Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Wellesley's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Wellesley's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 92 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
$1,658,382spent on capital assets in 2025, against a budget of $2,864,820
Capital spending is money for roads, buildings and equipment that last many years. A reserve is money the Township sets aside for later. The 2025 budget planned $2,864,820 of capital work, all paid from reserves. The audited statements show $1,658,382 spent on tangible capital assets (a figure that is 58% of the budget, worked out by us). Over the same year the reserves on the Township's books rose from $6,576,447 to $7,988,508 (a rise of $1,412,061, worked out by us). The 2026 budget again says all capital spending will be paid from reserves.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$1,668,711annual surplus in 2025, of which $2,539,475 was money for capital projects
The Township's 2025 budget planned for no surplus. The audited statements show an annual surplus of $1,668,711. But the same statements show $2,539,475 of "grants and transfers related to capital": money that can only be spent on building and fixing things. Without it, the year would have been a shortfall of $870,764 (worked out by us). In 2024 the same sum was worked out by us as a shortfall of $1,229,173 (a surplus of $5,970,002 less $7,199,175 of capital grants and gifts). One large cost in the statements is amortization, which is the yearly share of what the Township's buildings and roads are said to lose in value. It was $3,361,643 in 2025 and is not a cash payment.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$708,184left in the tax rate stabilization reserve at the end of 2025, against a $277K draw in the 2026 budget
A tax-rate stabilization reserve is a savings account that lets a town smooth out tax increases. The balance fell from $858,021 at the end of 2023 to $795,019 at the end of 2024 and $708,184 at the end of 2025. The 2026 budget slides say general revenue includes a "$277K Tax Rate Stabilization draw". The 2025 slides listed the same $277K but called it a "Reserve Contribution". At $277,000 a year, the $708,184 balance would last about two and a half years (worked out by us).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$1,015,653operating fund deficiency to be recovered in future years, end of 2025
The audited statements list, among the pieces that make up the Township's accumulated surplus, a negative line called "Operating fund deficiency to be recovered in future years": $1,015,653 at the end of 2025 and $2,342,233 at the end of 2024. The notes do not say what it is made of or when it will be recovered. In the 2024 statements the same pieces were shown differently: a single line of $12,926,233 called "Operating fund deficiency", which also covered the Township's long-term debt (worked out by us: $10,584,000 plus $2,342,233).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$5,567,472spent on salaries, wages and benefits in 2025, up from $5,051,646 in 2024
Salaries, wages and employee benefits were $5,567,472 in 2025, against $5,051,646 in 2024 and $4,583,037 in 2023. That is a rise of 10.2% in 2025 and 21.5% over two years (both worked out by us). The Township paid into the OMERS pension plan for 63 staff in 2025 (60 in 2024). Its pension contribution rose from $290,175 to $347,337 (worked out by us: 19.7%).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$5,136,661owed to the Township at the end of 2025, up from $1,935,154 two years earlier
Accounts receivable is money other people or governments owe the Township. It was $1,935,154 at the end of 2023, $3,954,511 at the end of 2024 and $5,136,661 at the end of 2025. That is more than two and a half times the 2023 balance (worked out by us). The cash-flow statement shows the Township had $1,182,150 less cash in 2025 because of this rise.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Wellesley spent $1.5M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $2.6M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 13 of 92 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$4,801,244transportation cost in 2025, against a budget column of $3,839,659
The statements compare each service's actual 2025 cost with a budget. For transportation (roads, bridges and the roads crew) the budget column shows $3,839,659 and the actual cost $4,801,244. The gap of $961,585 is worked out by us. The Township's explanation is not in a note, but the numbers point to a likely reason. Its budget slides show the same $3,839,659 for public works, and the budget also lists $2,401,962 for reserves and $935,582 for debt repayments as spending. The statements' actual costs include amortization ($1,889,930 for transportation). The two sets of numbers are on different bases, so the gap does not mean the roads crew overspent by that much.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$12,108,608the Township's investment in Enova at the end of 2025
Wellesley owns 2.78% of Enova Energy Corporation, a local electricity company formed in 2022. The Township's books value its stake at $12,108,608, 47% of the $25,934,974 of financial assets the Township holds (worked out by us). In 2025 it received a dividend of $336,000 and interest of $81,798 on a loan to Enova. The 2026 budget slides expect $338K of interest and dividends, "down from $403K" in the 2025 budget.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Wellesley spent about $127 per home on council in 2024. The typical similar town spent $51. Only 8 of 92 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Wellesley $127; typical similar town $51; ranked 9th highest of 93.
$1,658,382spent on capital assets in 2025, against a budget of $2,864,820
Capital spending is money for roads, buildings and equipment that last many years. A reserve is money the Township sets aside for later. The 2025 budget planned $2,864,820 of capital work, all paid from reserves. The audited statements show $1,658,382 spent on tangible capital assets (a figure that is 58% of the budget, worked out by us). Over the same year the reserves on the Township's books rose from $6,576,447 to $7,988,508 (a rise of $1,412,061, worked out by us). The 2026 budget again says all capital spending will be paid from reserves.
Why it matters
If planned projects are not built, the roads and equipment they were meant to fix keep ageing, and the money saved for them sits. Residents are asked to pay into reserves each year, so they have a right to know whether the work is happening on time.
It could be because…
Projects are often started in one year and finished in the next. The statements show $1,261,727 of assets still under construction at the end of 2025, so some budgeted work may simply be unfinished.
Some 2025 projects may have been paid for or delayed by grants, which are recorded in other lines.
The reserves also grow when the Township sets money aside for a big purchase planned for later, such as the fire truck named in the 2026 budget.
Questions you could ask
Which of the 2025 capital projects in the budget were not finished in 2025, and when will they be?
How much of the $1,412,061 rise in reserves is set aside for named future projects?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Statement of change in net financial assets: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (2,864,820), 2025 actual (1,658,382), 2024 actual (7,903,730).
Note 16, Accumulated surplus, "Reserve and Reserve Funds" total 7,988,508 at the end of 2025 (2024: 6,576,447). Infrastructure - roads, equipment and structures 3,636,652 (2024: 3,080,052); Fire 1,408,916 (2024: 1,063,724).
"100% of the Capital Spend is funded by Reserves." The slide also says "the purchase of a front-line pumper" is "responsible for ~ 31% of the overall budget."
$1,668,711annual surplus in 2025, of which $2,539,475 was money for capital projects
The Township's 2025 budget planned for no surplus. The audited statements show an annual surplus of $1,668,711. But the same statements show $2,539,475 of "grants and transfers related to capital": money that can only be spent on building and fixing things. Without it, the year would have been a shortfall of $870,764 (worked out by us). In 2024 the same sum was worked out by us as a shortfall of $1,229,173 (a surplus of $5,970,002 less $7,199,175 of capital grants and gifts). One large cost in the statements is amortization, which is the yearly share of what the Township's buildings and roads are said to lose in value. It was $3,361,643 in 2025 and is not a cash payment.
Why it matters
A surplus headline can look healthy when it depends on one-time money for projects. Residents are asked to cover the everyday costs from taxes and fees, so it matters whether those costs are covered each year on their own.
It could be because…
Amortization is not paid in cash. A year with an accounting shortfall may still have enough cash to cover its bills.
The Township pays into reserves each year to replace buildings and roads later. The 2025 budget slides show $2,401,962 going to reserves and $935,582 to repay debt.
Capital grants are counted as revenue when they are earned, while the matching cost is spread over many years through amortization, so a gap like this can appear without any overspending.
Questions you could ask
In the Township's own budget, how much of each year's tax and fee money goes to cover everyday costs, and how much to reserves and debt?
What would the 2025 result have been on the same basis as the budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2025: "Annual surplus" budget nil, actual 1,668,711 (2024 actual 5,970,002). Grants and transfers related to capital: "Grants - Ontario" 1,353,523 (2024: 4,124,623); "Deferred revenue earned" 693,966 (2024: 1,975,679); "Donations and other, capital" 491,986 (2024: 1,098,873).
Schedule of segmented disclosure, 2025 totals: "Grants and transfers related to capital" 2,539,475; "Amortization" 3,361,643; "Annual surplus (deficit)" 1,668,711.
$708,184left in the tax rate stabilization reserve at the end of 2025, against a $277K draw in the 2026 budget
A tax-rate stabilization reserve is a savings account that lets a town smooth out tax increases. The balance fell from $858,021 at the end of 2023 to $795,019 at the end of 2024 and $708,184 at the end of 2025. The 2026 budget slides say general revenue includes a "$277K Tax Rate Stabilization draw". The 2025 slides listed the same $277K but called it a "Reserve Contribution". At $277,000 a year, the $708,184 balance would last about two and a half years (worked out by us).
Why it matters
Using savings to keep this year's tax bill low means a bigger step up later, once the savings are gone. Residents should know whether the plan is to replace the savings or to raise taxes more later.
It could be because…
The reserve fell only $86,835 in 2025 (worked out by us), much less than $277,000. The Township may be topping it up at the same time as it draws from it.
Drawing on a stabilization reserve is exactly what it is for. The Township may have a plan for building it back that we did not find.
Questions you could ask
Was the $277K in the 2025 budget a draw on the tax-rate stabilization reserve, as the 2026 slides call it?
What is the plan for the reserve after 2026?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 16, Accumulated surplus: "Tax rate stabilization" 708,184 at the end of 2025 (2024: 795,019).
Note on the revenue slide: "Main sources of General Revenue includes $338K from Interest and Dividends from Enova (down from $403K), $277K Tax Rate Stabilization draw, Interest & Penalties $340K (up from $285K), & Other $287K".
Note on the revenue slide: "Main sources of General Revenue includes $403K from Interest and Dividends from Enova, $277K Reserve Contribution, Interest & Penalties $285K, & Other $210K".
$1,015,653operating fund deficiency to be recovered in future years, end of 2025
The audited statements list, among the pieces that make up the Township's accumulated surplus, a negative line called "Operating fund deficiency to be recovered in future years": $1,015,653 at the end of 2025 and $2,342,233 at the end of 2024. The notes do not say what it is made of or when it will be recovered. In the 2024 statements the same pieces were shown differently: a single line of $12,926,233 called "Operating fund deficiency", which also covered the Township's long-term debt (worked out by us: $10,584,000 plus $2,342,233).
Why it matters
A deficiency "to be recovered in future years" is a bill that will be paid by future taxpayers. It fell by $1,326,580 in a year (worked out by us), so it is moving, and residents can reasonably ask what moves it.
It could be because…
It may be made up of costs the accounting rules make the Township record now but pay for later, such as the asbestos removal the statements say is owed ($258,152).
It may be the part of the year's costs that taxes have not yet covered, which the Township is paying down.
It may be a presentation choice by the auditors. The 2024 statements showed it combined with debt, so the line is not new money.
Questions you could ask
What makes up the $1,015,653, and what is the plan and timetable to recover it?
Why were the 2025 statements changed to show this line apart from long-term debt?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Note 16, General surplus: "Operating fund deficiency to be recovered in future years" (1,015,653); 2024 (2,342,233). "Net long-term liabilities" (10,066,000); 2024 (10,584,000).
$5,567,472spent on salaries, wages and benefits in 2025, up from $5,051,646 in 2024
Salaries, wages and employee benefits were $5,567,472 in 2025, against $5,051,646 in 2024 and $4,583,037 in 2023. That is a rise of 10.2% in 2025 and 21.5% over two years (both worked out by us). The Township paid into the OMERS pension plan for 63 staff in 2025 (60 in 2024). Its pension contribution rose from $290,175 to $347,337 (worked out by us: 19.7%).
Why it matters
Pay and benefits are the largest cost that continues from year to year. When the bill rises faster than taxes, either services expand or something else gives.
It could be because…
Staff numbers grew: the number of OMERS members rose from 60 to 63.
Wage settlements, benefit costs and the cost of running a bigger recreation program (user fees were expected to rise, according to the 2026 budget slides) can all raise the bill.
Changes in how fire and recreation staff are paid could move costs between years.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2025 rise comes from more positions, and how much from pay and benefit rates?
How many full-time-equivalent positions did the Township have in 2023, 2024 and 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 12, Expenses by object: "Salaries, wages and employee benefits" 5,567,472 (2024: 5,051,646). Total expenses 13,419,315 (2024: 12,900,343).
$5,136,661owed to the Township at the end of 2025, up from $1,935,154 two years earlier
Accounts receivable is money other people or governments owe the Township. It was $1,935,154 at the end of 2023, $3,954,511 at the end of 2024 and $5,136,661 at the end of 2025. That is more than two and a half times the 2023 balance (worked out by us). The cash-flow statement shows the Township had $1,182,150 less cash in 2025 because of this rise.
Why it matters
Money owed but not yet received cannot pay for roads or staff. If it is a grant that is certain to arrive, there is little risk. If it is something else, residents should know.
It could be because…
Much of it may be provincial grant money for building projects that has been earned but not yet paid. The statements show Ontario infrastructure grants of $1,353,523 in 2025 and $4,124,623 in 2024.
A rise like this can also come from invoices to other governments for shared work that are due early the next year.
Questions you could ask
What is the breakdown of the $5,136,661 by who owes it, and how much has been paid since December 31, 2025?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Wellesley spent $1.5M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $2.6M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 13 of 92 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 75% in 5 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+75%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−19%
+1%
2021
−18%
+4%
2022
+19%
+11%
2023
+43%
+16%
2024
+75%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.1M a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $1.5M to $2.6M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Wellesley spent about $3,085 per home on long-term debt in 2024. The typical similar town spent $1,237. Only 13 of 92 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Long-term debt per home: Wellesley $3,085; typical similar town $1,237; ranked 14th highest of 93.
$4,801,244transportation cost in 2025, against a budget column of $3,839,659
The statements compare each service's actual 2025 cost with a budget. For transportation (roads, bridges and the roads crew) the budget column shows $3,839,659 and the actual cost $4,801,244. The gap of $961,585 is worked out by us. The Township's explanation is not in a note, but the numbers point to a likely reason. Its budget slides show the same $3,839,659 for public works, and the budget also lists $2,401,962 for reserves and $935,582 for debt repayments as spending. The statements' actual costs include amortization ($1,889,930 for transportation). The two sets of numbers are on different bases, so the gap does not mean the roads crew overspent by that much.
Why it matters
A reader who compares the budget column with the actual column will think the Township overspent by $1,097,802 in total (worked out by us). Because the two sides are built differently, that reading is misleading, and only a person who reads the budget slides would find out.
It could be because…
The budget is built to decide the tax levy, so it counts cash out (reserve transfers and debt repayment) and leaves out amortization. The statements follow public sector accounting rules, which do the opposite.
The Township may have no wish to show a budget on the accounting basis because Council does not vote on one.
Questions you could ask
Could the statements' budget column be restated on the same basis as the actual costs, or a note added that explains the difference?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2025: "Transportation services" budget 3,839,659, actual 4,801,244. Total expenses budget 12,321,513, actual 13,419,315.
Note 13, Budget information: "The budget figures reported on the Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus are the 2025 municipal operating and capital budgets as approved by Council during 2024." The note does not mention amortization or reserve transfers.
$12,108,608the Township's investment in Enova at the end of 2025
Wellesley owns 2.78% of Enova Energy Corporation, a local electricity company formed in 2022. The Township's books value its stake at $12,108,608, 47% of the $25,934,974 of financial assets the Township holds (worked out by us). In 2025 it received a dividend of $336,000 and interest of $81,798 on a loan to Enova. The 2026 budget slides expect $338K of interest and dividends, "down from $403K" in the 2025 budget.
Why it matters
This income helps keep taxes lower. Residents should know how much of the Township's money is tied up in one company and how steady its payments are.
It could be because…
Enova's own statements, summarized in the notes, show net income of $16,604,000 for 2025, so the dividends look well covered.
The 2026 budget may simply be cautious. The 2025 dividend and interest received, $336,000 and $81,798, add up to more than the $338K budgeted for 2026.
The slides compare the 2026 budget with the 2025 budget, not with what the Township actually received.
Questions you could ask
Why does the 2026 budget expect less from Enova than the Township received in 2025?
Does the Township have a policy on how much of its assets may be held in one company?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Wellesley?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6: "the Township holds 2.78% of the common shares of Enova Energy Corporation" and "$2,532,446 of long-term notes receivable" bearing interest at 3.23%. Interest received in 2025 was $81,798. Investment 11,983,017 at the start of 2025, share of earnings 461,591, dividends received (336,000), end of year 12,108,608.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy