Council BooksLairdOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Laird's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 10 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Laird's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 30 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 60% in 6 years?

+60%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Laird spent $329K on running the town office in 2019 and $528K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 30 similar towns had faster growth here.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources

Needs an answerMoney health

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$421Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $421K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 18% of everything billed. Only 2 of 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $330K.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingRising costs

Why is the township's fire services agreement costing $132,650 in 2026 when it cost $74,100 in 2025?

$132,650fire services agreement for 2026, against $74,100 spent in 2025

Laird does not run its own fire department. A staff memo says the township contracts its fire services from Echo Bay. The 2025 cost of the fire services agreement was $74,100. The 2026 budget set aside $150,000 for it, and a budget note in June 2026 says the new agreement "came in at $132,650". That is about $58,550 more than 2025 (worked out by us). Council discussed legal advice about the agreement in a closed session on May 21, 2026, then voted in public to have the Mayor and staff sign it. We did not find the agreement or a staff report on why the price changed.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the landfill closure savings fall from $306,775 to $141,660 in 2025, when the budget planned to add $20,830?

$141,660landfill closure reserve at the end of 2025, down from $306,775, against a closure liability of $1,928,540

The township owns one landfill. The audited statements record a promise to pay for closing it and caring for the site afterward, which they put at $1,928,540. Council keeps a reserve (money set aside for a future cost) for this. That reserve stood at $306,775 at the end of 2024 and $141,660 at the end of 2025, a fall of $165,115 (worked out by us). The 2025 budget and the 2026 budget both show a planned transfer of $20,830 into it. In the same year the reserve for general and administrative use grew from $1,069,217 to $1,313,588. We did not find a council decision or note that explains where the landfill money went.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why is the Laird Fairgrounds sewage study already projected at $47,000 against a $20,000 budget, and what will the fix itself cost?

$47,000projected for the fairgrounds septic study, against a 2026 budget of $20,000

In 2025 the province's environment ministry inspected the sewage systems at the Fairgrounds and Racetrack. The township now has to apply for an approval from the ministry, so it hired engineers. The 2026 budget set aside $20,000 for the "ECA Study for Septic". The July 2026 variance report projects $47,000 for that line, which is $27,000 over. On June 18, 2026 Council approved $17,000 for detailed design and soil testing and $27,150 for a groundwater study, and approved "a budget overage" to be paid from general reserves. The engineers' own price list says it leaves out cost estimates, so we found no estimate for the tanks, pumps and field upgrades that the design calls for.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowMoney health

Why did unpaid property taxes rise to $421,077, and how much of that rests on one account?

$421,077taxes receivable at the end of 2025, up from $330,182

Taxes receivable are property taxes billed but not yet paid. They were $330,182 at the end of 2024 and $421,077 at the end of 2025. The audited statements say about 42% of that total is owed on one account, and that Council and management are working on payment plans. The township's tax reserve is $50,000. In April 2026 staff told Council that the largest account was on a payment plan and the second largest had given post-dated cheques until June. A March 2026 staff report counted 30 properties two or more years behind, with 18 on payment plans and 4 in tax registration. We did not find an update after June.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Good to knowMoney health

Why did the township's investments bring in $113,046 in 2025 when $54,000 was budgeted, and what are they invested in?

$113,046investment income in 2025, against a budget of $54,000

The township holds $1,026,803 in one managed investment account. Income in 2025 was well above the $54,000 budgeted. A staff report to Council explains that most of the gain was an increase in market value that had not been sold, not interest. The 2026 budget cuts the line to $30,000. About two-thirds of the account is in securities and mutual funds, which can fall as well as rise. The staff report says its purpose is to confirm compliance with the township's investment policy; we did not find the policy among the pages we read.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to knowMoney health

Why did provincial grants fall from $867,449 in 2024 to $502,819 in 2025?

$502,819provincial grants in 2025, down from $867,449 in 2024

Provincial grants were the township's second-largest source of income after taxes. They fell by $364,630 from 2024 to 2025 (worked out by us). The 2025 budget had already expected a drop to $554,779, so this was planned, and actual grants came in $51,960 below budget (worked out by us). We did not find a note that says which grants made 2024 so high.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 1 source

Good to knowMoney health

Why raise the 2026 levy by 3.5% after surpluses of $712,701 in 2024 and $248,665 in 2025?

$248,665annual surplus for 2025, against a budgeted $203,178; the 2026 levy rose 3.5%

The levy is the part of property taxes the township collects for its own services. Council set the 2026 levy at $2,083,088, up 3.5%. The audited statements show an annual surplus of $248,665 for 2025, above the $203,178 the budget showed, after $712,701 in 2024. The statements explain that the budget is built a different way from the statements: it leaves out amortization (the yearly wear on buildings and roads, $382,401) and counts capital spending ($450,026) as a cost. So the statements' surplus is not spare cash. Council also told staff in January 2026 to plan to finish surface treatment on the township's roads within three years, which costs money. The 2026 budget carries forward $187,358 as "Audited Surplus from Prior Year"; we could not tie that figure to the statements.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 60% in 6 years?

+60%running the town office, 2019 to 2025

Laird spent $329K on running the town office in 2019 and $528K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 2 of 30 similar towns had faster growth here.

Why did the cost of running the town office grow 60% in 6 years?
+60%
Show as a table
YearRunning the town officePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−5%+1%
2021+28%+4%
2022+19%+11%
2023+24%+16%
2024+48%+18%
2025+60%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $199K a year pay for?
  2. Why did senior management go from $295K to $472K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Running the town office: 2019 $329K, 2020 $312K, 2021 $422K, 2022 $393K, 2023 $408K, 2024 $485K, 2025 $528K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Senior management, from $295K to $472K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  3. Typical growth among similar towns: 26%. Laird ranks 3rd of 31.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?

$421Kowed in unpaid property tax, end of 2025

At the end of 2025, $421K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 18% of everything billed. Only 2 of 30 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $330K.

Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$421K
Show as a table
YearUnpaid property tax at year end
2019$78,674
2020$171K
2021$181K
2022$73,187
2023$199K
2024$330K
2025$421K

Why it matters

When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.

It could be because…

  • The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
  • A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
  • Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
  2. Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
  3. Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Taxes receivable: 2019 $78,674, 2020 $171K, 2021 $181K, 2022 $73,187, 2023 $199K, 2024 $330K, 2025 $421K. Of the 2025 total, $142K was from earlier years.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 70, lines 0610 to 0699 · archived copy

  2. Typical among similar towns: 9.4% of taxes billed.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2025, 30 similar municipalities · Schedules 26 and 70 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why is the township's fire services agreement costing $132,650 in 2026 when it cost $74,100 in 2025?

$132,650fire services agreement for 2026, against $74,100 spent in 2025

Laird does not run its own fire department. A staff memo says the township contracts its fire services from Echo Bay. The 2025 cost of the fire services agreement was $74,100. The 2026 budget set aside $150,000 for it, and a budget note in June 2026 says the new agreement "came in at $132,650". That is about $58,550 more than 2025 (worked out by us). Council discussed legal advice about the agreement in a closed session on May 21, 2026, then voted in public to have the Mayor and staff sign it. We did not find the agreement or a staff report on why the price changed.

Why it matters

Fire protection is one of the few services residents cannot do without, and this line is now one of the larger items in the budget for protection. A rise of this size on a levy of about $2 million means something changed in what the township gets or how the cost is shared. Residents should be able to read what it is.

It could be because…

  • The old agreement may have been priced years ago and the neighbouring township may be charging a fair share of its real costs now.
  • The new agreement may cover more than the old one, such as a share of equipment or a new fire truck. A June 2026 motion paid $4,520.06 from the fire reserve for the township's share of a new truck.
  • Council may have planned for this: the fire capital reserve grew in 2025.
  • The agreement had to be settled with legal advice, which suggests it is a formal change, not a routine renewal.

Questions you could ask

  1. What does the 2026 fire services agreement cover that the previous one did not, and can the signed agreement be posted?
  2. What explains the move from $74,100 in 2025 to $132,650 in 2026?
  3. What does the budget note "$23,431.36 from 2025" refer to?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The records that would answer this can be requested: The 2026 fire services agreement and the cost comparison behind it, with wording you can copy.

The evidence

  1. Fire Services Agreement: 2025 budget 73,950, 2025 cost 74,100, 2026 budget 150,000. (Column headings "2025 Budget", "2025 Cost" and "2026 Budget" are printed on page 1.)

    Township of Laird, 2026 General Budget (Passed Motion #96-26, April 16, 2026) · page 3, Protection Persons & Property

  2. Line in the budget report: "Fire Services Agreement (Came in at $132,650 - $23,431.36 from 2025)" with a 2026 budget of 150,000.

    Council agenda, June 18, 2026 (Agenda 59) · page 27, 2026 budget report, Protection Persons & Property

  3. A staff memo says: "Laird Township contracts fire services from Echo Bay".

    Council agenda, June 18, 2026 (Agenda 59) · page 67, memo on the Community Fire Safety Officer vacancy, Background

  4. Rise and report from the closed session: "Council received solicitor comments and legal advice regarding the Fire Services Agreement under Section 239(2)(f)." Council then directed the Mayor and staff to sign the Fire Services Agreement, motion #126-26.

    Council minutes, May 21, 2026 · page 4, Closed Session and motion #126-26

  5. Reserves set aside by Council: "Fire department capital" 400,032 in 2025 and 300,032 in 2024.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 6, Accumulated surplus, PDF page 16

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the landfill closure savings fall from $306,775 to $141,660 in 2025, when the budget planned to add $20,830?

$141,660landfill closure reserve at the end of 2025, down from $306,775, against a closure liability of $1,928,540

The township owns one landfill. The audited statements record a promise to pay for closing it and caring for the site afterward, which they put at $1,928,540. Council keeps a reserve (money set aside for a future cost) for this. That reserve stood at $306,775 at the end of 2024 and $141,660 at the end of 2025, a fall of $165,115 (worked out by us). The 2025 budget and the 2026 budget both show a planned transfer of $20,830 into it. In the same year the reserve for general and administrative use grew from $1,069,217 to $1,313,588. We did not find a council decision or note that explains where the landfill money went.

Why it matters

A landfill has to be closed and watched for decades, and the statements put the closure date at 2073. Savings meant for that job are the only protection residents have against a large bill later. The statements say this reserve "does not offset" the liability, so the reserve at $141,660 covers a small part of it.

It could be because…

  • Council may have moved the money into the general reserve, which grew in the same year, as a bookkeeping choice.
  • Some of it may have paid for landfill monitoring, studies or repairs in 2025.
  • The closure cost estimate may have been redone, and the reserve reset to match a new plan.
  • A reserve is a choice by Council, not a rule: the township is not required to hold the full liability in cash.

Questions you could ask

  1. What was the $165,115 that left the landfill closure reserve in 2025 used for, and which council decision approved it?
  2. Why does the budget plan to add $20,830 a year while the statements show the reserve falling?
  3. Does the township have a plan for how it will pay for closure, and does it match the 2073 date in the statements?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The records that would answer this can be requested: Transfers into and out of the landfill closure reserve, 2024 to 2025, with wording you can copy.

The evidence

  1. Reserves set aside by Council: "Landfill closure and post-closure" 141,660 in 2025 and 306,775 in 2024. "For general and administrative use" 1,313,588 in 2025 and 1,069,217 in 2024.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 6, Accumulated surplus, PDF page 16

  2. Note 5: the closure is expected in 2073. "A reserve of 141,660 has been established to fund the future closure costs and does not offset the liability on the statement of financial position". Asset retirement obligation: 1,928,540 at the end of 2025 and 1,893,512 at the end of 2024.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 5, Asset retirement obligation, PDF page 15

  3. Under "Reserves & Transfers (Going into Reserves)": "Reserve Fund - Landfill Closing Costs 2075" 20,830 (2025 budget), 20,830 (2025 cost), 20,830 (2026 budget).

    Township of Laird, 2026 General Budget (Passed Motion #96-26, April 16, 2026) · page 10, Reserves & Transfers

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why is the Laird Fairgrounds sewage study already projected at $47,000 against a $20,000 budget, and what will the fix itself cost?

$47,000projected for the fairgrounds septic study, against a 2026 budget of $20,000

In 2025 the province's environment ministry inspected the sewage systems at the Fairgrounds and Racetrack. The township now has to apply for an approval from the ministry, so it hired engineers. The 2026 budget set aside $20,000 for the "ECA Study for Septic". The July 2026 variance report projects $47,000 for that line, which is $27,000 over. On June 18, 2026 Council approved $17,000 for detailed design and soil testing and $27,150 for a groundwater study, and approved "a budget overage" to be paid from general reserves. The engineers' own price list says it leaves out cost estimates, so we found no estimate for the tanks, pumps and field upgrades that the design calls for.

Why it matters

The study is the cheap part. The engineers describe balancing tanks, a dosing chamber and pumps, which are usually the larger costs. Council should be able to tell residents the full range before it has spent the study money.

It could be because…

  • The engineers say their design fee falls within the range they quoted in July 2025, so the overage may be due to the groundwater study being added later and not being in the budget.
  • Council deliberately chose to keep the groundwater work as a separate contract with the township to save a markup, which the engineers' proposal says.
  • The ministry may have added requirements after the budget was set. The proposal says this often happens.

Questions you could ask

  1. What is the township's best estimate of the full cost of the sewage upgrades, not only the study?
  2. How much will come from general reserves, and how much from grants?
  3. The engineers call this project 2025-13 and the motion says Project 2025-23. Are they the same project?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The records that would answer this can be requested: Cost estimates for the Laird Fairgrounds sewage system upgrade, with wording you can copy.

The evidence

  1. Capital 5 Year Plan Projects: "Laird Fairgrounds - ECA Study for Septic" 20,000.

    Township of Laird, 2026 General Budget (Passed Motion #96-26, April 16, 2026) · page 10, Capital 5 Year Plan Projects

  2. Budget variances until July 14/26: "Laird Fairgrounds - ECA Study for Septic" budget 20,000, projected 47,000, variance -27,000, status "In Process".

    Council agenda, July 16, 2026 (Agenda 61) · page 31, 2026 budget variances, capital five-year plan projects

  3. Engineers' proposal, Table 4: "Hydrogeological Study (Greenstone Engineering)" budget "$20,000 - $25,000", actual "$ 27,150"; subtotal "$52,500" budget and "$50,150" actual (excluding HST). Fees: "Detailed Design & MECP Application $ 13,000.00", "T-Time and Grain Size Analysis $ 4,000.00", total "$ 17,000.00".

    Council agenda, June 18, 2026 (Agenda 59) · pages 45 and 46, Algoma Engineering proposal PCR #2, sections 5

  4. The same proposal lists "Cost estimates" among its exclusions, and says the work includes "balancing/equalization tanks" and "a dosing chamber and associated pumping infrastructure". It names the ministry inspection of "May 19 - July 3, 2025" as the reason. It calls the project "2025-13".

    Council agenda, June 18, 2026 (Agenda 59) · pages 42, 43 and 47, Algoma Engineering proposal PCR #2, sections 1, 2 and 6

  5. Motion #145-26 approved "$17,000.00 plus HST" and "$27,150.00 plus HST", and "a budget overage for Project 2025-23", directing staff "to acquire additional funds from general reserves".

    Council minutes, June 18, 2026 · page 3, 8. Unfinished Business, motion #145-26

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 207% in 6 years?

+207%water, sewers and garbage, 2019 to 2025

Laird spent $37,072 on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $114K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.

Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 207% in 6 years?
+207%
Show as a table
YearWater, sewers and garbagePrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020+61%+1%
2021+80%+4%
2022+829%+11%
2023+213%+16%
2024+285%+18%
2025+207%+21%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $76,766 a year pay for?
  2. Why did the dump (landfill) go from $15,028 to $114K?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Water, sewers and garbage: 2019 $37,072, 2020 $59,518, 2021 $66,664, 2022 $345K, 2023 $116K, 2024 $143K, 2025 $114K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: The dump (landfill), from $15,028 to $114K.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2025 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did unpaid property taxes rise to $421,077, and how much of that rests on one account?

$421,077taxes receivable at the end of 2025, up from $330,182

Taxes receivable are property taxes billed but not yet paid. They were $330,182 at the end of 2024 and $421,077 at the end of 2025. The audited statements say about 42% of that total is owed on one account, and that Council and management are working on payment plans. The township's tax reserve is $50,000. In April 2026 staff told Council that the largest account was on a payment plan and the second largest had given post-dated cheques until June. A March 2026 staff report counted 30 properties two or more years behind, with 18 on payment plans and 4 in tax registration. We did not find an update after June.

Why it matters

A township this size depends on taxes arriving. When a large share is owed on one account, one missed payment makes a visible hole in cash.

It could be because…

  • A large property with a payment plan in place is ordinary, and the arrears may be paid down within the year.
  • Tax registration is the legal process for recovering unpaid taxes, and the township is using it.
  • The bigger total may include the current year's bills, not only old debts.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much of the $421,077 had been paid by the end of September 2026?
  2. Is the $50,000 tax stabilization reserve enough if the largest account is not paid?
  3. Will staff report to Council on the arrears before the new Council takes office?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of financial position: "Taxes receivable - no allowance" 421,077 (2025) and 330,182 (2024).

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 5

  2. Note 15, Credit risk: "Approximately 42% of property taxes receivable is due from one individual roll. Management and council are coordinating payment plans to reduce the amount owing." The township "has established a reserve in the amount of $50,000 for tax stabilization."

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 15, Financial Risk, PDF page 20

  3. Status of tax collection, verbal update: "The largest arrears account is now on a payment plan. The second largest has provided post-dated cheques until June."

    Council minutes, April 16, 2026 · page 3, 7. Reports, Status of Tax Collection

  4. Tax collection information, March 19, 2026: Total $358,680.06. "30 properties in arrears (2+ years): 18 on payment plans, 4 in tax registration, 8 with payment plan agreements due March 20 or proceeding to tax registration".

    Council agenda, March 19, 2026 (Agenda 53) · page 31, memo on tax collection information

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the township's investments bring in $113,046 in 2025 when $54,000 was budgeted, and what are they invested in?

$113,046investment income in 2025, against a budget of $54,000

The township holds $1,026,803 in one managed investment account. Income in 2025 was well above the $54,000 budgeted. A staff report to Council explains that most of the gain was an increase in market value that had not been sold, not interest. The 2026 budget cuts the line to $30,000. About two-thirds of the account is in securities and mutual funds, which can fall as well as rise. The staff report says its purpose is to confirm compliance with the township's investment policy; we did not find the policy among the pages we read.

Why it matters

Public money held in markets can lose value. Residents can reasonably ask how much risk the township accepts, and who decides. Income came in above budget, which is why this is context and not a concern.

It could be because…

  • Investment returns were better than expected in 2025, and the 2026 budget sets the line lower.
  • The staff report says its purpose is to confirm compliance with the municipal investment policy and applicable legislation.
  • Most of the 2025 gain was a gain on paper, so it is not spendable cash.

Questions you could ask

  1. Can the township post its investment policy and say how much of the account may be held in securities and mutual funds?
  2. The staff report totals $115,121 and the budget sheet shows $113,046 for 2025. What explains the $2,075 difference (worked out by us)?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. "IPC Securities Corporation": 2025 budget 54,000, 2025 cost 113,046, 2026 budget 30,000.

    Township of Laird, 2026 General Budget (Passed Motion #96-26, April 16, 2026) · page 1, Investment Income

  2. Staff report: "As of December 31, 2025, the municipality held total investments of $1,026,803". Activity in 2025: investments, dividends and distributions 27,847; realized capital gains 19,002; unrealized capital gains 75,833; management fees paid (7,561); total $115,121. The report's purpose is to "confirm compliance with the municipal investment policy and applicable legislation".

    Council agenda, March 19, 2026 (Agenda 53) · page 30, report on Financial Investment - Update Jan. - Dec. 2025

  3. Note 2, Portfolio investments: cash and guaranteed investment certificates 277,347; fixed income 80,044; "Securities and mutual funds" 669,412; total $1,026,803.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 2, Portfolio investments, PDF page 14

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why did provincial grants fall from $867,449 in 2024 to $502,819 in 2025?

$502,819provincial grants in 2025, down from $867,449 in 2024

Provincial grants were the township's second-largest source of income after taxes. They fell by $364,630 from 2024 to 2025 (worked out by us). The 2025 budget had already expected a drop to $554,779, so this was planned, and actual grants came in $51,960 below budget (worked out by us). We did not find a note that says which grants made 2024 so high.

Why it matters

Grants can pay for one-time work such as roads or bridges. Residents should be able to tell when the township is spending money that will not come again, and when it is paying for ongoing costs from a grant that might end.

It could be because…

  • A large one-time capital grant for roads or bridges arrived in 2024 and did not repeat.
  • Some grant money is recognized only when the work is done, so it can move between years.
  • The statements show the fall was planned in the 2025 budget.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which provincial grants were received in 2024 and not in 2025, and what did they pay for?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of operations: "Provincial grants" 2025 budget 554,779, 2025 actual 502,819, 2024 actual 867,449.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus, PDF page 6

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why raise the 2026 levy by 3.5% after surpluses of $712,701 in 2024 and $248,665 in 2025?

$248,665annual surplus for 2025, against a budgeted $203,178; the 2026 levy rose 3.5%

The levy is the part of property taxes the township collects for its own services. Council set the 2026 levy at $2,083,088, up 3.5%. The audited statements show an annual surplus of $248,665 for 2025, above the $203,178 the budget showed, after $712,701 in 2024. The statements explain that the budget is built a different way from the statements: it leaves out amortization (the yearly wear on buildings and roads, $382,401) and counts capital spending ($450,026) as a cost. So the statements' surplus is not spare cash. Council also told staff in January 2026 to plan to finish surface treatment on the township's roads within three years, which costs money. The 2026 budget carries forward $187,358 as "Audited Surplus from Prior Year"; we could not tie that figure to the statements.

Why it matters

Residents pay the levy and see surpluses reported. The township has explained how its budget differs from its statements, which is why this is context and not a concern. The open point is how much of each surplus is unspent cash and what Council plans to use it for.

It could be because…

  • The budget leaves out amortization, and the statements say so. About $382,401 of 2025 costs is wear on assets that was not budgeted.
  • Capital spending on roads and equipment came out of the same money, and the wheeled excavator and road work were bought in 2025.
  • Council has set a goal of finishing road surface treatment in three years.
  • The $187,358 may be a cash-basis figure from the township's own working papers, which differs from the statements' annual surplus.

Questions you could ask

  1. How does the $187,358 "Audited Surplus from Prior Year" in the 2026 budget relate to the $248,665 annual surplus in the audited statements?
  2. How much of the 2025 surplus was spent on roads and equipment, and how much went into reserves?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Laird? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of operations: "Annual surplus" 2025 budget 203,178, 2025 actual 248,665, 2024 actual 712,701.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Statement of Operations and Accumulated Surplus, PDF page 6

  2. Note 13, Budget: the budget "expensed all tangible capital expenditures rather than including amortization expense." Reconciliation: Amortization (382,401); net inter-fund transfers from reserves 135,553; capital transactions 450,026; "Budget surplus per statement of operations" $203,178.

    The Corporation of the Township of Laird, Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2025 · Note 13, Budget, PDF page 19

  3. Motion #97-26: Council adopts the 2026 budget "establishing a municipal taxation levy of $2,083,088, representing a Council-approved levy increase of 3.5%".

    Council minutes, April 16, 2026 · page 3, 8. Unfinished Business, Final Budget 2026

  4. Motion #07-26: Council directs staff to prepare 2026 budget figures "based on trying to complete the surface treatment within the next 3 years".

    Council minutes, January 15, 2026 · page 2, 5-Year Road Plan 2026 to 2030, motion #07-26

  5. Operating revenue: "Audited Surplus from Prior Year" 122,200 (2025 budget), 122,200 (2025 cost), 187,358 (2026 budget).

    Township of Laird, 2026 General Budget (Passed Motion #96-26, April 16, 2026) · page 1, Taxation Operating

↑ All questions