Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Sundridge's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Sundridge's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 32 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
-18.3%change in property tax revenue needed from Sundridge under one rate, before any savings (consultant's estimate)
The councils of the Village of Sundridge and the Townships of Strong and Joly are studying whether to join into one municipality. A consultant's report for their restructuring committee used 2024 figures. If one tax rate were used everywhere and nothing were saved, it says the money raised from property taxes would fall 18.3% in Sundridge and 16.6% in Joly, and rise 16.5% in Strong. With the savings it expects over time, Sundridge would be down 32.6% and Strong up 7.0%. These are changes in the total raised in each place (property taxes only), not in one house's bill. The Village's own page says residents will not vote on a merger.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$106,000 vs $174,000council savings in the consultant's report vs the staff report
Two documents estimate what a merger would save. The consultant's report says council would save $106,000 a year and total savings would be $111,430 in the short term and $462,930 a year in the long term. A staff report dated August 10, 2026 says council would save $174,000, and that total savings would be over $500,000. The two use different years and methods, and the staff report's tables are pictures we could not read, so we cannot say how each total was built.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$650,000highest estimated one-time cost of a merger, in the consultant's report
The consultant says one-time costs of a merger could be between $450,000 and $650,000. The biggest items are a new official plan and zoning by-law ($200,000 to $300,000) and incentives for staff to leave ($500,000 to $600,000), less $250,000 from selling an unused office. The report notes the province paid one-time costs of the forced mergers of 1995 to 2000 but says it is not clear it would do so now. The staff report's mock budget assumes all one-time costs have already been paid.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$587,408Sundridge share of the fire department in the 2025 budget, of which $367,668 comes from the fire reserve
The fire department is shared with the Township of Strong. In the 2025 budget schedule, "Sundridge Share of Fire Department" goes from $210,647.00 in the 2024 column to $587,408.00 in 2025. The same page shows a "Transfer From Fire Reserve" of $367,668.00 in 2025. A reserve is money the Village has set aside in past years. Taking the reserve transfer off, the amount left is $219,740 (worked out by us).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
$2,169,846to be raised from municipal property taxes in 2025, up from $1,992,304 in the 2024 budget
The levy is the amount the Village asks property owners to pay for its own services (schools are separate). The 2025 budget schedule raises it from $1,992,304.00 to $2,169,846.00, about 8.9% more (worked out by us). By-law 2025-019, passed April 23, 2025, uses the $2,169,846 figure. The same schedule shows less money from two road grants: "PROV GOV'T GRANTS - OCIF FORMULA FUNDING" goes from $371,454.00 to $167,085.00 and "NORDS Funding" from $222,574.00 to $68,465.00. Planned road capital spending also falls, from $605,000.00 to $233,186.00.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Sundridge spent $414K on roads and snow in 2019 and $646K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 6 of 32 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$261,849policing in the 2025 budget, against $199,927 in the 2024 column
In the 2025 budget schedule, "Policing - OTHER TRANSFERS" goes from $199,927.00 to $261,849.00, about 31% more (worked out by us). It is one of the larger single lines in the schedule's general expenses. The schedule does not say what changed.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source
2024the newest year of audited statements we found posted
The Village's budgets and financial reporting page lists audited statements for 2020 to 2024. We did not find 2025 statements on the page we read on October 7, 2026. The auditor's reports on the earlier statements are dated September 13, 2023 (for 2022), October 23, 2024 (for 2023) and September 10, 2025 (for 2024). The 2024 report says the 2023 statements were audited by another auditor.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$246,716operating deficit for 2023, against a budgeted surplus of $8,121
A deficit means a year's costs were more than its revenue. For 2023 the Village budgeted an operating surplus of $8,121 and recorded a deficit of $246,716. Government transfers came in at $772,207 against a budget of $1,215,499, and purchases of capital assets (things like roads and equipment) were $173,493 against a budgeted $757,255. The 2024 statements show a surplus of $536,073 against a budgeted $365,202.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Sundridge spent about $476 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar town spent $267. Only 2 of 32 similar towns spent more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Sundridge spent about $4,477 per home on long-term debt in 2025. The typical similar town spent $595. Only 2 of 32 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: Sundridge $4,477; typical similar town $595; ranked 3rd highest of 33.
-18.3%change in property tax revenue needed from Sundridge under one rate, before any savings (consultant's estimate)
The councils of the Village of Sundridge and the Townships of Strong and Joly are studying whether to join into one municipality. A consultant's report for their restructuring committee used 2024 figures. If one tax rate were used everywhere and nothing were saved, it says the money raised from property taxes would fall 18.3% in Sundridge and 16.6% in Joly, and rise 16.5% in Strong. With the savings it expects over time, Sundridge would be down 32.6% and Strong up 7.0%. These are changes in the total raised in each place (property taxes only), not in one house's bill. The Village's own page says residents will not vote on a merger.
Why it matters
A merger would change who pays for what, and the biggest shift falls on Strong, whose taxes are lower today. Residents of all three places cannot vote on it, so the numbers are how they judge it. The consultant also says a new council would have to decide how to handle the differences, so the final bills are not known.
It could be because…
Strong's rate is lower today, so any equal rate moves money between the three places. That is how the formula works, not a sign of a mistake.
A new council could phase in changes slowly. The consultant says changes to the commercial, industrial and multi-residential rates would likely be phased in.
The savings used in the long-term figures depend on staff leaving or retiring over time, so they may take years to arrive.
Questions you could ask
Which tax rate would a merged municipality start with, and over how many years would any change be phased in?
What would the tax bill on a typical house in each of the three places be before and after, in dollars?
How would costs that only village residents use, such as the sewer system, be charged?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The consultant's table "Tax Impacts of Amalgamation" gives current tax revenue of 1,999,902 for Sundridge and 3,111,705 for Strong. Future tax revenue is 1,634,342 for Sundridge (-18.3%) and 3,624,537 for Strong (16.5%). With short-term reductions Sundridge is 1,603,988 (-24.68%) and with long-term reductions 1,508,237 (-32.6%); Strong is 12.52% and 7.0%.
The report says: "Amalgamation will result in increased property tax in Strong." It adds that Joly and Sundridge "would experience tax decreases of 16% to 18% with no savings from amalgamation".
A staff report to the restructuring committee says that without harmonization of tax rates, amalgamation would lower rates in Joly and Sundridge and raise them in Strong, and that harmonization "would be required" so ratepayers "would not expect major deviations from their current municipal tax rate".
The Village's amalgamation page answers "Will residents have the opportunity to vote on amalgamation?" with "No, under the Municipal Act, amalgamation decisions are not made through referendums."
$106,000 vs $174,000council savings in the consultant's report vs the staff report
Two documents estimate what a merger would save. The consultant's report says council would save $106,000 a year and total savings would be $111,430 in the short term and $462,930 a year in the long term. A staff report dated August 10, 2026 says council would save $174,000, and that total savings would be over $500,000. The two use different years and methods, and the staff report's tables are pictures we could not read, so we cannot say how each total was built.
Why it matters
Savings are the main reason given for merging. When two official documents give different numbers for the same item, residents cannot tell which to rely on at the public information session.
It could be because…
The consultant used 2024 figures. The staff report built a mock 2026 budget using 2026 rates, so the totals would differ.
The staff report treats sewer, garbage collection, crossing guards, sidewalks and streetlights as local charges paid only by village residents, which moves costs around rather than saving them.
The staff report says it was asked to add to the consultant's work, so some differences may be added items, such as audit and insurance.
Questions you could ask
Why is the council saving $174,000 in one report and $106,000 in the other, and how many councillors does each assume?
Can the attached budgets and tax tables of the staff report be posted as text, so the totals can be checked?
Which of the two sets of figures will councils rely on in deciding whether to submit a restructuring request?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The consultant's "Annual Impact" table shows Council (106,000), Employees 21,500 short-term and (330,000) long-term, and a Joly fire contract (26,930). The total is (111,430) short-term and (462,930) long-term. Page 7 says 15 councillors cost about $236,000 in 2024 and 5 councillors could cost about $130,000.
The staff report's best-case scenario says savings in levy funding come to "over $500,000", listing Council expenses savings of $174,000, Audit expenses $50,000, Administration expenses $106,000 and Insurance expense $46,000. It gives a Sundridge rate decrease of 33% in the worst case and 38% in the best case.
The staff report lists the assumptions behind its mock budget, including that the Joly property was sold during the transition and that sewer, curbside garbage collection, crossing-guard, sidewalk and streetlight costs are excluded and treated as local improvement charges.
$650,000highest estimated one-time cost of a merger, in the consultant's report
The consultant says one-time costs of a merger could be between $450,000 and $650,000. The biggest items are a new official plan and zoning by-law ($200,000 to $300,000) and incentives for staff to leave ($500,000 to $600,000), less $250,000 from selling an unused office. The report notes the province paid one-time costs of the forced mergers of 1995 to 2000 but says it is not clear it would do so now. The staff report's mock budget assumes all one-time costs have already been paid.
Why it matters
If the province does not pay, the three councils would have to find the money, from reserves, borrowing or taxes. The long-term savings figures in the other documents do not include this cost.
It could be because…
The consultant says the cost of a new official plan would partly replace reviews each municipality has to do every ten years anyway.
The consultant says staff incentives are optional and should only be considered with the province's support, so the real cost could be lower.
The sale of the Joly property would bring in money, but it is Joly's property and an estimate only.
Questions you could ask
Has the province been asked whether it would pay the one-time costs, and what did it say?
If it will not, how would the three councils pay for them?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The consultant's "One-time Costs" table shows Official Plan and Zoning By-law 200,000 to 300,000, Employee Incentives 500,000 to 600,000 and Potential Sale of Surplus Property (250,000), for a total of 450,000 to 650,000. It says: "the province paid the one-time costs of the forced amalgamations that occurred in 1995 through 2000. It is not clear if the province would take the same position now".
The staff report's mock budget assumes the first year of "normal" operations after the transition period, "therefore all one-time cash inflows and outflows have already occurred with a NIL$ impact moving forward".
$587,408Sundridge share of the fire department in the 2025 budget, of which $367,668 comes from the fire reserve
The fire department is shared with the Township of Strong. In the 2025 budget schedule, "Sundridge Share of Fire Department" goes from $210,647.00 in the 2024 column to $587,408.00 in 2025. The same page shows a "Transfer From Fire Reserve" of $367,668.00 in 2025. A reserve is money the Village has set aside in past years. Taking the reserve transfer off, the amount left is $219,740 (worked out by us).
Why it matters
Spending $367,668 from savings is a large one-time draw for a village this size, and residents may want to know what it bought and how much is left. The budget schedule does not say.
It could be because…
The jump may be a one-time purchase, such as a truck or equipment, paid for mainly from the reserve that was saved up for it.
The share could include the Village's part of a joint capital plan agreed by the two councils on the fire committee.
Once the reserve transfer is taken off, the amount from taxes is little changed, so the levy may not be affected.
Questions you could ask
What is the $367,668 from the fire reserve paying for?
How much is left in the fire reserve after the transfer, and what is the plan to rebuild it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Under Fire Services, "Sundridge Share of Fire Department" is $210,647.00 in the "2024 Budget amount" column and $587,408.00 in the "2025 Proposed" column. "Transfer From Fire Reserve" is $367,668.00 in 2025. On page 10, "FIRE EQUIP. RESERVES TRANSFER" is $25,000.00 and $30,000.00.
$2,169,846to be raised from municipal property taxes in 2025, up from $1,992,304 in the 2024 budget
The levy is the amount the Village asks property owners to pay for its own services (schools are separate). The 2025 budget schedule raises it from $1,992,304.00 to $2,169,846.00, about 8.9% more (worked out by us). By-law 2025-019, passed April 23, 2025, uses the $2,169,846 figure. The same schedule shows less money from two road grants: "PROV GOV'T GRANTS - OCIF FORMULA FUNDING" goes from $371,454.00 to $167,085.00 and "NORDS Funding" from $222,574.00 to $68,465.00. Planned road capital spending also falls, from $605,000.00 to $233,186.00.
Why it matters
A levy rise of this size is a direct cost to residents. The budget schedule gives line amounts but not the town's reasons, so residents cannot see which lines drove the rise.
It could be because…
Some of the rise may come from bills the Village does not set, such as policing, which rises by about 31% on the same schedule (worked out by us).
Some may come from the fire reserve draw and other shared costs, and from less grant money for roads.
The schedule lists an "Opening Surplus (for budget only)" of $104,951.20 against $87,292.00, so some of the year's costs are covered from last year's surplus.
Questions you could ask
Which budget lines account for most of the $177,542 increase in the levy (worked out by us)?
Is a document explaining the 2025 budget, such as a staff report to council, posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Municipal Taxation" is $1,992,304.00 in the 2024 budget column and $2,169,846.00 in the 2025 column. "Revenue to be raised by Taxation" is $1,992,304.00 and $2,169,846.00. "PROV GOV'T GRANTS - OCIF FORMULA FUNDING" is $371,454.00 and $167,085.00 (page 3); "NORDS Funding" is $222,574.00 and $68,465.00 (page 4); "Road Capital - PW" is $605,000.00 and $233,186.00 (page 4). "Opening Surplus (for budget only)" is $87,292.00 and $104,951.20 (page 8).
By-law 2025-019 lists "General Purposes $ 2,169,846" and "Education $ 298,079" as the sums to be raised by taxation for 2025. It was "PASSED THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL, 2025" and says the estimates for 2025 are attached as Schedule A.
Sundridge spent $414K on roads and snow in 2019 and $646K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 6 of 32 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of roads and snow grow 56% in 6 years?
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+56%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Roads and snow
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−6%
+1%
2021
+3%
+4%
2022
+24%
+11%
2023
+43%
+16%
2024
+46%
+18%
2025
+56%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $232K a year pay for?
Why did roadsides and signs go from $178K to $568K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$261,849policing in the 2025 budget, against $199,927 in the 2024 column
In the 2025 budget schedule, "Policing - OTHER TRANSFERS" goes from $199,927.00 to $261,849.00, about 31% more (worked out by us). It is one of the larger single lines in the schedule's general expenses. The schedule does not say what changed.
Why it matters
Policing is a cost many residents cannot see or control. A rise this large would be useful to explain, along with how the Village's share is set.
It could be because…
The bill may come from the police service or the province rather than being set by the Village's council. We did not check how it is set.
The change may reflect a change in the number of properties or calls for service in the billing period, or an earlier year being corrected.
Questions you could ask
What explains the rise in the policing line, and how is the Village's share worked out?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Under General Expenses, "Policing - OTHER TRANSFERS" is $199,927.00 in the "2024 Budget amount" column and $261,849.00 in the "2025 Proposed" column.
2024the newest year of audited statements we found posted
The Village's budgets and financial reporting page lists audited statements for 2020 to 2024. We did not find 2025 statements on the page we read on October 7, 2026. The auditor's reports on the earlier statements are dated September 13, 2023 (for 2022), October 23, 2024 (for 2023) and September 10, 2025 (for 2024). The 2024 report says the 2023 statements were audited by another auditor.
Why it matters
Audited statements are the independent check on what the Village says it spent and owns. Until they are posted, the latest independent figures are for the year ended December 31, 2024.
It could be because…
The audit may still be under way, or finished but not yet posted.
The statements may be going to council first, and may be posted in an agenda package we did not read.
Timing has varied from year to year, so a later date is not unusual by itself.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2025 audited statements go to council and be posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The "Financial Statements" section lists the years 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020, each with the Village's statements. The first year listed is 2024.
The auditor's report for 2024 is signed in North Bay on September 10, 2025. Under "Other Matter" it says the 2023 statements "were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion of those statements on October 23, 2024".
$246,716operating deficit for 2023, against a budgeted surplus of $8,121
A deficit means a year's costs were more than its revenue. For 2023 the Village budgeted an operating surplus of $8,121 and recorded a deficit of $246,716. Government transfers came in at $772,207 against a budget of $1,215,499, and purchases of capital assets (things like roads and equipment) were $173,493 against a budgeted $757,255. The 2024 statements show a surplus of $536,073 against a budgeted $365,202.
Why it matters
A budget is the promise about what a year will cost. A swing from a deficit to a surplus in a year is worth understanding, because it shows how much depends on when grants arrive and when projects are done.
It could be because…
Grants are counted when the related spending happens, so a project that slipped from 2023 into 2024 would move both the grant and the cost.
The budget for capital items was $757,255 but only $173,493 was bought, which fits a delayed project.
The 2024 statements show capital grants of $566,177 in 2024, which may include money for work first planned for 2023.
Questions you could ask
Which projects and grants account for the gap between the 2023 budget and result?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations for 2023: "ANNUAL OPERATING SURPLUS (DEFICIT)" budget 8,121, actual (246,716). "Government transfers" budget 1,215,499, actual 772,207. On page 8, "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" is budget (757,255), actual (173,493).
Statement of operations for 2024: "Annual surplus (deficit)" budget 365,202, actual 536,073, with 2023 actual (246,716). "Government grants and transfers related to capital - Provincial" is 594,028 budgeted and 566,177 actual.
Sundridge spent about $476 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar town spent $267. Only 2 of 32 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Sundridge?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Sundridge $476; typical similar town $267; ranked 3rd highest of 33.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy