Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Clarence-Rockland's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Clarence-Rockland's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 23 similar Ontario places. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
In 2025, Clarence-Rockland collected $2.3M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 2 of 23 similar places raised theirs by more.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 3 sources
Clarence-Rockland spent $4.0M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $8.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 23 similar places had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 3 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
2 yearsin a row the report uses both "present fairly" and "Qualified Opinion", with no reason given
An auditor's report tells residents whether the City's statements can be trusted. A clean report says the statements "present fairly" the City's finances. A qualified report says they do, except for a named problem, and it must say what the problem is. In both the 2025 and 2024 reports, one paragraph says the statements "present fairly", and the next paragraph says the evidence is enough for the auditor's "Qualified Opinion". No paragraph in either report says what is qualified. The French side of each report says the same ("opinion avec réserve"). We did not find an explanation on the pages we read.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 3 sources
$8,987,885accounts receivable at December 31, 2025, against $2,895,714 a year earlier
"Accounts receivable" is money other people or governments owe the City at year end. It is separate from unpaid property taxes and unpaid water, sewer and waste bills, which the statements list on their own lines and which barely moved (taxes receivable $3,885,918; user charges receivable $2,160,399). The accounts receivable line more than tripled in one year. The cash flow statement shows the increase as $6,092,171. We did not find a note or budget page that explains what the line is made of. In the same year, provincial money for capital projects was $5,729,812 against $1,371,187 the year before, which may be related, but the statements do not say so.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 3 sources
$1,564,714interest and penalties on taxes in 2025, against $380,000 in the 2026 budget
A budget is the City's plan for the year. In 2025 the statements show "Interest and penalties on taxes" (charges on late tax payments) of $1,564,714 against a budget of $462,780, and "Interest income" of $1,077,085 against $309,735. Together with "Other income" of $573,303 against $14,000, the general "Other revenues" line came in at $5,448,170 against a budget of $2,369,264. The 2026 budget keeps the two lines at $380,000 and $269,370, the same as its 2025 budget page shows. The budget pages do not say why.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 2 sources
$44,835,6912025 capital budget, against $19,933,956 spent on capital assets
Capital spending is money for things that last, such as pipes, roads and buildings. The 2025 capital budget schedule totals $44,835,691, including $6,278,302 to be borrowed. The cash flow statement shows $19,933,956 spent on buying capital assets and $742,233 of new borrowing. Even counting assets that were handed to the City (contributed), note 7 shows additions of $25,766,705, which is about 57% of the budget (worked out by us). One watermain project, "New watermain: Caron booster station to 2 km South of Baseline Road", is $22,261,418 of the budget. The statements' own budget note lists capital expenses of $12,856,523, not $44,835,691, and we do not know why the two differ.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 4 sources
$10,364,419to be borrowed under the 2026 capital budget of $40,057,973
The 2026 capital budget is $40,057,973. Of that, $10,364,419 is to be paid for with debt (loans). The largest piece is project PL2608, "Land purchase and design of the sports center", at $6,365,000, of which $6,065,000 is debt. Another $1,100,000 for "Land acquisition" has $650,000 of debt. The Phase 2 St-Jean Street rebuild is $15,010,000, with $3,010,619 of debt. The City's loans stood at $32,809,719 at December 31, 2025. The statements show $27,577,007 of contract payments due in 2026, against about $4 million a year after that. The City's 2026 debt payments are budgeted at $2,669,800, up from $2,404,816. The budget pages are tables and do not give a repayment plan.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 5 sources
$218,671sewer operating deficit at December 31, 2025, up from $46,422
Sewer service is paid for by sewer charges, not by property tax. At December 31, 2025, the sewer operating fund stood at a deficit of $218,671, up from $46,422 a year earlier, while the other operating funds were in surplus. The 2026 budget sets sewer revenue and costs equal at $4,041,205, and the "Contribution to reserves" line for sewers is blank. Water, by contrast, puts $1,491,879 into reserves. Sewer reserves were $1,451,910. The City's biggest loan for sewers is $9,986,878.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 6 sources
Places keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Clarence-Rockland had $26.1M saved at the end of 2025, up from $12.3M in 2019. That is 56% of one year's spending. Only 3 of 23 similar places had less, compared with what they spend.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 2 sources
$38,639,420cash at December 31, 2025, against $32,809,719 of long-term loans
At December 31, 2025 the City held $38,639,420 in cash, nearly double the $20,370,238 a year before. Its investments fell from $16,465,997 to $6,149,375 as Guaranteed Investment Certificates (fixed-term savings) matured; the cash flow statement shows $10,316,622 coming back from investments. The City also owed $32,809,719 in long-term loans and paid $1,252,294 in interest on its debt in 2025, while earning $1,077,085 in interest income. Much of the cash is not free to spend: deferred revenue (money received for a set purpose) was $18,507,351, including $12,865,803 of development charges and $4,241,225 of transfer payments. The statements explain the rise in cash, so this is context, not a gap.
Found by reading the city's own documents · 5 sources
Clarence-Rockland spent about $244 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar city spent $84. Only 2 of 23 similar places spent more.
Found automatically from the city's financial reports · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
In 2025, Clarence-Rockland collected $2.3M more in its own property tax than in 2024. That is a 8% jump, while prices went up about 2.1%. Only 2 of 23 similar places raised theirs by more.
Why did Clarence-Rockland's property tax go up 8% in 2025?
$0$10M$20M$30M
$29.9M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
City property tax
2019
$20.7M
2020
$21.4M
2021
$22.8M
2022
$23.9M
2023
$25.6M
2024
$27.5M
2025
$29.9M
Why it matters
A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $203 more each year.
It could be because…
Costs the city cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
The city kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
The city is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.
Questions you could ask
What were the three biggest reasons for the 2025 increase, in dollars?
Is a similar increase planned for next year?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
City property tax: $27,531,876 in 2024, $29,866,092 in 2025.
Clarence-Rockland spent $4.0M on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $8.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 23 similar places had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 102% in 6 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%+150%
+102%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−7%
+1%
2021
−3%
+4%
2022
+31%
+11%
2023
+72%
+16%
2024
+92%
+18%
2025
+102%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The city added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $4.1M a year pay for?
Why did arena and buildings go from $1.5M to $4.1M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
2 yearsin a row the report uses both "present fairly" and "Qualified Opinion", with no reason given
An auditor's report tells residents whether the City's statements can be trusted. A clean report says the statements "present fairly" the City's finances. A qualified report says they do, except for a named problem, and it must say what the problem is. In both the 2025 and 2024 reports, one paragraph says the statements "present fairly", and the next paragraph says the evidence is enough for the auditor's "Qualified Opinion". No paragraph in either report says what is qualified. The French side of each report says the same ("opinion avec réserve"). We did not find an explanation on the pages we read.
Why it matters
Residents, lenders and the Province rely on this one page. If the opinion is clean, the word "Qualified" is most likely a wording slip worth correcting. If it is qualified, residents should be told what the auditor could not confirm.
It could be because…
A drafting slip: the heading words from a qualified-opinion template may have been left in a clean report, in both languages, and then copied from one year to the next.
The qualification may have been removed late in the audit, with the wording not fully cleaned up.
The auditor may have given Council a separate letter that explains it, which we have not seen.
Questions you could ask
Is the auditor's opinion on the 2025 and 2024 statements clean or qualified, and if it is qualified, what is the qualification?
Will the City ask the auditor to reissue the report with the opinion paragraph and the heading matching, and with the missing page number filled in?
Did the auditor give Council a separate letter about the 2025 audit, and will it be posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Independent Auditor's Report on the 2025 statements: "In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Corporation as at December 31, 2025". Under "Basis for Opinion": "We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our Qualified Opinion." The French column ends the same paragraph «pour fonder notre opinion avec réserve.» [“to base our qualified opinion”]. The report is dated May 26, 2026.
The same report says under "Supplementary Financial Information": "We have not audited, reviewed or otherwise attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of the schedule on page of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements." The page number is blank in both the English and French columns.
Independent Auditor's Report on the 2024 statements, same firm, dated May 22, 2025: "In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects" and, under "Basis for Opinion", "sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our Qualified Opinion." French: «pour fonder notre opinion avec réserve.» [“to base our qualified opinion”]. The blank-page sentence on the unaudited schedule is also in the 2024 report.
$8,987,885accounts receivable at December 31, 2025, against $2,895,714 a year earlier
"Accounts receivable" is money other people or governments owe the City at year end. It is separate from unpaid property taxes and unpaid water, sewer and waste bills, which the statements list on their own lines and which barely moved (taxes receivable $3,885,918; user charges receivable $2,160,399). The accounts receivable line more than tripled in one year. The cash flow statement shows the increase as $6,092,171. We did not find a note or budget page that explains what the line is made of. In the same year, provincial money for capital projects was $5,729,812 against $1,371,187 the year before, which may be related, but the statements do not say so.
Why it matters
A receivable is money the City has counted as earned but has not yet collected. When the amount grows this fast, residents should know who owes it and whether it has been paid since December 31, 2025.
It could be because…
The City may have claimed provincial or federal grants for capital work near year end that had not yet been paid.
Developers may owe amounts under agreements, such as charges for water and sewer connections or other development costs.
It may be a timing matter that was paid in early 2026.
Questions you could ask
What makes up the $8,987,885 in accounts receivable at December 31, 2025, by who owes it?
How much of it had been collected by the date the statements were approved, May 26, 2026?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: "(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable" [«(Augmentation) diminution des débiteurs»] (6,092,171) in 2025, 1,888,180 in 2024.
Consolidated Statement of Operations, "Government transfers related to tangible capital assets", "Province of Ontario": 2025 budget 1,376,311, actual 5,729,812 (2024 actual 1,371,187).
$1,564,714interest and penalties on taxes in 2025, against $380,000 in the 2026 budget
A budget is the City's plan for the year. In 2025 the statements show "Interest and penalties on taxes" (charges on late tax payments) of $1,564,714 against a budget of $462,780, and "Interest income" of $1,077,085 against $309,735. Together with "Other income" of $573,303 against $14,000, the general "Other revenues" line came in at $5,448,170 against a budget of $2,369,264. The 2026 budget keeps the two lines at $380,000 and $269,370, the same as its 2025 budget page shows. The budget pages do not say why.
Why it matters
When revenue is planned low, the City can end the year ahead and tax rates may be set higher than the plan needed. Planned low on purpose is a common practice and may reflect caution, but residents should be able to see that it is a choice.
It could be because…
Penalty and interest income depends on how many people pay late, which is hard to predict, so the City may budget a safe amount on purpose.
The statements' budget column (462,780 and 309,735) is not the same as the 2025 budget page's figures (380,000 and 269,370). The statements say the budget was adjusted to match accounting rules, so the budget pages may group these lines differently.
Investment income may have been higher in 2025 because the City held large cash balances and Guaranteed Investment Certificates that matured during the year.
Questions you could ask
Why does the 2026 budget keep tax penalties and interest at $380,000 and investment income at $269,370 when 2025 brought in $1,564,714 and $1,077,085?
Is the City's budget for these lines meant to be a safe amount, and if so, where is that policy written?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 6, Other Revenues, "General" (budget, 2025 actual, 2024 actual): "Interest and penalties on taxes" 462,780, 1,564,714, 638,551. "Interest income" 309,735, 1,077,085, 1,285,493. "Other income" 14,000, 573,303, 66,104. Total 2,369,264, 5,448,170, 3,751,970.
Schedule A, corporate revenues and expenses (2025 budget, 2026 budget): "Pénalités et intérêts sur les taxes / Penalties and interest on taxes" 380 000, 380 000. "Revenus d'investissements / Investment Income" 269 370, 269 370.
$44,835,6912025 capital budget, against $19,933,956 spent on capital assets
Capital spending is money for things that last, such as pipes, roads and buildings. The 2025 capital budget schedule totals $44,835,691, including $6,278,302 to be borrowed. The cash flow statement shows $19,933,956 spent on buying capital assets and $742,233 of new borrowing. Even counting assets that were handed to the City (contributed), note 7 shows additions of $25,766,705, which is about 57% of the budget (worked out by us). One watermain project, "New watermain: Caron booster station to 2 km South of Baseline Road", is $22,261,418 of the budget. The statements' own budget note lists capital expenses of $12,856,523, not $44,835,691, and we do not know why the two differ.
Why it matters
Capital budgets set how much the City plans to borrow and spend on growth. If less than half is spent, the plans may be moving to later years, which can mean the same borrowing and costs show up in the 2026 budget.
It could be because…
Large projects often take more than one year. The unspent part may be carried forward. The statements show assets under construction rising from $8,722,302 to $12,872,844.
The watermain project's "Other" funding of $13,802,079 may depend on developers or other parties, so it may not start until they are ready.
The budget schedule and the statements' budget note use different bases, so the two capital totals may not be meant to match.
Questions you could ask
How much of the 2025 capital budget of $44,835,691 was carried forward to 2026, and which projects?
Why does the statements' budget note list capital expenses of $12,856,523 when the capital schedule totals $44,835,691?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule B, 2025 capital budget: "Total 2025" 44,835,691, of which "Dette / Debt" 6,278,302. Project WW2403 "New watermain: Caron booster station to 2 km South of Baseline Road" 22,261,418, of which "Autres / Other" 13,802,079.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, 2025: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets" (19,933,956). "New long-term liabilities" 742,233. "Repayment of long-term liabilities" (2,489,984).
Note 7, Tangible Capital Assets, 2025 total: "Acquisition" 25,766,705. "Assets under construction" cost, beginning of year 8,722,302; end of year 12,872,844.
$10,364,419to be borrowed under the 2026 capital budget of $40,057,973
The 2026 capital budget is $40,057,973. Of that, $10,364,419 is to be paid for with debt (loans). The largest piece is project PL2608, "Land purchase and design of the sports center", at $6,365,000, of which $6,065,000 is debt. Another $1,100,000 for "Land acquisition" has $650,000 of debt. The Phase 2 St-Jean Street rebuild is $15,010,000, with $3,010,619 of debt. The City's loans stood at $32,809,719 at December 31, 2025. The statements show $27,577,007 of contract payments due in 2026, against about $4 million a year after that. The City's 2026 debt payments are budgeted at $2,669,800, up from $2,404,816. The budget pages are tables and do not give a repayment plan.
Why it matters
Debt is paid back from future taxes, water and sewer rates, and development charges (fees on new buildings). A decision to borrow for land and design, before a building is approved, commits money for years.
It could be because…
The sports centre debt may be meant to be repaid from development charges as new homes are built. The statements show $12,865,803 of development charges held at December 31, 2025, but those are restricted to specific uses.
The loan may not be taken out if grants or other funding are found.
The $27,577,007 in 2026 contract payments may mostly be the St-Jean Street rebuild and other capital projects already in the budget.
Questions you could ask
What is the repayment plan for the $6,065,000 of debt for the sports centre's land and design, and which source will repay it?
Has Council approved the sports centre itself, and where is the report that sets out its cost?
How much of the $27,577,007 of contract payments due in 2026 is the St-Jean Street rebuild?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule B, 2026 capital budget (Total, Growth, Reserve funds, Grants, Other, Debt): PL2608 «Achat de terrain et conception du centre sportif» [“Land purchase and design of the sports center”] 6 365 000, 300 000, -, -, -, 6 065 000. BP2605 "Land acquisition" 1 100 000, debt 650 000. PL2402 "Phase 2 - St-Jean Street" 15 010 000, debt 3 010 619.
Note 13, Contractual Obligations: "The aggregate minimum annual payments for all contracts over the next five years": 2026 $27,577,007; 2027 $4,117,033; 2028 $4,015,825. Note 5, Net Long-Term Liabilities, total $32,809,719.
$218,671sewer operating deficit at December 31, 2025, up from $46,422
Sewer service is paid for by sewer charges, not by property tax. At December 31, 2025, the sewer operating fund stood at a deficit of $218,671, up from $46,422 a year earlier, while the other operating funds were in surplus. The 2026 budget sets sewer revenue and costs equal at $4,041,205, and the "Contribution to reserves" line for sewers is blank. Water, by contrast, puts $1,491,879 into reserves. Sewer reserves were $1,451,910. The City's biggest loan for sewers is $9,986,878.
Why it matters
A reserve is savings for repairs and replacement. If sewer charges only cover running costs and nothing is saved, the next big repair is paid by borrowing or by a larger rate rise. The 2026 capital budget has $6,136,000 of sewer projects, including a $2,555,200 treatment plant upgrade.
It could be because…
A small deficit in one year may be covered by the sewer reserve, which is how reserves are meant to work.
Sewer capital work may be paid mostly from development charges and grants rather than from rates.
The water and sewer part of the statements, taken together, shows a large surplus in 2025 (net surplus 7,112,576), mostly from capital items such as grants, so the deficit may be only the day-to-day part.
Questions you could ask
What caused the sewer operating deficit of $218,671, and will it be covered from the sewer reserve?
Why does the 2026 budget put nothing into sewer reserves while water puts in $1,491,879?
How will the sewer projects in the 2026 capital budget be paid for if not from rates and reserves?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Clarence-Rockland spent $6.5M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $10.1M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 56% in 6 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+56%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−2%
+1%
2021
+11%
+4%
2022
+18%
+11%
2023
+13%
+16%
2024
+17%
+18%
2025
+56%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The city added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $3.6M a year pay for?
Why did sewage treatment go from $889K to $2.8M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Places keep savings (called reserves) to pay for new trucks, roof repairs and surprises. Clarence-Rockland had $26.1M saved at the end of 2025, up from $12.3M in 2019. That is 56% of one year's spending. Only 3 of 23 similar places had less, compared with what they spend.
Does Clarence-Rockland have enough saved for repairs and emergencies?
$0$10M$20M$30M
$26.1M
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Savings (reserves)
2019
$12.3M
2020
$18.2M
2021
$18.9M
2022
$20.8M
2023
$21.2M
2024
$21M
2025
$26.1M
Why it matters
With little saved, a broken bridge or a storm has to be paid for with a sudden tax increase or a loan. Low savings can also mean past budgets were balanced by spending savings instead of facing the real cost.
It could be because…
The city spent savings on purpose, on projects that were planned and saved up for.
Some savings were used to match grant money, which brings in more than it costs.
The city has a plan to rebuild its savings.
Questions you could ask
Does the city have a written reserve policy with a target amount?
What were the savings spent on between 2019 and 2025?
What is the plan to rebuild them, and by when?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$38,639,420cash at December 31, 2025, against $32,809,719 of long-term loans
At December 31, 2025 the City held $38,639,420 in cash, nearly double the $20,370,238 a year before. Its investments fell from $16,465,997 to $6,149,375 as Guaranteed Investment Certificates (fixed-term savings) matured; the cash flow statement shows $10,316,622 coming back from investments. The City also owed $32,809,719 in long-term loans and paid $1,252,294 in interest on its debt in 2025, while earning $1,077,085 in interest income. Much of the cash is not free to spend: deferred revenue (money received for a set purpose) was $18,507,351, including $12,865,803 of development charges and $4,241,225 of transfer payments. The statements explain the rise in cash, so this is context, not a gap.
Why it matters
Cash held for a purpose should not be mistaken for money available to cut taxes or fees. How much is free is the number residents need.
It could be because…
Most of the cash is restricted to the purposes it was received for, such as development charges and grants.
Loans may be tied to long-lived assets such as sewers, fire halls and arenas, and repaid on fixed schedules, so paying them early may cost penalties.
The cash may be waiting for the 2026 projects, with $27,577,007 of contract payments due in 2026.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $38,639,420 of cash at December 31, 2025 was restricted, and how much was free to spend?
Does the City have a policy on holding cash and borrowing at the same time, and where is it posted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Clarence-Rockland spent about $244 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2025. The typical similar city spent $84. Only 2 of 23 similar places spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some places record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar places?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Clarence-Rockland?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Clarence-Rockland $244; typical similar city $84; ranked 3rd highest of 24.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy