Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Puslinch's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 13 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Puslinch's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 45 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
Puslinch spent $387K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $687K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 45 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
$255,8382025 licence and permit income below budget (worked out by us: $768,476 less $512,638)
The Township budgets for fees from licences and permits, mostly building permits. In 2024 it took in $473,416 against a budget of $744,374. In 2025 it took in $512,638 against a budget of $768,476. Its own 2025 audit note says building permit demand is uncertain.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$3,254,5162025 capital budget not spent, as the Township's report prints it
Capital means roads, buildings and equipment that last many years. The Township's own report compares a 2025 capital budget of $5,705,637 with $2,451,121 spent. It says $2,728,946 is capital carry-forward, meaning projects that moved to a later year. Three projects make up $2,088,342 of that (worked out by us), and a second report from the same day gives a much smaller carry-forward figure.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
$148,944administration legal fees in the 2025 year-to-date column, against a 2025 budget of $68,500
In the adopted 2026 budget schedule, administration legal fees were $170,404 in 2024 and $148,944 in the 2025 year-to-date column, against a 2025 budget of $68,500. By-law legal fees were $199,040 and $119,606 against $109,500. The legal contingency reserve balance printed in the Township's reports fell from $257.2K to $158K between February 2025 and February 2026.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$162,8352025 penalties and interest above budget (worked out by us: $428,812 less $265,977)
The audited statements show penalties and interest on taxation of $428,812 in 2025 against a budget of $265,977. In 2024 it was $353,973 against a budget of $230,000. That is 61% above budget in 2025 (worked out by us). The Township's own proposed 2026 budget report raised its budget for interest on tax arrears by $80.1K "based on actuals".
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$2,210,391projected Asset Management reserve in 2030, against a minimum target of $2.433 million
The Township saves for replacing assets in its Asset Management reserve, which held $5,328,176 at the end of 2025. Its own projection puts that reserve at $2,210,391 in 2030 and $2,253,253 in 2031, below the $2.433 million minimum target it set in 2025. The report says larger contributions are needed to close the funding gap in its asset plan.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
2025listed on the council pay page without a link, on October 5, 2026
The Municipal Act requires the treasurer to give council a yearly statement of what each member was paid. The Township's page lists 2025 with no link, while 2024, 2023 and 2022 link to reports. The 2024 report says the statement is due on or before March 31st.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Puslinch spent $1.4M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 7 of 45 similar towns had faster growth here.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 3 sources
13completed budget surveys for the 2026 budget (15 the year before)
The Township's online budget survey had 13 completed surveys and 82 visits to its page, against 15 completed surveys and 75 visits the year before. The adopted 2026 budget has a $7,237,887 capital budget and an operating levy of $4,423,016.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
$147,196total paid to the five members of council in 2024, up from $137,593 in 2023
The Township's statements show total pay, benefits and expenses for council of $137,593 for 2023 and $147,196 for 2024, a rise of about 7.0% (worked out by us). Pay itself was $109,748 and then $114,519.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
Puslinch spent $387K on parks, arena and library in 2019 and $687K in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 3 of 45 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of parks, arena and library grow 77% in 6 years?
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
−50%+0%+50%+100%
+77%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Parks, arena and library
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−20%
+1%
2021
−16%
+4%
2022
+13%
+11%
2023
+51%
+16%
2024
+82%
+18%
2025
+77%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $300K a year pay for?
Why did parks go from $111K to $279K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Puslinch spent about $423 per home on council in 2025. The typical similar town spent $50. None of the 45 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Council per home: Puslinch $423; typical similar town $50; ranked 1st highest of 46.
$255,8382025 licence and permit income below budget (worked out by us: $768,476 less $512,638)
The Township budgets for fees from licences and permits, mostly building permits. In 2024 it took in $473,416 against a budget of $744,374. In 2025 it took in $512,638 against a budget of $768,476. Its own 2025 audit note says building permit demand is uncertain.
Why it matters
When expected fees do not arrive, the gap is filled from somewhere else: other income, reserves or property taxes. A budget that is too hopeful two years in a row makes the tax bill harder to plan.
It could be because…
The budget assumed building projects that were later delayed, which happens often when interest rates or trade rules change.
Building fees are meant to cover the cost of the building department, and the department can draw on its own building reserve in a slow year, so the tax bill may not have been touched.
Staff may budget these fees on purpose near the top of a range of likely volumes.
Questions you could ask
What volume of building permits does the 2026 budget assume, and why is residential permit income budgeted at $420,240 when the 2025 year-to-date figure was $336,654?
When permit income falls short, how much comes out of the building reserve and how much from property taxes?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 10, Other income: Licenses and permits, 2025 budget $768,476, 2025 actual $512,638, 2024 actual $473,416.
Operating schedule, Building: Residential Building Permits, 2024 actuals -$302,914, 2025 year to date -$336,654, 2025 budget -$420,240, 2026 budget -$420,240 (revenues are printed as negatives). The adopted 2026 budget keeps the same figure for 2026 as for 2025.
Note 16, Material uncertainty related to tariffs: the Township says tariffs create uncertainty around "future demand for the municipality's services (e.g. building permits)".
$3,254,5162025 capital budget not spent, as the Township's report prints it
Capital means roads, buildings and equipment that last many years. The Township's own report compares a 2025 capital budget of $5,705,637 with $2,451,121 spent. It says $2,728,946 is capital carry-forward, meaning projects that moved to a later year. Three projects make up $2,088,342 of that (worked out by us), and a second report from the same day gives a much smaller carry-forward figure.
Why it matters
Money set aside for projects that do not happen on schedule stays in reserves, and the projects cost more later if prices rise. Residents also pay a yearly capital levy for work that may not be done when promised.
It could be because…
A fire truck can take a year or more to build and deliver, so its money is often spent in the next year.
Projects funded by grants or reserves can only start when the funding is confirmed, and a building project needs design work first.
The second report counts only carry-forwards paid from the tax levy or grants, which may explain why its total is smaller.
Questions you could ask
When will the Pump 31 truck, the Kerr Crescent stormwater facility and the municipal operations facility be delivered or built, and what has been paid so far?
Why does one report show $2,728,946 carried forward and another $465,362? Which projects are in one figure and not the other?
Does the 2026 capital budget of $7,237,887 include the carried-forward projects, or are they on top of it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule A, 2025 Total Capital Expenditures: Grand Total, budget $5,705,637, actual $2,451,121, difference $3,254,516; $2,728,946 Total capital carryforward projects; $525,570 Total project surpluses.
Schedule A lists these as "Capital carryforward" with nothing spent in 2025: Pump 31 Truck, budget $888,342, actual $0; Kerr Crescent - Stormwater Management Facility, budget $600,000, actual $0; Municipal Administration and Operations Facility, budget $600,000, actual $0.
Statement of Changes in Net Financial Assets: acquisition of tangible capital assets, 2025 budget (4,866,745), 2025 actual (2,202,062), 2024 actual (2,158,758). This statement uses the audit's own basis, so it differs from the project report above.
Table 1, Capital Carry-Forward Balance Reconciliation as at December 31, 2025: Total Capital Carry-Forward Balance $465,362, including Municipal Administration and Operations Facility $268,000. The report defines carry-forward projects as those "funded through the tax levy or grant funding".
$148,944administration legal fees in the 2025 year-to-date column, against a 2025 budget of $68,500
In the adopted 2026 budget schedule, administration legal fees were $170,404 in 2024 and $148,944 in the 2025 year-to-date column, against a 2025 budget of $68,500. By-law legal fees were $199,040 and $119,606 against $109,500. The legal contingency reserve balance printed in the Township's reports fell from $257.2K to $158K between February 2025 and February 2026.
Why it matters
Legal fees are paid from the tax levy and reserves. If they keep running above budget, the plan for the year is not a good guide to what residents are paying.
It could be because…
Legal work follows events such as planning disputes, by-law prosecutions and agreements, which are hard to forecast, and some of it can be recovered from developers.
The 2025 column is labelled year to date and the document does not say as of when, so it may not be a full year.
The Township says it started a clearing account in 2026 so recoveries of third-party legal and engineering costs net to zero, which changes how these lines are budgeted.
Questions you could ask
What were the main legal matters behind the administration and by-law legal costs in 2024 and 2025, and how much of each has been recovered from other parties?
What was the full-year 2025 total for these two lines once the books were closed?
Why was the 2025 budget for administration legal fees set at $68,500 when 2024 actual spending was $170,404?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule A, Administration: Professional Fees - Legal, 2024 Actuals $170,404, 2025 Year to Date $148,944, 2025 Budget $68,500, 2026 Budget $60,000.
The Township explains a new clearing account for third-party recoveries related to engineering and legal fees: "a decrease of $150K in recoveries and a corresponding decrease of $151.7K in legal and engineering expenditures".
$162,8352025 penalties and interest above budget (worked out by us: $428,812 less $265,977)
The audited statements show penalties and interest on taxation of $428,812 in 2025 against a budget of $265,977. In 2024 it was $353,973 against a budget of $230,000. That is 61% above budget in 2025 (worked out by us). The Township's own proposed 2026 budget report raised its budget for interest on tax arrears by $80.1K "based on actuals".
Why it matters
This income comes from households and businesses that pay their tax bills late. A rising amount can mean more late payers, or a few large unpaid accounts, and it is a source of income the Township cannot count on.
It could be because…
A few large accounts paid late in 2025 and have since been settled.
The Township may budget this line low on purpose because it is hard to predict.
Taxes receivable fell between 2024 and 2025, which may mean old arrears were collected and the interest was paid with them.
Questions you could ask
How many accounts were in arrears at the end of 2025, and is the amount owed concentrated in a few properties?
Is the 2026 budget for interest on arrears set to match what has actually been collected?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 10, Other income: Penalties and interest on taxation, 2025 budget $265,977, 2025 actual $428,812, 2024 actual $353,973.
Schedule A, Corporate revenues: Interest - Tax Arrears, 2024 Actuals -$297,750, 2025 Year to Date -$365,247, 2025 Budget -$210,373, 2026 Budget -$290,500 (revenues are printed as negatives).
$2,210,391projected Asset Management reserve in 2030, against a minimum target of $2.433 million
The Township saves for replacing assets in its Asset Management reserve, which held $5,328,176 at the end of 2025. Its own projection puts that reserve at $2,210,391 in 2030 and $2,253,253 in 2031, below the $2.433 million minimum target it set in 2025. The report says larger contributions are needed to close the funding gap in its asset plan.
Why it matters
Roads, bridges and buildings wear out on a schedule. If the savings do not keep up, the choices later are higher taxes, borrowing or letting things decline.
It could be because…
The reserve is meant to rise and fall as large projects are paid for, so a dip below target in two years may be planned and temporary.
The target is adjusted each year for inflation, so the figure it is compared with may differ from the $2.433 million printed today.
Grants or the road reserve may cover part of the cost.
Questions you could ask
How large is the funding gap in the Township's asset management plan, in dollars a year?
What would the 2030 and 2031 reserve balances be if the 2026 contribution of $1,051,509 were raised?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule 2, Schedule of Accumulated Surplus, Reserves: Asset management $5,328,176 in 2025 and $4,846,336 in 2024.
Table 3, projected balances for the AM Discretionary Reserve: 2030 $2,210,391; 2031 $2,253,253; 2027 $2,886,929. The report says the minimum target is $2.433 million and "The projected balances meet these targets from 2026 to 2029 and from 2032 to 2035."
The report says "increased contributions to the AM Discretionary Reserve are required to address the infrastructure funding gap identified in the AM Plan."
2025listed on the council pay page without a link, on October 5, 2026
The Municipal Act requires the treasurer to give council a yearly statement of what each member was paid. The Township's page lists 2025 with no link, while 2024, 2023 and 2022 link to reports. The 2024 report says the statement is due on or before March 31st.
Why it matters
Council pay is public money and the statement is the one place it is added up. A missing statement just before an election makes it harder to compare pay across years.
It could be because…
The statement may have been presented to council and not yet posted on the page.
It may be filed with a council agenda that we did not read.
Questions you could ask
Was the 2025 statement given to council, and on what date?
Can the Township link it from the council pay page?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
The page lists previous annual remuneration and expense reports as 2025, 2024, 2023 and 2022. On the day we read it, 2025 had no link and the other three did. The page also lists 2025 expenses month by month for each member.
Section 284 (1) of The Municipal Act, 2001 requires the Treasurer to submit a statement to Council itemizing remuneration and expenses "in each year on or before March 31st". Report FIN-2025-011 has a meeting date of March 26, 2025.
Puslinch spent $1.4M on running the town office in 2019 and $2.2M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time. Only 7 of 45 similar towns had faster growth here.
Why did the cost of running the town office grow 56% in 6 years?
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+56%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Running the town office
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−7%
+1%
2021
+8%
+4%
2022
+27%
+11%
2023
+35%
+16%
2024
+56%
+18%
2025
+56%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
Money spent running the office is money not spent on roads, water or safety. When office costs grow much faster than the services people see, it is fair to ask what the extra money is buying.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $786K a year pay for?
Why did council go from $661K to $1.3M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Running the town office: 2019 $1.4M, 2020 $1.3M, 2021 $1.5M, 2022 $1.8M, 2023 $1.9M, 2024 $2.2M, 2025 $2.2M.
Puslinch spent $1.7M on police, fire and safety in 2019 and $2.6M in 2025. Prices only went up about 21% in that time.
Why did the cost of police, fire and safety grow 55% in 6 years?
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
−20%+0%+20%+40%+60%
+55%
2019202020212022202320242025
Show as a table
Year
Police, fire and safety
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
−7%
+1%
2021
+2%
+4%
2022
+10%
+11%
2023
+22%
+16%
2024
+52%
+18%
2025
+55%
+21%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $930K a year pay for?
Why did fire department go from $908K to $1.3M?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Police, fire and safety: 2019 $1.7M, 2020 $1.6M, 2021 $1.7M, 2022 $1.8M, 2023 $2.0M, 2024 $2.6M, 2025 $2.6M.
13completed budget surveys for the 2026 budget (15 the year before)
The Township's online budget survey had 13 completed surveys and 82 visits to its page, against 15 completed surveys and 75 visits the year before. The adopted 2026 budget has a $7,237,887 capital budget and an operating levy of $4,423,016.
Why it matters
A budget is only as informed as the people who comment on it. Very few answers makes it hard for council to know what residents want.
It could be because…
Many residents may give input through the public meeting, councillors or the newsletter instead of the online survey.
Small totals can be normal in a small township.
Questions you could ask
What else will the Township do to reach residents before the 2027 budget, whose public meeting is on its timeline for January 27, 2027?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"A total of 13 surveys were completed, with 82 visits to the engagement page as part of the 2026 Budget engagement process." The report says 2025 had 15 completed surveys and 75 visits. It lists other ways to take part: social media, a website banner, a newspaper advertisement, a public meeting on January 21, 2026 at 7:00 p.m., and a newsletter with the final tax bill.
$147,196total paid to the five members of council in 2024, up from $137,593 in 2023
The Township's statements show total pay, benefits and expenses for council of $137,593 for 2023 and $147,196 for 2024, a rise of about 7.0% (worked out by us). Pay itself was $109,748 and then $114,519.
Why it matters
Council pay is set by council itself, so residents can reasonably ask how it is decided and how it moves.
It could be because…
Pay and benefits normally move with a yearly cost-of-living adjustment, and employer payroll costs rise with pay.
Expenses vary with the conferences members attend.
Questions you could ask
How was the 2024 increase in council pay set, and which policy governs the 2026 amounts?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Schedule A, 2024: Totals, remuneration $114,519, benefits $29,031, sub-total remuneration $143,550, expenditures $3,646, grand total $147,196. The report says pay is authorised by By-law No. 058-2020, passed December 16, 2020.
Puslinch spent about $259 per home on snow ploughing in 2025. The typical similar town spent $141. Only 6 of 45 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Puslinch?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Snow ploughing per home: Puslinch $259; typical similar town $141; ranked 7th highest of 46.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy