Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Chatsworth's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 7 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Chatsworth's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 82 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Chatsworth spent $1.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.4M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 82 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
2 yearsin a row with a qualified audit opinion on the same two points (2023 and 2024)
Each year an outside accounting firm checks the Township's yearly statements and says whether they "present fairly" the Township's finances. A qualified opinion means the firm found one thing it could not sign off on. For both 2023 and 2024 the firms say the same thing: the Township has not finished working out what it will owe to take old buildings, roads and other assets out of service (an "asset retirement obligation", a new accounting rule since January 1, 2023), and it records its landfill clean-up cost under an older rule that has been withdrawn. The firms say they cannot tell how much this changes the numbers. The statements themselves say management plans to finish the work as part of a facilities review after the year end.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
December 24, 2025date of the auditor's report on the year ended December 31, 2024
The Township's year ends on December 31. The firm's report on the 2023 statements is dated October 26, 2024. The firm's report on the 2024 statements is dated December 24, 2025. The 2024 report also says the earlier year was audited by another firm. On October 5, 2026 the Township's budgets and financial statements page listed statements up to 2024 and no statements for 2025. We did not find a reason for the timing in the documents we read.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$1,573,712of capital assets unfinanced at December 31, 2024 (2023: $699,437)
Capital spending means buying or building things that last, such as trucks, roads and bridges. The 2024 budget planned $3,201,700 of it. The statements show $4,083,965. The notes show that $1,573,712 of capital assets were "unfinanced" at the end of 2024 (money spent that has no matching loan, grant or reserve behind it), up from $699,437. The Township also signed to buy two plow trucks, at $419,275 and $410,338, which it says will be paid for with long-term debt. At the same time the reserves it keeps for capital purposes fell from $5,323,745 to $4,649,350. The Township's own reconciliation shows how the year balanced.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$4,368,409net financial assets at December 31, 2024, down from $5,378,811
Net financial assets is what the Township holds in cash and money owed to it, minus what it owes. It was $5,378,811 at the end of 2023 and $4,368,409 at the end of 2024; the budget had planned $4,476,958. Cash and temporary investments fell from $7,083,296 to $6,101,952. The statements say the Township has an undrawn bank credit facility of $1,000,000 for operating needs. Annual surplus was $1,459,197; a surplus on paper is not the same as cash in the bank.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$3,160,539actual 2024 transportation spending, against a budget of $2,163,170
For 2024 the statements compare a budget of $2,163,170 for transportation services (mostly roads) with actual spending of $3,160,539. The same gap showed in 2023 ($2,154,341 budgeted, $3,124,441 actual). The statements show why: they print the budget for "Amortization of tangible capital assets" as nothing (amortization is the yearly share of an asset's cost, a way of counting wear and tear), while actual amortization was $1,564,131 in 2024. We worked out that without amortization, 2024 actual expenses were $8,332,609, which is under the budgeted $8,608,995. So most of the gap looks like a difference in how the budget is written, not an overspend.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$842,587put into reserves from the 2026 roads budget
The adopted 2026 budget raises $8,292,364 in taxation, against $8,047,567 in the 2025 budget, a rise of $244,797, or 3.0% (worked out by us). In the roads administration section the 2026 budget puts $842,587 into "Transfer to Reserves" and a further $181,348 into "Transfer to Reserves-Lifecycle" in the capital plan. Set against that, the audited statements show the Township's capital reserves fell by $674,395 during 2024 (worked out by us from $5,323,745 and $4,649,350).
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Chatsworth spent $1.0M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.4M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 2 of 82 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 125% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+50%+100%+150%
+125%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+78%
+1%
2021
+115%
+4%
2022
+109%
+11%
2023
+133%
+16%
2024
+125%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.3M a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $932K to $1.1M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $1.0M, 2020 $1.9M, 2021 $2.3M, 2022 $2.2M, 2023 $2.4M, 2024 $2.4M.
2 yearsin a row with a qualified audit opinion on the same two points (2023 and 2024)
Each year an outside accounting firm checks the Township's yearly statements and says whether they "present fairly" the Township's finances. A qualified opinion means the firm found one thing it could not sign off on. For both 2023 and 2024 the firms say the same thing: the Township has not finished working out what it will owe to take old buildings, roads and other assets out of service (an "asset retirement obligation", a new accounting rule since January 1, 2023), and it records its landfill clean-up cost under an older rule that has been withdrawn. The firms say they cannot tell how much this changes the numbers. The statements themselves say management plans to finish the work as part of a facilities review after the year end.
Why it matters
A clean opinion tells residents the books are reliable. A qualified one is not a finding of wrongdoing, but it means a gap that nobody has measured. If the same gap is still open in the 2025 statements, it will have lasted three years.
It could be because…
The new asset retirement rule is hard for small townships, which have many old assets and few staff to list them.
The Township says it plans to finish the assessment as part of a facilities review, so the gap may be a matter of timing.
The amount may turn out to be small. The auditors say only that it cannot be measured yet.
Questions you could ask
When will the asset retirement assessment be finished, and will the 2025 statements carry a clean opinion?
Roughly what range could the unmeasured amount fall in?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Auditor's report on the 2024 statements, "Basis for Qualified Opinion": "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential asset retirement obligations." It also says the Township accounts for its landfill closure and post-closure liability "in accordance with withdrawn PS 3270".
Auditor's report on the 2023 statements, "Basis for Qualified Opinion": "Management has not completed its assessment of the tangible capital assets for potential asset retirement obligations." The same landfill point is made. The opinion is headed "Qualified Opinion".
Summary of significant accounting policies, 2024: "Management intends to complete an assessment of the asset retirement obligation as part of the facilities review planned subsequent to the December 31, 2024 year end." The 2023 statements say the same, with "December 31, 2023 year end".
December 24, 2025date of the auditor's report on the year ended December 31, 2024
The Township's year ends on December 31. The firm's report on the 2023 statements is dated October 26, 2024. The firm's report on the 2024 statements is dated December 24, 2025. The 2024 report also says the earlier year was audited by another firm. On October 5, 2026 the Township's budgets and financial statements page listed statements up to 2024 and no statements for 2025. We did not find a reason for the timing in the documents we read.
Why it matters
Residents and the province use the audited statements to see how the Township is doing. When they arrive close to a year after the year they describe, the numbers are old by the time anyone can ask about them.
It could be because…
A change of audit firm between years can slow the first audit with the new firm.
The open asset retirement question may have taken extra time to discuss with the auditors.
The 2025 statements may be audited and not yet posted. We did not find them, and we did not find a date for them.
Questions you could ask
When does council expect to receive the audited 2025 statements?
Did the change of audit firm or the asset retirement work cause the delay?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The report is signed at Owen Sound, Ontario and dated "December 24, 2025". It covers the year ended December 31, 2024.
$1,573,712of capital assets unfinanced at December 31, 2024 (2023: $699,437)
Capital spending means buying or building things that last, such as trucks, roads and bridges. The 2024 budget planned $3,201,700 of it. The statements show $4,083,965. The notes show that $1,573,712 of capital assets were "unfinanced" at the end of 2024 (money spent that has no matching loan, grant or reserve behind it), up from $699,437. The Township also signed to buy two plow trucks, at $419,275 and $410,338, which it says will be paid for with long-term debt. At the same time the reserves it keeps for capital purposes fell from $5,323,745 to $4,649,350. The Township's own reconciliation shows how the year balanced.
Why it matters
Unfinanced capital spending has to be paid for later, from taxes, reserves or new debt. The Township's long-term debt at the end of 2024 was $609,737.
It could be because…
Unfinanced means paid for but not yet matched with funding, and grants or debt may be on the way. The trucks are a case where debt financing is planned.
Capital projects often cost more than the budget when prices rise or work is moved up from another year.
Using reserves for capital is what reserves are for.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $1,573,712 will be covered by grants, debt or reserves, and when?
Did the 2025 budget plan for the same pace of capital spending?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of changes in net financial assets: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" budget (3,201,700), 2024 actual (4,083,965), 2023 actual (1,535,436).
Note 5, accumulated surplus: "Unfinanced capital assets" (1,573,712) in 2024 and (699,437) in 2023. Note 6: reserves for "Capital purposes" $4,649,350 in 2024 and $5,323,745 in 2023.
Note 13, contractual commitments: an agreement "to purchase a tandem plow truck for $419,275" and "a second truck for $410,338". "Both purchases will be funded through long term debt."
Note 3: long-term liabilities total $609,737 in 2024 ($789,630 in 2023). Note 7 reconciliation of the budget: "Change in unfinanced amounts" budget 213,655, actual 874,275.
$4,368,409net financial assets at December 31, 2024, down from $5,378,811
Net financial assets is what the Township holds in cash and money owed to it, minus what it owes. It was $5,378,811 at the end of 2023 and $4,368,409 at the end of 2024; the budget had planned $4,476,958. Cash and temporary investments fell from $7,083,296 to $6,101,952. The statements say the Township has an undrawn bank credit facility of $1,000,000 for operating needs. Annual surplus was $1,459,197; a surplus on paper is not the same as cash in the bank.
Why it matters
A township with a thinner cushion has less room if a large repair or a late grant payment comes up. A shrinking cushion is common in a year of heavy capital spending, but it is worth watching over time.
It could be because…
Capital spending of $4,083,965 in 2024 turns cash into roads and equipment, which leaves the Township with more assets, not fewer.
The 2024 budget itself planned for net financial assets to fall to $4,476,958.
The $1,000,000 credit facility was not drawn.
Questions you could ask
What level of cash and reserves does council aim to keep, and is it being met?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of changes in net financial assets: "Net financial assets, end of the year" budget $4,476,958, actual $4,368,409, 2023 $5,378,811. "Annual surplus" actual $1,459,197.
$3,160,539actual 2024 transportation spending, against a budget of $2,163,170
For 2024 the statements compare a budget of $2,163,170 for transportation services (mostly roads) with actual spending of $3,160,539. The same gap showed in 2023 ($2,154,341 budgeted, $3,124,441 actual). The statements show why: they print the budget for "Amortization of tangible capital assets" as nothing (amortization is the yearly share of an asset's cost, a way of counting wear and tear), while actual amortization was $1,564,131 in 2024. We worked out that without amortization, 2024 actual expenses were $8,332,609, which is under the budgeted $8,608,995. So most of the gap looks like a difference in how the budget is written, not an overspend.
Why it matters
A reader comparing the budget column to the actual column sees large overruns that are mostly not real. Showing both on the same basis would make it easier to see which lines truly ran over.
It could be because…
A budget that tracks cash can leave out amortization, because it is not cash.
The statements' own budget column follows the Township's adopted budget, which is cash-based.
Questions you could ask
Could the budget book show amortization so budget and actual can be compared line by line?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of operations, 2024: "Transportation services" budget 2,163,170, actual 3,160,539, 2023 actual 3,124,441. Total expenses budget 8,608,995, actual 9,896,740.
$842,587put into reserves from the 2026 roads budget
The adopted 2026 budget raises $8,292,364 in taxation, against $8,047,567 in the 2025 budget, a rise of $244,797, or 3.0% (worked out by us). In the roads administration section the 2026 budget puts $842,587 into "Transfer to Reserves" and a further $181,348 into "Transfer to Reserves-Lifecycle" in the capital plan. Set against that, the audited statements show the Township's capital reserves fell by $674,395 during 2024 (worked out by us from $5,323,745 and $4,649,350).
Why it matters
Saving up for roads is what residents are usually told they want. It also means a large share of the levy is not spent this year. Residents can ask whether the savings rate is enough to catch up on roads.
It could be because…
The reserve transfer may be how the Township pays for road work in later years, by saving instead of borrowing.
Part of the 2026 reserve transfers may be grants (such as Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund money) that arrive and are saved until the work is done.
The 2026 tax rise reflects the Township's own plan; we did not read the reports that explain it.
Questions you could ask
How much does the Township believe it must save each year to replace its roads, and what share does the 2026 transfer cover?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Chatsworth?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule "A", Municipal Taxation: "Total Budgeted Taxation" 8,292,364 (General levy 8,156,864). Roads administration account 01-0630-7500 "Transfer to Reserves" 842,587.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy