Council BooksThe Blue MountainsOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read The Blue Mountains's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 14 so far

Things worth asking about

We read The Blue Mountains' financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 47 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 198% in 6 years?

+198%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

The Blue Mountains spent $4.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $11.8M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 47 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Are the Town's savings running out faster than it can fill them?

$82.4 million to about $6.7 millionprojected reserves and reserve funds, 2021 to the end of 2026, in the Town's 2026 budget book

Reserves are savings that council sets aside for future needs, such as replacing roads and pipes. The Town's own 2026 budget book says its reserves and reserve funds are projected to fall from $82.4 million in 2021 to about $6.7 million by the end of 2026. The audited statements show the reserves total dropped in 2025, and the budget book's table shows far more money planned to go out of reserves in 2026 than the Town expects to hold. The Town has explained why and has added a $345,000 yearly transfer, which it calls a step in the right direction.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources

Worth askingMoney health

How will the Town pay the $29.8 million bill for closing its landfill and removing asbestos?

$29,849,250recorded cost of closing the landfill and removing asbestos, at December 31, 2025

Under accounting rules the Town must record what it will cost to close its landfill, care for it afterwards and remove asbestos from some buildings and pipes. That total is $29,849,250. The Town's accumulated surplus note lists the same kind of amount as 'unfunded', meaning no money has been set aside for it. We did not find this obligation mentioned in the 2026 budget book.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why has garbage collection cost so much more, and who will pay for it?

150%increase in waste management costs over 2023, per the Town's 2026 budget book

The Town's budget book says waste management costs have risen 150% over 2023 and are rising again. Council took out a proposed $4 fee on each bag of garbage that would have raised about $750K, so the cost stays on the property tax levy. The Town says collecting commercial blue box recycling costs almost $3,500 per tonne.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Does the 2026 budget count on jobs staying empty?

$380K to just over $1 millionthe salary vacancy factor in the 2026 budget

A 'salary vacancy factor' is an amount taken off the pay budget because some jobs are usually empty. Council raised it from $380K to just over $1 million. That cut the levy but only works if positions stay unfilled. The Town's own forecast says the 2027 tax increase would be 5.50%, driven mainly by lowering this factor again. Salaries and benefits grew from 19,376,318 in 2024 to 21,251,439 in 2025 (about 9.7%, worked out by us).

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingOpenness

Where is the new accommodation tax money going?

$645,000of the Town's accommodation tax share set aside for 2026 projects, against an estimated $2.8M generated in 2025

The Town began a 4% Municipal Accommodation Tax on short stays of less than 30 days on January 6, 2025. The Town estimated it would generate $2.8M in 2025 and splits it with the local destination marketing group. For 2026 council set aside $645,000 of the Town's share for named projects, including $175,000 to run transit so that it no longer falls on the property tax levy.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did The Blue Mountains' property tax go up 8% in 2025?

+8%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, The Blue Mountains collected $1.9M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 8 of 47 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Does The Blue Mountains have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$27.4Min savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. The Blue Mountains had $27.4M saved at the end of 2025, down from $47.8M in 2019. That is 66% of one year's spending. Only 8 of 47 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowMoney health

Does the $50.8 million surplus in 2025 mean the Town has money to spare?

$50,753,745annual surplus in 2025, while cash fell from $24,343,518 to $22,174,329

The audited statements show an annual surplus of $50,753,745 for 2025. Most of it is not cash the Town can spend. Almost all of it is two things that are not spendable cash: assets such as roads and pipes handed over to the Town ($26,310,664), and restricted money such as development charges counted as revenue ($23,178,341). Together, worked out by us, that is $49,489,005, close to the whole surplus. Cash in the bank went down over the year.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Good to knowOpenness

Why was the 2025 audit finished later than the year before?

September 16, 2026date of the auditor's report on the 2025 statements (2024: June 30, 2025)

The auditor, KPMG LLP, gave a clean opinion on the Town's 2025 statements, saying they 'present fairly, in all material respects' the Town's position. The auditor's report is dated September 16, 2026. The 2024 report was dated June 30, 2025, about two and a half months earlier in the calendar year. We did not find the Town's explanation on the pages we read.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowSpending level

Why is council's own budget up 26% in 2026?

26%increase in council's budgeted expenses, 2025 to 2026, as printed in the budget book

The 2026 approved budget for Council as a whole is $687,642 in expenses, up from $546,502 in 2025. The Town's budget book shows large jumps in communications and in personnel and training. Council added $20,000 in extra training, paid from the Council Reserve.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Good to knowMoney health

The Blue Mountains went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?

−$8.0Mnet financial position, 2025

In 2019, The Blue Mountains had $33.9M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$8.0M. About 71% of that change ($29.8M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 25 of 47 similar towns are in a weaker position.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 198% in 6 years?

+198%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

The Blue Mountains spent $4.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $11.8M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 0 of 47 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 198% in 6 years?
+198%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+20%+1%
2021+12%+4%
2022+66%+11%
2023+69%+16%
2024+139%+18%
2025+198%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $7.9M a year pay for?
  2. Why did senior management go from $2.8M to $7.2M?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $4.0M, 2020 $4.8M, 2021 $4.4M, 2022 $6.6M, 2023 $6.7M, 2024 $9.5M, 2025 $11.8M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Senior management, from $2.8M to $7.2M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 45%. The Blue Mountains ranks 1st of 48.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 47 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why does The Blue Mountains spend more than most similar towns on council?

$220per home on council, 2025

The Blue Mountains spent about $220 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $50. Only 2 of 47 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Council per home: The Blue Mountains $220; typical similar town $50; ranked 3rd highest of 48.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 47 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Are the Town's savings running out faster than it can fill them?

$82.4 million to about $6.7 millionprojected reserves and reserve funds, 2021 to the end of 2026, in the Town's 2026 budget book

Reserves are savings that council sets aside for future needs, such as replacing roads and pipes. The Town's own 2026 budget book says its reserves and reserve funds are projected to fall from $82.4 million in 2021 to about $6.7 million by the end of 2026. The audited statements show the reserves total dropped in 2025, and the budget book's table shows far more money planned to go out of reserves in 2026 than the Town expects to hold. The Town has explained why and has added a $345,000 yearly transfer, which it calls a step in the right direction.

Why it matters

Reserves are what pay for big repairs without borrowing or raising taxes in a hurry. When they run low, the choices left are higher taxes, higher user rates, more debt or fewer services. The Town itself says its debt limit would allow up to nearly $110 million of borrowing, so debt may be how the gap gets filled.

It could be because…

  • Reserves exist to be spent. Drawing them down on planned capital projects is what they are for.
  • The Town says many Ontario municipalities face the same gap between the cost of replacing aging assets and what they set aside.
  • The budget book's projection is a plan made on December 1, 2025. The audited year-end balances count some money differently (for example, development charge money is shown as deferred revenue, not as a reserve), so the two sets of numbers are not directly comparable.
  • An updated Asset Management Plan and a Long-Term Financial Plan were still being prepared. They may set targets and a path to rebuild the reserves.

Questions you could ask

  1. What are the Town's reserve targets, and when will the Long-Term Financial Plan set them?
  2. How much of the $70,666,655 in commitments is already covered by money in hand, and how much depends on new borrowing or higher taxes?
  3. Why did the year-end reserve balances differ from the December 1, 2025 projection?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Town's budget book says: “Reserves and reserve funds remain under significant pressure. Balances are projected to decline from $82.4 million in 2021 to approximately $6.7 million by the end of 2026.” It adds that the Asset Management Reserve “is projected at only $1.8 million”, and that the Town’s Annual Repayment Limit “allows up to nearly $110 million in debt capacity”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Financial Overview, Reserves and Financial Outlook, PDF page 8 (printed page 8)

  2. The budget's reserves table shows a total projected 2025 ending balance of $57,414,533 and a total of $(67,269,647) projected to go out in 2026. (In the PDF text the row labels sit apart from the figures, so we used only the Total row, the one with dollar signs, and checked that the five rows above it add up to those totals.)

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Reserves and Reserve Funds, summary table of contributions and draws, PDF page 168 (printed page 168), Total row

  3. The Town's explanation: staff are “recommending an additional $345,000 transfer to the Asset Management Reserve”, and the approved 2026 municipal levy is shown as (24,609,613), a 4.34% increase. The Town calls the transfer “an important step in the right direction” and says the updated Asset Management Plan will give the full picture.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, PDF page 8 (the $345,000 transfer and the quotes) and the levy walk from Draft 2 to Approved Budget, PDF page 18 (the 2026 approved municipal levy)

  4. The audited statements list “Reserves and Reserve Funds” of 27,386,162 at the end of 2025 and 44,072,030 at the end of 2024.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 10, Accumulated surplus, PDF page 19 (printed page 17)

  5. The budget reconciliation in the audited statements shows “Net transfers from (to) reserves” of 25,721,490 in the 2025 budget, 16,685,868 in 2025 actual and 674,201 in 2024 actual.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 11, Budgets, PDF page 20 (printed page 18)

  6. The Town reports contractual commitments: “The anticipated future payments until the completion of these contracts amount to approximately $70,666,655.” It says funding will come from reserve funds, development charges, local improvement charges, government grants, long-term debt and taxation.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 16, Contractual commitments, PDF page 22 (printed page 20)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

How will the Town pay the $29.8 million bill for closing its landfill and removing asbestos?

$29,849,250recorded cost of closing the landfill and removing asbestos, at December 31, 2025

Under accounting rules the Town must record what it will cost to close its landfill, care for it afterwards and remove asbestos from some buildings and pipes. That total is $29,849,250. The Town's accumulated surplus note lists the same kind of amount as 'unfunded', meaning no money has been set aside for it. We did not find this obligation mentioned in the 2026 budget book.

Why it matters

The landfill is the only one the Town runs, and it says about 25 years of space are left. The cost is a future bill that taxpayers and rate payers will pay when the site closes, so how it is saved for affects future budgets.

It could be because…

  • Most of the bill falls due many years from now, and the amount is discounted for that delay. Setting money aside can start later.
  • The Long-Term Financial Plan and the reserve policies the Town says are being prepared may deal with it.
  • The cost is an estimate and could change as the site's closing date and plans become clearer.

Questions you could ask

  1. Does the Town plan a reserve or a yearly contribution for landfill closure, and when will it start?
  2. When the Long-Term Financial Plan is finished, will it say how the $29,849,250 is to be paid?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 8 says the Town “owns and operates one active landfill site” with “a remaining capacity of approximately 161,175 m3 and an estimated life expectancy of 25 years”. The table shows a closing balance of 29,849,250 on December 31, 2025, of which 29,030,284 is landfill closure.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 8, Asset retirement obligation, PDF page 16 (printed page 14)

  2. Note 10 lists “Unfunded asset retirement obligation” of (29,451,553) in the accumulated surplus for both 2025 and 2024.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 10, Accumulated surplus, PDF page 19 (printed page 17)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why has garbage collection cost so much more, and who will pay for it?

150%increase in waste management costs over 2023, per the Town's 2026 budget book

The Town's budget book says waste management costs have risen 150% over 2023 and are rising again. Council took out a proposed $4 fee on each bag of garbage that would have raised about $750K, so the cost stays on the property tax levy. The Town says collecting commercial blue box recycling costs almost $3,500 per tonne.

Why it matters

Garbage collection is one of the Town's largest contracts. When it grows, it pushes up the tax bill every year unless residents pay a fee instead. The Town's forecast expects 5% more a year.

It could be because…

  • The Town says a new collection contract began in late 2023 at higher prices, and the cost of waste collection has gone up across the industry.
  • Council may have judged that a per-bag fee was unfair or hard to run and chose to keep the cost on the general levy.
  • The Town says it is working with Grey County on a cheaper way to collect commercial recycling.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did garbage and recycling collection cost in 2023, 2024 and 2025, and what is the contract's price in 2026?
  2. Will council look again at a per-bag fee or a user-pay service for businesses?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Key budget pressures include “Waste Management Escalation - 150% increase over 2023 (and an additional increase of $100,000 over 2025)”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, Key Budget Pressures, PDF page 8 (printed page 8)

  2. The Garbage Collection page says commercial blue box tonnage was 30 tonnes between January and June and “the per tonne cost is extremely high (almost $3,500 per tonne)”. It also says “Waste collection has increased in cost significantly.”

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Operations, Garbage Collection, Risks & Challenges, PDF page 126 (printed page 126)

  3. The Garbage Collection operating table shows Operating and Administrative Expenses of 1,830,001 in 2024 actuals and 2,217,775 in the 2026 approved budget.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Operations, Garbage Collection, 2026 Approved Operating Budget table, PDF page 127 (printed page 127), row Operating and Administrative Expenses, first and sixth columns

  4. The Town reports that “Council directed staff to remove the proposed new fee structure for garbage bag tags of $4 per bag for all garbage bags placed at the curb.” The levy walk shows “Removal of Proposed Garbage Collection Revenue – $750K”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, levy walk from Draft 1 to Draft 2, PDF page 13 (printed page 13)

  5. The four-year forecast assumes Garbage Collection costs rise 5.00% a year.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, Four-Year Operating Forecast, assumptions table, PDF page 28 (printed page 28)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Does the 2026 budget count on jobs staying empty?

$380K to just over $1 millionthe salary vacancy factor in the 2026 budget

A 'salary vacancy factor' is an amount taken off the pay budget because some jobs are usually empty. Council raised it from $380K to just over $1 million. That cut the levy but only works if positions stay unfilled. The Town's own forecast says the 2027 tax increase would be 5.50%, driven mainly by lowering this factor again. Salaries and benefits grew from 19,376,318 in 2024 to 21,251,439 in 2025 (about 9.7%, worked out by us).

Why it matters

If the Town fills its jobs, it must find the extra money. If it does not fill them, services may be thinner than the budget suggests. Either way, the saving is not permanent.

It could be because…

  • Council said the change reflects “current and potential future staff vacancies”, so it may match what the Town really sees (staff turnover, hard-to-fill roles).
  • The Town's forecast already sets the factor back to 2% of tax-supported salaries from 2027, so it is open about it being a one-year effect.

Questions you could ask

  1. How many positions were empty in 2025, and for how long?
  2. What will council cut or raise if the Town fills most of its jobs in 2026?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Town reports that “Council directed staff to increase the salary vacancy factor from $380K in the proposed budget to just over $1 million to account for current and potential future staff vacancies.” The levy walk shows “Increase in Salary Vacancy Factor 619,778”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, levy walk from Draft 1 to Draft 2, PDF page 13 (printed page 13)

  2. The four-year forecast says it “indicates a tax rate increase in 2027 of 5.50% over the 2026 approved tax rate”, an increase of approximately $129 annually for a median assessed home of $530,000, “mainly driven by the reduction in the salary vacancy factor and the estimated increase in the Town’s large contracts (OPP, Garbage Collection)”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, Four-Year Operating Forecast, PDF page 28 (printed page 28)

  3. The segmented information note shows “Salaries and benefits” totalling 21,251,439 in 2025 and 19,376,318 in 2024.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 19, Segmented information, Total column: 2025 on PDF page 25 (printed page 23), 2024 on PDF page 26 (printed page 24)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Where is the new accommodation tax money going?

$645,000of the Town's accommodation tax share set aside for 2026 projects, against an estimated $2.8M generated in 2025

The Town began a 4% Municipal Accommodation Tax on short stays of less than 30 days on January 6, 2025. The Town estimated it would generate $2.8M in 2025 and splits it with the local destination marketing group. For 2026 council set aside $645,000 of the Town's share for named projects, including $175,000 to run transit so that it no longer falls on the property tax levy.

Why it matters

A new tax that is large relative to other revenue needs clear reporting on how much is collected and what it is spent on. Using it for existing services like transit also lowers the property tax levy, so residents benefit unevenly from tourism spending.

It could be because…

  • The Town says the rest of its share will be used through a separate process, with a staff report to follow and a published scoring system for projects.
  • Funding transit from the tax is allowed and can help the visitors who use it.
  • 2025 was the first year and part of it was exempt for pre-booked stays, so figures are rough estimates.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much accommodation tax did the Town collect in 2025 and how much has been spent?
  2. Will the Town publish a yearly report on the tax, showing collected, shared with the marketing group, spent and unspent?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The budget says the tax “came into effect on January 6, 2025, at a rate of 4% on all short-term stays of less than 30 days” and lists items funded by it in 2026: Economic Development Action Plan (60,000), Comprehensive Parking Strategy (50,000), Destination Strategy (150,000), Transit Service (175,000) and Gateway Signage (210,000), for a TOTAL of (645,000).

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, Municipal Accommodation Tax, PDF page 19 (printed page 19)

  2. The Strategic Initiatives page says the program is estimated to generate $2.8M in 2025, and that the Town's share is 50% of the total collected. Its operating table shows External Revenues of 2,919,012 in the 2025 forecast and 2,810,000 in the 2026 approved budget.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Strategic Initiatives, Municipal Accommodation Tax and 2026 Approved Operating Budget table, PDF page 52 (printed page 52), row External Revenues

  3. The levy walk shows “Fund Transit with Municipal Accommodation Tax 175,000”, which lowers the levy increase by 0.76%.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, levy walk from Draft 1 to Draft 2, PDF page 13 (printed page 13)

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did The Blue Mountains' property tax go up 8% in 2025?

+8%town property tax, 2024 to 2025

In 2025, The Blue Mountains collected $1.9M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 8 of 47 similar towns raised theirs by more.

Why did The Blue Mountains' property tax go up 8% in 2025?
$23.8M
Show as a table
YearTown property tax
2019$17.4M
2020$17.3M
2021$18.1M
2022$19.4M
2023$20.7M
2024$21.9M
2025$23.8M

Why it matters

A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $193 more each year.

It could be because…

  • Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
  • The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
  • The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
  2. Is a similar increase planned for next year?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Town property tax: $21,931,377 in 2024, $23,786,532 in 2025.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  2. Typical increase among 47 similar Ontario towns: 7.2%. The Blue Mountains ranks 9th highest.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 47 similar municipalities · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  3. Prices (inflation) rose 2.1% over the same year.

    Statistics Canada CPI, table 18-10-0005-01 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Does The Blue Mountains have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?

$27.4Min savings at the end of 2025

Towns keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. The Blue Mountains had $27.4M saved at the end of 2025, down from $47.8M in 2019. That is 66% of one year's spending. Only 8 of 47 similar towns had less, compared with what they spend.

Does The Blue Mountains have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$27.4M
Show as a table
YearSavings (reserves)
2019$47.8M
2020$51.3M
2021$49.9M
2022$50.1M
2023$44.7M
2024$44.1M
2025$27.4M

Why it matters

With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.

It could be because…

  • The town spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
  • Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
  • The town has a plan to rebuild its savings.

Questions you could ask

  1. Does the town have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
  2. What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
  3. What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Savings (reserves and reserve funds): 2019 $47.8M, 2020 $51.3M, 2021 $49.9M, 2022 $50.1M, 2023 $44.7M, 2024 $44.1M, 2025 $27.4M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, line 6420 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: savings equal to 102% of a year's spending. The Blue Mountains: 66%.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 47 similar municipalities · Schedules 40 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Does the $50.8 million surplus in 2025 mean the Town has money to spare?

$50,753,745annual surplus in 2025, while cash fell from $24,343,518 to $22,174,329

The audited statements show an annual surplus of $50,753,745 for 2025. Most of it is not cash the Town can spend. Almost all of it is two things that are not spendable cash: assets such as roads and pipes handed over to the Town ($26,310,664), and restricted money such as development charges counted as revenue ($23,178,341). Together, worked out by us, that is $49,489,005, close to the whole surplus. Cash in the bank went down over the year.

Why it matters

A big surplus on paper can be mistaken for a budget with room in it. Assets that were given to the Town also come with future upkeep and replacement costs.

It could be because…

  • This is how public sector accounting works: contributed assets and restricted funds count as revenue in the year they are recognized.
  • The budget itself planned for a surplus of 63,608,478, so a large paper surplus was expected.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much of the $26,310,664 in contributed assets will need to be maintained and replaced from the Town's own budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Statement of Operations shows an annual surplus of 50,753,745 for 2025 (the budget was 63,608,478 and 2024 was 19,117,818) and obligatory reserve funds revenue of 23,178,341.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus, PDF page 7 (printed page 5)

  2. Note 12, Other income, lists “Contributed tangible capital assets” of 26,310,664 for 2025 (2024: 8,685,612).

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 12, Other income, PDF page 21 (printed page 19)

  3. The cash flow statement shows cash at the end of the year of $22,174,329, down from $24,343,518 at the start of the year.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, PDF page 9 (printed page 7)

  4. The Statement of Financial Position shows net debt of (8,022,000) at the end of 2025 (2024: (7,064,666)), meaning financial assets are smaller than liabilities.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 6 (printed page 4)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why was the 2025 audit finished later than the year before?

September 16, 2026date of the auditor's report on the 2025 statements (2024: June 30, 2025)

The auditor, KPMG LLP, gave a clean opinion on the Town's 2025 statements, saying they 'present fairly, in all material respects' the Town's position. The auditor's report is dated September 16, 2026. The 2024 report was dated June 30, 2025, about two and a half months earlier in the calendar year. We did not find the Town's explanation on the pages we read.

Why it matters

Residents and council use audited statements to judge the Town's finances. Late statements reach council and the public later, and the 2026 election is on October 26, 2026.

It could be because…

  • Complex new accounting items, such as asset retirement obligations, can lengthen an audit.
  • Audit timing often moves from year to year with auditor scheduling and year-end work.
  • The report's date is when the auditor signed. The Town may have posted the statements sooner or later than that, and we did not check.

Questions you could ask

  1. What caused the 2025 audit to finish later than the 2024 audit, and when did council receive the statements?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The auditor's report on the 2025 consolidated statements is dated September 16, 2026 and says the statements “present fairly, in all material respects” the Town's financial position.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Independent Auditor's Report, PDF pages 3 to 5

  2. The auditor's report on the 2024 consolidated statements is dated June 30, 2025.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2024 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements · Independent Auditor's Report, PDF page 5

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why is council's own budget up 26% in 2026?

26%increase in council's budgeted expenses, 2025 to 2026, as printed in the budget book

The 2026 approved budget for Council as a whole is $687,642 in expenses, up from $546,502 in 2025. The Town's budget book shows large jumps in communications and in personnel and training. Council added $20,000 in extra training, paid from the Council Reserve.

Why it matters

Council sets its own budget, so residents are entitled to see what is behind an increase. The amounts are small next to the whole budget.

It could be because…

  • The 2026 election year may bring extra communication costs. We did not find a line explaining it.
  • A cost-of-living increase affects pay lines, which rose 12% to 13%.
  • The extra training is paid from a reserve set aside for it, not from taxes.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the $47,800 communications line for?
  2. What rules decide how council members use the extra training money?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. The Council operating table shows Total Expenses of 546,502 in the 2025 budget and 687,642 in the 2026 approved budget (26%). Communications go from 3,050 to 47,800 (1467%) and Personnel and Training from 41,000 to 74,850 (83%).

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Council, 2026 Approved Operating Budget table, PDF page 36 (printed page 36), columns 2025 Budget and 2026 Approved Budget

  2. The budget notes a request for “Additional Council Training and Professional Development”: council directed staff to include it “as a revised amount of $20,000 to be funded from the Council Reserve”.

    Town of The Blue Mountains, 2026 Approved Budget · Executive Summary, budget requests, item 9, PDF page 14 (printed page 14)

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound automatically from financial reports

The Blue Mountains went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?

−$8.0Mnet financial position, 2025

In 2019, The Blue Mountains had $33.9M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2025 it was −$8.0M. About 71% of that change ($29.8M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 25 of 47 similar towns are in a weaker position.

The Blue Mountains went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$8.0M
Show as a table
YearNet financial position
2019$33.9M
2020$36.8M
2021$31.7M
2022$23.8M
2023−$5.1M
2024−$7.1M
2025−$8.0M

Why it matters

This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.

It could be because…

  • A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
  • Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
  2. Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Net financial assets: 2019 $33.9M, 2020 $36.8M, 2021 $31.7M, 2022 $23.8M, 2023 −$5.1M, 2024 −$7.1M, 2025 −$8.0M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, line 9945 · archived copy

  2. Future landfill and similar closing costs recorded: $29.8M. Long-term debt: $4.7M. Temporary loans: $0.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 2920, 2699, 2099 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound automatically from financial reports

Why does The Blue Mountains spend more than most similar towns on garbage, dump and recycling?

$385per home on garbage, dump and recycling, 2025

The Blue Mountains spent about $385 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar town spent $159. Only 1 of 47 similar towns spent more.

Why it matters

Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.

It could be because…

  • Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
  • Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
  • A one-time cost in this year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
  2. When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for The Blue Mountains? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Garbage, dump and recycling per home: The Blue Mountains $385; typical similar town $159; ranked 2nd highest of 48.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 47 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 and Schedule 2 · archived copy

↑ All questions