Council BooksPort HopeOntarioSign inSubscribe
Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you
Read by hand. We read Port Hope's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.

Questions · 10 so far

Things worth asking about

We read Port Hope's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 68 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.

What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer

Needs an answer

These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.

Needs an answerRising costs

Why did Port Hope's property tax go up 12% in 2024?

+12%town property tax, 2023 to 2024

In 2024, Port Hope collected $2.9M more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 12% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 6 of 68 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 10% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 2.6%.

Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 4 sources

Worth asking

Worth asking

There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.

Worth askingMoney health

Why do the water and wastewater reserve funds show negative balances?

$(8,781,572)water and wastewater reserve funds combined at December 31, 2024 (worked out by us)

A reserve fund is money set aside for a named purpose. At the end of 2024 the Municipality's statements show the water system fund at $(2,692,011) and the wastewater system fund at $(6,089,561). Both were lower than a year earlier, when they were $(2,010,657) and $(5,833,652). A negative fund means more has been spent from it than has been put in, and other money has covered the gap. Together the two funds are $8,781,572 below zero (worked out by us). The Municipality has published its own reasons, in its 2026 budget presentation, and has raised the wastewater rate by 11.0% and the water rate by 3.5% for 2026.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingRising costs

Why did user charges come in about $1.9 million below budget in 2024?

$12,530,790user charges collected in 2024, against a budget of $14,444,765

User charges are fees for services, such as water and sewer bills. The 2024 budget in the audited statements counted on $14,444,765. The Municipality collected $12,530,790, which is $1,913,975 less (worked out by us). The year before it collected $14,301,453. The statements do not say which services account for the drop. Total revenue was $41,433,394 against a budget of $43,661,311, and the Municipality still reported an annual surplus of $4,844,326, because other revenue for capital was higher than budgeted.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why was less than 60% of the 2024 capital budget spent, and what is the $7.7 million already committed?

$10,539,465spent on capital assets in 2024, against a budget of $18,869,200

Capital spending buys long-lasting things such as roads, pipes and buildings. The 2024 budget in the audited statements planned to buy $18,869,200 of tangible capital assets. The statements show $10,539,465 bought, about 56% (worked out by us). That is part of why the Municipality ended 2024 with net financial assets of $1,655,414, when the budget had pointed to net debt of $(7,805,002). At the end of the year it also had capital contracts of approximately $7.7 million outstanding. The statements explain that capital projects can run over more than one year.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

Why did the Municipality owe its bank $2,376,714 at the end of 2023 while holding $35,285,271 in investments?

$2,376,714drawn on the bank credit line at December 31, 2023, when investments were $35,285,271

At December 31, 2023 the statements show bank indebtedness of $2,376,714, which is money drawn on the Municipality's operating credit line, at the bank's prime rate less 0.25%. The same statement shows investments of $35,285,271. At the end of 2024 nothing was owed to the bank and investments were $29,966,074. The Municipality's credit line was up to $7,500,000 for the period from October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. The statements do not explain why the line was used while investments were held.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Worth askingMoney health

What is the plan for the two radioactive waste reserve funds, and for costs that could fall to the Municipality when the federal clean-up ends?

$21,944,630in the two radioactive waste reserve funds at December 31, 2024 (worked out by us)

Port Hope has sites with low-level radioactive waste (LLRW), cleaned up under the federal Port Hope Area Initiative. The Municipality holds two reserve funds for it: $11,202,327 for the urban area and $10,742,303 for the rural area at December 31, 2024. In the 2026 budget the Municipality takes $(657,000) of the interest on these funds and uses it to lower the police levy. The statements say Canada has taken responsibility for nine sites for an estimated 20 to 30 years, and that the Municipality has recorded no obligation for them because the amount cannot be known yet. The Municipality says it will reassess this each year.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Good to know

Good to know

Background that helps make sense of the rest.

Good to knowMoney health

How much of the Municipality's debt is one 4.73% loan that runs to 2051?

$20,199,625owed on the 4.73% loan ending January 17, 2051, out of $23,550,293 in total

At December 31, 2024 the Municipality owed $23,550,293 on loans from Infrastructure Ontario, down from $24,669,796 a year earlier. One loan, at 4.73% and ending January 17, 2051, makes up $20,199,625 of that, which is about 86% (worked out by us). In 2024 the Municipality paid $1,119,504 in principal and $1,077,953 in interest. The statements say these payments are within the annual debt repayment limit set by the province.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources

Good to knowRising costs

What will the larger infrastructure levy of $4,700,000 in 2026 pay for, and how much is it for the typical home?

