Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Moonbeam's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 11 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Moonbeam's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 48 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Moonbeam spent $400K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $761K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 4 of 48 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
At the end of 2024, $524K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 17% of everything billed. Only 9 of 48 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $416K.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
nilcarrying value of asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2024, and the auditor could not confirm it
Some things a town owns must be cleaned up or safely taken apart one day, such as landfill sites, buildings with asbestos and monitoring wells. Accounting rules call these asset retirement obligations. The town's books show the cost as nil. The auditor says it could not get enough evidence to say whether nil is right, so it gave a "qualified" opinion on the 2024 statements. It gave the same kind of opinion on the 2023 statements. A qualified opinion means the statements are fair except for one named problem.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$176,392Moonbeam's 6% share of the landfill board's closure obligation at December 31, 2024, not counted in the statements
Moonbeam and the Town of Kapuskasing run one landfill through a shared board. At December 31, 2024 the board owed $2,939,872 for closing the site and looking after it afterwards. The statements say Moonbeam's share at 6% is $176,392 and that this is not in Moonbeam's own statements. The board expects the site to be full around 2035. The town has set aside $132,558 in a landfill reserve.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$2,268,654cash at December 31, 2024, down from $5,279,695 a year earlier
Cash fell from $5,279,695 at the end of 2023 to $2,268,654 at the end of 2024. The town spent $3,749,873 on buying and building assets, and most of it ($2,866,454) went to projects not yet finished. The reserve set aside for the community hub project fell from $1,630,295 to $148,925. At the same time the town was owed $1,167,260 by the Province and $591,050 by the federal government. The town has an unused line of credit of $400,000.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$39,000budgeted for Municipal Council "operations" in 2026, against $6,000 in the 2025 column
The 2026 budget book shows the Municipal Council line at $128,683, up from $87,346 for 2025. Of that, $89,683 is listed as elected officials' compensation (2025: $81,346) and $39,000 as "operations" (2025: $6,000). The book does not say what the operations line pays for. This is a total for the whole council, not for any one member.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
The 2026 budget has $197,000 on the "operations" line for planning (2025: $207,500), more than half (worked out by us) of the planning budget of $325,822. The book says the planning and development increase is "mainly due to higher legal and professional fees". In the 2024 statements the town listed commitments to an outside planning firm: $141,760 for an official plan and zoning review, with $86,719 left to pay, and $27,570 for a commercial improvement plan with $8,704 left.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
$74,673allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2023, shown as nil at December 31, 2024
An allowance for doubtful accounts is money a town sets aside because some bills will not be paid. At December 31, 2023 the town had an allowance of $74,673 against taxes receivable. At December 31, 2024 it shows "-". Taxes from prior years, with penalties and interest, were $330,864 (2023: $317,628). The notes do not explain the change.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
Moonbeam spent $509K on running the town office in 2019 and $817K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 9 of 48 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$4,712,340total 2025 expenses as adopted, against $4,745,884 and $4,788,804 shown for 2025 in the 2026 book
The 2025 budget Council adopted on May 8, 2025 shows total expenses of $4,712,340. The 2026 budget book, in its overview table, shows the 2025 column as $4,745,884. In its detailed schedule, the same book shows the 2025 budget as $4,788,804. The 2026 book explains some of the differences by moving costs between departments, but a move between departments should not change the total.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
November 6, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements
The 2023 statements are dated October 23, 2024 and the auditor's report on the 2024 statements is dated November 6, 2025, about ten months after the year ended. Budgets are adopted well into the year they cover: the 2024 budget on June 6, 2024, the 2025 budget on May 8, 2025 and the 2026 budget on May 7, 2026. When we read the town's finance page on October 7, 2026 the 2024 statements were the newest posted.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
Moonbeam spent $400K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $761K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 4 of 48 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 90% in 5 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%
+90%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−33%
+1%
2021
−18%
+4%
2022
−7%
+11%
2023
+43%
+16%
2024
+90%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $360K a year pay for?
Why did programs go from $140K to $296K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
At the end of 2024, $524K of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 17% of everything billed. Only 9 of 48 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $416K.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$200K$400K$600K
$524K
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$332K
2020
$338K
2021
$321K
2022
$313K
2023
$416K
2024
$524K
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $332K, 2020 $338K, 2021 $321K, 2022 $313K, 2023 $416K, 2024 $524K. Of the 2024 total, $250K was from earlier years.
nilcarrying value of asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2024, and the auditor could not confirm it
Some things a town owns must be cleaned up or safely taken apart one day, such as landfill sites, buildings with asbestos and monitoring wells. Accounting rules call these asset retirement obligations. The town's books show the cost as nil. The auditor says it could not get enough evidence to say whether nil is right, so it gave a "qualified" opinion on the 2024 statements. It gave the same kind of opinion on the 2023 statements. A qualified opinion means the statements are fair except for one named problem.
Why it matters
If the real cost is more than nil, the town's savings are overstated by that amount. Today's taxpayers would be leaving the bill to later ones. The town's own notes say the obligations exist (landfill, asbestos, wells) but that the timing cannot yet be estimated.
It could be because…
The work to estimate the cost of old sites is new for small towns and takes time and specialist help.
The town may hold that the timing and amount cannot yet be estimated, which is what its notes say for asbestos and wells.
The landfill is run by a shared board with another town, so part of the cost sits on that board's books (see the next question).
Questions you could ask
What work has the town done since 2023 to estimate these costs, and when will it have a number?
Has the auditor told Council what it needs to remove the qualification?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The auditor's Basis for Qualified Opinion says: "As at December 31, 2024, the carrying value of the asset retirement obligations is nil." It adds that it was "unable to obtain sufficient audit evidence" about the amount and that the opinion on the 2023 statements "was also modified for this qualification."
Note 12 describes obligations for a landfill, for asbestos in town buildings, and for "Septic systems, drinking water wells and monitoring wells". For asbestos and wells it says "The timing of post-closure care cannot yet be reasonably estimated."
$176,392Moonbeam's 6% share of the landfill board's closure obligation at December 31, 2024, not counted in the statements
Moonbeam and the Town of Kapuskasing run one landfill through a shared board. At December 31, 2024 the board owed $2,939,872 for closing the site and looking after it afterwards. The statements say Moonbeam's share at 6% is $176,392 and that this is not in Moonbeam's own statements. The board expects the site to be full around 2035. The town has set aside $132,558 in a landfill reserve.
Why it matters
This is a real bill that is coming, and today it appears only in a note. A 6% share is small next to the board total, but it is large next to a reserve of $132,558.
It could be because…
The board, not the town, owes the money, and the board holds cash and investments of $2,930,087 against it.
The share is based on usage and could change before the site closes.
The reserve can be topped up each year until 2035 instead of in one go.
Questions you could ask
How much does the town plan to put into the landfill reserve each year before 2035?
Will the shared board's obligation be counted in the town's statements once the auditor's question is settled?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 17 says the board's asset retirement obligation is $2,939,872, "Moonbeam's share at 6%" is $176,392, and "Neither the provision for the future costs or the net debt have been reflected in these financial statements."
The same note says the board's cash and investments were $2,930,087 at December 31, 2024, and that the expected remaining life of the landfill is 10.9 years (year 2035).
$2,268,654cash at December 31, 2024, down from $5,279,695 a year earlier
Cash fell from $5,279,695 at the end of 2023 to $2,268,654 at the end of 2024. The town spent $3,749,873 on buying and building assets, and most of it ($2,866,454) went to projects not yet finished. The reserve set aside for the community hub project fell from $1,630,295 to $148,925. At the same time the town was owed $1,167,260 by the Province and $591,050 by the federal government. The town has an unused line of credit of $400,000.
Why it matters
A town spends reserves on a big project when it has saved for it. The questions are how much of the cost grants will repay, and whether the town has enough cash left for ordinary bills in the months before grants arrive.
It could be because…
The cash was saved on purpose in reserves for the community hub project, and spending it is what the reserve was for.
The money owed by the two senior governments is grant money earned in 2024 that arrives in 2025.
Holdbacks of $269,484 owed to builders were not yet paid at year end, so cash will fall further when they are.
Questions you could ask
How much of the community hub project is paid for by grants, and how much of that grant money has arrived?
What is the town's cash today, compared with the $2,268,654 at the end of 2024?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The statement of financial position shows "Cash $ 2,268,654 $ 5,279,695" for 2024 and 2023.
Accounts receivable include "Province of Ontario 1,167,260" (2023: 373,847) and "Government of Canada 591,050" (2023: 207,517). Note 9 says the $400,000 line of credit had no amounts drawn. Note 10 lists "Holdbacks 269,484".
$39,000budgeted for Municipal Council "operations" in 2026, against $6,000 in the 2025 column
The 2026 budget book shows the Municipal Council line at $128,683, up from $87,346 for 2025. Of that, $89,683 is listed as elected officials' compensation (2025: $81,346) and $39,000 as "operations" (2025: $6,000). The book does not say what the operations line pays for. This is a total for the whole council, not for any one member.
Why it matters
A rise of $33,000 is small in dollars, but it is more than six times the old line, in a town whose whole budget is about $5.2 million. The book explains other increases in words and leaves this one without a note.
It could be because…
Costs such as conferences or training that sat on other lines in 2025 may have been moved here. The 2025 budget listed "Conferences/meetings/professional allowances" of 25,000.
The $6,000 for 2025 matches the yearly fee for an outside integrity commissioner, so the new line may now hold other costs as well.
One-off costs for the year.
Questions you could ask
What is the $39,000 for?
Did Council approve this line as a separate item?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The schedule shows "Municipal Council 87,346 128,683", "Elected Officials Compensation 81,346 89,683" and "Operations 6,000 39,000" for the 2025 budget and 2026 budget.
The 2026 budget has $197,000 on the "operations" line for planning (2025: $207,500), more than half (worked out by us) of the planning budget of $325,822. The book says the planning and development increase is "mainly due to higher legal and professional fees". In the 2024 statements the town listed commitments to an outside planning firm: $141,760 for an official plan and zoning review, with $86,719 left to pay, and $27,570 for a commercial improvement plan with $8,704 left.
Why it matters
Plans written by consultants are useful if they are finished and used. When most of a budget line goes to outside advice, residents are entitled to know what it buys and when it ends.
It could be because…
A small town without its own planner has to buy planning advice, and some costs are covered by grants.
The official plan and zoning review are required work that comes up only every few years.
The line may also include non-consultant costs such as fees and software.
Questions you could ask
How much was spent on consultants in planning in each of 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date?
When will the official plan and zoning review be finished, and where can residents read it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
For Planning and Development Services (502,875 and 647,592), the overview says: "The increase is mainly due to higher legal and professional fees related to planning and economic development activities".
Note 16 lists "J.L. Richards & Associates - proposal to update the official plan and zoning by-law review for $141,760. Commitment left to pay at December 31, 2024 is $86,719." and a second proposal "for $27,570. Commitment left to pay at December 31, 2024 is $8,704."
$74,673allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2023, shown as nil at December 31, 2024
An allowance for doubtful accounts is money a town sets aside because some bills will not be paid. At December 31, 2023 the town had an allowance of $74,673 against taxes receivable. At December 31, 2024 it shows "-". Taxes from prior years, with penalties and interest, were $330,864 (2023: $317,628). The notes do not explain the change.
Why it matters
Removing the allowance makes the year look better by $74,673. That is only right if the old taxes are expected to be paid, for example because the town can sell the property if they are not.
It could be because…
The note says property taxes are secured by the land and pose minimal collection risk, so the town may have decided no allowance is needed.
Some old taxes may have been collected or written off, which would use up the allowance.
Questions you could ask
Were old taxes written off, collected or reassessed in 2024?
Does the auditor agree that no allowance is needed?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 8 shows "Prior years and penalties and interest $ 330,864 $ 317,628" and "Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts - (74,673)" for 2024 and 2023, giving taxes receivable of 524,038 and 415,903.
Moonbeam spent $509K on running the town office in 2019 and $817K in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time. Only 9 of 48 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 61% in 5 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%
+61%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+16%
+1%
2021
+6%
+4%
2022
+62%
+11%
2023
+27%
+16%
2024
+61%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $308K a year pay for?
Why did senior management go from $451K to $737K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $509K, 2020 $591K, 2021 $537K, 2022 $822K, 2023 $647K, 2024 $817K.
$4,712,340total 2025 expenses as adopted, against $4,745,884 and $4,788,804 shown for 2025 in the 2026 book
The 2025 budget Council adopted on May 8, 2025 shows total expenses of $4,712,340. The 2026 budget book, in its overview table, shows the 2025 column as $4,745,884. In its detailed schedule, the same book shows the 2025 budget as $4,788,804. The 2026 book explains some of the differences by moving costs between departments, but a move between departments should not change the total.
Why it matters
A budget is the promise to taxpayers. Comparing 2026 with 2025 only means something if everyone is comparing against the same 2025 number. The audited 2025 statements, which would show the actual result, were not on the town's page when we read it.
It could be because…
Council may have amended the 2025 budget during the year, and the 2026 book shows the amended figure.
The 2026 book may include costs (such as the school board levy lines) in a different way.
Typing or copy errors in a book put together quickly.
Questions you could ask
Did Council amend the 2025 budget? If so, on what date and by how much?
Which 2025 total is the one the audited 2025 statements will be compared against?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The adopted 2025 budget overview shows "Total Expenses 4,768,662 4,712,340" for 2024 and 2025.
The 2026 budget overview shows "Total Expenses 4,745,884 5,191,520 +9.39%" for 2025 and 2026. For Government Services it shows 621,440 and 1,501,750, and explains: "reclassifications of expenses that were accounted for in the Finances and Transfers Department in 2025".
The 2026 schedule of consolidated expenses shows "TOTAL EXPENSES 4,788,804 $ 5,231,382 $" for the 2025 budget and 2026 budget, and "GOVERNMENT SERVICES 1,421,755 1,501,750".
November 6, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements
The 2023 statements are dated October 23, 2024 and the auditor's report on the 2024 statements is dated November 6, 2025, about ten months after the year ended. Budgets are adopted well into the year they cover: the 2024 budget on June 6, 2024, the 2025 budget on May 8, 2025 and the 2026 budget on May 7, 2026. When we read the town's finance page on October 7, 2026 the 2024 statements were the newest posted.
Why it matters
Residents can only judge last year's money while it is still recent. A budget adopted in May means the town spends for months without a plan Council has voted on.
It could be because…
A small town with a small finance team and an auditor who is also finishing other towns' work.
Waiting for final grant and landfill board figures.
Councils often pass an interim spending plan at the start of the year; we did not find the town's.
Questions you could ask
When will the 2025 audited statements be ready?
Does Council pass an interim budget before the full budget is adopted?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Moonbeam?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The auditor's report on the 2024 statements is dated "November 6, 2025".
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy