340,400 “to be financed from debt as it was unfinanced in the 2025 budget”.
Items delayed in the 2026 budget: “Harolds Bridge replacement for $460,000. This will be necessary to do in 2027 due to risk of failure.” and “Henry Street Bridge replacement for $800,000 scheduled for 2028.”
On February 17, 2026 council directed staff to remove “the Stirling-Marmora Road culvert replacement project in the amount of $392,575” from the 2026 budget.
Savings at the end of 2025, from the town’s own list: Reserve - Capital Works $13,941.25; Reserve - Roads $65,687.29; All reserves together were $3,198,773.53, of which $1,485,193.01 belongs to the shared building inspection service.
$4,000,000loan in the 2026 budget for a $15 million water, sewer and road project
The 2026 budget includes a rebuild of Belleville Road, East Front Street and North Street, with water and sewer lines. The town calls it a $15 million project with a $10.8 million provincial grant. The budget shows a $4,000,000 loan for most of the rest, so the project adds nothing to the 2026 tax levy. The loan has not been priced yet. In February the CAO said a report on financing would come to council later. Using the 4.4% rate and 20 years that the town’s own consultant used for its debt estimates, a $4,000,000 loan would cost about $305,000 a year (our arithmetic). The town says 1% of its tax levy is $71,582, so that would be roughly 4% of the levy, unless water and sewer rates pay part of it. Council hired an engineer for the project on June 16, 2026 for $378,333.91.
Why it matters
The town already plans to pay $1,517,585 in 2026 on loans and leases, and council authorized a $3.39 million loan in May 2024 for the downtown project. A new loan on top of that is the kind of decision whose cost shows up later, in tax and water bills. Residents should be able to see the interest rate, the yearly payment and who pays it before the loan is signed.
It could be because…
Infrastructure Ontario loans have cost the town less than its bank loan and equipment leases: 2.05% to 4.83%, against 6.11% to 7.62%.
Some of the cost is for water and sewer lines. The town says those systems are paid by user rates, not taxes, so part of the loan may be repaid from water and sewer bills.
Bids may come in lower or higher than the budget, and the loan can be sized after the tender.
The town has said it will bring a full analysis of the debt to council. This question is about what that analysis should show.
Questions you could ask
What interest rate, length and yearly payment are expected for the $4,000,000 loan, and will taxes or water and sewer rates pay it?
How much of the town’s yearly debt limit will be used after this loan, and is there a lower limit the town sets for itself?
What happens if the project costs more than $15 million, or the grant is smaller than expected?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The 2026 capital list shows for this project: Provincial Grant - HWSW Project (10,827,000); Loan for HWSW Project (4,000,000); Consulting 1,000,000; Contract 13,827,000, all marked “Belleville Rd, North Road”. The grant and loan together equal the cost, so the project is net zero in the 2026 budget.
“An analysis of the proposed debt for the $15 million Infrastructure project being funded from the ICIP HWSW funding will also be included so Council can make some informed decisions regarding long term financing for the Township.”
The water and sewer budget report says the reconstruction “is part of the funding from the province for a total project of $15 million with a grant of $10.8 million”. It says water and sewer systems are self-funded and “There is no impact on the Township tax rates”.
On February 3, 2026 council voted to proceed with Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program (Health and Safety Water Stream) funding for the “Rehabilitation of Belleville Road / East Front Street / North Street” and directed staff to prepare a by-law for a transfer payment agreement with the Province.
On June 16, 2026 council awarded the engineering contract for Belleville Road and North Street reconstruction to Jewell Engineering for $378,333.91, net of HST rebate.
The town’s debt table for 2026 to 2034 totals $1,517,585 of payments in 2026, $1,308,110 in 2027 and $1,212,129 in 2028. It does not include this new loan.
The town’s consultant projects that by 2035, debt costs on $12.0M of new water and sewer debt “(plus existing debt) will equal $1.7 million or 59% of the ARL” (the Province’s annual repayment limit). We could not tell whether that estimate includes this loan.
May 6, 2024 minutes, Resolution #15, Carried: "That By-law 23-24 being a by-law to authorize the borrowing upon amortizing debentures in the principal amount of $3,393,673.78 towards the cost of the Downtown Infrastructure Update - Henry Street, West Front Street, North Street and Mill Street be read and passed this 6th day of May, 2024."
+37%net cost of general administration, 2025 budget to 2026 budget
“General administration” pays for the office staff, computers, insurance and the municipal building. The 2026 budget puts its net cost at $1,086,602, which is $291,902 (37%) more than the $794,700 budgeted for 2025. In 2025 it actually came in at $727,926.94. Spending alone was $911,973 in 2025 and is budgeted at $1,217,102 for 2026. The town says the reason is changes in the number of office staff in 2025, plus higher computer leasing costs. It lists wages and benefits as the first of four reasons for the 2026 tax increase. It does not say how many positions were added or what contract help costs.
Why it matters
Office salaries repeat every year once added. When one part of the budget grows by a third in a year, residents can fairly ask what they are getting for it, and how it compares with what they see on roads and in services.
It could be because…
Jobs that were vacant or filled by contract in 2025 are now budgeted for a full year. The CAO’s May 2026 report lists recruiting a clerk and a finance clerk.
A contract treasurer costs more per hour than an employee but is temporary.
A union contract and a non-union pay plan raised wages. The town ratified a three-year CUPE agreement in October 2025.
Some costs may have moved into this line from elsewhere in the budget.
Questions you could ask
How many full-time and part-time positions are paid from general administration in 2024, 2025 and 2026?
What does the contract treasurer cost in a year, and when will the job be filled permanently?
Of the $291,902, how much is new positions, how much is raises, and how much is contract help?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Total Administration Expenditures: 2024 budget 838,350; 2024 actual 778,155; 2025 budget 853,300; 2025 actual 911,973; 2026 budget 1,217,102. Net General Administration: 772,550; 660,510.93; 794,700; 727,926.94; 1,086,602. The change shown is 291,902, or 37%.
The town’s notes on that page: “Changes in the staffing complement in 2025 for administration resulting in increased wages and benefit costs are the reason for the increase in this portion of the budget.” and “Increased computer leasing costs.”
The summary of 2026 tax increases lists Wages & Benefits $291,902, No prior year surplus 200,000, OMPF Increase 42,100, and Public Works Capital 557,610.
The treasurer’s statement says: “In 2026 the Township is struggling mostly with increased wage and benefit costs, debt repayment from previous years capital.”
The CAO’s May 2026 report lists recruitment for a clerk, a finance clerk, a winter patrol labourer, a summer student and a water and wastewater operator, and a new three-year CUPE collective agreement ratified in October 2025.
In 2024, Stirling-Rawdon collected $919K more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 15% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 5 of 65 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 13% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 1.6%.
Why did Stirling-Rawdon's property tax go up 15% in 2024?
$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M
$7.0M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Town property tax
2019
$4.9M
2020
$5.3M
2021
$5.5M
2022
$5.5M
2023
$6.1M
2024
$7.0M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $443 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
The town says about $1.87 million of grants and reserve money used in 2023 was not available in 2024. Which grants and reserves were those, and are any expected to return?
The levy rose 9.9% for 2023, 14.8% for 2024, 10.8% for 2025 and 6.7% for 2026 (our arithmetic from the town’s numbers). What is the plan for the next four years?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Town property tax: $6,064,732 in 2023, $6,983,512 in 2024.
The town’s own numbers: the 2023 tax levy (the amount raised from property tax for the town’s own use) was $5,628,847.72, up 9.9% from $5,121,642.85 in 2022.
The 2024 levy was $6,463,134.55, which is $834,286.83 or 14.8% more than 2023 (our arithmetic). The town named the pressures: OPP policing $697,878, insurance $279,110, debt payments from taxes $396,000 (“Funding Debt Payments represents 6.13% of the tax levy”), and a two-ton truck and plow $121,000.
The town also explained a loss of revenue: “In 2023 we had $2,650,000 in revenue for Transportation Services and in 2024 we are only able to include $779,474, which is a decrease of $1,870,526.” It adds that “we also brought significant dollars in from Reserves, Gas Tax and Development Charges to offset the expenditures in 2023 that we are not able to use in 2024.”
The Province held property values at their old amounts for another year. The town’s taxable assessment grew only 2.57% in 2024 ($599,655,430 to $615,055,430).
The draft budget council saw on February 13, 2024 had a levy increase of about 16.3%, a tax rate increase of about 14.16%, “$375 per year or $7 per week on an average assessment of $200,000”. The final levy was lower.
The following years: the 2025 levy was $7,158,249 (+10.8%, a tax rate increase of 7.87%, or $334.80 more on an average assessment of $266,972). On February 17, 2026 council approved a 2026 general levy of $7,635,526, which is 6.7% more than 2025 (our arithmetic). The 2026 levy is 49% above the 2022 levy.
2025 Budget overview; special council minutes of February 17, 2026 · 2025 overview pages 2 and 6 of 6; 2026 levy from the minutes, page 13 of 133 of the March 3, 2026 package (https://stirling-rawdon.civicweb.net/document/69988/Regular%20Council%20-%2003%20Mar%202026.pdf?handle=2134FD88F799434EA93DEF783D4A5985)
The treasurer’s statement for the 2026 budget: “This budget also presents higher tax rate as previous year tax rates were not increased enough in each budget year to cover ongoing costs related to infrastructure needs”. It also says the Province’s OMPF grant (a yearly grant to rural towns) is $1,094,900 for 2026 against $1,559,700 in 2020, and that the town estimates it has “lost a total of over $7 million in OMPF funding in the past 15 years.”
Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Stirling-Rawdon had $2.2M saved at the end of 2024, down from $3.1M in 2019. That is 23% of one year's spending. Only 1 of 65 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Stirling-Rawdon have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M
$2.2M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$3.1M
2020
$3.3M
2021
$4.0M
2022
$3.5M
2023
$2.8M
2024
$2.2M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
The town’s savings list shows $13,941.25 in capital works and $65,687.29 for roads at the end of 2025. What target is the town working toward, and by what year?
The treasurer promised a long-term capital plan “in the next few months”. When will council see it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The town’s own list of savings at the end of 2025 totals $3,198,773.53. Of that, $1,485,193.01 is the building inspection reserve (a service shared with six other municipalities), $400,050.00 is the working fund, $383,817.27 is for fire, $96,078.30 is gas tax money, $65,687.29 is for roads and $13,941.25 for capital works. Development charges, which can be used only for growth projects, are listed separately at $1,353,652.07.
The treasurer’s statement for the 2026 budget: “This budget is attempting to build reserves to pay for future capital needs rather than borrowing.” A full long-term capital plan “will be presented in the next few months”.
The audited 2024 statements show reserves of $526,167 and reserve funds for future capital of $2,533,745 at the end of 2024, and note that long-term debt of $660,998 is “supporting operations”.
Stirling-Rawdon spent about $2,726 per home on long-term debt in 2024. The typical similar town spent $643. Only 6 of 65 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
Why are the equipment leases (6.11%, 6.37% and 7.62%) and the bank loan (6.27%) so much more expensive than the Infrastructure Ontario loans (2.05% to 4.83%)? Was buying with an Infrastructure Ontario loan compared with leasing?
Which loans and leases end in 2026 to 2028, and how much will the yearly payment fall when they do?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The audited 2024 statements list the debt: Infrastructure Ontario loans at 2.05% (due September 2026), 2.45% (due May 2027) and 4.83% (due May 2034, for the downtown project); a Bank of Montreal term loan at 6.27% (due November 2028); and three equipment leases new in 2024 at 6.11% (BMO, due July 2030), 6.37% (Meridian, due October 2027) and 7.62% (PNC, due January 2027). Leases total $1,143,830 of the $5,653,925. Interest charges were $275,776 in 2024 against $65,677 in 2023.
The downtown project loan: council passed By-law 23-24 on May 6, 2024 to borrow $3,393,673.78 for the Downtown Infrastructure Update (Henry Street, West Front Street, North Street and Mill Street) from Infrastructure Ontario at 4.83% over 10 years.
The 2024 budget presentation put debt payments from taxes at $396,000, “6.13% of the tax levy”. The 2023 presentation listed municipal debt payments of $551,650 and said the town’s annual repayment limit was $1,508,861, with $957,211 of repayments still available. The 2026 table totals $1,517,585 of debt and lease payments for 2026. The limit is recalculated each year, so those figures are not directly comparable.
2024 and 2023 budget presentations; 2026 budget update · 2024 page 5 of 17; 2023 page 19 of 19 (https://media-001-ca.cdn.govstack.com/stirlingrawdon-002-ca/media/0efjzahm/budget-overview-public-meeting.pdf); 2026 update page 7 of 8 (https://media-001-ca.cdn.govstack.com/stirlingrawdon-002-ca/media/ei4fcj5m/township-of-stirling-rawdon-2026-budget-february-17-2026-additional-information.pdf)
The town’s debt table lists a loan called “Administration and Police” at 6.27% over 5 years ($832,868.85 borrowed, last payment in 2028), the same rate as the bank term loan in the audited statements. The 2026 budget says the police budget includes “the annual repayment of the Police loan that was incurred due to the disbandment of the Stirling-Rawdon police services”.
2026 Budget booklet (Township of Stirling-Rawdon, February 4, 2026) · page 16 of 91; the loan table is on page 7 of the February 17, 2026 update (https://media-001-ca.cdn.govstack.com/stirlingrawdon-002-ca/media/ei4fcj5m/township-of-stirling-rawdon-2026-budget-february-17-2026-additional-information.pdf)
Equipment leases: the 2025 budget says leasing of “the large trucks” raised 2025 operating costs, and that in 2024 “our lease included the two graders and the excavator”. In May 2026 council approved paying out the 2022 grader lease for $241,535.
Stirling-Rawdon spent $2.3M on roads and snow in 2019 and $3.4M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 9 of 65 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 49% in 5 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+49%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−3%
+1%
2021
−1%
+4%
2022
+30%
+11%
2023
+40%
+16%
2024
+49%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.1M a year pay for?
Why did paved roads go from $1.3M to $2.3M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The town explains that part of the cost is equipment leases: “Operating costs have increased in 2025 due to leasing of the large trucks. In 2024 we didn’t budget for the lease of the new trucks, as the timeline was unknown. We have now received both trucks and therefore lease payments have commenced. In 2024 our lease included the two graders and the excavator.”
In the Province’s return, the interest ($120,114) and “rents and financial” ($159,162) on paved roads are counted inside the cost of roads in 2024. The downtown rebuild loan and equipment lease costs therefore sit inside this number.
Spending on transportation services in the audited statements, which includes depreciation, was $4,338,111 in 2024 and $4,030,338 in 2023. The net book value of roads and streetlights rose from $9,432,302 to $13,370,091 in 2024, mostly when $3,218,618 of finished construction was moved into roads.
For 2026 the town says public works wages rise “due to the new CUPE contract for wages and benefits, however the majority of the costs are for increased capital.”
+23%the mayor’s yearly council pay, 2023 to 2025 (councillors +13%, deputy mayor +30%)
Council members are paid a yearly amount called an indemnity. The mayor received $16,272.88 in 2023 and $19,999.98 in 2025. The deputy mayor went from $13,818.13 to $18,000.06, and two councillors from $13,271.18 to $15,000.18. The town’s pay policy says council pay rises each year with the cost-of-living increase for non-union staff. That does not obviously explain two years of 13% to 30% increases. We did not find the council statement for 2024, so we cannot see in which year the change happened or which decision caused it.
Why it matters
Council sets its own pay. Because of that, the reasons and the vote should be easy to find. Council’s total cost line also rose from $120,293 in 2024 to $138,026 in 2025, a 14.7% increase.
It could be because…
Council may have decided to move pay closer to similar townships after several years of small increases.
Pay for 2023 may have lagged behind: the 2022 statements show the mayor at $14,929.56 for a full year.
Benefits are separate and were stable. The mayor’s group insurance was $5,318.18 in 2023 and $5,249.46 in 2025.
Questions you could ask
Which council decision set the 2024 and 2025 pay, and what was the vote?
Why was a change larger than the non-union cost-of-living increase made, and how was it compared with similar townships?
Can the 2024 council pay statement be posted with the others?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Stirling-Rawdon?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
2023: Robert Mullin (Mayor) council indemnity $16,272.88, total $22,824.01. Jeremy Solmes (Deputy Mayor) $13,818.13, total $18,693.96. Caroline Smith and Don Stewart $13,271.18 each, total $21,235.23 each.
2025: Mayor Bob Mullin remuneration $19,999.98, total $29,561.58. Deputy Mayor Jeremy Solmes $18,000.06, total $23,236.06. Councillors Caroline Smith and Don Stewart $15,000.18 each, totals $22,568.78 and $23,786.80. All council and committee payments for 2025 total $119,541.09. The report says they were paid under By-law 65-24.
Net Council Expenditures: 2024 budget 125,210; 2024 actual 120,293; 2025 budget 139,700; 2025 actual 138,026; 2026 budget 151,037 (includes $30,000 for the 2026 election, $20,000 of it from a reserve).
By-law 65-24, as printed in the December 16, 2024 council package, is titled “A by-law to appoint certain officers in and for the Corporation of the Township of Stirling-Rawdon for the year 2025”. We could not see in it where council’s own pay is set; Schedule B was not in the package.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy