Not the full picture. Built from public records, which leave things out.Read by hand, Oct 2026DetailsThis is built from public records, which leave a lot out, and some of it may be wrong or out of date. Check the sources, and tell us if you spot a mistake. What this site can't tell you Read by hand. We read Southwest Middlesex's own documents for this site in October 2026; the Sources page lists which ones. The comparisons with other places still come from the Province's yearly reports.
Questions · 12 so far
Things worth asking about
We read Southwest Middlesex's financial reports and meeting minutes, and compared its numbers with 73 similar Ontario towns. These are the things that stood out.
What these are, and what they are not. A question here means a number or practice is unusual, or harder to see than it should be. It does not mean anyone did anything wrong. Most unusual numbers turn out to have ordinary explanations, and every question lists some. The only way to know is to ask.
Needs an answer
Needs an answer
These are unusual enough that residents deserve a clear answer from council.
At the end of 2024, $1.8M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 16% of everything billed. Only 3 of 73 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.7M.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Worth asking
Worth asking
There may well be a good reason. It is still worth asking what it is.
$344,332bank overdraft at the end of 2024, against $1,727,251 in cash a year earlier
At the end of 2023 the Municipality had $1,727,251 in cash. A year later it had no cash and owed its bank $344,332. A bank overdraft is money the bank has covered because the account ran below zero. During 2024 it paid $4,047,019 for capital assets (roads, buildings, vehicles) and its cash flow from operations was $1,975,436. At the same time its notes list reserves (savings set aside for named purposes) of $6,279,579. Reserves are a line in the books. They are not always cash sitting in an account. In October 2025 the Mayor moved that staff report on "our internal financing program", and in November 2025 Council reviewed the 2024 statements and asked for external financing options. In January 2026 Council passed a temporary borrowing by-law of $2,000,000.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$2,932,926net debt at the end of 2024, from net financial assets of $4,216 at the end of 2022
Net financial assets is what a town has in cash and money owed to it, minus what it owes. At the end of 2022 it was a small plus ($4,216). At the end of 2023 it was a minus of $2,037,000, and at the end of 2024 a minus of $2,932,926. The notes to the 2024 statements also list "Unfunded capital" of $9,610,882, up from $8,652,623, as an amount still to be recovered. The statements do not say how it will be paid. Council has since adopted a Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy and a Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy, and in June 2026 endorsed a financing strategy and passed a by-law for credit facilities and a bridge loan.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 8 sources
$1,297,292.02approved project budget for the Limerick closure, excluding HST, in March 2025
The Municipality owns two landfills. The 2023 statements estimated the closing cost of the Limerick site at $900,000 and the 2024 statements at $1,209,000. In January 2025 Council awarded the closure work for $876,568.86 (excluding HST, the sales tax). In March 2025 it added "provisional items" (extra work listed in the tender, to be done if needed) of $420,723.16 and set the total approved project budget at $1,297,292.02, which is $88,292.02 more than the $1,209,000 estimate (worked out by us). The statements say part of the cost is expected back from "participating municipalities", and in December 2025 Council approved an operating and monitoring cost sharing agreement with Chatham-Kent and the Village of Newbury.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 6 sources
$2,400,000estimated closing cost of the Trillium landfill, unchanged in the 2023 and 2024 statements
The statements for 2023 and for 2024 say the Trillium site "was required to be closed by 2024, but ceased operations during 2022", that the Municipality is "awaiting approval" of a plan sent to the Ministry, and that the closing cost estimate is $2,400,000. The wording and the figure are the same in both years. The $4,967,918 recorded for both landfills is "based on a estimate for the closure and monitoring of both sites received in 2021". The reserve set aside for these costs was $1,579,481 at the end of 2024.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 3 sources
October 15, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements, against August 14, 2024 for 2023
The auditor signed the 2024 statements on October 15, 2025 with a clean opinion. The 2023 statements were signed on August 14, 2024. Council accepted the 2024 statements on October 15, 2025. On November 20, 2025 it held a special meeting on a "2024 Financial Statement Review" (FIN-2025-22). On December 3, 2025 it received a report titled "Updated 2026 Budget Timeline and Process in Response to Financial Review Findings" (CAO-2025-64). We did not find either report posted, so we do not know what the review found. The 2026 budget was accepted "in principle" on February 11, 2026.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 5 sources
$2,117,672owed to the Municipality for "Municipal drain work" at the end of 2024, up from $1,343,917
In its statements the Municipality lists what it is owed. The line "Municipal drain work" rose from $1,343,917 to $2,117,672 in 2024, an increase of $773,755 (worked out by us). That is more than half of the $1,007,875 by which accounts receivable (money owed) grew in the year, and it came in a year when the Municipality ended with a bank overdraft. Council also dealt with several new drains in 2025.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 2 sources
8council members for the October 26, 2026 election, per Council's February 4, 2026 decision; five are planned from 2030
On December 3, 2025 Council's own motion said it "has voted to reduce the size of Council" from eight to five members "effective for the 2026 Municipal Election", and asked the province to remove the Municipality from the strong-mayor list. On February 4, 2026 Council confirmed that "the existing council composition currently in force will remain in place for the 2026 municipal election" and that a five-member council would start with the 2030 election. On February 18, 2026 it passed by-law 2026/017 to that effect. The motion also told staff to "review internal governance processes and statutory deadline tracking". In August 2025 Council received a "Mayoral Direction" to start the 2026 budget process, under strong-mayor rules where the Mayor prepares the budget, and it defeated a motion to shorten the veto periods in those rules.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
8 of 8members whose "#" meeting count in the 2024 pay report matches the 2023 report
The yearly statement of council pay has a "#" column beside each member's meeting pay. For all eight members the "#" figures in the 2024 report are identical to the 2023 report, while the meeting pay amounts changed. The 2024 report says it uses "SWM By-law # 2023/007, as amended for 2024 rates". If the column was carried over from the year before, readers cannot tell from the report how many meetings the 2024 pay covers.
Found by reading the town's own documents · 4 sources
In 2019, Southwest Middlesex had $3.9M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$2.9M. About 73% of that change ($5.0M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 24 of 73 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 2 sources
Southwest Middlesex spent about $422 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2024. The typical similar town spent $210. Only 4 of 73 similar towns spent more.
Found automatically from the town's financial reports · 1 source
Each question in full
Needs an answerFound automatically from financial reports
At the end of 2024, $1.8M of property tax had been billed but not paid. That is 16% of everything billed. Only 3 of 73 similar towns had a higher share. A year earlier it was $1.7M.
Why are so many property taxes unpaid?
$0$500K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M
$1.8M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Unpaid property tax at year end
2019
$1.0M
2020
$1.0M
2021
$1.2M
2022
$1.5M
2023
$1.7M
2024
$1.8M
Why it matters
When taxes go unpaid, everyone else carries the cost, and the town may borrow to cover the gap. The Province's financial indicators treat 10% to 15% as a moderate risk and more than 15% as a high risk. Collection is the town's job, so a rising number is worth asking about.
It could be because…
The final tax bill was due late in the year, so some payments simply arrived in January.
A few large properties are in dispute or being sold for back taxes.
Hard times for residents, which the town may be handling with payment plans.
Questions you could ask
How much is more than one year overdue, and from how many properties?
Are the rules for chasing unpaid taxes applied the same way to everyone?
Has the town registered tax arrears certificates on properties about two years behind? If still unpaid a year after that, Ontario law lets the town sell the property.
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Taxes receivable: 2019 $1.0M, 2020 $1.0M, 2021 $1.2M, 2022 $1.5M, 2023 $1.7M, 2024 $1.8M. Of the 2024 total, $835K was from earlier years.
$344,332bank overdraft at the end of 2024, against $1,727,251 in cash a year earlier
At the end of 2023 the Municipality had $1,727,251 in cash. A year later it had no cash and owed its bank $344,332. A bank overdraft is money the bank has covered because the account ran below zero. During 2024 it paid $4,047,019 for capital assets (roads, buildings, vehicles) and its cash flow from operations was $1,975,436. At the same time its notes list reserves (savings set aside for named purposes) of $6,279,579. Reserves are a line in the books. They are not always cash sitting in an account. In October 2025 the Mayor moved that staff report on "our internal financing program", and in November 2025 Council reviewed the 2024 statements and asked for external financing options. In January 2026 Council passed a temporary borrowing by-law of $2,000,000.
Why it matters
A town that runs short of cash may borrow from its own reserves or from a bank, and both have to be paid back. Residents can only judge whether reserves are safe if the Municipality says how much of them has been lent to day-to-day spending or to projects, and when it will be put back.
It could be because…
Property tax bills and grants arrive in lumps, so cash can swing from one year end to the next.
The Municipality paid for projects in 2024 that it expects grants, drain bills to landowners or reserve transfers to cover later.
Using reserve money for a time before it is needed elsewhere (an "internal financing program") is a common way to avoid paying bank interest, if it is tracked and repaid.
The overdraft is small next to the $1,500,000 bank facility, of which only $390,671 was drawn at year end.
Questions you could ask
How much reserve money was used to pay for other things at December 31, 2024, and when will it be put back?
Where is the report on "our fiscal management, including our internal financing program" that Council asked for on October 15, 2025, and is it public?
Why does the 2026 temporary borrowing limit ($2,000,000) exceed the $1,500,000 bank facility described in the 2024 statements?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Statement of cash flows: "Acquisition of tangible capital assets and work in process" (4,047,019). "NET CHANGE IN CASH" (2,071,583). The operating activities subtotal is 1,975,436. "CASH (BANK INDEBTEDNESS), END OF YEAR" (344,332) for 2024 and 1,727,251 for 2023.
Note 6: "The Municipality has available $1,500,000 of short-term financing, with interest at prime rate, with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. At year end, the balance drawn on this facility was $390,671 (2023 - $nil)."
Council passed: "That staff bring back a report related to our fiscal management, including our internal financing program to Council." (motion 2025-287, moved by the Mayor).
$2,932,926net debt at the end of 2024, from net financial assets of $4,216 at the end of 2022
Net financial assets is what a town has in cash and money owed to it, minus what it owes. At the end of 2022 it was a small plus ($4,216). At the end of 2023 it was a minus of $2,037,000, and at the end of 2024 a minus of $2,932,926. The notes to the 2024 statements also list "Unfunded capital" of $9,610,882, up from $8,652,623, as an amount still to be recovered. The statements do not say how it will be paid. Council has since adopted a Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy and a Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy, and in June 2026 endorsed a financing strategy and passed a by-law for credit facilities and a bridge loan.
Why it matters
Net debt means the Municipality owes more than it can quickly turn into cash. It can be normal while a town builds things that will last decades, but residents pay the borrowing costs and the bill for roads and buildings still to be funded.
It could be because…
The Municipality built a large building in 2023 (buildings added $7,393,502 in the 2024 statements' note on capital assets) and has not yet matched it with grants, reserves or loans.
Net debt is a standard measure and a town can carry it safely if future revenue is sound. The auditor gave a clean opinion.
Council has already started to respond, with new financing and reserve policies and a financing strategy for 2026.
Questions you could ask
What does the $9,610,882 of unfunded capital consist of, and what is the plan and timetable to fund it?
What is the size and cost of the bridge loan authorized in June 2026, and what is it bridging to?
Will the Municipality publish the 2024 Financial Statement Review (FIN-2025-22) and the 2026 debt management update (FIN-2026-17)?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Statement of financial position: "NET FINANCIAL ASSETS (DEBT)" (2,932,926) for 2024 and (2,037,000) for 2023.
Note 10, Accumulated Surplus, under "AMOUNTS TO BE RECOVERED": "Unfunded capital" (9,610,882) for 2024 and (8,652,623) for 2023. "Landfill closure and post-closure costs (Note 16)" (4,967,918) for 2024.
Council received "2024 Financial Statement Review (FIN-2025-22)", asked to review the "Draft Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy and Draft Reserve and Reserve Fund Policy", and directed: "the Treasurer bring forward options for external financing during the 2026 Budget deliberations."
Council endorsed "the financial strategy presented in Report FIN-2026-17" for the "2026 capital program and related cash flow requirements" (2026 Capital Budget and Debt Management Update).
By-laws listed: "By-law 2026/058 Being a by-law to authorize Credit Facilities from the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) to meet expenditures in Connection with Annual Operating Line of Credit and Capital works and to authorize a Bridge Loan Financing".
$1,297,292.02approved project budget for the Limerick closure, excluding HST, in March 2025
The Municipality owns two landfills. The 2023 statements estimated the closing cost of the Limerick site at $900,000 and the 2024 statements at $1,209,000. In January 2025 Council awarded the closure work for $876,568.86 (excluding HST, the sales tax). In March 2025 it added "provisional items" (extra work listed in the tender, to be done if needed) of $420,723.16 and set the total approved project budget at $1,297,292.02, which is $88,292.02 more than the $1,209,000 estimate (worked out by us). The statements say part of the cost is expected back from "participating municipalities", and in December 2025 Council approved an operating and monitoring cost sharing agreement with Chatham-Kent and the Village of Newbury.
Why it matters
Closing a landfill is a legal duty and the bill falls on local taxpayers and water and sewer users unless others share it. The statements book a total landfill liability of $4,967,918 for both sites, so changes to the Limerick number matter.
It could be because…
The tender covered more than the original estimate, including final cover and stormwater drainage works, and the estimate was set in 2021.
Provisional items are work that may be needed. The final bill may be lower than the approved budget.
The cost sharing agreement may recover a large share, so the net cost to residents could be well below the project total.
Questions you could ask
What share of the Limerick closure and monitoring cost will Chatham-Kent and the Village of Newbury pay, in dollars and as a percentage?
What was the final cost of the closure work, and were the provisional items all used?
Will the landfill liability in the 2025 statements be restated for the new Limerick figures?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 15: "The estimate for the closure cost of the Limerick site is $900,000. It is anticipated that a portion of these closure costs will be recovered from participating municipalities."
Note 16: "The estimate for the closure cost of the Limerick site is $1,209,000 (2023 - $900,000). It is anticipated that a portion of these closure costs will be recovered from participating municipalities."
Council directed staff "to award the Limerick Landfill Closure, Final Cover and Stormwater Drainage Works Tender bid submission received from ASG Excavating Inc. in the amount of $876,568.86 (excluding HST)".
Council approved "the provisional items listed in the awarded tender for the Limerick Landfill Closure, Final Cover, and Stormwater Drainage Works at a total cost of $420,723.16 (excluding HST); And that the total approved project budget be adjusted to $1,297,292.02 (excluding HST)."
Council approved by-law 2025/103 "to enter into the Limerick Landfill Operational and Monitoring Cost Sharing Agreement with the Municipality of Chatham-Kent and the Village of Newbury."
Note 16: "The Municipality has accrued $4,967,918 (2023 - $4,786,048) in the Statement of Financial Position based on a estimate for the closure and monitoring of both sites received in 2021."
$2,400,000estimated closing cost of the Trillium landfill, unchanged in the 2023 and 2024 statements
The statements for 2023 and for 2024 say the Trillium site "was required to be closed by 2024, but ceased operations during 2022", that the Municipality is "awaiting approval" of a plan sent to the Ministry, and that the closing cost estimate is $2,400,000. The wording and the figure are the same in both years. The $4,967,918 recorded for both landfills is "based on a estimate for the closure and monitoring of both sites received in 2021". The reserve set aside for these costs was $1,579,481 at the end of 2024.
Why it matters
If the cost has risen since 2021, as it did for Limerick, the liability and the bill to residents could be larger than the books show. The gap between the amount recorded ($4,967,918) and the reserve ($1,579,481) is what taxpayers and users would still have to find.
It could be because…
The Ministry has not yet approved the closure plan, so no better estimate can be made until it does.
The estimate may have been checked by the Municipality's engineers and judged still fair, even though the note does not say so.
Costs will be paid over many years, and the reserve is growing (from $969,525 to $1,579,481 in 2024).
Questions you could ask
Has the Ministry approved the Trillium Design and Operations Plan, and what is the new closing date?
Has the 2021 estimate been updated, and what does the update show for Trillium?
How will the difference between the amount recorded and the reserve be funded?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Note 15: "The Trillium site was required to be closed by 2024, but ceased operations during 2022. The Municipality has submitted and is awaiting approval of a Design and Operations Plan, which includes a closure report to the Ministry. The estimate for the closure costs of the Trillium site is $2,400,000."
Note 16: "The Trillium site was required to be closed by 2024, but ceased operations during 2022. The Municipality has submitted and is awaiting approval of a Design and Operations Plan ... The estimate for the closure costs of the Trillium site is $2,400,000. The Municipality has accrued $4,967,918 (2023 - $4,786,048) in the Statement of Financial Position based on a estimate for the closure and monitoring of both sites received in 2021."
Note 16: "As of December 31, 2024, the Municipality has contributed $1,579,481 (2023 - $969,525) to a reserve fund for these closure and monitoring costs." Movement in the obligation: opening 4,786,048, additions 309,389, accretion expense (recovery) (127,519), closing 4,967,918.
October 15, 2025date of the auditor's report on the 2024 statements, against August 14, 2024 for 2023
The auditor signed the 2024 statements on October 15, 2025 with a clean opinion. The 2023 statements were signed on August 14, 2024. Council accepted the 2024 statements on October 15, 2025. On November 20, 2025 it held a special meeting on a "2024 Financial Statement Review" (FIN-2025-22). On December 3, 2025 it received a report titled "Updated 2026 Budget Timeline and Process in Response to Financial Review Findings" (CAO-2025-64). We did not find either report posted, so we do not know what the review found. The 2026 budget was accepted "in principle" on February 11, 2026.
Why it matters
The Municipality changed its 2026 budget timetable because of what a review found, but residents cannot read the findings. Late statements also delay the numbers that residents, lenders and the province use to judge the town's finances.
It could be because…
The 2024 audit may have been delayed by changes in staff or by the new asset retirement obligation accounting for landfills, which the statements discuss.
The review may be an internal check of the 2024 numbers, written for staff, that the Municipality has not thought to post.
The report may be posted somewhere we did not look. The agendas and minutes page says reports are available, but the minutes we read do not carry them.
Questions you could ask
Will the Municipality publish the 2024 Financial Statement Review (FIN-2025-22) and the Financial Review Findings report (CAO-2025-64)?
What caused the 2024 audit to finish later than the 2023 audit, and was the 2025 audit date affected?
What did the review find, and what changes in the 2026 budget came from it?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Independent Auditors' Report: "In our opinion, the Municipality's consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Municipality as at December 31, 2024". Signed "St. Thomas, Ontario, Graham Scott Enns LLP, October 15, 2025".
Council received "Updated 2026 Budget Timeline and Process in Response to Financial Review Findings (CAO-2025-64)" for information and acknowledged "the revised budget meeting schedule".
Council "accept the 2026 Budget, as amended, in principle" and directed staff "to prepare and bring forward the necessary by-law to adopt the 2026 Budget at the next regular meeting of Council."
Southwest Middlesex spent $2.0M on water, sewers and garbage in 2019 and $3.2M in 2024. Prices only went up about 18% in that time.
Why did the cost of water, sewers and garbage grow 58% in 5 years?
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
+0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%+120%
+58%
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Water, sewers and garbage
Prices (inflation)
2019
+0%
+0%
2020
+2%
+1%
2021
+104%
+4%
2022
+69%
+11%
2023
+77%
+16%
2024
+58%
+18%
Change since the first year shown. The grey line is how much prices rose overall, for comparison.
Why it matters
When one area grows much faster than prices, it is either doing more (which may be great) or paying more for the same thing. Residents deserve to know which.
It could be because…
The town added a service, a building or staff that residents asked for.
Costs were moved from another area, so the total did not really change.
Accounting rules changed how costs are sorted.
Large one-time costs, like a study, lawsuit or repair, landed in one year.
Questions you could ask
What did the extra $1.2M a year pay for?
Why did sewage treatment go from $408K to $772K?
Was each increase approved by council as a separate decision, or did it happen through the yearly budget?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
$2,117,672owed to the Municipality for "Municipal drain work" at the end of 2024, up from $1,343,917
In its statements the Municipality lists what it is owed. The line "Municipal drain work" rose from $1,343,917 to $2,117,672 in 2024, an increase of $773,755 (worked out by us). That is more than half of the $1,007,875 by which accounts receivable (money owed) grew in the year, and it came in a year when the Municipality ended with a bank overdraft. Council also dealt with several new drains in 2025.
Why it matters
When a town pays for drain work and bills the landowners who benefit later, its own cash is tied up until they pay. How long that takes and what interest is charged affect how much the town has to borrow.
It could be because…
Drain costs may be billed to the landowners who benefit and paid back over several years, so the amount owed rises while work is under way and falls later. We did not find the Municipality's own explanation.
Work on several drains finished in 2024 and the final bills had not yet been sent.
Questions you could ask
How much of the $2,117,672 has been billed to landowners, over how many years, and at what interest rate?
How are the drain projects approved in 2025 and 2026 being paid for until landowners repay?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
8council members for the October 26, 2026 election, per Council's February 4, 2026 decision; five are planned from 2030
On December 3, 2025 Council's own motion said it "has voted to reduce the size of Council" from eight to five members "effective for the 2026 Municipal Election", and asked the province to remove the Municipality from the strong-mayor list. On February 4, 2026 Council confirmed that "the existing council composition currently in force will remain in place for the 2026 municipal election" and that a five-member council would start with the 2030 election. On February 18, 2026 it passed by-law 2026/017 to that effect. The motion also told staff to "review internal governance processes and statutory deadline tracking". In August 2025 Council received a "Mayoral Direction" to start the 2026 budget process, under strong-mayor rules where the Mayor prepares the budget, and it defeated a motion to shorten the veto periods in those rules.
Why it matters
Candidates and voters need to know how many seats are on the ballot this fall. Strong-mayor powers change who writes the budget and who can veto changes to it.
It could be because…
A deadline for changing council size before the 2026 election may have passed, so Council moved the change to 2030. The February 4 motion mentions a review of "statutory deadline tracking".
Council may still be waiting for the province to answer its request about strong-mayor powers.
Questions you could ask
Why did the December 2025 motion say the smaller council would start in 2026, and what changed by February 2026?
Has the province answered the request to remove the Municipality from the strong-mayor list?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
"Whereas Council has voted to reduce the size of Council ... from the current eight (8) members to five (5) members, consisting of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and one councillor per ward, effective for the 2026 Municipal Election".
"That Council confirm that the existing council composition currently in force will remain in place for the 2026 municipal election; And that Council direct Administration to prepare and bring forward a by-law ... expressly providing that the amended council composition will take effect for the 2030 municipal election".
Council adopted "By-law 2026/017 Being a by-law to reduce the size of Council for the Corporation of the Municipality of Southwest Middlesex effective for the 2030 Municipal Election".
Council received "the Mayoral Direction issued to staff to initiate the 2026 budget process and begin preparation of the Mayor's budget". A motion to reduce the veto time periods in O. Reg. 530/22 was recorded "Defeated".
8 of 8members whose "#" meeting count in the 2024 pay report matches the 2023 report
The yearly statement of council pay has a "#" column beside each member's meeting pay. For all eight members the "#" figures in the 2024 report are identical to the 2023 report, while the meeting pay amounts changed. The 2024 report says it uses "SWM By-law # 2023/007, as amended for 2024 rates". If the column was carried over from the year before, readers cannot tell from the report how many meetings the 2024 pay covers.
Why it matters
Council pay is public so residents can check it. If the count is not what the pay is based on, the report does not let them check it.
It could be because…
The "#" column may be a standard count of regular meetings, while pay also covers special meetings and committee meetings that vary by member.
The 2024 rates were amended, and members may have been paid at different rates (for example for chairing committees).
The count may have been carried forward from 2023 by mistake while the amounts are right.
Questions you could ask
What does the "#" column count, and is the 2024 count the 2024 count or a copy of the 2023 count?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
2024 report: "#" column of 33.5 for the Mayor and for one councillor.
In 2019, Southwest Middlesex had $3.9M more in cash and money owed to it than it owed to others. By 2024 it was −$2.9M. About 73% of that change ($5.0M) is a new accounting rule from 2023: towns must now record the future cost of closing things like a landfill. That is not new spending or borrowing. Even leaving that out, only 24 of 73 similar towns are in a weaker position.
Southwest Middlesex went from having money in the bank to owing more than it has. What changed?
−$4.0M−$2.0M$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M
−$2.9M
201920202021202220232024
Show as a table
Year
Net financial position
2019
$3.9M
2020
$6.5M
2021
$4.5M
2022
$4,216
2023
−$2.0M
2024
−$2.9M
Why it matters
This number is one of the clearest signs of whether a town is living within its means. The accounting-rule part is a bill that will come due when the landfill closes, not money already spent. The rest is real borrowing and spending of savings.
It could be because…
A new accounting rule (asset retirement obligations, from 2023) added a large future cost to the books all at once.
Borrowing for a planned project, such as sewage lagoons, which is paid back over many years.
Questions you could ask
What is the plan and timeline for paying the landfill closing cost?
Without the accounting change, is the town's position getting better or worse?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
Southwest Middlesex spent about $422 per home on garbage, dump and recycling in 2024. The typical similar town spent $210. Only 4 of 73 similar towns spent more.
Why it matters
Spending more than neighbours is not wrong by itself. It might buy better service. But it is the first place to look for costs that could be lower, such as contracts that were not competitively bid.
It could be because…
Geography: more roads, more snow, a bigger area or a landfill of its own.
Accounting: some towns record the same cost in a different category.
A one-time cost in this year.
Questions you could ask
What makes this cost higher here than in similar towns?
When were the main contracts in this area last put out to competitive tender?
You can ask during the public part of a council meeting, by writing to the clerk, or by contacting your councillors. How to reach council.
Speak for Southwest Middlesex?Send us your answer and we will publish it with this question.
The evidence
Garbage, dump and recycling per home: Southwest Middlesex $422; typical similar town $210; ranked 5th highest of 74.
Can we count your visit? With your OK, we use Google Analytics to see which pages help people. It sets cookies and sends visit data to Google. Nothing loads unless you say yes. Privacy