$176the Municipality's estimate of the 2026 municipal increase for a typical home

The infrastructure levy is a part of the property tax set aside for roads, pipes and buildings. In the 2026 budget presentation it rises from $3,811,116 to $4,700,000, which is $888,884 more. The Municipality says the budget is trying to close an infrastructure funding gap, and that the 2026 increase for a typical house is $176, or 3.42% of the total tax bill. The adopted 2026 budget shows $4,700,000 for the levy and a total municipal levy requirement of $30,700,722.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources

Good to knowRising costs

Why does the Council budget line rise 19.2% in 2026, and what will the council compensation review decide?

$74,292increase in the Council budget line, 2025 to 2026 (19.2%)

The Council department budget is $387,847 for 2025 and $462,139 for 2026, a rise of $74,292, or 19.2%. The budget presentation lists a "Council Compensation Review + Implementation" among its strategic plan items. We could not tell how much of the rise is for that review, because the text of the slide is out of order and does not pair the item with its cost reliably, so we have left its cost out. The Municipality has not posted the yearly pay and expenses statement for Council that Ontario's Municipal Act requires (section 284) on the pages we read. Its financial reports page points to the provincial salary disclosure instead.

Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources

Each question in full

Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports

Why did Port Hope's property tax go up 12% in 2024?

+12%town property tax, 2023 to 2024

In 2024, Port Hope collected $2.9M more in its own property tax than in 2023. That is a 12% jump, while prices went up about 2.4%. Only 6 of 68 similar towns raised theirs by more. Almost all of it came from a higher tax rate (up 10% for homes); the value of homes on the tax roll grew only 2.6%.

Why did Port Hope's property tax go up 12% in 2024?
$27.8M
Show as a table
YearTown property tax
2019$20.2M
2020$20.3M
2021$21.4M
2022$22.8M
2023$24.9M
2024$27.8M

Why it matters

A big one-year jump usually means something changed: a new cost, a service that grew, savings being rebuilt, or a problem from earlier years being paid for now. Residents should be able to see exactly which. Spread across every home, it is about $376 more each year.

It could be because…

  • Costs the town cannot control went up, such as policing, insurance or county charges.
  • The town kept taxes too low in earlier years and is catching up.
  • The town is rebuilding savings or paying for a big project like a bridge or equipment.

Questions you could ask

  1. What were the three biggest reasons for the 2024 increase, in dollars?
  2. Is a similar increase planned for next year?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Town property tax: $24,911,538 in 2023, $27,849,900 in 2024.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  2. Typical increase among 68 similar Ontario towns: 7.4%. Port Hope ranks 7th highest.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2024, 68 similar municipalities · Schedule 10, line 9940 · archived copy

  3. Residential tax rate (town share): 1.046% in 2023, 1.149% in 2024. Residential assessment: $1.9B to $1.9B.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 22, residential (RT) · archived copy

  4. Prices (inflation) rose 2.4% over the same year.

    Statistics Canada CPI, table 18-10-0005-01 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why do the water and wastewater reserve funds show negative balances?

$(8,781,572)water and wastewater reserve funds combined at December 31, 2024 (worked out by us)

A reserve fund is money set aside for a named purpose. At the end of 2024 the Municipality's statements show the water system fund at $(2,692,011) and the wastewater system fund at $(6,089,561). Both were lower than a year earlier, when they were $(2,010,657) and $(5,833,652). A negative fund means more has been spent from it than has been put in, and other money has covered the gap. Together the two funds are $8,781,572 below zero (worked out by us). The Municipality has published its own reasons, in its 2026 budget presentation, and has raised the wastewater rate by 11.0% and the water rate by 3.5% for 2026.

Why it matters

Water and sewer service is paid for by the people who use it, through their water bills. If the funds that are meant to pay for pipes and plants run below zero, either bills must rise, or other savings or the tax levy end up covering the gap.

It could be because…

  • The Municipality has said prices rose faster than its 2019 rate study expected, so the study's plan for the funds fell short.
  • Large capital projects can be paid for first and refilled later by rate increases, which is a normal way to phase in costs.
  • The Municipality has already voted the 2026 rate increases it says are meant to close the gap.

Questions you could ask

  1. By what date, and from what source, does the Municipality plan to bring the water and wastewater funds back above zero?
  2. Which money covered the negative balances in 2024, and was it other reserves, borrowing or the tax levy?
  3. How much of the 2026 rate increases is meant to repay the funds, and how much is meant to cover new costs?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The records that would answer this can be requested: Plan for the water and wastewater reserve funds, with wording you can copy.

The evidence

  1. Statement of Municipal Equity, reserve funds set aside for specific purposes by Council: Water system (2,692,011) for 2024 and (2,010,657) for 2023; Wastewater system (6,089,561) for 2024 and (5,833,652) for 2023.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Municipal Equity, PDF page 10 (printed page 4)

  2. The Municipality lists contributing factors including "Lower than projected consumption in rate study", "Reserve funds trending down vs. projected increase in rate study" and "Unforeseen increase in biosolids disposal cost due to facility closure".

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Operating, Utility Highlights, PDF page 24

  3. The same slide says: "Wastewater Rate Increase = 11.0%" and "Water Rate Increase = 3.5%".

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Operating, Utility Highlights, PDF page 24

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did user charges come in about $1.9 million below budget in 2024?

$12,530,790user charges collected in 2024, against a budget of $14,444,765

User charges are fees for services, such as water and sewer bills. The 2024 budget in the audited statements counted on $14,444,765. The Municipality collected $12,530,790, which is $1,913,975 less (worked out by us). The year before it collected $14,301,453. The statements do not say which services account for the drop. Total revenue was $41,433,394 against a budget of $43,661,311, and the Municipality still reported an annual surplus of $4,844,326, because other revenue for capital was higher than budgeted.

Why it matters

Fees are what pay for the services people use. A big miss against budget can mean the budget counted on more use than there was, which then has to be made up from taxes, savings or later fee increases.

It could be because…

  • A budget is a forecast, and the Municipality's own slides say water use came in lower than its rate study projected.
  • Some fees may have been moved, recorded in a later year or recorded under a different heading.
  • Weather and the closure of a facility can change what households and businesses use or are charged.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which services account for the $1,913,975 shortfall in user charges in 2024?
  2. Does the 2026 budget count on user charges that match what was actually collected in 2024 and 2025?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Consolidated Statement of Operations, revenue: User charges, reconciled budget 14,444,765; 2024 actual 12,530,790; 2023 actual 14,301,453.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Municipal Equity, PDF page 8 (printed page 3)

  2. Total revenue: reconciled budget 43,661,311; 2024 actual 41,433,394. Annual surplus: budget 3,797,943; 2024 actual 4,844,326.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Operations and Accumulated Municipal Equity, PDF page 8 (printed page 3)

  3. The Municipality's slide on the utilities lists "Lower than projected consumption in rate study" and "Growth and resulting DC and consumption revenue below rate study projections". It speaks about the water and wastewater rate study, not about the 2024 total of user charges.

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Operating, Utility Highlights, PDF page 24

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why was less than 60% of the 2024 capital budget spent, and what is the $7.7 million already committed?

$10,539,465spent on capital assets in 2024, against a budget of $18,869,200

Capital spending buys long-lasting things such as roads, pipes and buildings. The 2024 budget in the audited statements planned to buy $18,869,200 of tangible capital assets. The statements show $10,539,465 bought, about 56% (worked out by us). That is part of why the Municipality ended 2024 with net financial assets of $1,655,414, when the budget had pointed to net debt of $(7,805,002). At the end of the year it also had capital contracts of approximately $7.7 million outstanding. The statements explain that capital projects can run over more than one year.

Why it matters

Capital projects that are planned but not built can mean roads or pipes wait longer. The money not spent in one year is usually spent later, so a gap this size shows how much work is still ahead.

It could be because…

  • The Municipality says capital projects are budgeted by project and may be carried out over one or more years, so the budget and the year's actual are not directly comparable.
  • Projects can be delayed by supply problems, weather, grant timing or tenders that come in later than planned.
  • The outstanding commitments of approximately $7.7 million suggest much of the unspent work is already under contract.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which projects in the 2024 capital budget were not started or not finished, and when will they be?
  2. How much of the 2024 capital budget that was not spent was carried into 2025 and 2026?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets (Debt): Acquisition of tangible capital assets, budget (18,869,200), 2024 actual (10,539,465). Net financial assets (debt), end of year: budget $ (7,805,002), 2024 actual $ 1,655,414.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets (Debt), PDF page 9 (printed page 4)

  2. Note 14: "The budgets established for capital investment in tangible capital assets are on a project-oriented basis, the costs of which may be carried out over one or more years and, therefore, may not be comparable with current year's actual amounts."

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 14, Budget data, PDF page 28

  3. Note 13: "At December 31, 2024, the Municipality has outstanding capital project contractual commitments of approximately $7.7 million (2023 - $5.5 million)."

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 13, Commitments, PDF page 28

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

Why did the Municipality owe its bank $2,376,714 at the end of 2023 while holding $35,285,271 in investments?

$2,376,714drawn on the bank credit line at December 31, 2023, when investments were $35,285,271

At December 31, 2023 the statements show bank indebtedness of $2,376,714, which is money drawn on the Municipality's operating credit line, at the bank's prime rate less 0.25%. The same statement shows investments of $35,285,271. At the end of 2024 nothing was owed to the bank and investments were $29,966,074. The Municipality's credit line was up to $7,500,000 for the period from October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. The statements do not explain why the line was used while investments were held.

Why it matters

Borrowing costs interest. If a town borrows while it also holds investments, residents may want to know whether the investments were locked up for a purpose, or whether the cash timing could be managed to save interest.

It could be because…

  • Property tax money arrives in set instalments, so a short-term credit line is a normal way to pay bills in between.
  • Much of the investment portfolio is money set aside in reserves and reserve funds for specific purposes, and it is held in fixed income securities that mature on set dates.
  • Selling a fixed income security before its maturity date can lose money, so using the credit line for a short time can cost less.

Questions you could ask

  1. How much interest did the Municipality pay on its credit line in 2023 and 2024?
  2. How much of the $35,285,271 in investments at the end of 2023 was available to spend without selling before maturity?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Consolidated Statement of Financial Position: Bank indebtedness (note 16) - for 2024 and 2,376,714 for 2023. Investments (note 4) 29,966,074 for 2024 and 35,285,271 for 2023.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, PDF page 7 (printed page 1)

  2. Note 16: "The Municipality's financial agreement with its bank provides for an operating credit facility of up to $7,500,000 from October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 to finance expenses, pending receipt of property taxes and other income. As at December 31, 2024, $Nil (2023 - $2,376,714) was drawn, bearing interest at prime rate, less 0.25%."

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 16, Bank indebtedness, PDF page 34

  3. Note 4: cash and cash equivalents $ 4,625,309 (2024) and $ 11,687,696 (2023) at cost, and "The fixed income securities yield interest between 0.95% and 5.04% and have maturities ranging from January 2025 to September 2029."

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 4, Investments, PDF page 19

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound by reading the town's documents

What is the plan for the two radioactive waste reserve funds, and for costs that could fall to the Municipality when the federal clean-up ends?

$21,944,630in the two radioactive waste reserve funds at December 31, 2024 (worked out by us)

Port Hope has sites with low-level radioactive waste (LLRW), cleaned up under the federal Port Hope Area Initiative. The Municipality holds two reserve funds for it: $11,202,327 for the urban area and $10,742,303 for the rural area at December 31, 2024. In the 2026 budget the Municipality takes $(657,000) of the interest on these funds and uses it to lower the police levy. The statements say Canada has taken responsibility for nine sites for an estimated 20 to 30 years, and that the Municipality has recorded no obligation for them because the amount cannot be known yet. The Municipality says it will reassess this each year.

Why it matters

Together they are about twice the Municipality's "Total reserves" of $11,928,453 (worked out by us). Residents should know what the money is meant to be used for, and what could fall on them later.

It could be because…

  • The federal government has taken responsibility for the sites, and the funds may be a deliberate cushion for after the work is finished.
  • Using the interest, and not the principal, to lower taxes is a common way to use a permanent fund.
  • No obligation is recorded because accounting rules do not allow an amount to be recorded when it cannot be estimated.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which Council decision sets how much of the LLRW funds' earnings may be used each year, and who gave the direction mentioned in the budget?
  2. What does the Municipality expect to pay for these sites, if anything, once the federal clean-up is finished?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Statement of Municipal Equity, reserve funds: Low level radioactive waste - urban area 11,202,327 (2024) and 11,360,622 (2023); Low level radioactive waste - rural area 10,742,303 (2024) and 10,604,938 (2023). Total reserves 11,928,453.

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Consolidated Statement of Municipal Equity, PDF page 10 (printed page 4)

  2. Note 12(b)(ii): "The Municipality has identified nine sites which contain Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW)"; the Government of Canada "has assumed responsibility for these sites, including maintenance and potential future remediation activities, for an estimated period of 20 to 30 years"; no obligation is recognized, and the responsibility "will be reassessed annually".

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 12, Contingent liabilities, PDF page 27

  3. The 2026 summary shows "Less: LLRW Interest Applied to Special Service" of (657,000), applied to the police levy.

    2026 Operating Budget Summary (adopted budget) · 2026 Budget Summary, PDF page 1

  4. The Municipality says it is "Continuing to use LLRW Funds interest to reduce property taxes on an area specific basis" and that budgeted amounts are "estimated to be same as last year (80% of net earnings per direction)".

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Changes - LLRW Funds Interest Application, PDF page 51

↑ All questions

Worth askingFound automatically from financial reports

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 50% in 5 years?

+50%police, fire and safety, 2019 to 2024

Port Hope spent $7.7M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $11.5M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time.

Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 50% in 5 years?
+50%
Show as a table
YearPolice, fire and safetyPrices (inflation)
2019+0%+0%
2020−6%+1%
2021+2%+4%
2022+17%+11%
2023+36%+16%
2024+50%+18%

Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.

Why it matters

When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.

It could be because…

  • The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
  • Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
  • Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
  • Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the extra $3.9M a year pay for?
  2. Why did police (opp contract) go from $5.6M to $7.5M?
  3. Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Police, fire and safety: 2019 $7.7M, 2020 $7.2M, 2021 $7.9M, 2022 $9.0M, 2023 $10.4M, 2024 $11.5M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

  2. Biggest driver: Police (OPP contract), from $5.6M to $7.5M.

    Ontario Financial Information Return (FIR), 2019 to 2024 · Schedule 40 · archived copy

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

How much of the Municipality's debt is one 4.73% loan that runs to 2051?

$20,199,625owed on the 4.73% loan ending January 17, 2051, out of $23,550,293 in total

At December 31, 2024 the Municipality owed $23,550,293 on loans from Infrastructure Ontario, down from $24,669,796 a year earlier. One loan, at 4.73% and ending January 17, 2051, makes up $20,199,625 of that, which is about 86% (worked out by us). In 2024 the Municipality paid $1,119,504 in principal and $1,077,953 in interest. The statements say these payments are within the annual debt repayment limit set by the province.

Why it matters

A long loan at a set rate is a steady cost for residents for decades. It is worth knowing what the money paid for, and whether the Municipality has looked at whether the cost could be lowered.

It could be because…

  • Long loans for long-lived assets spread the cost across the residents who use them.
  • Loans from Infrastructure Ontario usually cannot be paid off early without a charge, so staying put can be cheaper.
  • The statements say the payments are inside the provincial limit.

Questions you could ask

  1. What did the 4.73% loan pay for, and what is its early repayment cost?
  2. What are the plans to repay debt or borrow more as the 2026 capital budget is carried out?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. Note 9(a): the outstanding principal of the debentures is $23,550,293 (2023 - $24,669,796). "Infrastructure Ontario Debenture, bears interest at 4.73%, payable in semi-annual payments with a maturity date of January 17, 2051" $ 20,199,625 (2024) and $ 20,961,875 (2023).

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 9(a), Net long-term liabilities, PDF page 23

  2. Note 10: Principal payments $ 1,119,504 (2024) and $ 1,149,104 (2023). Interest 1,077,953 (2024) and 1,124,324 (2023). Total $ 2,197,457 (2024).

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 10, Charges for net long-term liabilities, PDF page 24

  3. Note 9(c): the annual principal and interest payments "are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing".

    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, year ended December 31, 2024 (KPMG LLP, December 3, 2025) · Note 9(c), PDF page 24

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

What will the larger infrastructure levy of $4,700,000 in 2026 pay for, and how much is it for the typical home?

$176the Municipality's estimate of the 2026 municipal increase for a typical home

The infrastructure levy is a part of the property tax set aside for roads, pipes and buildings. In the 2026 budget presentation it rises from $3,811,116 to $4,700,000, which is $888,884 more. The Municipality says the budget is trying to close an infrastructure funding gap, and that the 2026 increase for a typical house is $176, or 3.42% of the total tax bill. The adopted 2026 budget shows $4,700,000 for the levy and a total municipal levy requirement of $30,700,722.

Why it matters

The Municipality has said it has a gap between what its roads, pipes and buildings need and what it saves for them. The levy is the way it plans to close it, so residents will pay it every year.

It could be because…

  • Building up savings before assets wear out is cheaper over time than paying for sudden repairs.
  • The Municipality's own plans list asset management and the funding gap as the first notable considerations for the 2026 budget.
  • Part of the levy increase may be offset elsewhere, since the Non-Departmental line falls.

Questions you could ask

  1. Which projects will the extra $888,884 pay for in 2026, and when does the Municipality expect the funding gap to be closed?
  2. Why does the adopted total levy requirement of $30,700,722 differ from the $31,051,122 in the staff presentation, and which line changed?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The evidence

  1. 2026 Budget Summary: Infrastructure Levy 2025 Total Budget 3,811,116; 2026 Total Budget 4,700,000; 2026 vs 2025 Budget Incr./(Decr.) 888,884.

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Summary, PDF page 50

  2. Notable considerations include "Improving the Infrastructure Funding Gap" and "Integrating Asset Management".

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Notable Considerations, PDF page 4

  3. "$176 or 3.42%" municipal impact on total tax bill; Estimated Impact to Taxpayer: Municipal Increase only $176; Municipal Portion of Total Property Tax Bill $3,273, based on a typical single detached home with an MPAC value of $272,000 as of 2016.

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Overview, PDF page 8, and Estimated Impact to Taxpayer, PDF page 55

  4. Adopted 2026 summary: Infrastructure Levy 4,700,000; Total Municipal Levy Requirement 30,700,722.

    2026 Operating Budget Summary (adopted budget) · 2026 Budget Summary, PDF page 1

↑ All questions

Good to knowFound by reading the town's documents

Why does the Council budget line rise 19.2% in 2026, and what will the council compensation review decide?

$74,292increase in the Council budget line, 2025 to 2026 (19.2%)

The Council department budget is $387,847 for 2025 and $462,139 for 2026, a rise of $74,292, or 19.2%. The budget presentation lists a "Council Compensation Review + Implementation" among its strategic plan items. We could not tell how much of the rise is for that review, because the text of the slide is out of order and does not pair the item with its cost reliably, so we have left its cost out. The Municipality has not posted the yearly pay and expenses statement for Council that Ontario's Municipal Act requires (section 284) on the pages we read. Its financial reports page points to the provincial salary disclosure instead.

Why it matters

Council sets its own pay. Residents may want to see the pay and the reasons for any change before it takes effect, especially in an election year (the next vote is on October 26, 2026).

It could be because…

  • A pay review is usually done once a term, and this one may follow a gap since the last review.
  • The Council sheet also includes staff and benefits lines, and not only members' pay.
  • The section 284 statement may be posted somewhere we did not look.

Questions you could ask

  1. Who is doing the council compensation review, when will it report in public, and how much does the 2026 budget set aside for it?
  2. Where is the Municipality's yearly statement of Council pay and expenses under section 284 of the Municipal Act?

You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.

Speak for Port Hope? Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.

The records that would answer this can be requested: Statement of council remuneration and expenses, with wording you can copy.

The evidence

  1. Total Council: 2025 Budget $387,847; 2026 Total Budget $462,139; 2025 vs 2026 Incr./(Decr.) $74,292, 19.2%.

    2026 Operating Budget, Council department sheet · 2026 Operating Budget, Council, PDF page 1

  2. The strategic plan highlights list "Council Compensation Review + Implementation". The cost beside it is out of order in the slide text, so we do not give it here.

    2026 Budget, staff proposed presentation to Council · Operating - MPH Highlights Strategic Plan, PDF page 21

↑ All questions